Die you ethereum scum pump and dump
It's Turing complete, check it out. |
|
|
|
|
Mrpumperitis is freaking out, what's going on?
|
|
|
|
|
Can we expect Homonero anonymous transactions any time soon?
|
|
|
|
"So there is no desktop QT wallet at this time for ION??? "bla bla bla.....(snip)
This is a disaster waiting to happen… "
yo turdman...fyi...the disaster started a year or so ago, and hasnt ended yet
So the geniuses have innovated and evolved by copying ETH, is that the deal here? ION is to XPY as ETH is to BTC.  |
|
|
|
Sorry, I should have stated for dapps. |
|
|
|
i think the earth is round, because the wind cannot move in a flath earth, but that is just my view  Proof of wind on a flat surface:   haha but that is not what i meant, but like tornados and stuff like that. tornados rotate and the earth rotates with it, and stuff like that The Sun is small and orbits close to the surface creating a moving zone of high pressure as day passes to night. The moving displacement of atmosphere creates vortices.  |
|
|
|
i think the earth is round, because the wind cannot move in a flath earth, but that is just my view Proof of wind on a flat surface: |
|
|
|
|
What about API access over RPC or even better REST for Ethereum?
|
|
|
|
No that's not the flat earth explanation for gravity, that's the controlled oppositions attempt at discrediting flat earth with a straw-man. Gravity is a fallacy invented to explain the orbits of the fake ball planets they claim are solid objects flying around in their fake vacuum space. None of the forces they attribute to gravity here on earth require gravity as an explanation for their cause.
OK, I'll bite. Explain the flat earth explanation for gravity. Why does the apple fall from the tree? I'll answer your question but first you have to explain why a helium balloon rises up into the sky when you let go of the string? Then you have to explain why the apple has to play by a different set of rules? Balloons rise in the atmosphere due to hydrostatic pressure (i.e. lighter fluids rise when immersed in heavier ones), but a balloon in space doesn't rise. Balloons released on Earth won't reach outer space because the force of lift will eventually reach equilibrium with the force of gravity. Hydrostatic pressure applies to fluids, but the density of interstellar gasses is so low in space that they behave like individual particles (which is why balloons won't rise in space). Apples are too dense and heavy to gain lift from hydrostatic pressure. So, apples fall when dropped because of gravity, and because they aren't buoyant in the atmosphere like balloons are. Balloons are subject to gravity, too, but this doesn't become as obvious until balloons reach an altitude at which the atmosphere is so thin that the lift generated from hydrostatic pressure is overcome by the force of gravity. In a vacuum affected by a gravitational field, a helium balloon would actually fall; this is because gravity still affects it, but hydrostatic pressure doesn't. It will stop rising when the density of the atmosphere reaches that of the helium in the balloon. We haven't even reached this mythical vacuum space you talk about before it stops that is if it hasn't already popped which is unlikely. Then you invoke the magical force of gravity but why? This unpoppable balloon has stopped rising due to the atmosphere it's displaced being the same density as the helium. Then you go on to mention the fantasy of interstellar space; this isn't even relevant. As for the apple it falls because it's denser than air and again you invoke the magical force of gravity for no reason. You accuse me of intellectual dishonesty yet your statements here show that you're an outright intellectual fraud. PSo, it's all density, eh? Here's a question for you then, and I'll even play by your rules: In simulated anti-gravitational environments, such as when an airplane dips at a given speed and angle such that everything is floating around (actually, they're just in free-fall) in an air-filled chamber -- you know, just like the videos you almost surely believe NASA creates to fool us into believing that astronauts are in outer space -- how do you explain that everything in the plane is *floating*? In other words, if both the air and all objects in the air-filled chamber are descending at the same speed relative to each other, why doesn't density separate the more-dense objects (like people) from the air in the chamber? The problem for you is that hydrostatic pressure decreases in weightless (NOT sparce) environments. If it didn't, then in the descending airplane that causes all things inside it to free-fall, all of the objects that are more dense than the air would fall to the floor of the plane, even in free-fall conditions. 1) Mass + gravity --> weight --> hydrostatic pressure --> balloons rise, apples fall 2).Mass + no gravity --> weightlessness --> no hydrostatic pressure --> balloons and apples behave similarly3) Density = mass/volume. That's it. Density is dependent upon mass, but is independent of weight which is integral to hydrostatic pressure. We can see this from free-fall airplanes in which all objects are weightless in their environment; it doesn't matter how much mass or density the objects have, they all have no weight. This gives us two scenarios to consider -- we see how objects behave in weightless environments (such as free-fall planes), and also in weighted environments (such as on Earth's surface). Does density explain both scenarios? No. What does? Gravity. By the way, the formula for weight is w=mg where m=mass and g=Freefall acceleration of gravity. In a freefall airplane, g=0, so w=0. So you're saying a helium balloon will float around in the middle of the vomit comet ("artificial zero-gravity" airplane ride) with the apple? To answer your question the force caused by the plane dropping counters the force due to the apples density thereby causing it to float. A balloon on the other hand should rise up faster than normal due to the additional force. Also, NASA does fake all their space walks in their fake space. You can see air bubbles rising, scuba tanks in the background and various items floating up in their "official" videos. It's not a matter of "belief" as you put it. Yes, an apple and a helium balloon will both float around in a vomit comet, or in an elevator freefalling at terminal velocity, etc. A helium balloon won't rise above other objects because all objects under these conditions are weightless. Density doesn't matter; objects are equally dense in both a vomit comet and on the ground. There is no force of density. But weight *is* equal to a force. This has nothing to do with bubbles. Not only are you wrong, you're completely Looney Toons and living in a total fantasy world.  EDIT: After viewing the behavior of a helium balloon in a moving vehicle, I see you're probably correct about the balloon losing its buoyancy in the vomit comet in the same way a bowling ball loses its depression. FYI though, you're still living in a complete fantasy world in regards to the remainder of you're misguided arguments in regards to your globalist prerogative. |
|
|
|
5280 steps. Took the test (after answering #31) and got a B; closed book. Could have aced it if I stressed a bit on a few questions. The questions I needed to open the book (Google) for were the finer points of the English language it seems. |
|
|
|
|
Why dream when ETH is for real?
|
|
|
|
|
^
MS and IBM have gone cuckoo for cocoa puffs with Ethereum, this isn't water cooler chat it's an established fact.
|
|
|
|
|
Musk uses Tesla's name but can't engineer an electrical power source to drive his car farther than a few blocks before it's kaput. I'm willing to bet this guy can't engineer shit and uses 100% off-the-shelf technology throughout the entire car.
|
|
|
|
^
It is only a concept car though and will probaly take atleast 5-10 years or something until mass production.
But the Tesla is a pre-order and sometimes companies have "problems", customers could end up experiencing delays. Take the last pre-order I made for example, it's been delayed for two and a half years now. Could be 2020 before customers receive a practically worthless obsolete car if they receive a car at all before Musk decides to embezzle the money. |
|
|
|
350 km with one battery charge for 30.000€ gg
217 miles per charge, LOL what a joke! The car defiantly looks cool but Musk is scammer with with his SpaceX fraud etc and people are eventually going to get burned on these cool cars that don't go very far. Personally I'd wait for the E-Porsche:  |
|
|
|
More dox for anybody who's interested:  |
|
|
|
Current date: 01 April 2016 Order date: 25 November 2013. Promised shipping date: 24 February 2014. Status: order not shipped. Refund: refused. These guys stole a lot of money from me.  make a chargeback ! Can't, bank transfer to an HSBC in HK via swift. Daniel ANDRONIC (BA CFO) and Alex SOVU (BA CEO) closed their account (#015-784242-838) when the very first delay was announced. |
|
|
|
Current date: 01 April 2016 Order date: 25 November 2013. Promised shipping date: 24 February 2014. Status: order not shipped. Refund: refused. These guys stole a lot of money from me. |
|
|
|
To commemorate the one year anniversary of this thread I've crafted the following depiction of our flat earth:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
