Bitcoin Forum
July 11, 2024, 01:49:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 [213] 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 ... 367 »
4241  Economy / Gambling / Re: Proving that my gambling script works. on: March 03, 2018, 06:34:23 PM
Last-minute add-on:

I'll offer to audit this script. If alia wants to send it to me then I will go through it and analyze how it works and post my analysis about it here without revealing its inner workings. I don't plan to bet money with it, instead to analyze the code.

Some of my posts take much time to write, gather links and quotes for, etc.  I wrote the below part about auditing before RGBKey posted this.

I myself will vouch for RGBKey’s technical competence for performing such an audit.  I don’t know gambling; but I have interacted with RGBKey in the Development & Technology forum, and he knows his stuff.  I would trust the results of any gambling script audit performed by RGBKey.
~

Why?

I've heard too many times how someone has found winning method, ignored all warnings and finally busted all bankroll.

No one can't fight against math and logic and no one can't fight against negative expected value.
Even with low house edge such as 1% no one can beat the fact that casino has 1% advantage over players, whatever you do that advantage will remain.

Also there is no guaranty that game won't generate very bad streak, I've personally experienced 4 losses in row playing on multiplier 1.1X which is if I am not wrong 90% chance to win and calculate what is chance for that.

I am not sure why is so important to prove something which doesn't exist.
4242  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Selling Private Bitcoin investment site on: March 03, 2018, 05:55:39 PM
I'll be an honest pauper, rather than a rich thief.

I sincerely hope that you are scammed out of everything you own. Maybe you would understand better why "lucrative" and "good" are not always the same thing.

Tell the banks to the governments and to the supermarket chains that steal you every day.
What supermarket chains has to do with ponzi script you are trying to sell so someone can steal money from naive people?
remove yourself from here.
This.
4243  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: What if i buy coin of 1 sat .. i can double my money just in a day on: March 03, 2018, 04:17:40 PM
i wanna talk about selecting some 1 sat coins in coinexchange.io put some money on thm and wait for pump .. it is not difficult to jump to 2 sat so i double my money easily
Oh no, don't do that, you will most likely lose money.
Trust me on this one, I've got the same crazy idea somewhere in late 2016. I've bought bunch coins on yobit for 1 satoshi, 99% of them never pumped and I still can't sell most of them because no one wants to buy them  Roll Eyes
4244  Other / Archival / Re: Merit abuse. Bounty abuse. Giveaway cheating. Trust abuse. on: March 03, 2018, 10:29:09 AM
~
4245  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What I Should Know Before i Start Trading Cryptocurrency on: March 02, 2018, 09:56:35 PM
What do I need to Know to Start Trading on Cryptocurrency? Can anyone help me?
First read all "how to trade" topics. Do a lot research about coins and market before you start trading. Read news but choose wisely what news to follow because there are more FUD and fake news than real news.
Nowadays crypto trading is very popular, that's why I have some interest in it. is it all about HOLD or SELL?
Your final goal is profit, so you will need to buy coins when their price is low and sell when price increase.
The thing is you have to spot right time for buying and right time for selling.
4246  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Is Bitcoin the best Long-term Hold? on: March 02, 2018, 09:19:10 PM
Of course, for a long time, it will be very good to hold Bitcoin.The price of bitcoin continue is rising are decreasing.So trading will not be very good for a short time.So if you can hold it for a long time then there is the possibility of double profit.If you want to profit, buy Bitcoin right now and hold it for a long time for your bright future.
This is contradiction, if price is going up and down all the time it can only mean that it is better to go short.
of course there will be more and more altcoins which are faster, cheaper and greater than BTC. But BTC likes a Gold of crypto world. many people trust in its value and no thing can change it. So, in long term, BTC is still the best coin of the world
That is problem with altcoins. There will always be more altcoins, bitcoin will remain only one.
4247  Economy / Gambling / Re: Proving that my gambling script works. on: March 02, 2018, 08:44:45 PM
~
Follow the progress here: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain
~
Day 1 - 24% ROI

Am I the only one who see 3 bets cashing out on 1.08X and calling this 24% ROI?

She's only betting 1 bit i guess which is faucet, and she started with 1 bit

so 1.08*3 = 1.24

I thought this was going to start with 1 btc but nvm
You missed my point here.

Player placed 3 bets on multiplier 1.08 and called this winning method.

This user tested method for 2 years and after 2 years user is trying to prove that script works by placing 3 bets at 1.08X...betting 100 satoshi.

Such gambling much fallacy
4248  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM |Deposit 777 play with 1777 mBTC |Live Casino, Slots, Betting on: March 02, 2018, 08:38:25 PM
I find withdrawals wagering requirements ridiculous to be honest,but each site has its own rules,

If you don't read rules before depositing money then it is your fault.

It is similar to Bitler bans accounts when they profited from a faucet because that is their rules.

I agree with you, people always just check the "I agree" box and then get mad when they break or don't understand the rules..

But bitsler banning accounts that profited from faucets, really? Did not know that Cheesy
Well, it's in their ToS. If someone never deposit and play only from faucet they can ban player.
If I recall someone was abusing their faucet with large number of multi accounts gaining positive edge against them.
4249  Economy / Gambling / Re: Proving that my gambling script works. on: March 02, 2018, 08:26:11 PM
~
Follow the progress here: https://www.bustabit.com/user/makealiagreatagain
~
Day 1 - 24% ROI

Am I the only one who see 3 bets cashing out on 1.08X and calling this 24% ROI?
4250  Other / Archival / Merit, Bounty, Giveaway and Trust abuse 20+ accounts, need DT members on: March 02, 2018, 07:56:07 PM
blah.
4251  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can you still believe aTriz words? on: March 01, 2018, 05:57:38 PM
All casinos are EV- in the long run and thus all strategies. In the short run, many strategies can be profitable.
This has been discussed million times in gambling section  Roll Eyes

Btw, sometimes is better to place one big bet than 100000 small bets.
It is simple math, lets say you have 1BTC bankroll:

1) place 1 BTC on payout 2X and you will either lose 1BTC or you will make 1BTC.
2) Divide 1BTC in 100,000,000 small bets and bet all on multiplier 2X and lets say house edge is 1%. In perfect conditions, you will win 45,000,000 bets and you will lose 55,000,000 bets, which means you will lose 0.1BTC in long run. If you continue to bet you will eventually lose all bankroll, because casino has 1% advantage over you.

Now, regarding strategies:

1) There is no such thing as short run or long run if you use strategies(martingale, fibonacci etc), because eventually bad streak will occur. Unless you have crystal ball there is no possible way to say when it will occur.
You can run martingale(or any other method) for days and eventually you will hit that bad streak and you will lose your bankroll.
You can run martingale(or any other method) for 10 seconds and very bad streak could happen and you will lose your bankroll.

In any case, no matter what method you use, you will lose your bankroll, unless you are in circle of 0.01% super lucky people who managed to beat casino and house edge.

So please, would you stop repeating that there is winning method because such method doesn't exist!

Stop writing nonsense, I am sick tired of ignorant people who are repeating nonsense in gambling section, THERE IS NO METHOD/STRATEGY/SCRIPT/BOT WHICH WILL HELP YOU TO BEAT CASINO.
Whoever is selling such script knows that, because if there is winning method seller would use it.

Besides, you said you were testing strategy for 2 years which is big red sign in first place because if you tested winning strategy it means that you made lots of money and you don't need to sell script to earn more!

OP please lock topic, we are all tired of reading shits posted by scammer.
4252  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can you still believe aTriz words? on: February 28, 2018, 10:39:51 PM
~
nullic said in the other thread that he trusted alia with 0.01 btc to gamble with, and was told that the identity of the site she was playing at is secret and iirc the strategy was specific to the site (even though the identity of the site would be public via the blockchain).
I was editing my post.
4253  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can you still believe aTriz words? on: February 28, 2018, 10:27:41 PM
As for the gambling vouch, didn't he just say that it worked?
Did he check script for backdoors?
That would imply that he knows more than what a variable initialization looks like. To my knowledge, he does not.
That wasn't really a question.

Look, I am strongly against people who are selling "winning scripts" or any kind of gambling scripts/bots for several reasons:
1) gambling scripts/bots are available for free, no one needs to buy one
2) winning script/method doesn't exist, people who are selling such methods are selling fog to naive people
3) such scripts/bots usually have something hidden to steal balance

As I already said, he was probably thinking with his lower head and I hope all this will remind him not to vouch for such shady thing again.

~
However I remember that she said her ''strategy'' was based on a vulnerability on a particular casino because the casino itself had some sort of script that would let new accounts win at first or something like that. It wasn't really a normal idiotic ''strategy'' at least that's what she said. I personally wouldn't vouch for something like that even if it was legit since it involves some sort of cheating.
You are wrong, For this case and method, she specifically said that script was created for provably fair sites:
Quote
This script is designed for crash sites, and has been backtested against around 2 years worth of data. This script is intended for use on provably fair sites
"Method" you mentioned was posted in other topic.
4254  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1) on: February 28, 2018, 09:36:10 PM
~
Miscellaneous:
Bounty abusers.
Which one?
4255  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can you still believe aTriz words? on: February 28, 2018, 05:27:39 PM
As for the gambling vouch, didn't he just say that it worked?
Did he check script for backdoors?
4256  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can you still believe aTriz words? on: February 28, 2018, 04:38:24 PM
Looking at the terms of the contract, I don’t see any reason why aTriz should be able to back out of paying alia.
Other than the amount that was paid upfront, I think the same. Although the input from others is welcome.

I have to assume aTriz is referring to something with his post... but I agree, it seems like the contract, as posted, should not hold aTriz accountable to continue payments. Still not sure why one would agree to a 5 month upfront payment in this situation. Seems like quite a risk for a user with no real prior history who has only been on the forum 1 month.

This rule is interesting:
For the whole term, a signature of his choice will be in my signature space

He should send (s)cam girl legendary signature, she won't be able to wear it, and I don't see "junior member signature" is mentioned anywhere in contract  Cheesy

@OP i am not sure, but maybe aTriz was thinking with his dick  Undecided
4257  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 12:07:40 AM
~
I wasn't talking to you.
4258  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 27, 2018, 11:56:17 PM
I was asked to give a rating on her method that she was selling, and since it was a vouch copy I didn't want to deposit real money, since it would feel like cheating.
She was selling her "method" and you were fine with this statement(something which 15 year old kid can recognize as scam):
Quote
This script is designed for crash sites, and has been backtested against around 2 years worth of data.

Historically, this script is able to give me upwards of 10% on each round of playing

I am only selling 15 copies of this script, and the price per script will be 0.99 BTC.
And you tested 10000$ worth script using...faucet...and recommend it. Roll Eyes

My knowledge with gambling / scripts is very limited, as you can see from my previous history and I was just speaking from personal experience. I profited so I said that.
I doubt it.

Your chance of winning does not increase at all when you hit a red streak of something. Instead it stays the same.

So based on that your method is already not working.

This is the famous gambler's fallacy. Gamblers tend to think that they are able to beat the house because after each loss their chance of winning rises. But that is mathematically not true because each event is independent of what happened before that.

But prerolls i think might be helpful because even though it does not change the rolls after it, you'll still save some satoshis that you may have bet on that particular losing bet because it is the exact same seeds.
That is why I prefer bonus which basically erases house edge for few hours. That is more interesting, and gives me more opportunities, than having 100% or 150% deposit bonus.
Yeah, i have used played on pd plenty of times as well and like xypos i've lost a lot of my coins Sad
[...]
PD has revolutionised bitcoin dicing if you asked me Smiley

Thanks PD for these 4 years, i'll always play on your site Cheesy
[...]
 I did lose a lot using directbet because their betting service was instantaneous but I can't blame them for my stupid actions in the past - it's just illogical. They have paid every time I won something from them with no issues.

Hopefully they can reopen in the future, right now I'd say that the most trustworthy one in the community is nitrogensports, others all have some sort of problem with KYC, one way or another. Hopefully they can reopen.
4259  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Merit not for sale! on: February 27, 2018, 03:49:02 PM
I think this is great for reducing the number of users. and requires the struggle for users to increase their quality and rank. but this is one of the highlights, so the reward can be right to the users of good quality posts
This is not correct.
Merit won't reduce number of users but it will reduce number of accounts. It is a big difference.
4260  Economy / Reputation / Re: More mass merit farming on: February 26, 2018, 07:58:57 PM
They should be banned from the forum really but they haven't really explicitly broken any of the forum rules apart from some of them were multi posting and talking to each other and trading/farming merit doesn't seem to be a bannable offence yet.

Is this user banned https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=818476 ?

Hm...I'll rephrase:

Chinesepracing posted this address 338o15RsxUkXPTANKT8eEwrLsoMfBDSxXh here:

https://archive.fo/ukWH4#selection-8055.0-8055.63
Quote
Name: chineseprancing
Post count: 578 (include this post)
Rank: Fullmember
Bitcoin address: 338o15RsxUkXPTANKT8eEwrLsoMfBDSxXh

Samsungbitcoin posted the same address here:
https://archive.fo/kWZBP#selection-4399.0-4399.82
Btctalk name: SamsungBitcoin
Rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 1029
BTC Address: 338o15RsxUkXPTANKT8eEwrLsoMfBDSxXh

rhed posted the same address here:
https://archive.fo/FFJ14#selection-8478.0-8481.25
Quote
name: rhed718
post: 68
activity: 42
position: Jr. member
btc address: 338o15RsxUkXPTANKT8eEwrLsoMfBDSxXh
Is he banned?  Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 [213] 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 ... 367 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!