I personally hold several XLM. Seeing this news that Lee said it did not hurt, because it could have been a possibility that will happen in the future.
But I believe that XLM will continue to be developed.
That problem will become centralized, I think as long as they keep trying to be the best, there is no problem. And about the adoption of the period, I think SDF is enough to give free XLM to the wider community because in fact only a handful of people who enjoy the results with greed.
At least that's what I can say, I don't care about people who disagree with me.

If you are late in submitting KYC then you must be prepared to accept the consequence of not getting a reward. Some bounties do have strict rules, so you should at least monitor the progress of their groups, not necessarily every day. If it's like this, you whine, I don't think the decision will change. Try to make a timeline of all the bounties that you follow so you can easily monitor them in the future.

That's what I mean. We must be careful of obscure links that can lead us to phishing websites. No problem you have to create an account where, the important thing is you have to maintain your own account because it is your treasure. No one is responsible but ourselves. Strengthen the security of your account with anything, and of course your email must also be strengthened.

Both are very good and useful for crypto players to see which coins or tokens are good and potential. Honestly, I don't really care which comparison is more popular, because they have their own standard in entering tokens or coins. What I like is that they provide accurate, real-time info according to market conditions. If someone says CMC has too many fake volumes, I think it's a matter of exchange, not CMC, because CMC only shows the conditions according to market reality.

Yes, indeed this is a problem if scams continue to occur between countries. But, this raises the question for me that with what purpose do we transfer between countries? If the goal is to invest in ICO or IEO, and a scam happens, then this could be a serious problem.
But if you transfer personally, how can you just trust people you have never seen before in terms of giving funds. If we doubt it, it's better to use Escrow. And Escrow doesn't have to be a company. If the company is involved surely regulations will emerge. This is the same as transferring fiat between countries. Then what's the difference?

What is yours is your responsibility to look after it. The problem that occurs is whether the coinbase is hacked or just your account?
If only your account is hacked, I think it's your own fault. There's no way someone hacked an account without knowing what the email was. It's certain that you accidentally clicked on a phishing website that contains a keylogger. So the hacker can find out your email and password. Therefore, strengthen your account with Google 2FA.

Of course, for this I will entrust a large exchange. On the other hand, it's a different story if I want to make it fiat. Of course I will sell on the local exchange in my country. To be more safe and reliable. Apart from that, I will not sell it as a whole, certainly gradually. Due to limitations on withdrawals to banks from exchange in my country. Or I could just sell the rest gradually to crypto collectors who was verified. I think there are many ways to exchange it other than to large exchangers such as binance, kucoin, okex etc.

Bitwings is indeed a good company. before jumping into crypto, they have already seen their credibility. But their project idea is not too new because it is still focused on security and privacy which there are many coins that offer it. But what makes me interested is their smartphone that can mine BWN which can produce 2 eth in a month. Ez365 is the same, not a new idea. But at least they try to educate users about crypto. Good project. Maybe that's all I can say.

During my time in the world of bounties, bounties that were only attended by one person were absent, especially in signatures. If this happens, the bounty manager must have anticipated by making a rule at the beginning that if one part of the bounty does not meet the number of participants, the distribution of the results will be distributed to other parts. Because the purpose of the bounty is to promote the project as much as possible with a large number of people as well.

Yes indeed bitcoin is designed to experience inflation, but only at the beginning of its adoption. So far I have not seen that happen. Because you can see for yourself that the total bitcoin is only 21 millions and there are no additions. In fact, it will continue to diminish as people forget about their privatekey.
We know that inflation occurs when the amount of money in circulation is too much and continues to grow. So that the price of goods increases but the value does not change. Unlike bitcoin, the amount will not increase instead it will continue to decrease and the value will increase.

Sometimes I spend bitcoin to buy googleplay vouchers, of course, for topup games or buying useful apps for me. I bought it not through a reputable website that provides these services but bought it to individuals who accept bitcoin as payment. And I think it doesn't matter where bitcoin is going to be used. In the end, there is someone wants to have it and still use it as a payment method.

Crypto that is backed up with commodities is very difficult to survive. As ever, many of them fell, especially to gold.
Because in fact the commodity that backs up crypto is questioned for its existence, is it true that there are goods or only as words.
I once followed an ICO backed up with gold, Lightcash. Somehow they failed in the middle. Maybe because of regulatory or hardcap issues not being met, I don't really understand and they are turning over investors' funds.

I think it's safe if you import privatekey to Dapps. Since it is called a decentralized app, it means no one can own it even the dev. All this time I have used Trustwallet, nothing has happened with my funds. If there really is a case of privatekey theft, I think it is a fake Dapps that is inserted by a keylogger.
For the characteristics of good Dapps I don't quite understand, but use Dapps that already have big names, that's all my advice.

I think that not all crimes in crypto are kept silent because of anonymity.
In my opinion, there are 2 types of scamming people, the first is individuals and the second is companies.
In the case of individuals, which may be rather difficult to trace because they do not know the shape of their faces, their origin, etc. But, if this scamming happens, I think only fools fall on them.
Second, the scam of the company. There are a lot of examples, such as, new projects that raise funds and when funds are collected they run away. Or exchanges that suddenly close and carry users' money.
In this second, the possibility of further action from the law or the police must be there. Because the number of victims they must be many and also the identity of the company or CEO must have been open at the beginning.
So not all crypto crimes are not followed up by law, there must be. It's just that we don't want to find that information.

If a commodity is very useful then demand will be created properly. That's the law.
What I see in XLM is that they can still make demands for people so that when the supply is reduced, the price surge will definitely occur because of its limitations. Demand is created because of the development that continues from the beginning until now. Yes, of course, towards better and more complex things. And that's what I saw in XLM from the very beginning they came out until now.

I have joined Wapinter, Btcltcdigger, Arteezy, and many more. They are good but I think nothing is really the BEST. Because in my opinion if it's BEST, the bounty will not cause problems in the future. We know that there are a lot of bounties that have problems with bounty hunters, starting from delay payments, not being paid even though there are. Yes indeed this is not BM's problem, but at least BM can ask the dev first so that there will be no misunderstanding later. The BEST is that you depend on yourself to determine a good bounty.

I once bought crypto with fiat, only once or twice not too often. In my country, to buy bitcoin is quite easy and the cost is not too expensive.
I did not really choose many criteria for the exchange, the important thing is safe and is a local exchange. Because it's definitely easier in the transaction and complaining and we are better able to understand according to our own language.

I think this happened because what they were running was a million-dollar business. Everyone wants to seek their fortune there. Not new if there is something interesting and booming, there will definitely be someone who follows it by way of seeing, examples, and modifications. At least this indicates that the growth of crypto is increasingly in demand and also as a natural selection that those who are not serious about carrying out their projects will die in vain.

Personally, IEO will not last long because it is not much different from ICO. Maybe there will be another way later to collect funds.
The obvious difference is that in IEO projects only selected and clear projects will get a partnership with the exchange.
On the other hand, when viewed from large number of IEOs circulating on small or large exchanges, this has led to speculation that IEO is not far from the ICO where the profits for investors are unclear and fraud can still occur in more subtle ways such as ignoring the project slowly.
Because of this, I no longer want to go to any kind of tokensale. This is just my personal mind, I do not suggest anyone to follow.

Yes, I also profit a lot from XLM 
If you look at the chart today, XLM has gone up by 20-25% because they burned around 55 billion XLM out of 85 billion available to be destroyed. I am very sure that XLM will continue to develop into the top 5 cryptos later.