Please do not use the "error" field in the client software to display messages to users. Currently it is displaying Thank you for upgrading to the new wallet (version 0.8.6.2). To optimze performance, we critically need other nodes to update as well. Please UPDATE ALL WALLETS TO 8.6.2 and ask anyone else you know to upgrade It is causing it to repeatedly spit out the error message in p2pools console and web site stats. P.S. Nice spell check (optimize) BTW  |
|
|
|
Impressive! Imagine getting one of these cards with your pot purchase at dispensaries. This would encourage future usage. |
|
|
|
Wow, great job! I am constantly looking for reliable block explorers for my p2pool nodes and yours are terrific! Please consider adding Craftcoin as I do not think it currently has a working block explorer. https://github.com/craftcoin/craftcoin |
|
|
|
3. Vertical scalability that reduces variance for all miners.
This is where the real challenges lie.
For p2pool to support large mining operations, and still be able to attract medium, small, and micro miners we need completely new share difficulty and payout structures.
The first step here has nothing to do with code, some completely new concepts need to be developed and generally accepted by p2pool miners. Once we have those concepts down, and can demonstrate them to be technically possible, we can seek out devs with the chops to pull it off.
P2Pool in it's current form is just not scalable. As others have pointed out the current sharechain model only becomes worse as more hashrate is added. Perhaps a model where we have "super nodes" that split out smaller sharechains could be considered. I also think the concept of pseudo shares in-between real shares should be eliminated or modified so that work is not wasted. |
|
|
|
Been seeing the following error lately: No bitcoind connection when block submittal attempted! Restarting the coin daemon seems to resolve it temporarily but I still see the following error sometimes: Block submittal result: False (u'rejected') Expected: True Anyone? Is it possible to have a backup coin daemon running with p2pool? |
|
|
|
and on that note... CSC was being mined on the pool with 200+mh/s!
That's not so impressive these days  |
|
|
|
|
Wow, the second splash screen is nice!
|
|
|
|
11.5 BTC buy order in at 0.00000394  |
|
|
|
Is the source for this open? And is there currently a home for CraftCoin? I tried checking out the links OP posted, but they were 404. I have a developer, and plenty of hosting resources, and would be willing to put work into CraftCoin to keep it alive. Also, what work needs to be done with it?
https://github.com/craftcoin/craftcoinIt needs a new dev! The current dev may actually be willing to let it go. |
|
|
|
Hey guys! I've moved POT off this pool and into my new BTC paying Multipool. POT is currently being mined on scrypt. Would love some more testers as I've got no fee's during this period. Here are the details: xpool - BTC Multipool http://www.xpool.caSon of a bitch...nice web site but couldn't you have found a different domain name to use? You may not know it but xpool.net has been operational for over a year :/ I didn't even know.... I went with xpool for the X factor... multipool auto e Xchange... and I live in canada  Fair enough. Best of luck! |
|
|
|
Ok, being lazy...but have the seed nodes been updated in the source? At the very least delete the ones that are there because they are on the old blockchain. Edit: Stopped being lazy and checked the source. It still contains the old seed nodes. This is likely the source of sync problems. https://github.com/casinocoin/casinocoin/blob/master/src/net.cppLine 1190 // DNS seeds
// Each pair gives a source name and a seed name.
// The first name is used as information source for addrman.
// The second name should resolve to a list of seed addresses.
static const char *strMainNetDNSSeed[][2] = {
{"casinoco.in seed", "seed.casinoco.in"},
{"casinoco.in seed #1", "seed1.casinoco.in"},
{"casinoco.in seed #2", "seed2.casinoco.in"},
{"casinoco.in seed #3", "seed3.casinoco.in"},
{NULL, NULL}
};
|
|
|
|
Hey guys! I've moved POT off this pool and into my new BTC paying Multipool. POT is currently being mined on scrypt. Would love some more testers as I've got no fee's during this period. Here are the details: xpool - BTC Multipool http://www.xpool.caSon of a bitch...nice web site but couldn't you have found a different domain name to use? You may not know it but xpool.net has been operational for over a year :/ |
|
|
|
I can say the same thing about the massive hyper inflation CasinoCoin is currently experiencing at the detriment of all the holders.
So it's like fiat of we sit and watch and it's like fiat if we take action.
Difference is, if we take action, it will help anyone buying CSC where if we sit and watch it's gonna hurt everyone.
So we have to stop with the hating Fiat bit cause Bitcoin is Fiat 2.0 and we have to focus on the right strategic moves to increase shareholder value, short-term and Long-term.
And cutting dilution and inflation is a big move in the right direction.
...but the difference is that purchasers of Casinocoin knew what they were getting into. They know the coin specs including the total supply. Those specs should almost be set in stone...but like I said only a part of me is having problems with changing the specs...the other part of me that knows the value of my current supply will dramatically increase says "go for it" I guess that value is only there if new purchasers are not aware that they are buying into a market that was significantly cheaper before the change. |
|
|
|
But we're not doing a reverse split and no money is spent so it's an amazing strategy to employ which corporations simply cannot do without spending massive amounts of money.
I keep thinking about how one of the benefits of BTC is that the supply cannot be increased or decreased based on the whim of a government. In reality it can be changed based on the whims of the majority or even just a few devs (translation: it can be changed based on the whims of nerds). I'm not against changing the supply or reward but a part of me seems to feel like it is being no better than what governments do with fiat. I know other coins have done it to various degrees of success but does that make it okay? I am not familiar with the reasons for the original supply amount but one would hope there was some thought put into it. Just putting my thoughts out there. It would be financially beneficial to current holders of Casinocoin to decrease supply and reward but is that the right thing to do? |
|
|
|
...presuming folks were required to view the source code before using it, or that they do. Most folks, even pool ops, just hurry up and compile to keep their systems from accumulating downtime. There have been numerous opensource exploits not caught until after damage has been done. While this wasn't implemented, it's very odd to not have some description there.
Look at it this way, nobody to date has caught it. Imagine how many hundreds of thousands of potcoin could've been skimmed/stolen? Only 1 individual out of the userbase noticed this? This is so true...as a pool op I recall going as far as quickly reviewing the code (most don't); seeing that part and thinking "that's odd" but noticed it was commented out. I moved on since I was in a rush to compile. |
|
|
|
|
So is there a 2% tax on mining potcoin?
Realize that this is different than a pool taking 2% as it is on every block found. Also, if a pool charges 2% then it would be 4% being lost to the miners :/
If it is true then the fact that it was not communicated seems wrong and sneaky. Just because it was in the source is not a good enough reason in my book.
|
|
|
|
I dunno about anyone else but I'm going to mine this coin hard until the subsidy reduction  |
|
|
|
RitzGrandCasino appears to be an advance casino with all sorts of games, etc. Exactly what this coin was created to support. I would suggest we work to get them accepting Casinocoin as much as possible. Maybe they/we can advertise each other in some sort of mutual fashion. Casinocoin can currently be purchased CHEAP on cryptsy although I don't think you can withdraw at the moment. If I was them I would look at buying enough to cover bets sooner than later and start buying up the market to have something of an exclusive on the coin. They could really make a lot if done right especially now that the a reduction in market cap and block reward is being considered. I know if I had such an advance casino it's what I would do...buy up the coin... offer some incentives to play with Casinocoin vs other coins...hoard it while the price rises...slowly release coins for players to purchase on the exchanges...seems like the perfect storm to me...but what do I know |
|
|
|
this last 2 week's or so i've notice a marked increase in hashrate (on and off) but no pools seems have any change in fact most have less now. when it grows it's by 50/60mh could you solo mine with that much
Sure, there are a few higher hashrate miners on the market now so you can expect jumps anywhere from 20 to 100 Mh/s in an instant. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
