Check out this ANN thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2778477.0One of the campaign rules are. Bumping the ann thread is not required, but appreciated. Manager and Team save the rights to increase or change any rules, payment structure and anything else if necessary.[/size][/center]
So secretly,the campaign manager wants the participants to bump the ANN when such ANN bumping is strictly prohibited on bitcointalk.I honestly think,the campaign manager and all the participants who agree to comply with that rule should be tagged. You should look for, and provide, examples of *obvious* bumping of the ANN thread. I am strongly inclined to tag said person; said evidence would then make it trivial. @Lauda ,since we are on-topic.I got one more case which needs your judgement.
You can post them all here, sure.
|
|
|
You may not want to draw attention to yourself once you received untrusted feedback. This may, and will, attract DT members whose feedback has a direct effect on your account.
|
|
|
I am not kissing anyone's ass . I am requesting Lauda to lift my negative trust which I got because of ignorance.
Everyone makes mistakes. Remind me again once my rating gets lifted for my, well intended, but utter misjudgment. Seems fair to me.
|
|
|
Ok. That is just great. You just copied the same rating and pasted it on my profile. Thank You, I guess.
I think I am the person cat who literally wrote that first, exact, message. I recommend others to use it as it makes it easy to remain consistent.
|
|
|
Time isnt far when Ill get a message from Lauda asking money to remove the neg trust, another indirect extortion attempt from another no life internet bully.
Yep, your rating is now permanent for the trust farming and defamatory bullshit. I already blocked you yesterday.
Disclaimer: I have never, and will never, ask anyone for funds to change a negative trust rating. If someone receives such a message, it may be spoofed or I may be compromised 1. [1] Tag and notify DT members immediately in this, unlikely, case.
|
|
|
And today when I tried to send a request again, I found he blocked me from messaging him on the forum.
That was a personal recommendation that I had given him earlier.
|
|
|
2. MiaBTC - FREE Bitcoin Transaction Accelerator - https://archive.fo/G5pJlNot sure why my negative score there..I do this for free..not even mentioned any wallet of my wallet as I am strongly against any fake paid service. I am new to this forum and victim of confirmtx ..As I felt this service should be free I started this.. Request you all to reconsider this. You don't describe the method used, nor can I know whether you ask for donations via other communication channels (presumably the one mentioned in the thread).
|
|
|
I mean, who doesn't want to get dozens of PMs from hundreds of potential scammers asking if it's OK to do a certain thing on the forum...
![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I'm putting all of these PM spammers on ignore. There are legitimate requests regarding scammers that need to be tagged, which get drowned by their useless whining. If they want to *make a case* against the rating, they should appeal in the thread which led to it or create on in the Reputation section. All those who make threads in Meta just confirm that their rating is warranted.
|
|
|
..something that i am not aware that is illegal...
Ignorantia juris non excusat. Also, it has nothing to do with legality but rather trustworthiness.
|
|
|
Hey SFR10 , you've included me here even though my thread was closed at the time you posted this list.
Seems legit! ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FQN6kZMR.png&t=663&c=98gfSl8NgMIJHA) It was closed sometime after January the 10th apparently (or at least, if you consider the last edit the time of closure). However, he edited it again after the good detective work of SFR10 in order to cover up information.
|
|
|
My question is what does one need to do to have the trust removed?
Depends on what exactly you did. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Is there a probation period, are trend I can go read to get clarification?
No. I have tried to go through the forum but i cant find anything substantial.
Trust ratings are not really a matter of the forum (Meta), but rather Reputation section. These get left independently by forum users.
|
|
|
He may need to revise some of his stuff sent prior to his promotion, but that is normal and is going to take some time. I think the admin of the forum should note this abuse of trust system by him and Remove his DT power back.
No. Other DT members like Lunda / Yahoo etc are doing good job and only giving Negative feedback to the bad people but the "The Pharmacist" is just lol....
What makes you think I don't agree with him tagging shitposting monkeys? Just because I haven't given the same rating to someone, that doesn't mean that I disagree with the sent ones.
|
|
|
We have 1 Member and 1 Senior member slot now open. Anyone who applies with a non Segwit address (i.e. hasn't read anything before applying) will be instantly SMAS blacklisted.
![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I see some arm twisting is doing some good in the forum. Hahaha. I wish they will also take the time and read about Segwit too. Plus the politics behind Bitcoin Cash and 2X, and also the history all the way back when Gavin Andresen started the Bitcoin XT coup. While it would be quite optimal for them to read about all of the coup 'de etat attempts and understand what was/is going on, that would be pushing it. The reason for which I made that rule is: a) Helps increase Segwit adoption. b) Helps with network congestion. c) This campaign does not need mindless, highly ignorant, people. If you have not heard the basics behind Segwit yet, you're doing something wrong.
|
|
|
and Lauda yes yes im talking on Lauda ask me to send him child porn (12-14 years max he insist) he ask porn when father fuck his little child. When i refuse to give her service she tag my account negative. That is just.. disgusting. ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) I'm not saying he's perfect and I might not agree with everything he does.
* Lauda gets a traumatic nightmare induced by Q1 2017. ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif)
|
|
|
I am holding some 1 BTC from 2015. I have not claimed with byteball distribution.
If you haven't signed up for the aidrop, you won't get any bytes. This thread is pure nonsense.
|
|
|
I legitimately did a CTRL + F and couldn't find the user. Weird. Anyhow, negative removed.
|
|
|
As always there are exceptions,
Correct. here there is a case of one, called rosccy, he did mention which all accelerators he uses and he didn't mention anything about the tips so, are you sure on the negative rating? Had asked some users when I made the list and they didn't find anything scammy or tricky behavior to steal people's funds for nothing. Just asking.
I don't see 'rosccy' in the above list?
|
|
|
You cannot just put a negative trust on my profile telling me that it would be a waste of time to edit it.
I can write you a new, very personal, negative trust rating if that helps. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
|
You're a cute little monkey. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fe0vHz2x.gif&t=663&c=wwo_cjomXp8HFA) How badly are you butthurt?
Obviously, this thread was solely created due to his butthurt.
|
|
|
Very obvious one with: Need to ask questions, answer for questions etc
Tagged.
|
|
|
|