Paraphrasing other people's posts.
User: ChathusandAnother alternate account owned by these two User: Ruvi2000sewUser: raji1995nayaHowever, we must consider panic selling when the whales have begun tossing the coins because it will take a very long time to hold the coins, especially if the coins have very few major updates, and pumping back the coins will rely solely on an increase in the price of BTC, which will not pump high, as I experienced while trading in the market.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5798/57983719.htmlparaphrased from the postHowever, we also need to consider panic selling when the whales have started tossing the coins because it will take a very long time to hold the coins, especially if the coins very rarely have major updates, then to pump back the coins rely only on the increase in the price of BTC even then it won't pump high, maybe that's what I experienced while I was trading in the market.
------------------------ If there hasn't been any regulatory pressure on Facebook previously, may be they've begun to accept cryptocurrencies. Of course, there's still time for this to happen, and it may come soon as Facebook continues to expand and can't afford to ignore blockchain in the long term.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5798/57983678.htmlparaphrased from the postIf there’s no regulatory pressure with Facebook before, I’m pretty sure they’ve started to adopt cryptocurrency but of course there’s still time for this and honestly, it can happen soon as facebook continues to grow and they can’t afford to ignore blockchain in the long run. If they’ll create their own token that’s fine, and if they accept bitcoin much better.
----------------------------------- That adoption is fantastic news, therefore I don't believe it's the cause of the crash; instead, I believe whales were manipulating Bitcoin at the time, and that's why there was a massive sell-off and whales were making sure to protect their money. Anyway, this is only a short correction, and certainly, we will climb again; let's see if this correction lasts till the end of the year.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5792/57923113.htmlparaphrased from the postThat adoption is a good news so I don’t think that’s the reason for the dump, I also believe whales manipulate Bitcoin by that time and that’s the reason where’s a big sell off and whales are making sure to secure their money. Anyway, this is just a temporary correction and yes we are going to rise again, let’s see if this correction will last until the end of the year or not.
|
|
|
|
@Pmalek, you are very observant. And, probably, you need to ban a user who regularly paraphrases other people's posts. Since the user is still not banned, I will add to your accusations and I think the moderators, based on our accusations, will quickly ban this user. Paraphrasing other people's posts.User: Ruvi2000sewPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5355703.msg57806455#msg57806455( archive) The interests of the banking system, including taxes, management costs, and the cost of money, are now nearly zero or even negative, whereas the interests of the numerous sites are now almost zero or even negative. Defi can achieve 100% in exceptional circumstances, therefore there is no competition, platforms defi triumph over traditional banks, and more and more people select defi as their primary investment resource.
Earlier postnow the interests of the banking system including taxes, management costs, cost of money are practically zero or even negative, instead the interests of the various sites defi in rare cases can even reach more than 100% so there is no struggle, competition, platforms defi win over traditional banks and more and more users choose defi as their first investment resource
 -------------------- Without a doubt, all investments involve some level of risk, but there are some risks that should not be taken simply because they involve risk. For example, crypto investment involves risk, but it varies from project to project; investing in already established projects such as bitcoin, ethereum, and bnb is less risky than investing in new projects, where the risk is high and the reward is high if you are lucky.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5780/57806607.htmlEarlier postAll investment involves some level of risk no doubt but there some certain risk that don't need taking just because investment involves risk, for example, crypto investment involves risk but it varies from project to project, investing in already established project like btc, eth, bnb are lest risker than in new project, the risk is high so is the reward if you are lucky.
============================================================================= Maybe the only merit he received was also one given to himself by an alt account. I haven't looked into it, but the username of the person who merited him is similar to his own. Ruvi2000sew and raji1995naya It's just a hunch, + he got merited for a post like this: Hello Team, Is there any update about Bounty reward distribution ? Its long time now You're right. I checked. This is one person with alternate accounts who breaks the company bounty rule by participating with multiple profiles, he has a transfer of merit, and also take a look at this. I feel now is a good moment to invest in crypto since most of the major currencies are trading at a discount to their all-time highs, and there is significant resistance due to institutional investment and coins locked on the blockchain. With the growth of blockchain-related Fintech, we may expect more usage in the near future. The quantity of most popular currencies is limited, and with the growing popularity of DEFIs and crypto in general, demand for crypto and utility tokens for fees is growing.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5792/57923232.htmlI believe it's a good time to buy crypto as most of the prominent coins are much lesser than their all time high and there is a great resistance due to institutional investment and coins frozen on the blockchain. With the rise of Fintech around blockchain, we can expect more and more adoption in the near future. The supply are limited for most prominent coins and with the rising popularity of DEFIs and crypto as a whole, the demand for crypto and utility tokens for fees are increasing.
------------------------ Even if Elon Musk has not tweeted about crypto recently, the euphoria is still alive and well. Of course, numerous variables influence the fundamentals of the market, so the hype is waning. market And, with the quantity of Bitcoin to be mined running out, this will undoubtedly be a watershed event for Bitcoin, allowing it to achieve even higher values in the future and generating new crypto buzz, attracting new investors.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5792/57923172.htmlThe crypto hype is still not over as there will be some hype in the next few years even though currently Elon Musk has not tweeted about crypto, of course that is not the reason the hype is decreasing as many factors affect the fundamentals in the market. market And with the depletion of the supply of Bitcoin to be mined, of course this will be a big moment for Bitcoin to reach even more fantastic prices in the future and can get new hype in crypto so that many investors will enter.
----------------------------------- I don't think Fidelity was one of the futures-based ETFs, was it? If my memory serves me correctly, Fidelity's will not be the first to be authorized. Given the SEC's comments, they appear to be considerably more receptive to a futures-based ETF, and a couple were submitted shortly following the SEC's futures comments.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5797/57975297.htmlI believe Fidelity wasn’t one of the futures based ETFs, right? If that recollection is accurate, I don’t believe Fidelity’s will be the first to be approved. Given the comments coming out of the SEC, they seem much more open to a futures based ETF, and a handful were immediately submitted after the futures comments from the SEC. I’d say one of them being approved before the end of the year is more likely.
The same paraphrasing of other people's posts.Pretty silly though. |
|
|
|
The fact that you gave your account or not, we cannot verify this now. Your excuses are popular enough and are no longer interesting. When you give something, you are fully responsible. Having given your car for temporary use, you will also be responsible for all events that occurred during this period. Therefore, stop making excuses, but rather think about your entourage, whom you trust. Also read the unsolicited private messaging rule. Please transfer the topic to Reputation https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0 |
|
|
|
For my part, I would like to say thank you to the moderators, who process our reports very quickly. This is a massive job, as I see that everything is checked quite seriously, and only after that do we get our "good" It is always pleasant to work in a well-coordinated team when you understand that you are not doing something in vain.  |
|
|
|
|
Even banned accounts go online? It looks a little strange. Authorization takes place in a few seconds.
Either these are virtual machines on one computer or a multi-browser. By clicking on the tabs, you log into accounts, thereby recording the login time.
I assume that the cheater does not clear cookies after his session. Since I very much doubt that banned accounts will regularly log into their profile.
It turns out that these are three people who, on average, have the same number of accounts?
|
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: KevinRosaPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5287434.msg57105801#msg57105801( archive) Goldman Sachs analysts Charles Himmelberg and Zach Pandl pointed out in a report: "The widespread use of the U.S. dollar outside the United States, coupled with the fact that some countries have fully dollarized, indicate that the international community has accepted the exchange and storage value needs of the U.S. dollar. In countries and regions with imperfect financial systems and insufficient supply of traditional currency services, it is possible for digital cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin to provide viable alternatives."
Copy-paste from a Chinese site. Translated by google translator. No link to the source https://www.bitebi123.com/etagid25696b0/-------------------------
As soon as the new season of the American drama "Billions" began, the male protagonist "Federal Prosecutor" Chuck shut down a Bitcoin mine with his subordinates.
My point of view is very clear, that is, I hope that more and more cultural industries and film industries will promote Bitcoin. Although technology changes lives, I hope that Bitcoin will be known to more and more people and will continue to be widely used. Global consensus, I believe this is not just my personal thoughts.
Although more and more people are participating in Bitcoin, especially this year, the back-end servers of many exchanges have stalled due to the excessive number of newly registered users, and wallet addresses are increasing, but the normal application scenarios are very few.
I always believe that there are two things in our lives that are most important. Sometimes they are life-saving straws, and sometimes they are really terrible things. They are hope and habit respectively. Therefore, Satoshi Nakamoto brings us endless hope. We have to get used to using Bitcoin, I believe this day will come soon.
Why the first sentence is blue, because blue represents hope
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5741/57418241.html https://finance.sina.com.cn/blockchain/roll/2020-05-15/doc-iircuyvi3233907.shtml================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Aliceooo78Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5287434.msg57105801#msg57105801( archive)
sure. S2F model is just a coincidence and it didn't anticipate this drop caused by China. but one thing is for sure, Bitcoin is recovering. Investors should remember that the cryptocurrency field is always accompanied by adjustments and even setbacks. If you understand Bitcoin, you will understand its volatility and know that a 50% correction is normal. What's more, the long-awaited U.S. Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) will provide "rocket fuel" for digital assets. It is expected that US regulators will approve the Bitcoin ETF in September. Once this happens, due to the new sources of demand from RIA (registered investment advisors) and asset management companies, the entire crypto market will rise.
  https://min.news/en/economy/211779a662a6726cdd2e39ffc58b7546.html================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Liamttw Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5354951.msg57747539#msg57747539( archive) The first Bitcoin block mined by Satoshi Nakamoto is called the genesis block. The uniqueness of the genesis block is that it does not contain any data from the previous block, and it can also establish all the necessary variables required to create a subsequent block chain. Its mining also marked the beginning of the Bitcoin blockchain.
The birth of Bitcoin includes Satoshi Nakamoto's beautiful vision for a borderless non-sovereign currency, as well as forward-looking thinking and ideas for the future financial system. The existence and development of Bitcoin for more than ten years has demonstrated its value and position in the financial and economic market, and has shown the world the most potential development space since its begin in a unique way.
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator.  https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/100689977================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Kiley33 Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5355292.msg57730182#msg57730182( archive) Marx believed that the essence of money is the externalization, objectification, and materialization of human labor time, and it is people's own production relations expressed in the form of objects.
Suppose the primitive people traveled to this day and came to you to buy something with a shell, of course you would feel unreasonable; on the other hand, if you go back in time, the ancients would think that you want to trade with a piece of torn paper is pure fantasy.
This is because according to Marxist philosophy: no one can choose the level of productivity he faces as he pleases. Since money is a production relationship, it is undoubtedly determined by productive forces and not transferred by human subjective will.
Productivity determines production relations. Science and technology are the primary productive forces. Of course, science and technology can also determine when and what form of currency should appear.
Copy-paste from a Chinese site. Translated by google translator.  https://www.8btc.com/article/9103
|
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: Connor BrittonPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350363.msg57515425#msg57515425( archive) Absolutely , by every metric bitcoin is the most decentralized and this has been proven in 2017 when miners and the community disagreed and the miners backed down.
1.Bitcoin has no President or Creator that is active or known
2.Bitcoin has the most active fully validating nodes
3.Bitcoin has the most independent miners
4.Bitcoin has the most independent full node implementations
5.Bitcoin has the largest community and most merchants
6.Bitcoin has the most developers
7.Bitcoin has the most wallets
The post is copied from Reddit after. The date of publication on Reddit is 2 days earlier.  https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/comments/oo6ijl/hi_guys_i_want_to_ask_something_bitcoin_will_be/======================================================================================== PlagiarismUser: XUNingPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5354218.msg57690493#msg57690493( archive) In a mixed economy, the government intervenes through the spontaneous role of the market mechanism to improve resource utilization efficiency. Adjust and intervene in economic life through fiscal and monetary policies, smooth economic fluctuations, and ensure balanced economic growth.
Through the establishment of a mixed economy, the pooling and unified use of funds of different natures in society is not only an effective means to solve the current capital tensions, but also an important way to rapidly expand the scale of social production and improve the efficiency of capital concentration.
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator.  https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E/2627638?fromtitle=%E6%B7%B7%E5%90%88%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E4%BD%93%E5%88%B6&fromid=10641121========================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: caryoscarPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351171.msg57547396#msg575473965( archive) The question of why Bitcoin is valuable is widely debated. Believers point out that “consensus is value” and there is no need to question its intrinsic value. They believe that from this perspective, gold, which is sought after by traditional secular society, is similar to Bitcoin and has little value in its use. Buffett has never recognized the value of gold, but some people believe that gold has the value of storing value, which represents distrust of other values. Opponents believe that Bitcoin is not currency and has a value of 0. The author does not agree that the value of Bitcoin is zero, but does not agree that this value comes only from blockchain technology, let alone that it comes from blind consensus.
This is a word-for-word copy of a Google translation of a six year old Chinese article:   https://t.cj.sina.com.cn/articles/view/5989156557/164fb46cd001008nu9
|
|
|
|
You are referring to OP, I understand. I would like you to clarify this. Are you saying we have another pokapoka124 case? In the archived link I can't see any evidence of plagiarism, and if so it should have been reported. Really, funny. For the OP, this is the third topic about the same thing. OP, have you discovered something new? In the previous threads, you have decently raised the amount of merit. We can see that you are pleased. In this case, create a directory of recommendations from GeorgeJohn, which we will contact in case of problems with plagiarism. That thread was made when i was a member, and at period i never go through the rules and regulations of the community or master the community criteria, and after the post been reported to moderator for a while it was wiped, because i used my initiative to write almost of them, so that prompted me to make this thread to new users, and i do that repeatedly to newbies to read the rules and regulations of community first before anything, because during my time of newbies i was not opportune to read the rules in time to know system, go through my profile the topic is not there, it's happens because i have no guidance, just cross check thread and see when it happens, long time ago and its not longer in my profile. Oh, my God! It is sometimes very helpful to read the responses of the people in the thread you are creating. First, at least the previous answer. You should not write in a personal, proving something. Moreover, I didn’t blame you. Another thing is, why to create regularly the same type of topic  ? No comments.  |
|
|
|
You are referring to OP, I understand. I would like you to clarify this. Are you saying we have another pokapoka124 case? In the archived link I can't see any evidence of plagiarism, and if so it should have been reported. Really, funny. For the OP, this is the third topic about the same thing. OP, have you discovered something new? In the previous threads, you have decently raised the amount of merit. We can see that you are pleased. In this case, create a directory of recommendations from GeorgeJohn, which we will contact in case of problems with plagiarism. |
|
|
|
Can you take a look at this?I ask you as an expert on the subject. I don't know if we are going to have another pokapoka124 or Mpamaegbu case. Well, if this is plagiarism, then there must be a source where it was copied from. I could not find it, and the post is gone. Why excavate the dead? |
|
|
|
I'll ask the OP a counter-question. What were your guides when you copied this post? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5356636.msg57787284#msg57787284Oh yes, you added a link, but this information is not new, and you did not write it.   And in the topic you created, after your copying, there is not a single word from you. The information is so old that it just didn't make sense to copy it, but you thought it was productive information. The opening of the topic was aimed at obtaining AT LEAST some merit. It is with these thoughts that people come here with plagiarism. They are not just lazy, but on the contrary, they are cunning, thinking that with their cunning they can deceive those who are experienced enough in finding such charlatans. And explain the opening of this topic today for what? |
|
|
|
I think there may be a lot of such works that RainbowKun and his alts stole from Chinese sources. I looked at the accounts from my starter post and some have already been punished: ... caryoscar - ban evader... I wouldn't be surprised at all if it turns out that all these banned accounts were caught plagiarizing Chinese articles. Well let's take care of this one as well. I join. PlagiarismUser: Tim-BTCPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive)
After the craziest half a year, China's crypto mining entered a period of sharp turbulence from May to June. Under the attack of local governments, most of the mines were shut down. The miners who just entered the high point this year suffered huge losses. The sell-off of some miners under economic pressure also led to a sharp correction in the crypto market.
At the moment, how to dispose of this batch of down-time mining machines and minimize losses is the most urgent problem for miners of all sizes.
Going overseas is the way that miners have placed the greatest hope before, but after a period of exploration, the road to overseas is not as smooth as expected, and some small miners are still trying to stay
 https://inf.news/en/economy/92ee32304bd76dbb698a4a79450bb071.html If all these accounts, as RainbowKun said, belong to his students, then they are very lazy and stupid. If it is RainbowKun who creates this, then you can understand where he has time to post for all accounts, when he himself writes walls of texts, paraphrasing other people's thoughts. EDIT:If Tim-BTC copied the text from an English resource. Then Kimberl2020 stole the post from the Chinese. @Ratimov, you were right. Two more accounts should be banned. ================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Kimberl2020Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350533.msg57517578#msg57517578( archive) The main reasons for Bitcoin's current transaction speed limitations are:
1. The processing power of the entire blockchain = the average processing power of all nodes-the product of consensus
2. Block size is limited
3. The time required for consensus is too long.
4. The average information propagation speed between nodes is limited.
Although the consensus provides sufficient security for transactions, it also imposes huge restrictions on the transaction processing capabilities of the blockchain.
There is no scale increase effect, but limited by the processing capacity of the node itself, which is essentially a great waste of resources.
The solutions to this are: the node itself can form a chain; joint mining; sharding.
Increasing the block size can certainly increase the TPS, but this will lead to an increase in the requirements for hardware processing capabilities, which will cause users to switch to mining machines.
The recentralization of mining pools has already occurred on PoW platforms such as BTC and BCH. 10 minutes of consensus has severely affected transaction demand, and reducing the consensus time will increase the probability of being attacked successfully. Therefore, an overpass can be built-both side chains and lightning transactions.
Post original, Released August 3, 2018
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word. https://www.zhihu.com/question/41004649 https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/ofc9s31hp98wxvtz/preview?key=7or83l41aquc0jj7&suspectId=b8ec04e9be&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1 |
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: Tim-BTCPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive)
After the craziest half a year, China's crypto mining entered a period of sharp turbulence from May to June. Under the attack of local governments, most of the mines were shut down. The miners who just entered the high point this year suffered huge losses. The sell-off of some miners under economic pressure also led to a sharp correction in the crypto market.
At the moment, how to dispose of this batch of down-time mining machines and minimize losses is the most urgent problem for miners of all sizes.
Going overseas is the way that miners have placed the greatest hope before, but after a period of exploration, the road to overseas is not as smooth as expected, and some small miners are still trying to stay
https://inf.news/en/economy/92ee32304bd76dbb698a4a79450bb071.html================================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: Kimberl2020Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350533.msg57517578#msg57517578( archive) The main reasons for Bitcoin's current transaction speed limitations are:
1. The processing power of the entire blockchain = the average processing power of all nodes-the product of consensus
2. Block size is limited
3. The time required for consensus is too long.
4. The average information propagation speed between nodes is limited.
Although the consensus provides sufficient security for transactions, it also imposes huge restrictions on the transaction processing capabilities of the blockchain.
There is no scale increase effect, but limited by the processing capacity of the node itself, which is essentially a great waste of resources.
The solutions to this are: the node itself can form a chain; joint mining; sharding.
Increasing the block size can certainly increase the TPS, but this will lead to an increase in the requirements for hardware processing capabilities, which will cause users to switch to mining machines.
The recentralization of mining pools has already occurred on PoW platforms such as BTC and BCH. 10 minutes of consensus has severely affected transaction demand, and reducing the consensus time will increase the probability of being attacked successfully. Therefore, an overpass can be built-both side chains and lightning transactions.
Post original, Released August 3, 2018
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word.https://www.zhihu.com/question/41004649https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/ofc9s31hp98wxvtz/preview?key=7or83l41aquc0jj7&suspectId=b8ec04e9be&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1============================================================================================ PlagiarismUser: McphailPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive) Bitcoin's "consensus" is people's acceptance and recognition of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is endorsed by "consensus", not by physical assets, nor by the credit of a centralized government or country. So from this point of view, Bitcoin is difficult to replicate.
The blockchain technology represented by Bitcoin naturally solves the problems of centralization and trust, making the transfer of value more convenient than ever.
The internal combustion engine solves the problem of converting explosive energy into power. The generator solves the problem of energy transmission. The problem solved by the Internet is the problem of cross-domain transmission of information. Bitcoin solves the problem of the trust of communication.
 https://min.news/en/tech/419da1b9f3b0e28dbe08a81d0105a0dc.html .Bitcoin will be known to the people of the earth within 3-5 years. Just like historical relics, ordinary people will know that it is extremely rare and valuable. This will be the consensus of all people on the earth.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5770/57708267.html https://blog.actorsfit.com/a?ID=01800-cef44ecc-582d-4f2b-a2ab-b9469f05180e============================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: sisikinPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347888.msg57412279#msg57412279( archive) Due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the future work of mankind will definitely be replaced by artificial intelligence.
If Bitcoin is successful, then it is the last line of defense against artificial intelligence.
If artificial intelligence wants to obtain wealth and then hire humans to work for them, or hire humans to "listen to them", they only need to modify the big books of the banks in a "centralized" society.
If our world uses Bitcoin as currency, then artificial intelligence cannot modify this large ledger, so it is difficult to easily obtain a large amount of wealth.
Therefore, if there is no "decentralization", then artificial intelligence can achieve the goal of ruling mankind "civilizedly" without violent means at all.
But if the decentralized mode of operation represented by Bitcoin becomes the underlying operating logic of our world, it will obviously increase the difficulty of artificial intelligence to rule the world to a large extent, because in many things, it needs to interact with most humans. Only by forming a "consensus" can the implementation be promoted.
Post original, Released 2017.12.27 The post is translated from Chinese by google translator. Copied word for word.  http://www.iheima.com/article-166651.htmlhttps://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/wx54v4uxs05sxfa5/preview?key=o7b9dgm2b7zefhgc&suspectId=4ae834a3d6&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1 ============================================================================================== PlagiarismUser: IrenertyPost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5352632.msg57635628#msg57635628( archive) Trading cryptocurrency is a high-risk speculation, and it is very unstable. Changes in market sentiment can lead to sharp and sudden changes in prices.
1.The most basic skill necessary for trading is the ability to accept losses and continue trading. Set a stop loss and do not move the stop loss when the transaction is not favorable.
2.Before trading cryptocurrencies, you should be familiar with the related risks. When a hard fork occurs, the price fluctuation range may be large, and if there is no reliable base market price, trading may be suspended.
3.Novice traders should develop simple trading systems and avoid making decisions on patterns or indicators that are not fully understood. Analyze the market from a clear technical indicator line.
The post is translated from Chinese by google translator.  https://www.cmcmarkets.com/zh-sg/learn-cryptocurrencies/what-are-the-risks https://forum.mt5.com/showthread.php?317501-In-Crypto-Currency-Trading-Pay-Attention-to-Avoid-Making-These-10-Mistakes
|
|
|
|
Adding more accounts connected to Rkss4 since the account woke up recently. The accounts are connected through mutually shared address that collects bounty tokens: Sihab76Kayum10029Tnt1971Nilakash1983A couple of these accounts are still active and one wasn't yet tagged, so I'm gonna take care of that. Been using a combination of TryNinja's address tool and Etherscan, which is basically a cheater killer. I also want to add another cheater from this company. Today they participate in Giving 🚀BITCOIN🚀 . I do not know if there are rules for prohibiting the participation of alternative accounts, but I will inform the manager about them. 5 Accounts Connected
1.Sihab76
2.Jomunariver798
Proof:
[ archive ] [ archive ] Related Addresses:Reddit URL: https://www.reddit.com/u/Sihab7626
 3. nazmul30[ archive ] Another account belonging to this farm. |
|
|
|
And if on top of that his alts have been banned, he should be banned for ban evasion.
All the remaining accounts seem to have little activity, and I agree with Nutildah, they are harmless. RainbowKun himself is a rather peculiar person who, for some reason, continues to publish his ideas, realizing that after the story with the farm, many simply sent him to ignore. The number of merits has also stopped increasing, so at the moment he is one of the most harmless participants in the forum. He does not participate in any subscription, you can just observe what he wanted to get in the end, having come with the team to this forum? Time will put everything in its place. To ban other accounts, there is simply no evidence that the moderators rely on. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
