Bitcoin Forum
September 15, 2024, 10:24:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 148 »
401  Economy / Speculation / Re: We're falling as of the auction? on: May 07, 2015, 06:58:16 PM
Take a look at this https://bitcoinaverage.com/#USD.
I'm actually using a ticker called "bitcoin checker" in my android device, it updated me every 2 minutes. You should take a chance to download it.

 
402  Economy / Speculation / Re: We're falling as of the auction? on: May 07, 2015, 06:38:47 PM
Look, bitcoin dropped another 10$ in these 2 months

The average seems to be back up to about 238 fortunately. I have a feeling it's going to drop back down to round about 225 again in about a few days time.
403  Other / Off-topic / Re: How long have you been logged in for? on: May 07, 2015, 06:32:48 PM
I see this thread hit 1000 replies
Pretty damn fine.
404  Economy / Speculation / Re: We're falling as of the auction? on: May 07, 2015, 06:31:00 PM
If the auctioned coins were dumped, we should be at lower levels than $245 now. According to CoinDesk, 3 parties won. I think the party who won 3000btc is the lowest of the winning bids and they are the only on ones most likely to be dumping. I think auction winners can make more profit by selling coins privately in bulk than dumping on exchanges.

Quote
The winnings were divided among the unnamed individuals, with the leading bidder claiming 27,000 BTC ($7.9m at press time). The remainder of the bitcoin was split among two individuals who took winnings of 20,000 BTC ($5.9m) and 3,000 BTC ($885,801), respectively.
http://www.coindesk.com/three-unnamed-bidders-win-latest-us-marshals-bitcoin-auction/

From about $300 to $237 in a matter of a few days is a pretty big drop. They would make a substantial profit if they sold it privately, but with the current prices, who would buy from private sellers? I'm sure their rate would be noticeably higher.

that 300 was a simply mini pump, not a correction in price or anything else, and i'm not surprised that the price returned to 230, which is the real floor, and i don't think they sold a large portion of those coins inside the market, otherwise the crash would have been bigger

300-230 was pure manipulation

hard to think 230 is the floor.  no good news incoming, and it seems like the potential for bad news, ie exchanges losing/stealing money & going under, scam sites stealing money, governments cracking down on btc use is creating a lot of downward pressure.

if it is not the floor, is a good wall indeed, because we are there since 3 months already, this make me think that the 230 value should hold strong enough

The price of 220-250 has hit a numerous amount of times. I think bitcoin will stay around what we're currently at now. Seems as if the true price of bitcoin is 230.
You know, seeing small dumps in the 10k's worth of bitcoins, I can only imagine what 100k bitcoins or a million would do. It would probably send us to the sub zero prices.

I'd assume we'd go no lower than around 60-70. The dumped coins won't stay there forever and the arbitrage should lift us up.
405  Other / Meta / Re: Someone hacked my account on: May 07, 2015, 06:20:19 PM
Just so you can earn some coin with small signature campaigns. And by the time you become a member your account will be recovered and you can then sell the member account.
Because the purpose of this forum is to use your signatures to make money.
406  Other / Meta / Re: Different SSL cert for bitcointalk.org (This Connection is Untrusted) on: May 07, 2015, 06:17:36 PM
I'm pretty sure theymos did reply. I have an email received from the forum saying he did. Probably deleted it. He said it was a
Quote
A reply has been posted to a topic you are watching by theymos.

View the reply at: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1053287.new;topicseen#new

Unsubscribe to this topic by clicking here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=notify;topic=1053287.0

The text of the reply is shown below:

That's a MITM by a Tor exit node
407  Economy / Securities / Re: 50% from SyncBit.IO BTC Network and 69BTC.com BTC Adult VideoChat for sale on: May 07, 2015, 03:53:35 PM
I'm trying to convince myself to invest. I took a brief look over the syncbit. It doesn't look as if you're taking this seriously. I'll agree with Chef on this one.


Can you argue,why is not a good investment bringing crypto world in one place for posts,chat,cam chat,for playing crypto games,for exchange for tipping each other with coins instead likes ?
Or is not a good investment because people cant be scammed there,or because is not an investment for profit in short time ?
In fact we are looking for investors for long time investment.

So we are looking for partners to join the team to finish the project :
PM us or contact us on contact@syncbit.io if you want to join the team.
You cab buy 1% at 0.58139535 BTC.

So how i said your replay didnt convinced me,posts like this i can make anywhere.
Can you argue ?

All I'm saying is, if you want to get an investor, you need to try harder. You need to show us a cash flow and a appropriate business model for what you're going to use the funds for. Right now, the site is designed very badly, look into improving it. It looks as if it was used with Word's WYSWIG editor and Paint for the back drops.

It is a good investment to bring "crypto world in one place for posts,chat,cam chat,for playing crypto games,for exchange for tipping each other with coins". It's not about the quick ROI.

All I'm asking is, is it a good investment with you?
408  Economy / Services / Re: (service request) unroot my galaxy s4 on: May 07, 2015, 01:16:22 PM
Please answer.

1) Which update file did you use to root?
2) Which update file did you use to unroot?
3) Are both of same type?

I'm currently helping him with this. He's out at the moment. We'll unroot his phone as soon as he gets back.
409  Economy / Securities / Re: 50% from SyncBit.IO BTC Network and 69BTC.com BTC Adult VideoChat for sale on: May 07, 2015, 12:19:51 PM
I'm trying to convince myself to invest. I took a brief look over the syncbit. It doesn't look as if you're taking this seriously. I'll agree with Chef on this one.
410  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: i got a strange payment today, i dunno what from. on: May 07, 2015, 12:06:02 PM
New form of marketing. They send you dust and they you go and search for the source of that dust. Very cheap and effective.

I do not know, if it is VERY effective indeed. If you know about the effect of "dust" in a account, it would most probably frustrate you more than being curious to investigate where it came from.

I doubt if I would support companies, who is spamming the blockchain and my Bitcoin address.

For it being "cheap"? ---> For sure it's cheap... but you pay for quality, and you get peanuts for this type of "blind" marketting. It's similar to these Ad spam bots... people hate it.  Angry 

It is most probably to be very effective and extremely cheap. There's a lot of people it can get to. Once the transaction confirms as well, it's there forever. So on famous addresses that gets thousands of views, like satoshi's first block.
411  Other / Meta / Re: Different SSL cert for bitcointalk.org (This Connection is Untrusted) on: May 07, 2015, 11:54:11 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1053184.0

That person there got it.  I haven't received any errors so far. I don't think it's the forum's fault since my certificate isn't showing to be the same.
412  Other / Meta / Re: Why Did Quickseller add this negative trust without any reason? on: May 07, 2015, 11:51:33 AM
Because you are puzzel.me

You both posted 1BtBqWDJ28o1pWYiqtX1oUcBKpU1d86XSC

you posted it in this thread. I am not even going to bother to post the bitcointalk post, the linked post is the archive so you can't change it. puzzle.me posted the same address here

I had blocked you from PM's because you kept spamming my inbox the last time you were exhibiting scammy behavior

edit: due to autocorrect, I actually said that you are an alt of puzzle.me, which the actual person you are an alt of is puzzel.me, however you spelled it correctly in the OP Roll Eyes

Oh c'mon, I am not the alt on Puzel.me. I don't know how come that address matches but I seriously am not his alt. This might have been done just because I left a negative feedback on his alt account (I know who Puzzel.me is personally) and he must be taking revenge. He asked me to remove that negative trust and I did remove it.
I confirm Deeprocks is my alt and have used it for a loan collateral too earlier which was held by MZ.
But I ain't Puzzel.me Is there any way I can prove that? I am ready to do as I know I am telling a truth and I will be able to do whatever you say Sad


Only people who own that address will post that address. There will be no one that have the same address because each address is unique. Person who posted the same address is ofcourse the same person.
You cant prove that you are not him because it is a solid evidence

Isnt theoretically possible for 2 different people to have the same bitcoin address? Or at least one that is so close that he might somehow mispell the last letter or number? Of course this would be really improbable but possible, right?

Addresses can be similar, but it's impossible from what I know for 2 exact addresses to be generated.
413  Economy / Marketplace / Re: I am lucky guy! Bitcoin made me rich! {bitcoin roulette experience} on: May 07, 2015, 11:50:03 AM
I have read about offline wallet but i am not comfortable for doing that, its too scary for me.

I would probably go for a direct bank withdrawal. 
Print out a paper wallet and keep it in your wallet. You should feel a bit more comfortable about that. Just don't store massive amounts on your online wallet.

yeah never stored big amount in wallet online , people will try to guessing hacking etc to get claim your adress
That's not the problem. Anyone can do that with sufficient malware installed on the victims computer. The biggest and the most troubling problem is the reliability of the company that's keeping your private keys.  They could pack up and go whenever they want to.

yeah as we know online wallet hold our private key , but if the online wallet like big company blockchain i think they will never run only for 100 bitcoin , is not worth.

With it's current price it's not worth it. But there are another couple hundred thousand people who use their service, they are holding a large sum of money. Although they seem reputable, you can't put your trust in an anonymous irreversible currency. They can still run off with it.  You did mention the possibility of being hacked. That is severe. Look at inputs.io
414  Economy / Marketplace / Re: I am lucky guy! Bitcoin made me rich! {bitcoin roulette experience} on: May 07, 2015, 11:30:31 AM
I have read about offline wallet but i am not comfortable for doing that, its too scary for me.

I would probably go for a direct bank withdrawal. 
Print out a paper wallet and keep it in your wallet. You should feel a bit more comfortable about that. Just don't store massive amounts on your online wallet.

yeah never stored big amount in wallet online , people will try to guessing hacking etc to get claim your adress
That's not the problem. Anyone can do that with sufficient malware installed on the victims computer. The biggest and the most troubling problem is the reliability of the company that's keeping your private keys.  They could pack up and go whenever they want to.
415  Economy / Marketplace / Re: GREAT IDEA FOR SALE on: May 07, 2015, 11:22:47 AM
If it's a great idea, patent it.  Once patented, look for an investor. You will not find your luck trolling here.
416  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Selling Keys Adobe on: May 07, 2015, 10:28:49 AM
You may want to use http://btc-priceimg.herokuapp.com/ for your BTC prices.

Thank your suggestions word for me.

My "suggestions word" said to tell you you're welcome?

I think he was meant to say "work"  instead of "word".
Do you have adobe premiere cc keys?
417  Other / Meta / Re: Why Did Quickseller add this negative trust without any reason? on: May 07, 2015, 09:54:02 AM


edit: due to autocorrect, I actually said that you are an alt of puzzle.me, which the actual person you are an alt of is puzzel.me, however you spelled it correctly in the OP Roll Eyes

This made my day, well done OP.
418  Economy / Marketplace / Re: I am lucky guy! Bitcoin made me rich! {bitcoin roulette experience} on: May 07, 2015, 09:49:34 AM
I have read about offline wallet but i am not comfortable for doing that, its too scary for me.

I would probably go for a direct bank withdrawal. 
Print out a paper wallet and keep it in your wallet. You should feel a bit more comfortable about that. Just don't store massive amounts on your online wallet.
419  Other / Meta / Re: Why Did Quickseller add this negative trust without any reason? on: May 07, 2015, 08:57:47 AM
Why did Quickseller add negative trust saying I am an alt of Puzzel.me? I don't even know what/who is puzzel.me?
You probably have the same tone, vocabulary as well as a similar posting style likes puzzle's. Talk it out here if he's blocked you. Don't rant about it and act immature.
420  Economy / Digital goods / Re: ●♦★██████ FREE BITCOIN SOFTWARES ██████★♦● on: May 07, 2015, 08:51:10 AM
What is this written in?  Java?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 148 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!