Wow! I've now learned one can find an MSDS with a Google search!
Use your new found skill to search an actual element like I was implying originally; hydrogen. Compare and contrast with gasoline; make my arguments for me  You are truly wasting your time, but I do have a question. Just one quote from MSDS for liquid h2 (roughly equal to 8000 psi h2 gaseous) "Isolate spill or leak area for at least 100 meters (330 feet) in all directions. "THE QUESTION: Are you influenced by the combustion products of h2 being h20 and not predominately Co2, since you view that as a GREAT EVIL? Because I do suspect that's your motive. |
|
|
|
.....
If you think a chemical that causes leukemia is safer than one that does not, you probably deserve to have cancer......
Yes, that is certainly possible. Lol. It's crazy how wrong you guys are about pretty much everything.
It's kinda cool having my own personal trolls though. Spendulus and TECSHARE both have their points refuted multiple times, yet they call "me" the idiot.
It's pretty obvious these guys are concern trolls.
Finding the MSDS is pretty easy; you literally just google element name + "msds".
.....
So now you are saying liquid gasoline is safer? That... is exactly what we have been arguing. Thanks for going full circle with your retardation. Wow! I've now learned one can find an MSDS with a Google search! And Gasoline's an element, lol! |
|
|
|
....
hey retard, you're still wrong.
Look at the definition you link, a pipe bomb does not meet that definition; so go fuck yourself you retard.
Yes, it does meet the definition, (2)(A). (2) the term “weapon of mass destruction” means— (A) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title; What else would you like to be corrected on? |
|
|
|
First and foremost, cultural appropriation is kind of tricky and misaligning. When you first hear or read about it, it seems that it is positive and 'appropriate'. Cultural appropriation seems right since it is the act of taking the cultural ways of other people that is of course not your kind of culture just to be part of them ....
There's some variation between countries and cultures on this, but in the US as a traditional melting pot of cultures .... |
|
|
|
Just because you do not agree with what is being broadcasted, it doesn't make it fake news. What's fake news is propaganda being spread all over the internet by "bloggers" and wanna be reporters.
Actually it's bloggers and amateur reporters who are largely responsible for pointing out the fake news in the mainstream media. There are countless examples of this. |
|
|
|
.... If I see a white person, I know that they nor their immediate family have been denied basic services or freedoms because of their race....
NO YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT. ....
An good example would be a white trans female. They obviously have a tough experience because they lack male privilege and cis privilege even though they still have white privilege. ....
No, there is nothing "obvious" about what goes on in the mind, or the life, of such a person. You are making things up to assume otherwise. |
|
|
|
.....The overwhelming majority of black people do not support Trump......
When you let Jeff Sessions head the DOJ, well, you lose the black vote.
I don't know anyone that favors Sessions. Of any persuasion. That includes religious right, my left oriented friends, lots of people in between. Trump is the dude that really tries to do what he says, and he said some really serious things about improving conditions for blacks in America. What does that amount to, when we've got many entire trades and industries taken over by illegal Mexican immigrants? I can't really answer that. How would you act so as to increase average liquid cash reserves in the subgroup in question to 2000, or 3000? |
|
|
|
Suffice to say that if, for example, pharmaceutical companies were an extremely powerful lobby in the halls of power of a country, one could expect any law passed which dished out money to really, really favor them. That's the case in the USA, but not in many other countries in which that lobby is not such a force.
Ya most democratic countries have figured out allowing politicians to be bought publicly is a bit of a problem LOL. So what your saying is that the lobby groups have to much power because they already bought BOTH political parties?? .... I wonder when the American citizens will figure this out and take all their assault rifles to congress ... lol.... Yes it is both parties down here. It's really a bit funny but that's how Trump got voted in, and that's why the Republicans hated him as much as the Democrats did (still do). I used the example of "big Pharma" but it's far more pervasive than that. It's not just health care, but that was the subject of discussion. And yea, that's why we need a 2nd Amendment right. Kind of weird and crazy and true all at the same time. |
|
|
|
Hydrogen's liquid state requires super cooling. Maybe if you went to science class once, you'd know this.  nice save. /s You don't think that someone's level of ignorance and misunderstanding in science and politics would be equally astonishingly wrong, do you? I mean, even a stopped clock.... |
|
|
|
....
Turns out when people have healthcare they end up liking it, kind of unbelievable but somehow it's true!
Ain't all that free shit nice? huh I guess the American citizens covered by the ACA never pay taxes... Do you like all those free roads you use or any other litany of services the government provides for "free". Your knowledge of the current state of ACA is one of blissful ignorance, but then I recall once having an in depth discussion with a Canadian doc about the socialized medicine in Canada, and realized I didn't know anything about it. Suffice to say that if, for example, pharmaceutical companies were an extremely powerful lobby in the halls of power of a country, one could expect any law passed which dished out money to really, really favor them. That's the case in the USA, but not in many other countries in which that lobby is not such a force. It should then be easy to understand (But I find it hard to forget the depths of stupid) that what works in one country may be predicted accurately to be a total fail in another. Fortunately, though, you don't have to know any of the details. The lying liars will tell you what to think and believe, and what to repeat, and you can just follow their lead. Or not. |
|
|
|
....
Turns out when people have healthcare they end up liking it, kind of unbelievable but somehow it's true!
Ain't all that free shit nice? |
|
|
|
.....
Checking privilege doesn't limit anyone's opportunity. Its simply asking someone to acknowledge the struggles of those who do not share their identity. Its a demand for courtesy. its not saying "you don't get _________ because you have privilege".
That's one of the stupidest rationalizations I have ever heard. Because statistically, individual variability is orders of magnitude higher than variability attributable to visible groupings such as skin color. Your demand for courtesy is an insult. That is because race is not real and is a social construct. This doesn't mean racism doesn't exist and hasn't had real effects and perhaps you don't know about the systemic racism that has taken place in the US because you had the privilege to not need to know. You would have to check your privilege to take the time to research practices that systemically penalized people based on race. It would be uncomfortable and life is a lot more pleasant to just pretend it doesn't exist. Then again, it could be because you have simply fallen for one of the stupidest social constructs ever promulgated by maniacs of the left. This is far more likely than your being right. The reason I say this is that my first answer to your ridiculous assertions was quite scientific. Because statistically, individual variability is orders of magnitude higher than variability attributable to visible groupings such as skin color.It's actually irrefutable. But you missed that entirely and went on with the lecturing. And I'll repeat my former conclusion. Your demand for courtesy is an insult. Particularly when you haven't the slightest clue what I know or don't know. |
|
|
|
....We have a president speaking directly to white nationalism.....
Hmm, that does not explain why Trump's popularity among black voters has more than doubled... Maybe you are simply wrong. And a side note; Nazis are pretty much a universally condemned class. The ideology is so dangerous, it's fucking illegal in some places....
Really? Funny how many left wing people including you believe in National Socialism... Wait...wasn't NAZI...let's see...how did that translate.... Definition of Nazi in English: Nazi
NOUN
historical
1A member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
Example sentences
1.1derogatory A person with extreme racist or authoritarian views.
Example sentencesSynonyms
1.2 A person who seeks to impose their views on others in a very autocratic or inflexible way.
‘I learned to be more open and not such a Nazi in the studio’What gives? Are you referring or mixing up definition 1A and 1.1 or 1.2? |
|
|
|
When we talk about some people, I think Donald Trump is one of them. He is very much skeptical about climate change.
Sure. It's hard to not be skeptical when you see politicians wanting to take your money to roll back the oceans. |
|
|
|
....I'm sure Trump and the GOP will just want more guns instead. Because more guns has worked so well in the past. Smart.
More guns would definitely fix things. For example, every "gun free zone" that attracts a maniac looking for a soft target could become a "make my day zone". What is your problem with that, if any? |
|
|
|
Tbh, I don't think this matters much politically, despite all the hot air. This might swing a few conservative moderates and undecideds, but Trump's base is Trump's base. They do not perceive the rhetorical environment the President has fostered, and don't understand the constant attacks on Trump from liberal media. So any political coin gained is useless to spend.
What about the rhetoric by the likes of Maxine Waters, Corey Booker, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder and others? Sometimes explicitly calling for violence and in others implicitly calling for violence. How do you feel about liberal Mayors ordering police to stand down for political purposes, resulting in danger to many innocent lives? What about either condoning or ignoring violence when it happens? All that is okay, right? The double standard of the left is sickening and removes their credibility. Frankly many on the left with these double standard are outright bad people. THAT'S ALL DIFFERENT BECAUSE, shut up! >>> attitude of leftists and media already burying the attempt to assassinate Scalise and many others But hey, I am cool with these rabid leftists finding a common ground of acceptable and unacceptable behavior. But I doubt we'll see that. |
|
|
|
Watch how fast they put pressure on them to flip this decision around...
Clarification: THEY: Silicon Valley oligarchs, Movie industry attorneys, and Hillary Clinton cronies US: Ordinary people, and Trump. |
|
|
|
Hydrogen's liquid state requires super cooling. Maybe if you went to science class once, you'd know this. Seriously, you need to come back after some chemistry and physics. You are wasting your time on this subject. Or grab a triple point diagram and come back, but be ready to learn some things. .......Still waiting for that triple point diagram. While you are at it how about some MSDS sheets? |
|
|
|
There's a certain individual who pretends he's a victim, when in reality;
How about we start talking about the guy that incited the right? Trump's a symptom of the propaganda machine, but the buck does stop with the President, in my opinion.
That is quite an interesting projection considering this whole time I was pointing out the whole point of this was the cast the left as victims to elicit sympathy right before midterms. Also a lot of them have prosecutions coming. They are losing power and are desperate. If that is your argument, who is responsible for inciting the shooting at the Republican baseball game a while back where Steve Scalise was shot? What about the people who incited a man to beat Rand Paul so badly he had to be hospitalized? Why is the left not responsible for their own rhetoric in the same way you are claiming the right should be? You know the answer. You know the way the left thinks. It's because, SHUT UP. |
|
|
|
.....
Checking privilege doesn't limit anyone's opportunity. Its simply asking someone to acknowledge the struggles of those who do not share their identity. Its a demand for courtesy. its not saying "you don't get _________ because you have privilege".
That's one of the stupidest rationalizations I have ever heard. Because statistically, individual variability is orders of magnitude higher than variability attributable to visible groupings such as skin color. Your demand for courtesy is an insult. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
