Vidis kako smo mi skromni ljudi! Vecina nas je odgovorila sa 1-5.
Naravno da u ovom slucaju vredi 'vise je bolje' ali iskreno sa 5 BTC bi moga da napravim sve sto trenutno zelim. Malo sredim kucu, promenim auto a jedan deo ulozim u biznis. Jos bi mi ostalo i za crne dane... 

Ako se ne varam theymos je negde napisao da ne zeli novu verziju SMF zbog svih modifikacija koje je ugradio (verovatno direktno u source code). To se verovatno odnosi na ranking, trust i merit sisteme i na razna ogranicenja u odredjenim sekcijama. Sto se tice novog softvera, odlucili su se na open source da bi zajednica preuzela dio zadataka oko trazenja i resavanja bug-ova. Samo sto je to dvosekli mac, jer ako se u open source kodu pronadje niki bug bit ce izlozeni napadima hakera ako se ne zakrpa na vreme. Tu sad ne svatam zasto nisu pruzeli neko stabilno open source resenje i samo dodali potrebne izmene i modifikacije. Sigurno bi ih to kostalo manje para a imali bi puno vecu zajednicu programera koji rade na otkrivanju i resavanju gresaka. 

I have already seen several similar complaints for Coinbase. It is strange to me that there is no clear communication on their part if the 7 days waiting period is 'new normal'.

In any case, the best way is to communicate things like this with their support.

Yes, that's what I meant. Probably wrong choice of words on my part...


These images reveal a little more detail. We can now assume with some certainty that they were taken in New York. Maybe someone can recognize the exact location?

Socialism might be a major feature of a prosperous future enriched by high technology and artificial intelligence. If the system can afford a basic income for all citizens, then we can consider it much more socialist than it is today. But, the future will most likely continue to be a mixture of capitalist and socialist systems as it is today.

The latter at least looks like the original. I don't see any signs of manipulation.

From their bounty thread, link to whitepaper: https://tradetokennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Whitepaper.pdf
Archive: https://archive.is/15pO7

Yet, they continue to argue that it is not 'correct' whitepapper. I can't believe how stupid some people can be. 

Mislim da nema koristi dust attackati na menjacnice. Takvi coini se pomesaju sa coinima drugih korisnika jer su na istom walletu i ne dolazi u obzir da te napadac otkrije na takav nacin. Samo ako napadac ima insajderske podatke od menjacnice ali u tom slucaju mu dust attack nije niti potreban... Ja se ne bih brinuo oko toga.


Eh, da. Zato ni necu da koristim socijalne mreze za nesto vazno.

Well, that's wrong at so many different levels.  

Btw, from that same thread, the guy before him likes carrots. I never considered carrots a fruit ... I learn something new every day.

Nikada mi nije bilo potpuno jasno koja je svrha tih dust attack-ova? Posalju sitne iznose na veliki broj adresa. I sto onda? Zagusuju mrezu poput DDoS napada? Ili nesto drugo?

So you've published an incorrect whitepaper on your own website? LOL

tradetoken wp: https://tradetokennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Whitepaper.pdf
archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20200825005257/https://tradetokennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Whitepaper.pdf

original: https://coinpaprika.com/storage/cdn/whitepapers/8477201.pdf




From what I can see, your 'incorrect' whitepaper is still up there, and still without any references to the original source. As noorman0 pointed out, you copied whole chunks of text from EVIMERIA's whitepaper, it wasn't just paraphrasing, it was almost verbatim (you just changed the title of that paragraph). This is a perfect example of your laziness and inability to write a few sentences about fundamental things like Blockchain.

So, are you now going to 'sack' your content creator too? Who's next? 


By the way, learn how to quote properly.

Ili jednostavnije lock na temu do proglasenja pobednika...
 

Damn it, @YOSHIE you beat me to it!  But luckily, you missed a few.  

8. Realbox06 - BPIP (Banned)

9. Rashedhasan - BPIP (Inactive)

10. BlackSparr0w - BPIP (Inactive)

11. BoyPower - BPIP (Active Banned)

Proof:







surce (locked topic): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4949023.msg44665218#msg44665218


surce (locked topic): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4972611.msg44992439#msg44992439




Related information:

There is a lot more evidence but I think this is enough.

Care to share their bitcointalk profiles with us? Surely they are respectable members of this community, aren't they?


By stealing someone else's intellectual property and lying to potential customers? Obviously we have a very different understanding of the term 'honesty' ...


Yeah, but what if they're just trying to scam us?

Well, it's actually a cool idea. Let's tokenize that and run ICO / IEO! 

In addition, we have this on the archimedex domain just three days before airdrop:
source: archimedex.net

There should be an alleged eucledium wallet... LOL

I may be wrong, but, frankly, I doubt it. There has never been any 'content writer' that's just their excuse for this train wreck. Nobody in their right mind would publish such an important document for any serious project without prior double-checking (and triple-checking). They say they have never even heard of the PECUNIO project before but, at the same time, claim that their project is 'completely different and unique'. How can anyone claim something like that if they haven't previously researched similar projects? And it just so happens that the whitepaper matches another project in over 60% of the content? Come on, give me a break!


Yeah! This makes them unique. And the funny thing is that there isn't even a mention of the legal aspects of their company.

Prvo ce jos malo da padne (tako da 6.9. bude oko $10000) a nakon toga ce opet da se digne!

- Vidoviti Milan

'That page doesn't exist'

Let's give this another shot. 

Looking at both documents, I noticed a large amount of copied/pasted text. How did you come to the conclusion that it was only 8 pages? Even the table of contents is almost identical.  Did you even look at the original document and compare it to your own?

In any case, plagiarism in itself, regardless of quantity, is a pretty big omission and very bad for any project. Whitepaper is the backbone of the project and should not be taken lightly.

---

By the way, a great relationship with potential customers. I admire your communication skills.