There are few reasons for manual withdrawals,
1. Bankroll issue, which i am hoping will be solved tomorrow (sunday.)
2. When we started the site we had some security issues like you could place a negative bet like -1 BTC which become 1 BTC on profit, generating same nonce for every bets using continuous ajax request etc. that's why i disabled auto withdrawals. I already fixed those issues but still i am afraid.
3. When i started the site i made a wrong calculation i had a small bankroll but i started the site without any max bet limit, which was dangerous. Then some well wisher told me to set a maximum bet or maximum profit per bet limit for which i am really grateful to him.
All of these issues should have been thought of before the release of this site. How can you be expected to sustain a good gambling experience if you yourself are inexperienced and negligent of even the most basic things?
A negative bet, like honestly really? I'm not sure what you were thinking. |
|
|
|
|
I just can't figure out the blue boxes. I have the rest of them clearcut (i'm pretty sure, apart from the capitalization)
|
|
|
|
Lengthy waiting time = hoping the player would forget about it and drop the topic for good
Minor amount x hundreds of naive players = jackpot
Sure, but you wouldn't get hundreds of naive players coming to deposit if accusations arose like this one. With new casinos - especially in bitcoin - anyone that deposits usually only places a small amount to test out the service. If potential customers think that the withdrawal time is too long, they won't deposit.
Not saying it's not a scam but paying for the website (albeit shitty) and hosting to nab maybe a hundred dollars total is not exactly a profitable use of time. |
|
|
|
Its all b.s and the people caught just create a new account and carry on business as usual, knowing that this crack poker team takes forever to look at any issue presented. They never watch for it themselves and expect us to bend over backwards with our reports that go nowhere. Shouldn't it be obvious when a new account deposits some coins, only plays poker and then jumps straight into the 4FL games and 100 flop challenges exclusively? I also like the uptick in new accounts here saying they will try the site out whenever the shit gets thick in here.
They seem to be destined to ride the wave to the bottom.
Sig spammers can be ignored. It's just selection bias because you'll get these posts about how they're excited to see the site or how it's good all the time -- you're just noticing it more. |
|
|
|
Signature campaigns wouldn't want people signing up, not making any posts and then claiming their payment.
Minimum posts are essential (whether on a weekly or monthly basis). Otherwise, campaigns will pay per post and that creates bigger problems.
Firstly, one could simply reject payment given the quality of the poster or have an incentive programme. What such problems would there be to switch to pay/post?
I'm willing to say that accounts enrolled in signature campaigns would be posting to the maximum most of the time anyway. Additionally, if you're going by a pay/post system, if the user in question decides to post less during the timeframe, then you pay them less in accordance. In fact this would be a favorable outcome considering the site would have the user spreading posts across multiple weeks for the same amount as one who would post for say, one week. As an example, consider the following: Alan and Bryan are enrolled in a campaign that is pay/post. It pays 1 mBTC per post and the maximum posts/week is 20. Alan posts 10 in the first week and 10 in the second week. Bryan posts 19 in the first week and 1 in the second week. I'd be willing to say that Alan brings along more of an effect than Bryan.
Why do you think fixed campaigns are a problem, but pay per post ones are not?
Signature spam is a problem of users and managers, not one of the payment scheme used by the campaign.
Fixed campaigns force the users to post even if they're unwilling. This, in turn, could result in spam. |
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure you were dreaming. Hero and Legendary ranks are semi-permanent (usually permanent but can be reverted if an admin sees), and at least usually last for a month.
Your enthusiasm intrigues me. You have dreams of earning a blue half-coin? :-/
I think admin can demote any rank why you say Here and Legendary is semi-permanent? Same applies to each and every rank I guess.
He's talking about a different a different matter  , there is a bug where demotion for Newbies, Hero member and Legendary members is not handled properly by the forum. See examples where accounts with less than 400 posts still have hero member status. Sure admins have the power to delete most of the posts and demote a rank or two, but I haven't heard of such cases. Anyway, this is quite OT Do a little research. I read some thread before that once you reached the legendary rank and you delete most of your posts but your activity will not be affected and you will remain as a legendary but I never thought that hero member has the same feature also or just a bug?  It's exactly this.
Furthermore, a quote from theymos confirms this: IIRC only Newbie, Hero, and Legendary members don't get demoted normally. Maybe I'll fix it at some point, but it's not really a big deal.
|
|
|
|
The FortuneJack campaign involving their 25 posts in the Gambling section is definitely an incentive to spam. In the campaign (highest-paying, IIRC) one is pretty much forced to spam because it's nearly impossible to actually sustain a full 25 posts in that cesspool unless you're a thread-starter or in some deep discussion. You'll get shit like this with minimum post requirements: An interesting site seems to me, for visiting. Is this some kind of poker game? i don't really understand the game on this site. It seems like I have to make sure to come to this site and play. Cool site, hopefully more visitors who come to playing here. I will telling too to my friend who like playing a poker game to coming at this site.
If you limit it to a maximum, then you'll see what happens: most actually just go up to that point and stop posting (given that they no longer get money for their contributions so there's no motivation; this works out for the best though). I for one joined my campaign because there was only a minimum post of 1 and since I couldn't be arsed to post a lot consistently this worked out great for me.
On the stance, I suppose that campaigns with high minimum posts/week should be eliminated. I think 10/week in all boards is fair. (Advocating for keeping minimum posts: they ensure that the advertiser is allowed a somewhat consistent way to track their views. If the posting fluctuates then it's unclear whether the advertising is failing, the website is failing, or if it's just simply a lack of posts) |
|
|
|
I've checked your site and have two questions:
1. Do you require documents on withdraw? KYC?
2. Do you run the tournaments mentioned in OP? Like weekly guaranteed 5K? Because the tournament schedule on your site is empty.
Perhaps instead of checking the user's site and asking stupid questions you should read back a page and note what's been happening with the site. If these questions are legitimate then they will be answered not. To a user on the previous page, the site is a scam in which they were caught. |
|
|
|
That’s really interesting to read. It seems as you got real guts to stay high from others. I appreciate your decision and would like to recommend that make a team with those whom you know well. You should go for your friends and family. 1500 chips is not a small amount. Furthermore, do devise strategy before landing into the game. My best wishes are with you, mate. Good luck!
1500 chips is about 3 and a half dollars.
You're just shitposting your spam here and clearly have no idea what's happening, when you want someone to have a "team" in a poker tournament. |
|
|
|
You mean a btc wallet address where the deposits are being kept? We do, but we don't really want to make that public. We don't think it would serve any purpose. How would it benefit a player who, let's say, deposited 0.002 btc to know that there's 3 btc total in our wallet at the moment? Proof of solvency. OK, here are the name of all the bots. We think it's only fair to let you guys know:
killphil, familyguy, tsonya, shush, bigwolf, appleman, jansdad, ox77, sammy, brooke, drdsi, bellboy, davidm, shaark, durrrr, ladymsj, jamie, sibeski, leon, peteman
I got all of them... but is bigmonkey not on that list? I could have sworn they were a bot. |
|
|
|
One thing that we haven't mention before and we think you should guys know - players' bitcoins are kept off-line in cold storage. We vouch for your money either way, but just to let you know that your money is safe as it can be.
Do you have the address and a signed message to verify this? |
|
|
|
I think there are too many bots on the tables
and sometimes it's 5 bots vs 1 human player which makes it impossible for real players to find a table to play until the human player decides to leave.
Which is why people need to start tables. |
|
|
|
User Ozafejyw782 cancelled bonus on 2017-07-15 because of not reading the confirmation message regarding penalty and DuckDice made a refund on 2017-07-25, You did not make the conditions clear. You did not have all the facts in your terms. It was not laid out in your terms that, given high enough gross profit, cancellation of the bonus could potentially lead to the actual deposited balance being deducted as well.
what months are you talking about, this is 10 days.
Read my post again. The issue at hand should have been resolved long ago in QA instead of months later when someone complains
Now read your post again. And once again, this is a first complaint of such matter in over 8 months[/size].[/b]
|
|
|
|
The real scam is the person making the accusation of a scam. Clearly, he didn't read or understand the finer points of the bonus.
Clearly, you didn't read anything about the case and don't realize that terms were not laid out. They were excluded.
Nice Games & Rounds posts, kiddo. |
|
|
|
doesn't seem like they're going to remove the neg trust... we might have to give em some positive trust?
I've played here a bit with no issues in withdrawals.
It should remain a stain on their account. The issue at hand should have been resolved long ago in QA instead of months later when someone complains -- even in that regard the problem should have been taken care of instead of calling the gambler a terrorist who intended for a "scandal" to occur.
|
|
|
|
|
Secret question resets make the account automatically lock. You have to PM an admin with a signed message from an address posted on the forum/PM's (if you have any).
|
|
|
|
Wrong.... I live in Central Europe now, in a country where it is legal to own a fire arm. I live in a compound with 10ft high walls and bullet proof windows, my inside leg mesurement is 32" and I prefer my women to have large chests, I like my Steak blue, prefer English mustard over Dijon and Red wine over white..
anything else you want to know about me?
What's your favorite board game? |
|
|
|
I just tried your site earlier and everything works smooth  Right now I am trying to access it but I am not able to , it says " Connection Timed out " . I played a couple of freeroll tournaments , it said 50 GDT minimum , does that mean 50 mbtc ? Or 50 XCC ( the currency that you have mentioned before ). 50 chips, equivalent to 0.0005. |
|
|
|
It may have something to do with BetKing in my opinion. Notice how Dean bumps 3 threads with a single message or the same update. Some 'pair-of-eyes' may have raised an eyebrow seeing it happening much often. Just my thoughts Read. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1974926.msg20386712#msg20386712ATTENTION: Due to the bounty incentivising posting on the ANN thread (which is an on-forum altcoin giveaway in any and all definitions), this thread is locked. There is zero tolerance for those blatantly breaking the "no on-forum altcoin giveaways" rule. |
|
|
|
ANN tread is locked.
What happening this?
No thread-bumping rule. Nothing to do with BetKing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
