Bitcoin Forum
July 30, 2024, 10:01:04 PM *
News: Help 1Dq create 15th anniversary forum artwork.
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 ... 352 »
4461  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Bitfinex - FRAUD, price manipulation, fake transactions on: March 23, 2018, 11:08:18 AM
"You gave Japan as an example of where Bitfinex is breaking the law. Where does Japanese law state that?"

TheQuin, another example that you know nothing about regulations :

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crypto-currencies-japan/japan-to-warn-hong-kong-based-cryptocurrency-exchange-binance-source-idUSKBN1GY1BK?__twitter_impression=true

https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/03/22/binance-cryptocurrency-japan-operation/

Quote
Contrary to reports from Japanese news outlet Nikkei, Binance has denied rumors that Japan’s Financial Services Authority (JFSA) is planning to issue a warning requiring the cryptocurrency exchange desk to shut down its operation in the country.

Quote
Earlier today, Nikkei reported that the JFSA will likely deliver a shutdown warning to Binance in the coming days or weeks. The purported reason for the penalty was that the cryptocurrency exchange desk – which has several employees in Japan – has reportedly been operating without government approval, according to the local outlet.

Again, operating in Japan, unlike Bitfinex.
4462  Economy / Exchanges / Re: [OFFICIAL]Bitfinex.com first Bitcoin P2P lending platform for leverage trading on: March 23, 2018, 10:58:48 AM
Tether and Bitfinex are closely intertwined in my opinion.

But I will nonetheless try to refrain from posting additional stuff that is related to Tether unless something
really crazy/interesting/shady happens that would be of interest to Bitfinex users as well.

Intertwined and related but I think many customers that have decided to stay at Bitfinex despite all the FUD follow this thread for information directly about the platform. After thinking about what Ente said I think he's right that we should do it a new Tether thread rather than here. Of course, mayax will continue to spam incoherent nonsense here regardless.

Edit:
If there is a major development a don't see any problem in posting a link here to a new thread but filling it up with page upon page of argument probably isn't a good idea.
4463  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: FreeBitco.in - Win free Bitcoins every hour! on: March 23, 2018, 09:44:57 AM
dunno if you say are right, also when ppl started saying that a deposit would fix it i did deposit 10k and didnt work for me..

I didn't say a deposit would fix it. I was trying to say that balance compared to total free-roll winnings is one of many factors that is used by their abuse detection system. Some people have managed to get above whatever threshold flagged their account for reduced base payout by depositing.
4464  Other / Meta / Re: A number of newbie accounts being made with good-knowledge posts? on: March 23, 2018, 09:23:59 AM
I seem to be the sole idiot who hasn't really noticed what OP's talking about.  He didn't give any examples, so maybe those excellent newbie posters do their thing in sections I have on ignore or something. 

Here you go https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3182219.msg32960262#msg32960262

Great question for a first post and a Jr. Member registered September 19, 2013, happened to have the answer ready and earned a Merit for it. Nothing to see here.

Although I do think DarkStar_'s cartoon sums it up rather well. If these accounts get sold to shitposters later on they'll be easy to spot and deal with at the time.
4465  Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?) on: March 23, 2018, 08:51:58 AM
Look at the OP. The image of the gold coin included in Cyrus's post has been deleted.
Is it possible for someone to repost an image?

If you hit quote to get the url https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif they are still there. The forum has been very slow to load or failing to load images ever since the switch to CloudFlare.
4466  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who owns the most Bitcoins? on: March 23, 2018, 08:40:37 AM
premined by Satoshi

Wrong. There wasn't a premine. Read the replies to this thread to educate yourself what actually happened. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3173086.0


being funny here. I know it wasn't premined. But you got to admit, Satoshi has a LOT. I am surprised Satoshi never did any burn methods to show us he burned coins.

Premined is when block #1 was generated with X amount of coins more than block #2 and etc.. it had a larger amount delivered to the first miner (traditionally) the developer.

Sure, but a lot of people will read that and it will just reinforce the myth. How many times have you read that Satoshi owns 1 million+ coins? That's based on him being the only one mining for a long time. In the middle of that thread I linked to you'll find this old quote.

So I can tell you with confidence that you mined very few blocks (e.g. 10 blocks)  during that time and you're not millonaire, or you are part of the Satoshi group, period.

Do I get to be Satoshi too? I was off by only a few days... https://i.imgur.com/w57rtbs.png

I know first-hand that there were several different people who mined before January 2010. It's kind of funny that history I've lived through is being questioned...

He certainly mined a lot but we're all guessing how many. As to proof of burn, I don't think that really fits in with the ethos. The mystery surrounding it all adds to the whole Bitcoin story.

Here is that image showing how many different Bitcoin addresses were mining in early 2010.


4467  Other / Meta / Re: Is it a bug? on: March 23, 2018, 08:01:07 AM
I guess (and I think it is right) that the account was sold recently and new owner wanted to make a new profile by deleting all old threads.
That's very unlikely: why would anyone buy a Full Member account just to reduce it to Newbie again? Accounts are mainly bought to earn from signature campaigns, reducing the level makes that impossible again.
That leaves the option that the original owner has - for some reason - deleted most of his posts.

Quote
I propose Theymos to make a change to the forum system. If someone delete their old posts, their ranks and their merits should decrease too. It's not fair if a Newbie got 100 merits for nothing
It's exactly as (un)fair as the Full Member who originally got the 100 Merits. Nothing changed there.

Quote
(particularly if the account was sold and violates the forum rules).
Selling accounts doesn't violate forum rules (but will likely earn you red trust).

I don't think it is that unlikely. The Merit is far more valuable than the activity now. If the post history was particularly poor quality spam or in a language the buyer doesn't speak it might make the fact that it had been sold very obvious. With the post history deleted it is difficult to tell what happened and it'll only take 120 days to get back to Full Member.
4468  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: FreeBitco.in - Win free Bitcoins every hour! on: March 23, 2018, 07:42:29 AM
I contacted wetsuit, but I still haven't received an answer. I then did a small deposit and my Free BTC base prize was fixed and is back to normal now. I think that there might be a new formula that determines the base prize for an account and if your current balance is lower than your total earnings (free rolls + referral earnings), which may happen when you make a withdrawal, then your base prize is halved. This is just a wild guess, so let's hope that one of the Freebitco admins tells us whether this is the case or it is something else.

Are all of you who had their base prize halved made a withdrawal? Is there anyone who have never made a withdrawal but his base prize got halved anyway?

I'm pretty sure it is not necessary to make a deposit but it is one of the many factors involved in determining the probability of abuse. I really don't think they have deliberately halved the base prize as many people have posted that Wetsuit fixed it for them. Hopefully, either Myfe or Wetsuit will update the threads and explain what has been going on.
4469  Other / Meta / Re: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0 on: March 23, 2018, 06:32:39 AM
The longer this thread goes on with out action, the closer it gets to becoming a safe haven for spam.

It looks like we've reached that point. @OP are you intending to do anything with this thread?
4470  Other / Meta / Re: Request: Merit history downloadable as raw data on: March 23, 2018, 06:28:25 AM
I (BPIP) have collected all merit data in a database, and I can send you a copy in the format you'd like if you send an email to vod@martinlawrence.ca

(I may retract this offer if I get too many requests)

Sending an email, thank

There's also this from LoyceV

New: theymos' data in human readable format (14 MB).

4471  Economy / Exchanges / Re: [OFFICIAL]Bitfinex.com first Bitcoin P2P lending platform for leverage trading on: March 23, 2018, 06:16:23 AM
I can´t imagine that many people find talking about some irrelevant UI change more interesting than
discussions about hundreds of millions of backed (according to @TheQuin) or unbacked (according to @mayax) tokens
that are definitely influencing the cryptocurrency markets.

I don't think Ente's objection was about how interesting it is but rather whether it is off-topic. Although Tether and Bitfinex are owned by the same parent company it is a separate service. This is the place for Bitfinex customers to discuss UI changes and the like. If you want to start a Tether thread I'll be happy to discuss the subject with you. Or you could post in mayax's thread but it is a bit heavy on juvenile trolling and lacking in any substance.

4472  Other / Meta / Re: Mod, please check new plagiarism: Reporting copy/pasting, please permban on: March 22, 2018, 03:46:21 PM
I'm not sure what is going on with the Forum Moderation Policy thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=20333.620 but the last 10 posts are all copy pastes from earlier in the thread. I reported the 1st three but they keep coming.
4473  Other / Meta / Re: A number of newbie accounts being made with good-knowledge posts? on: March 22, 2018, 03:25:30 PM
Ahh I see, i got your point.
As long if we transparent with our account and not to scam someone or bounty, then it's okay We have 2 account.. Am i correct?

The best way to do it is to leave trust from each account to the other saying it is your alt and then also post in the known Alts thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0

That way there will be no misunderstanding.
4474  Other / Meta / Re: A number of newbie accounts being made with good-knowledge posts? on: March 22, 2018, 03:15:56 PM
There is mentioned, multiple account and account sales are allowed.
Its mean, no problem if 1person having 2 account?

It is allowed but unless you publically declare it then it will be considered untrustworthy behaviour and you'll get a red tag. For example, theymos has a second account called theymos_away and everyone know that so he's not hiding anything. If someone has multiple accounts so they can cheat bounties it is another story.
4475  Other / Meta / Re: A number of newbie accounts being made with good-knowledge posts? on: March 22, 2018, 03:01:29 PM
However, this would only be to "new" account farmers rather than older ones since they would just as well post on their higher-ranked accounts and rank them up.

I've noticed this as well. Is it a new more intelligent set of account farmers moving in to pick the business as shitposting account farmers are forced out? Or are more Bitcoin enthusiasts joining the forum? I guess we'll find out if these well-informed noobs suddenly start posting is broken pidgin English after they have ranked up a few times.  Wink

4476  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos has been fooled! on: March 22, 2018, 02:25:55 PM
We all know that theymos request to eliminate The Pharmacist to be listed on Default Trust Network due to his trigger happy attitude
That was me, not The Pharmacist.

The Pharmacist was excluded because of OGNasty and Tomatocage, IIRC. theymos has (or at least shouldn't have) nothing to do with his exclusion.

He's included by Blazed and hilariousandco which balances out the two exclusions and gives a (0). Does that mean he's back on?

@Jet Cash. I can't wait for the TV series.

4477  Other / Meta / Re: Spammer?? on: March 22, 2018, 02:08:11 PM
Not.really, if you ask Mr. Google about the diffinition of spamming then you'll know the answer, this situation won't be avoided since many of us is joining bounty as long as you make post constructively and diffinitly your not spammer.

According to the OED

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/spam

Spam
1 Irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to a large number of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc.

If someone is just posting because they are paid by an advertiser to do so and the posts are irrelevant (giving the same answer in a thread that has already been given countless times) then it qualifies as spam.
4478  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: March 22, 2018, 01:50:30 PM
How about this case? I found this one by chance. 10 acitivities, newbie rank, 100 merits, and there is no merit history. What is this? Anyone can help to make a forensic analysis about the case (I am just kidding) because I am curious about this guy and would like to know what actually happened with the account.
Thanks all in advance.

Someone deleted all their old posts and de-ranked themselves. No idea why anyone would do that unless maybe they bought the account and didn't want to be associated with the account farmer's spam.
4479  Other / Meta / Re: Full Member thanks to the Merit system. on: March 22, 2018, 01:41:42 PM
Does only two members being able to reach full member after the merit system supports your claim ?

Firstly, I'm not sure if that statistic is accurate. Secondly, the old activity based system requires 120 days to get to Full Member and the system has only been in place 56 days. So however many have managed it they have done extremely well. We'll have a better idea how it is working in another couple of months time.
4480  Other / Meta / Re: Spammer?? on: March 22, 2018, 01:20:32 PM
But what if I have 200+ activities but only have 1 merit? Do you consider me as a spammer?

Not necessarily but you may be. What I would think is that you're not here because you are interested in learning about and getting involved with Bitcoin. That is after all the primary purpose of the forum. Other people use it for different reasons like earning money. That's OK if they just post in those bounty threads or whatever and don't get paid for spamming the rest of the forum. But they shouldn't expect their accounts to rank up. That's the point of Merit, only those that do something worthwhile get Merit and increase rank.

Of course the real way to tell if someone is a spammer is to check their post history.

Edit:
Exhibit A:

Page 17 of has trading become difficult?
Yes because there is no assurance that you can gain more profit. You have to monitor the chart time to time to get the right time to sell. I suggest you to read about trading so that you can have strategies and techiniques regarding this matter

A post that obviously nobody will ever read as it will quickly be buried amongst all the other inane replies. Those threads only exist to get spammed. No doubt something very similar and meaningless has already been said dozens of times in that thread, but nobody cares, they're not reading they're just posting to get paid.
Grade A example of signature spam and it looks like you do a lot of it.


 
Pages: « 1 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 [224] 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 ... 352 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!