From my perspective it would be the same as losing my private keys!

To be fair, I get the appeal of spending less on accommodation. If money is a serious constraint, you can get a cheaper place and use the money on high-end food instead, which I would prefer over a high-end hotel if I had to choose between one of the two. In reality, I wouldn't really leave without being able to afford both though, since I don't like spending money if it's a significant amount of my total savings.

Phew, finally a solid investment! x1000 in only a couple of months! And I thought it'd take me at least 50 years to become a billionaire.

Banks "store" everything digitally. And physical items are subject to theft and corrosion, so your argument doesn't really hold. It's also far simpler to swipe a card or smartphone than to use real cash for transactions.

The only bottleneck is a lack of technological progress in some developing countries, but that doesn't take very long and most people already have smartphones there.

And internet is going to be beamed to the entire planet within a couple of years by Alphabet and Facebook, who want to reach the billions of unconnected people to increase their ad revenue and influence.

Nah, people always need to brag when they own a lot. I personally have about 3 Million Bitcoins by the way. I had 5, but I lost my private key to the other wallet!

If they need until next year to even announce that they are looking for a workaround for their investors I'll be out before Christmas and never come back. By the looks of it I'm far from being the only one to jump boats too. But in crypto only flippers seem to count anyways, so I doubt anyone will care about honest and serious projects that reward investors, even though the projects wouldn't exist without them in the first place.

I really can't imagine another world war actually taking place precisely because of how ridiculously overgeared all leading military forces are. The third world war has probably already been going on behind the scenes for a very long time, with trades, currency and market manipulations instead of violence.

I preferred MonaCo from the very start, and went 20-80 in TenX-MonaCo. I'm about to flip 100-0 into TenX-MonaCo due to this change... Feels like Kris thinks that his token holders are idiots based on his latest statements, and I guess that's true if the chats are anything to go by. Good for Kris, bad for every serious investor.

SONM is perfectly on point with delivering what they have promised so far. And dividends aren't even a thing here, the network fees for token holders won't be paid until a commercial version of the platform comes out either, which is still a while off. SONM is definitely not losing anything here.

I'm not concerned about my investment. I've balanced my portfolio in a way that makes it impossible for me to lose any money.

I'm upset with the lack of honesty on the side of MonaCo and the shady attempts to appease investors with nonsensical disinformation.

Yes, this and the way Kris talked about this issue as if it was irrelevant really put me off of MonaCo, which I was heavily looking forward to using initially. Not when the CEO claims that not sharing revenue is "absolutely pointless" though. That's either a massive lie or complete incompetence with regard to basic Mathematics.

The card itself is still on the table. And it's a decent card to have for sure. But that's the perks that any and every consumer/user of the card will have.

People don't invest to get the same perks as a user. People invest to participate in the generated profits, directly. And now with the latest news this will no longer happen. So investors basically got screwed out of one of the two reasons to even buy MCO tokens in the first place.

This approach with the fact that Kris stated that sharing revenue is "absolutely pointless" is reason enough for me to get out if he doesn't retract his statement. Even if the card is good. A lack of honesty like this shouldn't be supported, even if it means having to find another opportunity to turn a profit (of which there are plenty).

There is no good reason to support shady statements like those in the latest video.

It's very interesting to see if Kris will retract his statement, which is either completely misinformed or a deliberate lie. I hope it's the former and not some shady attempt to manipulate public opinion.

I don't think money will be very useful in a post-war wasteland.

Well it could be if the US keeps printing dollars like toilet paper.

Waves is still in development. They've got a new platform in the workings for their DEX and wallet, as well as smart contracts.

If you're patient and rational with your investments, Blocklancer is unlikely to disappoint you. Most other ICOs are all about creating a buzz, hyping a coin and then being flipped. Blocklancer on the other hand is clearly here to stay, which can be seen by their extremely thorough analysis of the freelancing market as well as their proposed solutions to contemporary problems within it.

NVO's DEX is coming just at the right time considering regulators are starting to try and crack-down on cryptos. While regulation is needed, making dividend paying schemes illegal or unaccessible is not the right way to go about it. NVO to the rescue!

I'm probably ditching too, the new video is a massive disappointment.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjOL8rOC0o0

That example doesn't hold unless there's >100k new cards every year forever. Once the amount of new users starts stagnating the token value will dump. And that's ignoring long-term investors who were specifically waiting for Billions of annual revenue 5 to 10 years down the line.

It's simply not true that the new model (which is the old model minus sharing revenue with investors/token holders) is "mathematically proven" to be better. It's mathematically obvious that it's worse and such a gross misrepresentation of the Mathematics of this issue shows either a complete lack of competence, a lack of rigor, or a complete lack of honesty.

Everything else so far is just smooth talking aching to cold call insurance sellers.


And I didn't even get started about the massive risk for extreme market manipulation once the supply gets too small to fulfill orders. The amount of tokens required for reserving cards will have to be adjusted, which will have a massive impact on the price. And we all know whose interests centralized authorities usually satisfy in those situations: their own.

Don't worry about it, most people have never heard of it, because it takes a lot of money and/or the right connections to get into that scene. Which is why cryptocurrencies and ICOs are such a huge opportunity for people with less money. In the future ICOs could be VC that anyone has access to, regardless of their fortune or status.