Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 04:00:26 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 [209] 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 ... 397 »
4161  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Brainwallet recovery problem on: December 24, 2012, 01:12:40 AM

Note: I strongly advise against using brainwallet.org.


I've not used it, but can I ask why?

I suppose it is a very efficient method for collecting private keys

Load the page, yank the ethernet cord (or disable wireless), then use it.  Everything is done client side in javascript, and I don't see any network code that could potentially upload it, but disconnecting will make sure.

At that point, as long as write down your passphrase, address, and settings; close the page; and clear the browser cache you should be good to go.  I would probably also save a copy of the html and js (or dig through it better to understand what kind of hashing it uses to turn your passphrase into a private key) just in case the site disappears one day.
4162  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: If LTC is a pump & dump and is to collapse BTC is too. on: December 24, 2012, 01:00:46 AM
Network effect.

An ebay clone doesn't have the same potential as ebay.  
A BTC clone doesn't have the same potential as BTC.

It doesn't work that way.


FTFY
4163  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 24, 2012, 12:58:38 AM
Howabout the GOLD/SILVER RATIO

http://www.kitco.com/Gold_Silver_Ratio_Charts/gold-silver-ratio-charts.html
4164  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 24, 2012, 12:56:07 AM
Lol fair is not backing down on what he claimed that silver will do. He said physical silver price will go down below $10 for 1 oz of bullion. So we are talking in today's dollars as they exist backed by the bullshit faith and credit of the united states govt.

So S0302 what is it going to be? Care to define physical silver price? I have and I've called you out. Put up or shut up.

Thanks

Your terms have nothing to do with his claim about silver though.  It adds extra risk to his side of the bet and if he doesn't take the bet I won't blame him or doubt his resolve about what will happen to silver prices.  If you simply agreed to cancel the bet in such an event then the bet would focus on silver prices instead of dollar fundamentals, but since you don't want to agree to a fair bet I can only assume that you are trying to back out by making the terms unreasonable.

Notme stay out of it. He made the call and bet about PHYSICAL silver prices. If he backed himself into a corner that's not my problem. Fair isn't decided by you. If he made an unreasonable call about physical silver prices then that's his problem. I have called him out. Waiting for confirmation From him.

Except your terms make the bet not about his claim.

Oh, and I'm allowed to post what I want as long as I follow the guidelines.  He's not in a corner, but you are sure acting like you are.  I'm sure he will respond in time, but while we wait I'm going to keep pestering you as long as you insist on acting like a big man.


Say what you want. The facts are in this thread quoted. I just quoted his bet. I'm asking for clarification of the term physical silver.  How is the unfair to ask him to clarify the terms? Get a fucking life lol. I'm not doing anything dishonest.

You're making the bet about dollar fundamentals with your ridiculous "if the dollars fundamentals change I win".  I'm not saying he won't still take the bet, and maybe if you had a lick of patience you could wait for what he said.  However, as your ignore button indicates, it is way too easy to excite you and get you to act like the dick you are.  As you know from our past, this is something I enjoy doing.  Not normally, but I make an exception for you Wink.  Now don't you feel special?

I have no problem with you asking for clarification on the definition of physical price.  In fact, I'm interested to see his response.  But why not keep the bet about silver and not about the dollar?
4165  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Brainwallet recovery problem on: December 24, 2012, 12:47:56 AM

Note: I strongly advise against using brainwallet.org.


I've not used it, but can I ask why?
4166  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 24, 2012, 12:42:23 AM
Lol fair is not backing down on what he claimed that silver will do. He said physical silver price will go down below $10 for 1 oz of bullion. So we are talking in today's dollars as they exist backed by the bullshit faith and credit of the united states govt.

So S0302 what is it going to be? Care to define physical silver price? I have and I've called you out. Put up or shut up.

Thanks

Your terms have nothing to do with his claim about silver though.  It adds extra risk to his side of the bet and if he doesn't take the bet I won't blame him or doubt his resolve about what will happen to silver prices.  If you simply agreed to cancel the bet in such an event then the bet would focus on silver prices instead of dollar fundamentals, but since you don't want to agree to a fair bet I can only assume that you are trying to back out by making the terms unreasonable.

Notme stay out of it. He made the call and bet about PHYSICAL silver prices. If he backed himself into a corner that's not my problem. Fair isn't decided by you. If he made an unreasonable call about physical silver prices then that's his problem. I have called him out. Waiting for confirmation From him.

Except your terms make the bet not about his claim.

Oh, and I'm allowed to post what I want as long as I follow the guidelines.  He's not in a corner, but you are sure acting like you are.  I'm sure he will respond in time, but while we wait I'm going to keep pestering you as long as you insist on acting like a big man.
4167  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 24, 2012, 12:22:45 AM
Lol fair is not backing down on what he claimed that silver will do. He said physical silver price will go down below $10 for 1 oz of bullion. So we are talking in today's dollars as they exist backed by the bullshit faith and credit of the united states govt.

So S0302 what is it going to be? Care to define physical silver price? I have and I've called you out. Put up or shut up.

Thanks

Your terms have nothing to do with his claim about silver though.  It adds extra risk to his side of the bet and if he doesn't take the bet I won't blame him or doubt his resolve about what will happen to silver prices.  If you simply agreed to cancel the bet in such an event then the bet would focus on silver prices instead of dollar fundamentals, but since you don't want to agree to a fair bet I can only assume that you are trying to back out by making the terms unreasonable.
4168  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Brainwallet recovery problem on: December 23, 2012, 09:16:35 PM
Thanks all for your recommendations.

Do I need to try using the private key it generates every time or is my understanding correct that if I put the passphrase in correctly the same address I paid the bitcoin to will appear?  Also, if I am unsure whether or not I clicked on the Uncompressed/Compressed buttons I'm guessing I need to try both for each variation on the passphrase?

At the moment I'm using string manipulation in Excel to give me all the possible combinations for the 11 most likely errors I made which I will cut and paste one at a time into the brainwallet.org generator.  Any ideas as to how I could speed up this process?


This may well turn out to be a long-term project but with the amount on there if I manage it it will have been worth it!

I know what I did deserves a load of replies calling me a dipstick so I really do appreciate your trying to help me out and recover from this one.

Edit:  Thinking about it, I think the question regarding the address is:  Could the brainwallet.org generator be producing a different publik key (address) associated with the same private key (wallet)?  Because if it can then as I understand it I really do need to test each private key generated and not depend on recognising the address I initially used.  Am I right?

You only need to check the address matches.  Compressed/Uncompressed changes the address, so you will need to try both.
If you have even basic programming skills it shouldn't be too hard to hack something together using something like https://github.com/jnicklas/capybara
4169  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Poll for gun control activists: on: December 23, 2012, 08:46:33 PM
I notice your list of places neglects rural farming communities (outside of even the small towns, just a few hundred people per square mile).  This is where I live, and out here not only do we use guns to harvest much of our food, we use them to keep vermin under control (they will eat the crops, groundhog holes have killed at least one person I knew and injured many others when their tractor rolls).  The problem isn't guns, it's the way you psycho flatlanders live.  I would go crazy too if I had to be stacked hundreds of feet high without a single piece of grass or a tree to my name.  No thanks, I'll stay in the hills please.  And I'll keep my guns.

I recommend you go on a travel binge for a few years and then try to paint the picture. Clearly you have not spent time in Tokyo, for example. People are "stacked up", and there's not much grass, but typically you can walk around in the middle of the night, and only good or interesting things will happen to you. At this moment, Moscow or L.A. - not so much.

Consider these per-capita rates of violent crimes in Canada:

Quebec 756/100,000
Ontario 756/100,000

Manitoba 1,598/100,000
Saskatchewan 2,039/100,000
Yukon 3,007/100,000
NWT 6,448/100,000

Had you ever spent time in these places, you would have noticed that reality is exactly opposite of what you claim: more urbanized and densely populated areas have generally lower incidence of violent crimes. I don't say that there is a casual relationship, but obviously your claim of rural communities being less violent is false.



Well I can walk around just fine in my community without problems.  I do not generally carry a firearm unless I'm hunting.  Obviously your claim that rural communities are violent is false.

Also, the Quebec and Ontario regions are distinctly different cultural populations from the rest of Canada.  Try again.

Oh, and I have spent time in Saskatchewan, Yukon, NWT, and Northern BC.  I never experienced or even saw an act of violent crime.  Too bad it's only your experience that matters Wink.

Finally, these regions have very large transitory population of oil workers.  Not only are these not the most civilized people, depending on how they calculated their statistics (tough to say since you didn't provide a reference), they might only be counting crimes per citizen.  If this is the case, it would easily explain the discrepancy since permanent residents are few and far between.
4170  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 23, 2012, 08:33:53 PM
Silver is money. Our constitution in the USA says it and many many societies through history used it as money. I'm. It saying that it will be the choice for most transactions. What I am saying is that it is a store of value. S0302 or whatever his name is is wrong that the physical price will fall far. In 2008 when silver went below $10 in the paper market the physical price for say silver eagles was over $35 on eBay. Physical price is determine by real people selling at their price and not the paper manipulated price by jp Morgan etc.

lets stop arguing and bet - if you are so sure. I bet that physical silver prices will fall below 10 $ before 31st Dec 2016

Ok lets come up with some stakes: If you loose you would have to stop highlighting your posts in blue color. I'm open for suggestions on what the counter stake should be.

sorry, but I love blue...

I am happy to accept the bet. I bet 10 BTC that Silver will have moved below 10 $ at least once intraday before Dec 31, 2016


1. Your bet is pathetic in size. Let's up it.
2. You still haven't defined the physical silver price and what that means. No comex or paper silver etc.
3. Physical price to me is what you can buy silver bullion 1oz coins from dealers who are delivering and not storing it for you. We could even use an average of craigslist prices on that day to determine a fair physical price.
4. We are talking about US dollars today as they exist today. No modified US dollar currency where it is backed by something physical or any new US dollar period. Meaning if the dollar gets changed from now until then you lose the bet because you won't be able to gauge the value if it is not being used anymore.

How is 4 fair?

Shouldn't you just agree to cancel the bet of the dollar is fundamentally changed?
4171  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: DoS attack against the entire Bitcoin network ? on: December 23, 2012, 08:30:18 PM
This was possible but now many miners require fees for transactions whose inputs are the output of another recent transaction.  Essentially, if you don't let your coins sit for a day or two you will have to pay a fee.  If you have to pay a fee, you can only "attack" for so long because every transaction costs you a penny or so.   Additionally, the larger the transaction (in KB) the higher the fee that will be required.
Paying a fee is hard coded no matter if you have the oldest coins.

Not true.  Many transactions will accepted by nearly all miners without a fee if they are small and the inputs are old enough.
4172  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Integer or float used in Bitcoin? on: December 23, 2012, 08:29:17 PM
Clearly we must be talking about different arithmetic types. I'm talking about arbitrary-precision rational arithmetic of the type provided by mpq_t in the GNU multi-precision library, for which "2/1" + "2/1" = "2/1" * "2/1" = "4/1" (exact rationals with no concept of uncertainty).
No, we've been talking about the same thing. You just spent so much time amongst scientists and engineers that you've forgotten how the average folks (e.g. bookkeepers, tradesmen, etc.) do arithmetic.

What I wrote was: 200/100 + 200/100 = 400/100 and 200/100 *  200/100 = 40000/10000. The concept of "un/certainity" is know to most of the people as "in/significant digits". You may have saved yourself some time right now, but you'll pay it all back (and more) when the users will start showing you examples where your mathematically correct arithmetic simply doesn't agree with their textbooks or with the results from the HP-12c.

What is the value of your "exact" arithmetic if it cannot exactly represent many of the solutions to the time value of money problems, e.g. APR is 5%, how much is this per month or per week or per day? Lots of TVM math requires irrational numbers, quite few commonly used calculations (e.g. IRR) don't have closed-form solutions and require iterative approximations. If your software is going to disagree with the HP-12c, your software is going to lose, not the HP-12c.

Does GNU gmp support all the rounding modes routinely used in accounting? I couldn't quickly find them in the documentation. IEEE-754 folks support at least the basic 5.

Edit: Anyway, the advanced quantitative trading software that I've seen used continuous compounding for the TVM calculations. I can't recall the minimum fixed precision that was required; it was either 6 or 8 digits after the decimal point.

Edit2: To avoid any further miscommunication: please try correctly implementing http://speleotrove.com/decimal/telco.html using your chosen representation.

In rational math 400/100 = 40000/10000, but nice try.

Also, why the hell would bitcoin need to worry about TVM calculations?  You just take the bitcoin amount, convert it to whatever format you want, and then do your calculations.
4173  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: DoS attack against the entire Bitcoin network ? on: December 23, 2012, 08:08:07 PM
This was possible but now many miners require fees for transactions whose inputs are the output of another recent transaction.  Essentially, if you don't let your coins sit for a day or two you will have to pay a fee.  If you have to pay a fee, you can only "attack" for so long because every transaction costs you a penny or so.   Additionally, the larger the transaction (in KB) the higher the fee that will be required.
4174  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 23, 2012, 08:02:52 PM
ya i get this part. i read something like 1/5th of every tax dollar goes towards servicing debt at current (virtually zero) rates.

so sure if they keep ticking along at ~zero then they can stem the tide for a while, but tides have set a pretty strong historical precedent.

Essentially bonds are already negative interest, Do you think they would have the balls to actually make interest rates negative?

I think they are stuck between a rock (hyperinflation) and a hard place(deflation) and as bad as it might be, deflation is the lesser of two evils.

Exactly,  deflation is the lesser of the two evils.

Also, they don't have to make rates negative.  Every time they halve the interest rates the bond price doubles.  They just have to keep approaching zero.
4175  Other / Off-topic / Re: Gun free zone on: December 23, 2012, 07:50:50 PM
Let's start with some facts:

1. Every country on the list has less guns per capita than the US. Every country on the list has less gun deaths than the US, except for one, which is Mexico.

Every country in the world has less guns per capita than the US. Of the countries in this list, if I'm not mistaken, 97 have a lower homicide rate, while 108 have a higher homicide rate than the US.
What was your point again?

Developed nations. Not developing nations. You're a hack. Stop that.

Developed the kind of cancer we have in America.  There is nothing wrong with agriculturally based society.  It doesn't need "developed".  Sure, basic infrastructure and healthcare is important, but they don't need the kind of eternal distraction most Americans live in.  They can actually stand to sit still without getting fidgety.  To take that away from them in pursuit of a "higher standard of living", as defined by consumerists, is the greatest sin we can commit.
4176  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Brainwallet recovery problem on: December 23, 2012, 07:45:11 PM
Type your passphrase into brainwallet.org again and use the private key it generates.  Your passphrase won't work on MtGox.

If that's what you're already doing, then I'm afraid you probably did make a typo and there's not much you can do short of trying lots of passphrases with one or two characters different than what you expect.  Luckily it's not too computationally expensive to do that unless your passphrase is exceedingly long or you made more than a very small number of typos.
4177  Economy / Speculation / Re: Woo hoo Silver smack down on: December 23, 2012, 07:39:53 PM
I am with you on this hypothesis, but the really niggly thing is that bonds are in a bubble too. The bond market is way bigger than the gold market - doeasnt that make them the 'majority' that are going to lose (if/when the dollar collapses?).


No, because the Fed has to save the bond market otherwise the already unaffordable debt will balloon so quick we will have to gear up the printing to hyperinflation levels.

They won't be able to save anything else.  The bond market won't be pretty, but they will keep rates as low as they can for as long as they can.
4178  Other / Off-topic / Re: Gun free zone on: December 23, 2012, 07:36:06 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/blow-on-guns-america-stands-out.html?_r=0

Let's start with some facts:

1. Every country on the list has less guns per capita than the US. Every country on the list has less gun deaths than the US, except for one, which is Mexico.

2. Every country on the list has less assault deaths per capita than the US except for three countries.

3. Every country on the list has less assaults or threats per capita than the US except for four countries which have rates only marginally greater than the US.

4. Most all countries on the list have gun deaths per capita 5 to 10 times less than the US.

5. Most all countries on the list have assault deaths per capita nearly 5 times less than the US.

Now, what should be done to improve these numbers in the future such that the US is more competitive with the other nations. Or are you not interested in that? From the data in the table, it does not appear that more guns will yield the desired results.

It is also not clear that less guns will.  The points made by Holliday regarding the violent example of our government and the decline of the family can't be ignored.  I'm sure superficially you understand coorelation does not imply causation, but you seem to be arguing that it does.

Instead of hoping there's no obvious take away from the data, might it be better if you took a long detailed look at the nations which show preferable results regarding assaults and deaths, and engage in some discovery? I think so. Perhaps you could try as well, instead of engaging in dismissal. Or do you want your gun(s) that badly?

Since about of the quarter of the meat I eat is harvested with a rifle, yes, my guns are important.

And good job dismissing my points by calling them a dismissal instead of addressing them.

The only points I saw from you were speculation about why gun control wouldn't work, rather than an analysis of where it clearly works.

So you refuse to address my point because I don't agree it clearly works anywhere?

Show me an example of where it works, and prove it is because of gun control and not other factors.

Regardless, I don't hunt humans.  I hunt deer, turkey, bear, and vermin (mostly to protect crops and prevent property damage).  If you'd rather send me money each month for food maybe I'll give up farming (and my guns) and eat someone else's produce.  But wait, how will they control the vermin so that their crops survive until harvest?
4179  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Poll for gun control activists: on: December 23, 2012, 07:30:20 PM

You live in a place where murder, rape, assault, robbery, arson, kidnapping, etc doesn't exist?

Did you suggest that a gun can not prevent crime? This is an outright lie and I have no idea what gave you such a misguided view.

Yes, I live in a normal place. I don't know of anywhere on Earth that has zero crime.

Yes, I've thought long and hard on how to make things better, but I do not control policy, so I'm left doing what I can to protect my family.


I was not clear enough, I'll try again. Certainly there is, and always has been, unprovoked violence in all societies. However, the fact is that in some countries at some points of time the rates of violent attacks are 10 or 50 times lower than what we see today in the U.S., Russia, Colombia, or Thailand. How come? This is a good question to ask.

I spent time living in all sorts of countries, and have pretty much seen it all, from armed conflicts to gang violence, to boring and safe small towns, to safe and vibrant cities, to ghettos. I am not your typical gun control advocate. I think it's much more productive for us all to ask ourselves "how come?" than to seek a quick fix in gun control or in arming ourselves and our homes.

So, the topic being discussed in this thread is a red herring, and I can't even answer the poll.

I notice your list of places neglects rural farming communities (outside of even the small towns, just a few hundred people per square mile).  This is where I live, and out here not only do we use guns to harvest much of our food, we use them to keep vermin under control (they will eat the crops, groundhog holes have killed at least one person I knew and injured many others when their tractor rolls).  The problem isn't guns, it's the way you psycho flatlanders live.  I would go crazy too if I had to be stacked hundreds of feet high without a single piece of grass or a tree to my name.  No thanks, I'll stay in the hills please.  And I'll keep my guns.
4180  Other / Off-topic / Re: Gun free zone on: December 23, 2012, 07:03:34 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/opinion/blow-on-guns-america-stands-out.html?_r=0

Let's start with some facts:

1. Every country on the list has less guns per capita than the US. Every country on the list has less gun deaths than the US, except for one, which is Mexico.

2. Every country on the list has less assault deaths per capita than the US except for three countries.

3. Every country on the list has less assaults or threats per capita than the US except for four countries which have rates only marginally greater than the US.

4. Most all countries on the list have gun deaths per capita 5 to 10 times less than the US.

5. Most all countries on the list have assault deaths per capita nearly 5 times less than the US.

Now, what should be done to improve these numbers in the future such that the US is more competitive with the other nations. Or are you not interested in that? From the data in the table, it does not appear that more guns will yield the desired results.

It is also not clear that less guns will.  The points made by Holliday regarding the violent example of our government and the decline of the family can't be ignored.  I'm sure superficially you understand coorelation does not imply causation, but you seem to be arguing that it does.

Instead of hoping there's no obvious take away from the data, might it be better if you took a long detailed look at the nations which show preferable results regarding assaults and deaths, and engage in some discovery? I think so. Perhaps you could try as well, instead of engaging in dismissal. Or do you want your gun(s) that badly?

Since about of the quarter of the meat I eat is harvested with a rifle, yes, my guns are important.

And good job dismissing my points by calling them a dismissal instead of addressing them.
Pages: « 1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 [209] 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 ... 397 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!