Is this only with timetravel?
its not happening in cryptonight, i have not tested other things (im using nicehash stratum for cryptonight) Try -D to get debug messages. Also try short form options and remove unnecessary ones just to
eliminate some variables.
running right now, will post results with -D Thanks. I find no way an algo can cause the program to exit. It either returns with a share or without, everything else is generic unless there's a crash. here is the output (ignore the weird symbols, have not used no colors option for logging) http://pastebin.com/rt8CA4W9at the bottom it exited and got restarted by my manager |
|
|
|
Is this only with timetravel?
its not happening in cryptonight, i have not tested other things (im using nicehash stratum for cryptonight) Try -D to get debug messages. Also try short form options and remove unnecessary ones just to
eliminate some variables.
running right now, will post results with -D |
|
|
|
i have 3 amd cpus on windows running cryptonight, i can test those if there is a bin (for the exit issue), with 3.5.3 they have been running for the last 21 hrs
as im not using timetravel and/or x11evo i cant test them right away, maybe someone gives a full commandline from their mining so i can test with their mining account data/worker
I can provide this win .bat: cpuminer-corei7.exe -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:3555 --algo="timetravel" --threads="4" --retry-pause="5" -u MHcS2Q24fk7dyyhyppToERgnfeEdKN2WcN -p c=MAC Maybe you can get the needed info This won't be v3.5.4 but it will provide another data point: 3rd AMD user using previous release. im running it as we speak, will see if 3.5.3 behaves the same i have used the exact same commandline edit: it also exited in 3.5.3 edit2: running the commandline without the thread and retry-pause params resulted in 54 accepted shares until it exited (i run it on a 8 core machine) |
|
|
|
|
many times i have read that pascal algo is basically sha256 with some minor modifications to prevent asic usage
so my question is: why not simply copy and modify the sha256 part in ccminer to fit the changes made and maybe adjust the stratum to some new specs for suprnova stratum (if there are any)?
im not an expert in those things, could someone clarify as it seems its not that simple or im missing something?
|
|
|
|
I will need to make a decision on releasing v3.5.4 based on the 2 reported problems.
1: x11evo all rejects
x11evo was broken in v3.5.3 so there is no regression. I have not been able to reproduce the problem
on a similar CPU. Unless this problem is bigger, seen by other users or if other algos are broken it
will not delay the release.
2. AMD CPUs exit after 50 submits
If this is a new problem in v3.5.4 it may affect the decision to release it. However, the
problem description is so unusual in that the symptoms indicate completely intentional
and normal behaviour by the program, but there is no code to make it behave like that.
It is notable it has been reported by 2 users. I don't have AMD CPUs to test with and can't
reproduce the problem on Intel. It is unlikely this will be resolved quickly. I will probably
proceed with the release unless new information points to a problem with the code.
i have 3 amd cpus on windows running cryptonight, i can test those if there is a bin (for the exit issue), with 3.5.3 they have been running for the last 21 hrs as im not using timetravel and/or x11evo i cant test them right away, maybe someone gives a full commandline from their mining so i can test with their mining account data/worker |
|
|
|
it would be nice to have another feature:
- show watt usage of rig
if i have the watt usage of the rig, how it could be supplied to be shown?
watt usage could be read out for eaxmple with the TP-LINK HS110 Smart Plug
whenever watt usage goes below a certain value i would like to restart the rig for example.
i have looked at something like this myself for my own rigs with my own monitoring solution the problem is: you might use different brand models, so you have the choice of either supporting only a single brand model/range of models or write adapters for the hundreds of products available i have looked around and found openhab (2) which does exactly this. One could integrate openhab into the monitor to query stats and execute commands, i have not done this yet as i do it in openhab itself (with rules) |
|
|
|
Sorry aber viel zu teuer dafür dass du mit den Karten gemined hast :/
Gruß,
ChekaZ
wenn du es sagst ich finde die Preise angemessen nichts für Ungut, aber die Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 6GB bekommen wir NEU bei Amazon -30% Gutscheine = 189 Euro HA, Ha, ha Hast du einen Link zu den 30% Gutscheinen? Oder meinst du lediglich die 30% günstigeren Gutscheine die hier im Forum angeboten werden? So oder so sind die 1060er eh fast alle weg, nur eine ist noch übrig |
|
|
|
Well thanks to both of you for living up to all of my expectations. I would have been very easy to suggest using another miner like cudaminer, which worked by the way. But i guess some people just can't resist shitting on other peoples threads. There are doctors and medications for obsessive disorders like that. I suggest you look into those options before making any more posts. Thanks.  its just that most people dont even bother to read the full op it was intended to get familiar with mining, not for profit suggesting to buy a decent card just to get familiar with mining is like suggesting to buy a new car to get familiar with driving, even though you have a crappy old car for free in your garage to learn about stuff i personally dont know any specific miner for sm 1.X, but im sure a very old version of ccminer or cudaminer will work, as you stated above it did apparently additionally i suggest using cpu mining to get familar too, its very similar to gpu mining but got a better support in recent miners |
|
|
|
Sorry aber viel zu teuer dafür dass du mit den Karten gemined hast :/
Gruß,
ChekaZ
wenn du es sagst ich finde die Preise angemessen |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
im looking for a list of open source devs that contributed to major opensource mining software
additionally a estimated % of total work done by the dev would be great
eg:
ccminer
- Epsylon (40%)
- alexis (20%)
- djm34 (40%)
cpuminer(-opt):
- Epsylon ...
- joblo
..
etc
reason for this is im looking into setting my miners up with a donation "fee" for continued OSS support, very much similar to "donate by mining", but automatic
maybe the list of devs in the "dbm" ann is sufficient? but what about the distribution?
ideally im starting a miner cmdline each day for x seconds per dev (or even a single fund?)
it wont be much, my "farm" is small, but its a start
any suggestions are welcome
cheers
|
|
|
|
|
you can do that, you just need a phone with a 150W GPU inside that produces 4+ TFlops
the average phone would probably last about 3sec with this kind of load and looking at the size of the "phone" its probably no phone anymore
sarcasm aside, current gen high end phones will produce hash, but at the price of the phone its not worth an investment, performance is obviously worse than desktop cpu mining even when utilizing the mgpu
|
|
|
|
now price will go down... i lose today 2000$ on trading with this shit coin it's worse than zec...
blame the coin, obviously! |
|
|
|
Hi, nice idea for the site, but I think it needs some rethinking on colors, font sizes, icons and filters  Here are my results: cards - 2 GPU GIGABYTE Radeon RX 480 G1 Gaming 8G hashrate - 1235 h/s mining software - Claymore AMD GPU miner 9.6 parameters - 1300-1340 MHz / 2250 MHz, -5% power limit (~220W) os - Windows 10 Pro, 64 bit I might suggest to add icons to OS, cards and maybe colors to the miners, plus TDP need to be wider so info takes 1 line. Plus dropdown filters could be nice and a search field must have  I would definetly decrease the white space on the first page, so more useful info is visible wo scrolling! I am seeing in Chrome. Good work! Just added your benchmark, dropdown filters are placed on the top of both tables (▲▼). thanks for your suggestions but keep in mind i like to keep things as simple as possible. btw, added link to XMR-Stak-Amd miner on tools section --> http://monerobechmarks.byethost5.com/tools.phpNah, drop down menu is like a menu where you select a country, for example. With this menu for GPU cards one can easily choose the model he needs, like all Radeon RX 480 and see all the data you have on them. Now what you have is a simple sorting A..Z, 1..9, but it does the job in the long search  Yes, you are right simple things attract, but they can also be smart. i think what you want is a filter |
|
|
|
I adding rigs as we speak.I get around 780mhash on the 1070 and 460mhash on the 1060 3gb. 24 rigs added so far I I find blocks I will add another 100 rigs. if you will not be able to find a block with 100 rig which is 500G then something is clearly wrong here... im interested as well in your findings, but im likely to just wait for the pool, as a small miner chances to find a block are getting lower and lower |
|
|
|
As KlausT mentioned, CUDA JSON-RPC issues are caused by Pascalproxyv2, it doesn't send "target" param to the miner. Now we need that shitty proxy source... or a completely new miner  Or if somebody has time he can read proxy console output and replace headeroutXX.txt with correct value for "target", currently it's 000000000 for every round... anyone can see the src, thats not the problem, just decompile the jar it takes about 10 sec to google how  edit: here it is http://pastebin.com/SrPkQRrQhttp://pastebin.com/0HPWetziSo then what? We is the problem then apparently no one knows how to fix it or has done it yet publicly, im not aware of any *fixed* proxy jar file i myself also dont know about how all this works, i can code basic stuff in java, but thats about it hopefully this all changes when ocminers pool is finished |
|
|
|
As KlausT mentioned, CUDA JSON-RPC issues are caused by Pascalproxyv2, it doesn't send "target" param to the miner. Now we need that shitty proxy source... or a completely new miner Or if somebody has time he can read proxy console output and replace headeroutXX.txt with correct value for "target", currently it's 000000000 for every round... anyone can see the src, thats not the problem, just decompile the jar it takes about 10 sec to google how edit: here it is http://pastebin.com/SrPkQRrQhttp://pastebin.com/0HPWetzi |
|
|
|
Great job with the benchmarks.
Things are looking up in the linux world, the new version of sgminer is tight, and works well enough under the various flavors of ubuntu 14.04lts (so far so good with xubuntu, although I wonder if mint 17.3 might be a tad better) and catalyst 15. I think that has potential to give new life to the less expensive cards on the list. It's easy enough to order a case of 480's off NewEgg, harder to find those bargains on ebay.
I picked up a bunch of 7850's with elpida ram for ~75 each on ebay. Building up an el-cheapo special rig. $75 per card. $20 MB. $12 HP server PSU (900 watts yowsa). $10 CPU. Fingers crossed my crappy $10 ram works. I dunno. 1.2 Kh/s for $472 is kinda cool, in a pathetic dorky linux sorta way. Well let's say $482 with a nifty wooden crate, cuz I'm not doing the milk crate thing. Gotta draw the line somewhere.
I dunno that linux is any faster. More tools in windows to fine tune the cards; with linux you gotta flash the rom (or not) and figure out the whole intensity/worksize/wathamacallit thing. (OGAG let the cat out of the bag the other day; r=c*w*4, where r is rawintensity, c is number of compute units, w is worksize. 4 if you're running 2 threads, 8 if you're running one. There's like 40 hours of my life I want back,) Main thing is, less overhead. Gotta match that with the right cards I think.
Not completely convinced the 7850 should be crowned the el cheapo king, but it's gotta be close
for me its either 7870/270X or 7950/7970/280/280X, got some off ebay for 40 and 60€, same idea here though i will re-purpose my existing nvidia rigs for these cards once i sold them (completely) |
|
|
|
why im getting just ~300 mhs with r9 290... same card getting ~330-350 on zec?
Omg srsly? Different algo..obviously you should read the first page before asking such question. i suppose he meant why he is getting such a ridiculous small amount of hash compared to other cards (a 7970/280X does 230-400 from what i have read), the equihash reference should likely tell us that this card usually does not underperform that much well i could also be wrong |
|
|
|
Sorry for delay yes the Version of KlausT works good. I found already one block within 2h of mining with the newer version.
also: are you sure its from nvidia cards? the mining proxy seems to generate invalid submissions on the current wallet (viewable via log) |
|
|
|
|
im not sure what the dictating resource is for PascalCoin Hashrates, can someone clarify?
Notes: multiple 7970/280X do 210-230MH/s each, and i got one 7870 from Sapphire which does 280MH/s, where does the extra hash come from?
on other algos like Equihash and Cryptnight the hashrates match (as in 7870<7970/280X), but here it seems different
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
