I just added a new LP system and a slice scheduler similar to flowers. New lp is on by default. Scheduler uses --scheduler SliceScheduler
wow, nice man, eh the LP stuff in beta-testing I guess, my production serv. wouldn't be very grateful if I mess up with it again edit: testing in progress... just joking about the server |
|
|
|
How to completely disable the status page?
Um I can add an option I guess. Or just delete all of the stuff in bitSite's getchild besides return self.
I just finished reworking LP to poll all servers. I'm not sure if I should release it yet however as well all the testing I have done is with sending works and I'm waiting to see how it works when it receives an LP response.
Then its slicing time as that appears to be really needed. And its the oldest issue.
I think you should really add the work ryo did to your version, from my testing the dynamic penality system is working out alot more profitable. It just makes it easier to move on with latest updates you make since ryo's version is pretty much done afaik and he is only updating it from time to time with few changes you make in the master version thus it would be less time wasting if we could put his fork into master version. Correct me if I'm wrong but what c00w tries to do here with LP has nothing in common with ryo's penalty and slicing from flower altough it would be nice to have it all in one package  |
|
|
|
|
Someone will surely have one with your name on it
btw, I liked you intro to the forum hehe
|
|
|
|
your statement just reinforce my belief that hopping pools is actually a search for better eff. on the miner side
As opposed to? ...as opposed to any pool operator sustaining that prop. is the most profitable for miners, thus better eff. on long term. Any educated person would realize that submitting shares after a certain point in a prop. pool would make him lose money, energy or efficiency, whatever you want to call it. |
|
|
|
|
your statement just reinforce my belief that hopping pools is actually a search for better eff. on the miner side
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get it, there are 2 mixed pools or the upper is prop and the other is pps ?
|
|
|
|
@burp nice feature, exactly what was needed man you feel like making a git pull request ?  I don't have a github account, and for such small patches I don't think I need to fork the project. Anyone is welcome to just include the patch. hehe in just a moment (pro copy-paster) Your code is public domain or give rights to c00w ? |
|
|
|
@burp nice feature, exactly what was needed man you feel like making a git pull request ? |
|
|
|
seem like bmunion's owner doesn't like the "attention" he's getting  |
|
|
|
|
@sukrim would you mind coding some "removefromlist" filter if username and pass is not found in user.cfg for a certain pool ?
I just removed accidentally some pool credentials and was getting parse error not knowing why. Thanks
|
|
|
|
so what does this individual miner status show? do the arthor mean per pool? or is there a flexable mining proxy like feature that's built in already. also what information should you connect to the hopper by? e.g. the username and password ah ok, connect putting any username (ex: x) and any pass (ex: y) edit: you will have to provide usernames and passwords for every pool in "user.cfg" i don't understand the "individual miner" part though |
|
|
|
Me he leído las políticas y básicamente lo que dicen es que no se use sus servicios en actividades ilegales y juegos de azar, la venta de camisetas no entra dentro de sus prohibiciones. de acuerdo contigo pero... , hay un pero, a primeras no voy a utilizar un servicio que se preocupa por el uso que le voy a dar a mi dinero imponiendome su legislación local y basicamente no me presenta ninguna muestra de confianza, mi opinion claro. edit: servicios escrow en google |
|
|
|
* Individual Miner Stats. Based on username The lack individual miner tracking has been putting me off from using this hopper, now I see this feature, I have a few questions. how are the user name determined? do you connect to localhost:8337 using any username and password? thanks. you can use bitcoin-mining-proxy in between miner and hopper proxy for that purpose |
|
|
|
................................................................... Absolutely perfect! I would have never been able to figure that one out. Thanks. I've created a fork on github. Everybody check out my new stats layout / color scheme. (I also changed and capitalized the pool names in the pool.cfg and user.cfg.default, so just replace those files if you don't want to deal with that.) https://github.com/macboy80/bitHopperEDIT: Just updated to comment out disabled pools in pool.cfg and user.cfg.default (Removes disabled pools from the stats) index.html should copy over to latest c00w build without any changes make a pull request pls, would love to have that |
|
|
|
Im not into poolhopping to get anyone to fix prop or whatever pay methods. I like the extra payouts, I would prefer everyone to shhhh and just let this keep going  That said, out of the entire network hashrate I could count perhaps 150-200gh of hopping power. that is less 1.5% of the total network, no way we are making a dent at all. +1 |
|
|
|
|
thanks djex, I was not putting all my attention into this, working now
|
|
|
|
|
@djex
ok, I'm into it
edit: it's working for you ? I don't have that much skills to make it work here
|
|
|
|
man you have a stubborn hopper there paste output of this command: aptitude show python-twisted |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
