|
I've released my lyra2re miner sources, see my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I've released my lyra2re miner sources, see my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I've released my lyra2re miner sources, see my signature.
|
|
|
|
So here it is, the full miner sources. It includes a modified sgminer based on the djm34 version and my opencl files (some are slightly enhanced, some are heavily modified). The kernel is not compatible with stock sgminer: contrary to what is usually done on multi algo kernels, I've made this one monolitic (instead of the original split version). https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40353042/sgminer-lyra2re.zipIf you feel you can donate to: 1H7qC5uHuGX2d5s9Kuw3k7Wm7xMQzL16SNOr just mine a bit with the provided example.bat which loads lyra2re.confMany thanks and have fun! |
|
|
|
Hmm... $ strings ./quarkcoinTahitigw64l4ku0.bin |less |grep -i opencl readelf -aW kinda nicer. |
|
|
|
if people still interested I'll release the miner sources.
What sort of hash are you getting? see the first lines of the OP. |
|
|
|
|
if people still interested I'll release the miner sources.
|
|
|
|
Is that just new bin files for sgminer or complete new miner?
qubit and quark kernels not compatible with stock sgminer. |
|
|
|
why was the supposedly optimized quark and qubit sgminer post removed?
was it a trojan or a wolf0's leak?
The author still distributes them via PM at original Russian forum  алго/ск-ть вольфа/ск-ть/потребление компа с 1 картой, Вт/увеличение потребления на 1 карту, Вт
х11/5900/7400/310/10
х13/4600/5700/310/5
qubit/5300/12500/285/35
quark/3000/12900/315/65
(algo/Wolf's speed/speed/Watt/Watt delta) is there a linux build? :-) kernels have been split and parameters changed so you can't just copy the bins over... :-/ 310 watt is alot. Is this on the 290x? The public binaries of the Wolf0 does 10MHASH@x11 and 7MHASH@x13 on the 290x overclocked. The numbers posted for this was on a 280x, they only had bins for x11/x13/quark/qubit on Pitcairn and Tahiti. Nothing for 290's they say you can use the tahiti binary on hawaii. |
|
|
|
why was the supposedly optimized quark and qubit sgminer post removed?
was it a trojan or a wolf0's leak?
The author still distributes them via PM at original Russian forum алго/ск-ть вольфа/ск-ть/потребление компа с 1 картой, Вт/увеличение потребления на 1 карту, Вт
х11/5900/7400/310/10
х13/4600/5700/310/5
qubit/5300/12500/285/35
quark/3000/12900/315/65
(algo/Wolf's speed/speed/Watt/Watt delta) is there a linux build? :-) kernels have been split and parameters changed so you can't just copy the bins over... :-/ |
|
|
|
|
why was the supposedly optimized quark and qubit sgminer post removed?
was it a trojan or a wolf0's leak?
|
|
|
|
So, if the electricity costs will be much lower than with GPU, the price of vnl will not go higher, than it's now (during GPU minning). Am I right?
Impossible to predict, maybe something else will change the market. So what's a point to allow FPGA's minning VNL? A lower electric bill. that will not happen. difficulty will go up until it's barely profitable to mine with fpga, or even higher. that's how it works: if there is money to be made, people will come and mine, until difficulty is so high that someone must leave. it balances itself. Maybe the point is to secure the network. No, the point is probably that the only people who can mine anything profitably with GPUs are farms that pay an extremely low subsidized price per kwh (or use subsidized solar panels). So, let's move this coin to FPGA farms :-D Or... They may be mining it already.... The only purpose is being ahead of them for some days. |
|
|
|
So, if the electricity costs will be much lower than with GPU, the price of vnl will not go higher, than it's now (during GPU minning). Am I right?
Impossible to predict, maybe something else will change the market. So what's a point to allow FPGA's minning VNL? A lower electric bill. that will not happen. difficulty will go up until it's barely profitable to mine with fpga, or even higher. that's how it works: if there is money to be made, people will come and mine, until difficulty is so high that someone must leave. it balances itself. |
|
|
|
Yaamp, do you have any plans for the fhirlpoolx algorithm, and what is the situation with the groestl?
Thank you!
hello, i dont think we'll add whirlpoolx or zr5 soon as they changed the regular rpc api quite a lot. but groestl is just a matter of testing it. none of my installed miners software support groestl. we'll be looking at it. Just remember that, while groestlcoin and diamond use the same hashing algorythm, they use a different transaction hash. It doesn't matter if you use getwork but it matters if you use stratum. See this message and related posts on the same thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg6731722;topicseen#msg6731722 |
|
|
|
nice work poloniex!
Yeah nice work telling me to withdraw it immediately, which I already did. poloniex told you that? |
|
|
|
|
they converted my leftover as well, nice work poloniex!
unfortunately it's just too little to trade or move anywhere ;-)
|
|
|
|
-.... (Merkle Trees)
The Greek finance minister will not allow CC in Greece ... With that name of a tree  Sorry, couldn't resist ... hehe but merkle trees are in all coins, including bitcoin ;-) |
|
|
|
Hey guys, sorry for the delay on this but I have finally got some good news in relation to the Explorer as well as a few new features for Gridcoin Research. I've now added a new dedicated Gridcoin Research page on CryptoBlox that provides you with a new and improved Block Explorer, Richlist, Faucet, Links, Stats and Specs, and more. It's an early release and there is still much more work to go into it, but the explorer, richlist and faucet are now live. Have a look and let me know what you think. http://www.cryptoblox.com/coins/GridcoinResearch/Cheers, CryptoBlox BX not working? looks like it's still broken :-( |
|
|
|
|
how are you going to implement the developer fee? time based pool switch?
|
|
|
|
Anything that's profitable, there will be huge farms on - you can make a PoW or pick one, it hardly makes much of a difference.
Thanks for your reply. But some algorithms, like Fresh or Groestl, are less popular. Yet more energy efficient. Also no multipools on them. Perhaps some other like these exist? Quark? I think that using less popular algo will improve the evenness of distribution. I think it's the opposite: less popular = more chance of someone optimizing it badly and getting all the coins. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
