It has always been pending until all parties agree to it. Maybe Grealish will stay after Villa fans told Manchester City where to put the £100 million   Live news broadcast on Sky said Aston Villa had accepted the bid but were going to announce it later - probably thinking Grealish would agree terms but maybe Jack Grealish will stay put at Villa Lol I don't believe sky sports on their transfer news, Fabrizio is yet to confirm this, personal terms has not been agreed yet and besides Jack is ready to stay if Aston Villa want him to so the deal is still pending for now. |
|
|
|
Aston Villa has accepted the bid, they are happy to sell Jack Grealish for £100 million. It is up to the player now if he wants to start negotiations for a contract with Manchester City or not. . What source confirmed this? Because from my sources the deal is still ongoing and Jack Grealish is willing to move but the only option remains with Aston Villa to accept or not since they offered Jack a contract extension last week and are willing to keep him for another season. Jack is not in a hurry to make a move he respects Aston Villa and if they turned down the offer from Manchester City he won't have a problem playing for the Villa for another season. Live news broadcast on Sky said Aston Villa had accepted the bid but were going to announce it later - probably thinking Grealish would agree terms but maybe Jack Grealish will stay put at Villa Why would Aston Villa accept the offer and allow Grealish to talk with Manchester City but now announce it? Rumours are rife that Grealish will stay put. Aston Villa have accepted the bid, they are happy to sell Jack Grealish for £100 million. I also read that aston villa got the deal to sign Leon Bailey from Bayer Leverkusen Source: Aston Villa reach agreement to sign Leon Bailey from Bayer Leverkusenlast season aston villa was having a good performance but fell in the last games, i hope that this season they manage to hit the signings and have a good season. Yes they did so they have been busy in the transfer market today. |
|
|
|
Aston Villa have accepted the bid, they are happy to sell Jack Grealish for £100 million. It is up to the player now if he wants to start negotiations for a contract with Manchester City or not. I wonder which signings Chelsea, Leicester City, Manchester United and Liverpool might make before the new season starts. Talks started two days ago and here we are £100m placed now we wait for Aston Villa response. Will they accept? Or will Jack sign the new contract extension with Villa next week? ... Drama on!!! |
|
|
|
BREAKING NEWS !! Manchester City offer £100 million to buy Grealish Leaked reports in Sky Sports say that Aston Villa have accepted an offer of £100 million (USD $139 million) from Manchester City for Jack Grealish. They will make an official announcement soon but it is up to Grealish if he wants to stay at Villa or not. If the deal goes ahead Grealish will be the most expensive purchase by an English football club. The previous record was the £93 million Manchester United paid Juventus for Pogba. If he decides to go to Manchester City he will have to compete with Sterling, Mahrez, De Bruyne, Fernandinho, Silva, Rodri, Zinchenko and Gundogan for a midfield position. I think it will be a big mistake if he goes to a club like Manchester City where he will be up against too many of the squad for a midfield position because he will spend too much time on the bench being used as a substitute. He will become rich beyond his wildest dreams but will he be happy with the game-time? Sky Sports report here |
|
|
|
I will have look at the links you and lovesmayfamilis provided to alleged associated accounts, we all should be vigilant. Thank you. I see that a lot of posts were deleted by him. Posts made per post deleted: 298 (Rank: >1000th)This may indicate that the user had some kind of compromising information that he tried to hide. Nevertheless, his ETH address: 0x22c88Eb12703FbBE3F08C957d2d9B978CA92F500 detects connections between at least two accounts that are currently active and subscribed to one bounty company. They have the same style of writing, starting with consent. I don't have enough time now to accuse them of cheating. But I think this account is also an alternative to those two. JollyGood, good find. And as we can see, this account is not outraged by its tag, as it still hasn't replied in this thread. And this can be understood as consent. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138507https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169153 there's something similar about the accounts, especially the timing of the first password changes. I think there are many more connected stolen than just these three. 1. apa don - First password change 11/14/2018 2:33:07 PM2. fadil46 - First password change 11/14/2018 7:07:53 AM3. bahagia93 - Second password change 11/12/2018 11:51:23 AM |
|
|
|
Liverpool have done well to get Konate for £36 million but they needed at least two more additions to be serious contenders and to close the gap with Manchester City. Liverpool look vulnerable in defence so Klopp went looking for a defender and Konate seems like he has potential to strengthen Liverpool. That will not be enough to win the title though because both Manchester Clubs and Chelsea have stronger squads. Even Leicester City have a strong chance of finishing above Liverpool because they nearly did it last season and because Rodgers went out and did excellent business by buying Soumare and Daka, then got Bertrand for free from Southampton. Liverpool have to buy in the winter transfer window otherwise they could be out of the top 4 at the end of the season. I cannot see Grealish moving to Manchester City. With Sterling on the left wing and Mahrez on the right wing how can Grealish play regularly for them when De Bruyne, Fernandinho, Silva, Rodri, Zinchenko and Gundogan all occupy the midfield? Grealish already warmed the bench for most of the Euro 2020 tournament playing a bit-part so he will not want to move to a club that does not guarantee him game time. At Villa he is adored by the club and the fans and plays every game as long as he is not injured. If he really wanted to leave he should consider other options. I might have to change my predictions, at the moment it doesn't seem like Liverpool are in for any players, of course there's plenty of time for that to change, but at the moment its quite quiet on their front. A lot of their rivals have already got the players they have been linked with, and wanted. Its important in my opinion that you get players as early as possible, because then they settle in quicker, and can have a preseason with the team they'll be expected to play in.
Grealish comes across as a person who would rather be winning silverware, than be loyal to the club he supports, and of course there's nothing really wrong with that. They are professionals at the end of the day. Its easy for me to sit here, and say I would stay with my favourite club, but I imagine a lot of these players want to create a legacy filled with trophies rather than loyalty.
|
|
|
|
Kane is a Tottenham fan, he would love to stay but if he cannot see himself winning any silverware before he retires then he will consider it. Manchester City are a handful of clubs that could afford to buy him but will he go? And on the other side Grealish is a Villa fan, he would love to stay at Aston Villa but what silverware are Villa going to win soon? Spurs and Villa fans would easily forgive them for going to bigger clubs in the hope of winning trophies. If I had to guess I think both players will stay at their clubs for at least one more season. This is going to be scary season if they lay their hands on Jack and Kane just imagine Kane at CF, Sterling and Mahrez on the wing while Jack, Kelvin De Brune and Benado Silva terrorising the midfield this is going to be a strong team to beat this season but I don't think the Kane and Jack.G deal would through, I think they have already turned attention to Jack after the high demands from Tottenham for Kane. I see this deal going through.  we may see here we go soon from Fabrizio.  |
|
|
|
Where did the $14 million really go and who really profited from it? Lol I still have 50,000 dimcoin, 2 years ago I think this project will be success, especially when the ICO has raise more than $14 million. and now this project is dead I have dimcoins in my Depotwallet and they asked me to buy XEM tokens to transfer but each token is expensive so how many tokens I would need to transfer 100,000 Dimcoins?
Also, now the token has barely any trading value on hitbtc. Sorry to red about your situation. The price of Dimcoin does not seem to be going up any time soon because of the failure of its team to fulfil its ICO The ICO ended in August 2017 and two years they made over $14 million from the ICO but they have failed in doing anything of substance. In May 2018 the market capital of Dimcoin was over $24 million but today it is less that $670,000 with a 24 hour trading volume of just $515 These links provide the information needed to show Dimcoin has been a monumental failure: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dimcoin/https://icodrops.com/dimcoin/ |
|
|
|
They claim they are not part of the 1xbet scammers. They claim they are not part of Kawbet scammers. On their website or this forum, their representative has still not stated the name and address of the person or company that owns and operates 1xbit. It is very difficult to believe anything their representative here posts. There are 115 pages in this thread and nine pages in this thread where they claim they are trying to sort out problems but they have not really done much. Just a few newbies claiming to have been wronged have then claimed they have received their funds so no surprise there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266815.0You will not get a straight answer from them.
The 1xbit scammers will type any nonsense about anonymity but will never post the name and address of the company that owns and operates the scam.
While I understand your point of view and feel the same, but I try to remain objective here and give them a fair chance to be honest and open to this community, as they claimed they wanted to be. They will only get my support if they come out of this honest and willing to work with the community. If not, I will be the first one to say what I feel is wrong. |
|
|
|
You will not get a straight answer from them. The 1xbit scammers will type any nonsense about anonymity but will never post the name and address of the company that owns and operates the scam. There is no detail on their website who owns and operates them but they have a joke footer display stating "protect by law" even though website users have not been told who they are entering in to a contract with and who they can sue if they get scammed  When I asked which country litigation would take place the 1xbit representative gave a nonsense answer but deliberately did not mention which country the 1xbit scammers are based and what the name and address of the owner operator is. The one thing I would like to know, and it is impossible to find information on your website, is: Who pays out winnings? Is it 1XBET or some other company that you don't want to reveal?
We are not sure what you are trying to know here, when receiving a withdrawal it is seen who is the sender. For some coins like usdttrx withdrawal minimum is ~$1. Who makes the payments? Who controls the wallets? Is 1XBET in control of these wallets or are you *? I can't be any more specific than that. [ * ] by "you" I mean the company behind 1xbit (if there is one at all) |
|
|
|
Anonymity is not a feature of the 1xbit scammers, it is the only thing they have that they think will keep themselves safe from prosecution. That is why you are not posting the name and address of the owner of the 1xbit website. What is the reason the owners of the 1xbit website want to remain anonymous?
All the required information to start playing and don't get any troubles is available on the site (nothing extraordinary here, play fair - be safe). When you look for an anonymous casino, you might not want anything else but anonymity. If that's not something you want to be part of - you are always free to find a better suit. Anonymity is not the only feature of 1xBIt, and to help making your decision, we provide exclusive promotions and reviews on this forum. Now users are free to try 1xBit and get a reward for it - which guarantees no losses. Sincerely, 1xBit team |
|
|
|
If anybody wants to take the owners of 1xbit to Court what name and address should the Court summons be posted to? The answer was already provided. Where? Give the link Is there a reason you want to take 1xBit to a Court, or you are acting on someone's behalf, who had troubles with 1xBit and can prove his innocence and can't post it yourself? The reason I asked is because that information should be stated on the Terms and Conditions on the website but is is deliberately missing, just like you are deliberately not answering the question. If so, you can always post your issue here in public. Just like you are not posting the legally required information on the 1xbit website or here? Otherwise, it may sound like your trying to catch 1xBit in the only seeable for you way, because there is no other options. That comment from you is trying to deflect away from the fact you have deliberately avoided answering the question again, you are not posting the name and address of the owner of the 1xbit website and the Terms and Conditions have deliberately not stated it either. What is the reason the owners of the 1xbit website want to remain anonymous? |
|
|
|
1xbit representative keeps avoiding the question. Why are you showing unsportsmanlike behaviour? Just tell us what name and address to put on the Court summons if someone wants to start legal proceedings against 1xbit Placing a bet knowing that this bet is controversial to your previous bet, which will eventually help you to be in profit in any way - that's an example of unsportsmanlike bet. |
|
|
|
|
The way the clubs have behaved during the summer transfer window speaks volumes about intent:
Chelsea:
Marcus Bettinelli from Fulham for free
Leicester City:
Boubakary Soumare from Lille for £17m
Patson Daka from Red Bull Salzburg for £23m
Ryan Bertrand (free from Southampton)
Liverpool:
Ibrahima Konate from RB Leipzig for £36m
Manchester City:
Scott Carson Derby from free
Manchester United:
Jadon Sancho from Borussia Dortmund for £73m
Tom Heaton from Aston Villa
Raphael Varane from Real Madrid for £34
Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester City believe they have the squad to challenge for the Premier League title so they had very little activity. Manchester United and Leicester City believed they needed to strengthen their squad to challenge for the title so they went out and purchased players. Apart from that, Manchester City have started talks with Aston Villa over the possible signing of Jack Grealish but no deal has been agreed yet and maybe he will want to stay at Villa.
|
|
|
|
I think that is what the 1xbit scammers means but we have to wait for an official reply to understand their perspective. No matter what they say can we really look beyond them using any means possible in order to selective scam those that play at their website in good faith? The point of the question was not to determine a term, but to indicate what the player did.
Placing a bet knowing that this bet is controversial to your previous bet, which will eventually help you to be in profit in any way - that's an example of unsportsmanlike bet.
I don't understand what you mean by a controversial bets I've been gambling since 2011 (10 years) so I should know better I know your site is not up to 3 years, so lets go practically because you mentioned the player trying to get profit in any way so if I should place a bet on; Man utd vs Chelsea game. 1st ticket: I place Manutd win 2nd ticket: I place Chelsea win 3rd ticket : I place on Draw Is this an example of what you called a controversial bets? Because no matter the outcome I'll still gain and loses at the same time. If I'm wrong then tell me practically.
|
|
|
|
What is the name and address of the person or company that owns and operates the 1xbit website? Why are you showing unsportsmanlike behaviour? If anybody wants to take the owners of 1xbit to Court what name and address should the Court summons be posted to? ~ |
|
|
|
Here is how I think it will end: 1- Manchester City2- Manchester United3- Chelsea4- Leicester CityChelsea have signed just a goalkeeper on a free transfer but they have been playing brilliant since Tuchel arrived. He turned them in to a winnign machine. Yes they lost a few games along the way but the way he motivated those players to fight their way in to a 3rd place along with making them Champions League winners was just fantastic. I cannot see them winning the league this season and I think they could progress as far as the quarter-finals of the Champions League. In my opinion Liverpool will not have a top 4 finish because they have lost the element of fear that was instilled upon opponents when they stood in the tunnel. They concede too many goals and do not score as freely as they used to in those two seasons where Liverpool were just dominant. Salah, Mane and Firmino have not been playing like they did in those first two seasons which saw Liverpool make back to back Champions League finals (winning one and losing one) and win their first Premier League title in 30 years. Wijnaldum has gone on a free transfer to PSG and that will affect the team balance. They do not seem to have longevity with the team Klopp built. I think they could progress as far as the quarter-finals of the Champions League. Manchester City signed a goalkeeper on a free transfer and that is very strange. I agree with you it certainly seems like (on paper) Manchester City do not look leagues ahead of competitors when looking at their squad. Guardiola probably believes his team will win the league again but can always strengthen his squad in the winter transfer window if things are not going according to plan. That belief in his team just might cost him dearly if he is not careful. Losing the Champions League final is probably one of the lowest points in the career of Guardiola so he and Manchester City will want to bounce back much stronger. I think they could progress as far as the semi-finals of the Champions League. Manchester United have signed Varane and Sancho so they should be stronger this season than they were last. They are a young team and young squad. Losing the Europa League final would have hurt so they should bounce back stronger. I think they could progress as far as the quarter-finals of the Champions League. Here's my predictions for the new season:
1. Liverpool (if they make signings)
2. Manchester United
3. Manchester City
4. Chelsea
The thing with Liverpool is they haven't made any signings apart from Konate, who is a fantastic addition to their squad. However, they still lack that true striker, and while Firminho may come back to his best, it would be a safer bet to get someone in who is a proven outright striker, and then chop, and change them based on the opponent, and form.
Manchester United have made fantastic additions this summer. They've probably had the best window out of everyone in the Premier League, and I would expect them to either be first or second it really does depend on how well as a team they gel with the new players. The season after this one, I would expect them to be top of my list unless other teams make some serious signings.
This is probably the first time for a long time that Manchester City doesn't look so much better than the rest of the league on paper. They have lost a few important players over the years, and they haven't made many big signings. I feel like after many years of success they might actually be starting to stagnate, and as a result will struggle to stay on top with a constantly evolving league.
Last year I thought Chelsea signed some very good players, but they never really got to gel together, and as a result they probably under performed from a lot of fan's perspectives when they first heard about the type of players they were signing. Their success this season completely depends on whether they've worked out that issue. However, other teams like Manchester United have seriously stepped up their game in signings at least, and Chelsea no longer have the better players when you compare the two.
|
|
|
|
You keep avoiding the question. What is the name and address of the person or company that owns and operates the 1xbit website? Why are you showing unsportsmanlike behaviour? |
|
|
|
Why are you showing unsportsmanlike behaviour? You keep avoiding the question. What is the name and address of the person or company that owns and operates the 1xbit website? That sounds like a total bullshit answer in addition to being unprofessional, as you're responding to him in public and calling him unsportsmanlike (a term I've never heard applied to gambling, by the way, but I'm not a gambler). It's sad to see a trusted person not doing just a little research: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unsportsmanlikeThis term is used in bookmaker's rules, including 1xBit, and it means unfair character of a game or a bet. Sincerely, 1xBit team |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
