All orders that have been paid for say that,the next change will be "shipped" or "fulfilled" not much chance of a refund from BA now,they made that clear earlier,best thing to do is receive the miner and sell it when you get it. It would probably be much quicker than trying to get a refund

That would certainly make sence for the X-3 but for X-1s they said they "will" start shipping Monday rather than the "should" or "probably" as before..

[/quote]
Its because it causes problems with the shipping program and additional time spent shipping every day, I do enjoy the conspiracy theories tho.
[/quote]

So you don't want to sell any more units because you have spend time shipping them

Blackarrow miners removed from Minersource web site store

May I ask why you regret sending BTC/placing the order?

I understand,don't get me wrong I'm NOT trying to defend him as I don't know all the details. I would just like to see him admit in here that he got his stuff and be gone.

 I DO NOT know reactor in any way and have only been fallowing this thread for a couple days,I can understand why GAW are deleting his posts but it is a double edeged sword to do so.
As a potential new customer waiting to send several thousands of dollars to GAW it would give me alot more confidence to see reactor get the software he asked for,get his tracking # and/or his hardware delivered,say so here and go away happy.But how would I know this has happened if you keep deleteing everything he posts?.

if people don't like what he says or don't want to read his posts,use the "ignore" option under his avatar or don't complain about him

Any chance of getting some inside photos of the hosting facility?

Would you let a customer visit the facility?

Did they give you the option to take ALL your X-1s without cases?

Your problem is overclocked cards,set them back to default speed and retart the client and they will resync with the Stanford server.Then you can start to increase the overclocking slowly until the problem comes back. I find overclocking memory to be useless,myF2H uses very little GPU mem.

My problem is haveing 4 WUs wait in Queue to be folded with only 2 cards.

For some reason today,after uploading the last 2 WUs the F@H client started to act strange so I re-booted a couple times and I now have 4 extra WUs waiting in the queue,never had that before,only the 2 I was working on?

It happened to me and this is the help I got,
[/quote]

kqpahv posted some information directly from the folding forums about this a few pages back.

The issue you are seeing with the WU that appear to be stuck at 99.99% is actually a sync issue in the client.  What is actually happening is that your GPU has encountered an issue.  You can confirm this by looking at the log tab inside the FAH Control client for the specific work unit and you will see it actually stopped updating long before 99.99%.  I had no errors in my logs and didn't see any errors in Windows event viewer but the data being sent in the log stopped long before the 99.99%

The problem is almost guaranteed to be an overclocking problem on your graphics cards.  I had to tone my R9 290X TRI-X cards down to standard 290X speeds.  One computer still had hung work units so I slowed the core clock speed down to 990 MHz instead of 1000 and will keep dropping it until the GPU's can handle the work.  Keep in mind these cards were factory over clocked but that made no difference with folding.  The overclocking got in the way and actually slowed down my WU submission.

TLDR:  Lower your GPU clock and memory speeds until the "hung WU" issue no longer happens.  As a reference I'm using a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and memory clock of 1250 on my R9 290X TRI-X cards (much lower than the factory defaults).  Even at these speeds I still had to reduce the core clock speed on two of these cards down more to 990 MHz and will continue to lower them 10 MHz at a time until the work units get submitted without incident.


[/quote]

   
   
Re: Black Arrow 28nm 100Ghash Bitcoin ASIC from $1.99/GH/s, miners from $2.97/GH/s
Today at 07:16:20 PM
   
Reply with quote  #4614
Quote from: Pistachio on Today at 06:57:34 PM
What about the 'in-stock' PSUs from Minersource for the compensation units? If the PSUs have to be shipped separately, why aren't they shipping PSUs? Is there really a chance that they will need to change PSUs?

In fact, why aren't we all receiving PSUs now and the miners once they are ready?



+1

Aren't all PSUs supposed to ship separately because of uneven weighting or something? Why not ship them now, less to do later.

 The info I got from another Minning rig manufacture is the reason they ship without PSUs installed or sent separetly has to do with "cerifcation" which can take upto 4 weeks. To ship with a PSU the miner and PSU must be CE ceritfied together. The PSUs need to be sent completely separate and not in the same box as that would "imply" that they would be used together.    

Why does Doge,BBQ,CGA,PPC,MIN or any crypto have value....

I had the same problem and this is the help I got.
   
   

"kqpahv posted some information directly from the folding forums about this a few pages back.

The issue you are seeing with the WU that appear to be stuck at 99.99% is actually a sync issue in the client.  What is actually happening is that your GPU has encountered an issue.  You can confirm this by looking at the log tab inside the FAH Control client for the specific work unit and you will see it actually stopped updating long before 99.99%.  I had no errors in my logs and didn't see any errors in Windows event viewer but the data being sent in the log stopped long before the 99.99%

The problem is almost guaranteed to be an overclocking problem on your graphics cards.  I had to tone my R9 290X TRI-X cards down to standard 290X speeds.  One computer still had hung work units so I slowed the core clock speed down to 990 MHz instead of 1000 and will keep dropping it until the GPU's can handle the work.  Keep in mind these cards were factory over clocked but that made no difference with folding.  The overclocking got in the way and actually slowed down my WU submission.

TLDR:  Lower your GPU clock and memory speeds until the "hung WU" issue no longer happens.  As a reference I'm using a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and memory clock of 1250 on my R9 290X TRI-X cards (much lower than the factory defaults).  Even at these speeds I still had to reduce the core clock speed on two of these cards down more to 990 MHz and will continue to lower them 10 MHz at a time until the work units get submitted without incident."

Proof-of-stake

Peercoin's major distinguishing feature is that it uses proof-of-stake/proof-of-work hybrid system. The proof-of-stake system was designed to address vulnerabilities that could occur in a pure proof-of-work system. With Bitcoin, for example, there is a risk of attacks resulting from a monopoly on mining share. This is because rewards from mining are programmed to decline exponentially, which may decrease the incentive to mine.[1] As miners decline, the likelihood of a monopoly increases, which leaves the network vulnerable to a 51% attack (a 51% attack is when a single entity possesses over half the mining share, which would allow this entity to double-spend coins). With a proof-of-stake system, new coins are generated based on the holdings of individuals. In other words, someone holding 1% of the currency will generate 1% of all proof-of-stake coin blocks. This has the effect of making a monopoly more costly, and separates the risk of a monopoly from proof-of-work mining shares.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peercoin

DUH   I made the correction in the client,anything else I should do..

Ignore the transfers.


A - not sure about folding @ home showing that many work units - would ignore the number of work units


I would wait another day to give cryptobullion pools time to update itself points wise - did you keep caps the same?
[/quote]

Ok,no hurry.

F@H
Donor Statistics
Last updated: Saturday May 17, 2014
Number    Donor    Credit    Total    Team
   Name  
Passkey          
-- Name Stedsm
1    Stedsm    239421    27    2244970


Crypto

Username:    Stedsm
User Id:    1556

Strange problem with cryptobullionpools. I started folding 3 days ago,after about a 24 hr I checked F@H and it showed I completed 21 WU! NO way could I have done that many.
The F@H showed no points at that time,nor did cryptobullionpools,yesterday afternoon F@H showed 24 WU certified and 180,000. points certified and well before 6pm est today it was at 27WU and 200,000 certified points but cryptobullionpools stills shows 0 everywhere.
The user name is the same Stedsm for both. The other starnge thing is a transfer that shows on my acount before I even joined the site??


TX #    Date    TX Type    Payment Address    Block #    Amount
18335   2014-04-30 23:00:03   Credit_M      234    0.00855100
 

Thanks again,I put the cards back to default,they were running at my normal minning OC settings. I'll let them go for the rest of the afternoon and see what happens.