Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:33:05 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
421  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: The global decentralized secure electronic voting system is up and running on: January 28, 2012, 12:28:47 AM
But by all means, try!  I'm happy to pocket the extra transaction fees. Tongue
422  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: The global decentralized secure electronic voting system is up and running on: January 28, 2012, 12:28:16 AM
I don't think this works.  0.0000001 BTC is meaningless, effectively every transaction costs at least 0.005 these days.  This is a lot more expensive than you think, and the implementation will be so convoluted I doubt it will catch on.

You have a giant gaping hole: either you let people directly vote with BTC (10btc is 10x the voting power of 1BTC), or you censor a huge number of people by guessing which addresses are connected with each other.  It is better to start from scratch.

PS: Seeing as how you claim to be able to move things with your mind, there should be much better uses of your time than this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ww8rI0BG9k
423  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BIP 16 big picture on: January 27, 2012, 11:57:50 PM
Sooo…it seems like the consensus is BIP-16.
Don't know where you got that idea.

From almost everyone except you  Cheesy
424  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: BIP 17 on: January 27, 2012, 11:54:03 PM
gavin, do you have any commercial interest in implementing P2SH?

425  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Digg/Reddit like News site. Voting is based on Bitcoins! on: January 25, 2012, 09:02:30 PM
Maybe have the payments upvote in an anti-exponential manner?  So a vote with 0.001 BTC counts as 0.001, but a vote with 0.009 BTC counts only as 0.003.  Or a vote with 0.250 BTC counts only as 0.050.  This would discourage higher "spending" to an extent, but not make it impossible for people who really want to push a vote up to do so.
Great idea
426  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Get your pool support P2SH, if you care about bitcoin. on: January 24, 2012, 05:49:23 PM
Afaik I'm biggest pool who is openly supporting p2sh. Tycho will support p2sh only when the rest of the network over vote him.

Cool, I will switch over to your pool tonight.
427  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Get your pool support P2SH, if you care about bitcoin. on: January 23, 2012, 07:33:31 PM
What is the largest pool that votes for P2SH?  I will leave deepbit if they don't start voting for it.
428  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Feds kill Megaupload... are you buying Namecoins yet? on: January 20, 2012, 07:30:22 AM
Namecoin will never jump until it is considered a serious candidate for a DNS system for Tor hidden services.
+1
429  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Feds kill Megaupload... are you buying Namecoins yet? on: January 20, 2012, 04:04:23 AM
According to btc-e namecoin prices havent moved significantly in the past two weeks.

Just sayin...
430  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: According to TechCrunch - We FAIL on: January 20, 2012, 04:03:36 AM
Ugh, so ugly I couldn't even get to the Bitcoin part.  This is NOT a threat, whatsoever.
431  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: January 20, 2012, 04:01:06 AM
IM means Internet Marketing.

Surely anyone good at internet marketing should understand that acronyming that term makes them sound like social media synergy cloud buzzword snake-oil salesmen.
432  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Technical Anaylsis from a beginner for dummies, lol on: January 20, 2012, 03:42:09 AM
At first I thought these pictures were a parody of all the tech analysis images posted in speculation.

I had a good laugh before realizing you also believe in it.  Oh well, still funny.
433  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: CNN did a short skit about dwolla . on: January 20, 2012, 03:27:39 AM
Awesome spot!  Dwolla is a gateway payment system to Bitcoin.
434  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] RealCoin - Targeted to the IM world! on: January 19, 2012, 03:47:19 AM

As it has been stated, the two coins can co-exist and exchange knowledge around known issues.

I believe that this relationship can go both ways starting from RLC providing an insight to a different approach in economics and how they affect the cryptocurrency.


This is still almost the exact same pitch as we heard about SolidCoin.

How do you see RealCoin differing from SolidCoin?
435  Economy / Marketplace / Re: FeedZeBirds.com - Bitcoin Twitter Ad Platform [ANN] on: January 19, 2012, 12:31:47 AM
Oof, just saw your service is suspended. 

All the more reason to make your messages look less spammy. 
436  Economy / Marketplace / Re: FeedZeBirds.com - Bitcoin Twitter Ad Platform [ANN] on: January 19, 2012, 12:29:57 AM
I think your userbase will grow if you shorten it.  I am not using it because I think all of the tweets look like spam.  You will get at least one more user Wink
437  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] RealCoin - Targeted to the IM world! on: January 18, 2012, 10:02:46 PM
You can chat with him for only $0.49/min:
http://travel.bitwine.com/advisors/29377-theglobber

What are you wearing, goober?  Cheesy
438  Other / Off-topic / Re: 1GH/s, 20w, $700 (was $500) — Butterflylabs, is it for real? (Part 2) on: January 18, 2012, 09:29:29 PM
Weren't the singles supposed to ship by Jan 1?  It is supposed to be another 4-6 weeks?
439  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] RealCoin - Targeted to the IM world! on: January 18, 2012, 07:53:58 PM
The exchange is run by an incorporated company?  Where is this company incorporated?
440  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] RealCoin - Targeted to the IM world! on: January 18, 2012, 09:35:37 AM
Shit's about to get REAL Wink
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!