About plots - The two plots show how people are more actively creating new users on the forum especially since December 2020.
- You can easily see this fact from how the boxes explode in the last 3 months (November 2020 to January 2021 - incomplete month).
- They are mainly or partially come from the SEO-attacks.
- The last plot (for 2020 only) gives a better visual view, after excludes the extraordinary upsurge in January 2021
As of writing, the forum has 2983322 members totally, according to Stats centerNow, let's go to some available stats and small estimation. - Required new members to hit 3th million record: 16678.
- In median of 16 days in January of 2021 (p50 value in the raw result table): there is 1911 new members daily. The max value is 11413.
- So if this parameter (new daily members) won't break it record in 2021 at 11413, the forum will need more than 24 hours (~ 1.47 days) to hit the 3th million users.
- If it fluctuates around the median (1911), it might takes up to 8.73 days (~ 9 days) with the range of estimation based on interquartile range (939 to 4893 that are p25 and p75 values respectively) will be 3.41 days to 17.8 days.
- To recap, there is a 50% that it would take the forum from 3.41 days to 17.8 days (based on the interquartile range) to hit 3th million member record. The most likely waiting time is 8.73 days (based on the median)
Summary for variables: n_mem
by categories of: m
m | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020m7 | 30.0 379.6 48.6 386.0 351.0 402.0 277.0 501.0
2020m8 | 31.0 395.6 85.3 386.0 333.0 423.0 284.0 660.0
2020m9 | 30.0 393.4 70.8 406.5 342.0 454.0 256.0 510.0
2020m10 | 31.0 416.9 166.2 372.0 338.0 429.0 266.0 1018.0
2020m11 | 30.0 588.2 193.3 507.0 428.0 703.0 384.0 1014.0
2020m12 | 31.0 1886.3 1549.2 1483.0 1003.0 2424.0 554.0 9060.0
2021m1 | 16.0 3153.4 3114.7 1911.0 939.0 4892.5 575.0 11413.0
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | 199.0 879.2 1357.8 424.0 369.0 740.0 256.0 11413.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How about daily new posts? In contrast to daily new members, the statistic for total of daily new posts reached its peak in December 2020, not in January of 2021. Below are some plots and stats. Data interpretation can make in the same way above. Possible reasons: - New members (spammers) are faster dectected and nuked in Jan 2021, so they can not abuse as long as in December 2020.
- Those members are created and currently inactive, to prepare for future spam attacks.
Raw results Summary for variables: n_posts
by categories of: m
m | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020m7 | 30.0 6382.6 586.7 6477.5 6175.0 6724.0 5091.0 7534.0
2020m8 | 31.0 6270.6 283.6 6299.0 6068.0 6460.0 5606.0 6820.0
2020m9 | 30.0 6290.3 527.1 6259.0 5888.0 6659.0 5477.0 7628.0
2020m10 | 31.0 6498.0 513.7 6445.0 6134.0 6840.0 5462.0 7909.0
2020m11 | 30.0 7556.1 642.0 7647.0 7238.0 8006.0 5756.0 8621.0
2020m12 | 31.0 8554.2 1310.5 8176.0 7633.0 9161.0 6738.0 11538.0
2021m1 | 16.0 7902.0 743.1 7747.5 7287.0 8106.5 7133.0 9653.0
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | 199.0 7006.6 1119.5 6718.0 6247.0 7633.0 5091.0 11538.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Details +-----------------------------+
| date n_mem n_posts |
|-----------------------------|
185. | 01jan2021 5871 7840 |
186. | 02jan2021 1891 7294 |
187. | 03jan2021 3914 9653 |
188. | 04jan2021 2481 9331 |
189. | 05jan2021 2121 8009 |
190. | 06jan2021 1699 7710 |
191. | 07jan2021 1624 7878 |
192. | 08jan2021 1252 8204 |
193. | 09jan2021 5951 7661 |
194. | 10jan2021 7917 7133 |
195. | 11jan2021 576 7280 |
196. | 12jan2021 612 7785 |
197. | 13jan2021 626 7207 |
198. | 14jan2021 575 7268 |
199. | 15jan2021 11413 8662 |
200. | 16jan2021 1931 7517 |
+-----------------------------+
Recent rises and spikes from daily new members, daily new posts, and woke-up cases probably come from same or different companies. The common thing is they come from spammers or people want to do attacks on the forum, try to compromise the forum for their own jobs. |
|
|
|
Today, I give you the update for difference between weekly median of transaction fee and the daily median of intraday transactions. For the daily median, I run it for days of week: Monday - Sunday. Then, I calculate the difference (in percent). All results below are for difference (%) This new analytical method excludes the short- or mid-term effects of bitcoin rises / falls that in turn potentially increase bitcoin transaction fees within a few days, few weeks.
Box plot- The median values are vertical lines inside boxes (for each Days of week)
- Only 3 days have medians below 0: Monday, Saturday, and Sunday.
- It is a confirmation for weekend effects and the appearance of Monday with negative value somewhat shows the market need Monday to warm up for rest days of week
- With working days: Tuesday to Friday, the highest median is on Thursdays.
Bar chart- Values in bar chart are means.
- Only 2 weekend days have negative values: Saturday (- 3.01%) and Sunday (- 7.9%).
- Monday is slightly above 0, at 0.13 %.
- The peak is still on Thursday at 6.85%
I did not (but I might) censor data set to recent years as I believe results will be almost the same.You can combine this update with the hourly analysis above and make weekly, hourly plans for your bitcoin transactions. Raw resultsSummary for variables: diff_pc
by categories of: dofw
dofw | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday | 507.0 -7.9 18.7 -5.4 -15.7 -0.3 -100.0 120.9
Monday | 507.0 0.1 15.7 -0.7 -5.4 5.1 -98.1 131.4
Tuesday | 507.0 5.1 21.6 1.6 -3.3 8.5 -100.0 255.9
Wednesday | 508.0 6.5 22.3 2.4 -2.4 10.3 -51.0 231.0
Thursday | 508.0 6.8 19.1 2.8 -1.6 9.7 -100.0 178.5
Friday | 507.0 5.1 18.6 1.8 -2.5 9.3 -100.0 162.3
Saturday | 507.0 -3.0 19.3 -2.1 -10.5 3.2 -100.0 130.3
----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | 3551.0 1.8 20.1 0.2 -5.3 6.4 -100.0 255.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Today, after composing my another thread on fees, include transaction fees. I decided to come back to this thread, and spend sometime to update it. Below are 2 bar charts, that compares the median for all hours and median of transactions within each hour frame: from 0 UTC - 23 UTC. They are stats for 2 variables below. - Gas used
- Gas limit
- Hours from 0 to 11 UTC are better to do transactions. It is confirmed by both gas used and gas limit are lower in values (bigger negative values, lower positive values, and frequency -- shows by % in charts, of negative hours are bigger than positive hours)
You can read 2 following articles and compare given stats with my findings. Of course, the period for my analysis is only one month so what I found can match or un-match with their findings. Raw resultsGas usedSummary for variables: gas_used
by categories of: hr_frame
hr_frame | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 | 1336851.0 75365.6 159693.2 38788.0 21000.0 80693.0 0.0 1.2e+07
1 | 1443935.0 70247.0 152047.4 38195.0 21000.0 60387.0 0.0 1.2e+07
2 | 1575201.0 64483.1 132660.6 36733.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.2e+07
3 | 1505310.0 66175.8 132231.6 40441.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.2e+07
4 | 1514594.0 65963.1 132168.9 41185.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.0e+07
5 | 1495786.0 67637.7 156688.5 41185.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.2e+07
6 | 1546700.0 64253.6 134334.4 39643.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.1e+07
7 | 1626617.0 61359.6 125970.3 37141.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.1e+07
8 | 1704688.0 60197.2 127575.8 36109.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.2e+07
9 | 1639513.0 61022.0 118644.2 36296.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 9680533.0
10 | 1538882.0 65088.9 144788.7 36768.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 9682761.0
11 | 1533449.0 66116.8 140635.0 37358.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.0e+07
12 | 1544248.0 66803.0 134823.3 38935.0 21000.0 56209.0 0.0 1.1e+07
13 | 1502339.0 66555.6 127167.6 39526.0 21000.0 56221.0 0.0 9947874.0
14 | 1509287.0 67327.3 122692.5 41185.0 21000.0 57381.0 0.0 1.1e+07
15 | 1473938.0 68567.4 129645.9 39486.0 21000.0 65219.0 0.0 9647972.0
16 | 1463575.0 69021.7 131385.1 37562.0 21000.0 72755.0 0.0 1.0e+07
17 | 1399252.0 73182.9 157704.0 37693.0 21000.0 86964.0 0.0 9915837.0
18 | 1335239.0 76505.2 162404.3 38309.0 21000.0 99183.0 0.0 1.0e+07
19 | 1305428.0 77429.6 172281.9 37533.0 21000.0 100442.0 0.0 1.1e+07
20 | 1230454.0 81596.2 192723.9 38822.5 21000.0 107300.0 0.0 9213535.0
21 | 1201972.0 84342.7 188163.0 41209.0 21000.0 111356.0 0.0 1.2e+07
22 | 1212677.0 83311.0 177811.7 41197.0 21000.0 110685.0 0.0 1.2e+07
23 | 1220928.0 84343.6 181939.2 41209.0 21000.0 113229.0 0.0 1.2e+07
---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | 3.5e+07 69594.5 147113.3 38506.0 21000.0 59345.0 0.0 1.2e+07
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary for variables: gas_limit
by categories of: hr_frame
hr_frame | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 | 1336851.0 224165.7 384419.5 100000.0 48793.0 210000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
1 | 1443935.0 198827.2 357507.4 90000.0 44645.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
2 | 1575201.0 190902.8 336479.6 90000.0 48728.0 207128.0 0.0 1.2e+07
3 | 1505310.0 185946.1 339703.2 89953.0 44596.0 190000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
4 | 1514594.0 191628.3 340283.8 90000.0 48871.0 196605.0 0.0 1.2e+07
5 | 1495786.0 183575.3 344628.4 84313.0 44358.0 180570.0 0.0 1.2e+07
6 | 1546700.0 178692.1 337620.7 84295.0 41953.0 177949.0 0.0 1.2e+07
7 | 1626617.0 170131.7 317624.2 90000.0 42294.0 168493.0 0.0 1.2e+07
8 | 1704688.0 168917.8 313668.6 90000.0 46505.0 166676.0 0.0 1.2e+07
9 | 1639513.0 168532.2 316799.3 90000.0 42000.0 168110.0 0.0 1.2e+07
10 | 1538882.0 171463.5 326429.8 83906.0 41197.0 176718.0 0.0 1.2e+07
11 | 1533449.0 176814.8 323927.7 82442.0 41197.0 189774.0 0.0 1.2e+07
12 | 1544248.0 179368.5 329316.7 86790.0 41209.0 197986.0 0.0 1.2e+07
13 | 1502339.0 182868.7 328690.5 90000.0 41209.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
14 | 1509287.0 185885.6 331756.4 90000.0 42000.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
15 | 1473938.0 190346.5 341375.9 90000.0 41209.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
16 | 1463575.0 197002.2 343506.5 90000.0 41197.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
17 | 1399252.0 200517.6 365538.1 90000.0 35000.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
18 | 1335239.0 210531.6 369353.3 90000.0 40456.0 205298.0 0.0 1.2e+07
19 | 1305428.0 210226.3 373988.8 90044.0 36832.0 202446.5 0.0 1.2e+07
20 | 1230454.0 217510.9 377957.3 100000.0 41209.0 207128.0 0.0 1.2e+07
21 | 1201972.0 226663.8 391440.3 100000.0 42000.0 216492.0 0.0 1.2e+07
22 | 1212677.0 232938.0 396113.9 107165.0 44245.0 224368.0 0.0 1.2e+07
23 | 1220928.0 231133.2 386288.4 110000.0 48846.0 230996.0 0.0 1.2e+07
---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total | 3.5e+07 192956.7 348020.2 90000.0 42000.0 200000.0 0.0 1.2e+07
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
It is for people who need it. I truly believe that most of us are not over-paranoid about such things. Notes- With any coin, I believe you can have cheaper transaction fees on weekends.
- It is already proven with Bitcoin or Ethereum transactions.
- Make your weekly / hourly plans to save transaction fees
Table of contents
1. Withdrawalfees.com Back to table of contentsLinkPros- It provides a huge list of exchanges (60) and coins (2301)
- It is likely real-time updated (not sure)
- You can choose to get list for specific coin or specific exchange
Cons- There is no option to filter the fee ascendingly or descendingly. Frankly, I don't know why website does not include this basic feature.
2. Cointracker.io Back to table of contentsLinkPros - The table is neatly visually.
- There are few stats: Deposit, Withdrawal, Taker, maker, spread.
Cons - It is not a real-time database. The last update is on January 11, 2021./li]
3. Blockchair.com Back to table of contentsVisit their Compare crypto pagePros - real time updates from blockchain operational status
- You can compare transaction fees of some crypto currencies: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Bitcoin ABC, Ethereum, Litecoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, DASH, Groestlcoin, Stellar, Monero, Cardano, and Zcash.
Cons - Stats are for networks, and does not have information for exchanges (Deposit, Withdrawal, Taker, Maker fees)
- The table shows 5 coins at the same time (even you add more than 5 coins into the filter). Therefore, you have to do it for each 5 coins, copy & paste results to your sheet and repeat it again a few times if you want to get full sheet for all available coins.
- You can not customize which statistics you want to see
4. Bitinforcharts.com Back to table of contentsLink. It is a link (with chart, stats) for bitcoin. Pros - You can add other coins by clicking on their ticker labels.
- There is option to customize which statistics you want to see & compare. Click on the left corner drop-down box as shown in the sreenshot (Average transaction fee, USD -- change it to what you want)
- You can narrow down the period you want. As I do in the screenshot, hover the mouse on the period (in grey), right click, and get a chart for that period.
Cons - It simply provides you stats for networks, not exchanges
5. Crypto51.app Back to table of contentsLinkRead their attack cost formula with their explantion: How is the attack cost calculated?Pros - Details on theoretical attack cost for many cryptocurrency networks.
- It is helpful to warn you risks of replay attacks if you want to move your fund with alternative cryptocurrency, that tends to have lower hashrates on the network and more vulnerable to attacks
Cons - Stats can be inaccurate.
- It simply provides you stats for networks, not exchanges
6. Cryptowisser.com Back to table of contentsLinkYou can get the taker, maker fee and there are some options for you to customize the filter. 7. Threads/ articles on effects of hour-frames or weekend-days Back to table of contentsSneak peak from my analyses Bitcoin transaction feeWeekend effectsWorking-hour effectsETH and ERC20 transaction fee (gas used and gas limit)Click to see details |
|
|
|
Bitcoin has exponential power when it starts parabolic adventure but gold don't have such amazing power. There are many reasons - Total supply, circulating supply: bitcoin has a fixed total supply (21 million of bitcoin) and people can observe the ledger and point out how many bitcoin potentially was lost forever. They can estimate the rest lively and touchable bitcoin. With gold, you can not.
- It is easier to use news and FUDs to manipulate the market. Whale alert bots, ie. that are used many times to shed lights of big bitcoin transactions.
- Policies: Crypto market is still young and many things will be changed in policies, nationally and globally. It is both challenge and opportunity for bitcoin enthusiasts. Gold market is very old and law, policies are almost in place, there is less things to change.
- Adoption: bitcoin adoption has a future of explosion. With gold, you can not expect the same thing.
Nevertheless, Gold is a good asset to invest. Below is plots are taken from my another thread. Please visit that post to see details and my data interpretation.
Threads to read: |
|
|
|
Thank you for the information (from your data extrapolation) and the given data pages. As you are familiar with it, would mind give me headers of columns that are separated by commas, please. I don't know which column is for which variable/ parameter -- this info is necessary to run analyses, then I'll look at and play with it when I have time. I have all that data in json format in the domain, which I prefer. I can help you access it if you need.
I don't need json file as I am not a coder.  |
|
|
|
I visited your website, here is what I feel: - It looks very well-built (graphics).
- You said you have many past clients but I can not click on client's icons to visit their websites. I think you should include hyperlinks with those icons as a search on Google or other search engines can direct to phishing sites.
In case if you need someone else to join your team, with demand for market, growth statistical analyses, please take a look at my thread. |
|
|
|
I made a big update!
You are a very hard-working guy, bitmover. Following tranthidung suggestion, I made an horizontal bar charts for miners:
Thanks. However, the important thing is at the end, how do you feel about pie chart, bar chart and especially the difference between horizontal versus vertical bar charts? I will spend time to look at your updates and will focus on the last one, for Segwit.
i had a little chat with a friend who is statistician and he said barcharts are the way to go (just like the article I shared earlier)
Vertical / Horizontal depends on the amount of data you have.
Personally, I will just keep pie charts if I have less than 5 values to compare. Otherwise, bar charts.
I think horizontal ones are more beautiful. But I like vertical ones as well.
That's helpfulness and beauty of bar charts. |
|
|
|
These charts are different visual representations for changes of Total locked value (in USD) -- TLV, between 2 consecutive days, for specific DeFi platform. - Positive: Changes between 2 consecutive days are >= 0 figures
- Negative: Changes between 2 consecutive days are negative figures
- This style can help people who are not familiar with box plots (median, interquartile range, whiskers, etc.)
- Interesting finding & confirmation: The weak-down of Uniswap and the spike (positive) of Sushiswap happen within almost same period
- These charts also show Maker is one of most stable DeFi platforms, not the most as there is one significant positive spike to almost +20%. The 2 more stable DeFi platforms are Aave and Compound
|
|
|
|
As we all know, (DeFi) is one of the aspects of liquidity that made bitcoin price jump from 15000 dollar to 30000 dollar easily and fast.
I don't catch your opinion. Bitcoin is not related to DeFi hype and DeFi tokens are created on ERC20 chain. They are parasiting on the Ethereum blockchain. Bitcoin is one of two biggest assets locked in DeFi, together with Ethereum according to [1]I think differently. The DeFi hype in August or September of 2020 is to help big men collect as much bitcoin as they can from DeFi tokens. From this perspective, I was not suprised to see bitcoin reached its all time high at almost $42,000. The all time high of bitcoin is lower than all time high of YFI at $43966 on Binance. Capital flow changes from DeFi to bitcoin and help bitcoin set up many new records. It is the big contributions from DeFi tokens to bitcoin price but nothing more. Do you think that this news has a good effect on Bitcoin in general and the price in particular?
It is helpful in terms of creating another wave of over-optimistic and catching new flows of capital from newbies. 
[1] https://defipulse.com/ |
|
|
|
About the statement that 1 BTC = 1 BTC - It is constantly right over the whole lifespan of bitcoin.
- Only price of bitcoin in fiat changes over time. The changes can come from one of two sides or both of them: price of bitcoin increases or bailout of government-backed fiats that change over time and different by fiat to fiat.
- The fact so far is: people change from use bitcoin for their bitcoin transactions to smaller units of bitcoin such as satoshi.
|
|
|
|
The UI looks good but honestly I think the new forum software should give two options for UI at least or can be expanded to three options (with the last one) - Classic: familiar with and would love to use.
- Modern: can be fancy and is more favorite by younger generations.
- Customize: or people who want to play with it. Like what Windows give their users.
|
|
|
|
- This thread is planned to update monthly
- I will expand it to rest DeFi platforms (beyond top 10)
- It is purely statistics but from these you can get a picture, then connects it with Bitcoin price as well as the developments, promotions, drama of each platform
Top 10 DeFi platforms, in terms of total value locked in USD with the snapshot on 12 Jan 2021 are: Notes
Time series plotsIn this part, I split them into 2 categories: top 1-5 and top 6-10. Reason: Combine all ten tokens in 1 chart makes it bad visually. From 2 plots, you can see: - During around 3 months, Uniswap, Sushiswap and Curve Finance are the most volatile DeFi platforms.
- Uniswap that has a big drop in middle of November 2020. Within almost the same period, capital switched to Sushiswap that is reflected by a take-off of total value locked in Sushiswap. The platform after that has maintained its upward trend but it is still far from Uniswap.
- Curve Finance has almost same hiccup as of Uniswap and same pattern of rally.
- The rest 7 platforms don't have much volatile changes
Box plotsIn this part, I draw 2 plots with 2 different time frames: - Time windows
- Whole: 14 Oct 2020 to 12 Jan 2021
- Censored: 01 Dec 2020 to 12 Jan 2021
- The first box plot shows bigger boxes (widths of boxes), especially boxes for Uniswap, Sushiswap, and Curve Finance. It is logical as the aforementioned explanations. 3 platforms have some big changes in the whole period.
- The second box plot show narrower boxes for 3 platforms as they present for a period that don't include those big volatile changes. This plot reflect absolutely right the positions of top 10 platforms on DefiPulse.com
- Maker is the biggest and one of most stable platforms (see the Dark-orange box -- it is narrow) and compares it with time series plot above). Moreover, Maker stays very stably above others in interquartile range (the box), median (the vertical line inside box) and the range from lower to upper whiskers. It is right for whole or censored time window.
|
|
|
|
If the company feels fine with the payment rate, why do we have to care about that? - It can be a lie but bitcoiners say I am believe in bitcoin and 1 BTC is 1 BTC, I don't fear if bitcoin falls to a few cents. If you consider it is a trusted statement, they are caring about how many bitcoin/ satoshi they will receive for their works
- How many people will dump their bad judgement to bitcoiners if price falls to a few cent? If you support bitcoin today, you deserve it as you take all risks of any bad-judgement on you.
- It is not make sense to compare the salaries between bitcoiners (top-notch) and non-bitcoiners. Expanding the picture beyond cryptocurrency, it is non-sense to compare salaries in developed and developing nations. People are all survived with their received salaries.
- Me as an observer and applicant of the campaign, I can not deny I want to be in and have never stopped dreaming and trying for my future.
- To recap, I think it would be much derails already. If there is discussion, it should be among the company, manager, and participants, not for observers or ex-/ future- applicants
- If you want to earn a same income rate, let's get started to be a bitcoiner (if you've not yet), read, learn, and work hard. Some day, you can be one of them. Is it easy for top-notch bitcoiner to write a short but comprehensive post? It takes them months or years to turn challenging task to easy one (in aspect of knowledge) and decent times to compile their own documents. They deserve it
Cheers to all guys in Chip Mixer gang, you all deserve that.  |
|
|
|
You can find one for you from Screenshots [1] [2]
Binance P2P is expanding their zero-fee promotion up to 31 June 2021. Their announcement |
|
|
|
|
Bump to let you know that I updated the Part 2 in OP a few minutes ago. Enjoy your reading time!
|
|
|
|
Hi fil., I invite you to read a newest thread of mine on Grayscale: GDLC real-time observation with Trade block DLCX index. I don't know whether Trade Block allows to download raw data for their table as I have not yet tried to do so. I don't want to create an account on Trade Block and Sign in. My AV shows warning when I visit the website but it could be a false positive warning. |
|
|
|
Grayscale is a big guy in crypto and they are the one who triggered the wave of institutional investment in 2020. Some people also call this wave as institutional bubble. Ignore what they want to seed or imply with such news. I will introduce you to a website that allows you to observe the real-time, chronological changes of Grayscale investments (via compositions and performance of their GDLC index). Here is the introduction on the FAQ page [1] of Grayscale: *TradeBlock also publishes the TradeBlock DLCX Index, which allows investors and other market participants to obtain enhanced real-time transparency into the composition and performance of GDLC. While GDLC’s portfolio construction methodology was developed and is managed by Grayscale, an intra-day index price is calculated, verified, and published in real-time by TradeBlock, an independent pricing source. For more information, please visit: https://tradeblock.com/markets/dlcx. What is GDLC? - It is the abbreviation for: Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund LLC
- Definition: "Grayscale’s diversified Product, Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund, provides exposure to the top liquid digital assets by market capitalization and currently holds BTC, ETH, XRP, LTC, and BCH." I took it from top of the FAQ page. [1]
[1] https://grayscale.co/faq/Where to get data or chart for GDLC? - GDLC index on OTCmarkets.com (You can get data, chart and are allowed to download data tables)
- Tradeblock.com (this website gives you more details on compositions of GDLC and their changes. Customize the chart with 1h, 2h, 6h, 1d, 1w time-frame)
Ripple is disappeared on the table data after the lawsuit from SEC.
Coindesk purchased Trade block recently: CoinDesk Acquires TradeBlock, Adding Indexes and Pricing to News, Events Offerings |
|
|
|
No, the main reason is that Bitcoin price became overbought.
News are released at right time to resolve the overbought phenomenon. |
|
|
|
I've been getting a bunch of error 403 when opening the pages in a new tab. I've tried clearing cache and it still persists. Is it a forum-wide issue or is it just me?
403s error, do you mean this? It comes from today technical fix from theymos. It's annoying that browsers are doing this prefetching without any way for sites to signal that they shouldn't, but it's even more annoying that each browser has a separate way of indicating it via headers, and it's all very poorly-documented. In the case of Opera and apparently some versions of Safari, it seems that a prefetching request can be identified if it has a Sec-Fetch-Dest header but does not have a Sec-Fetch-User header. Bitcointalk.org blocks such requests now. (If anyone starts seeing random 403s, this may be the cause; let me know right away in that case.)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
