Oh gawd.. Let's talk about which shitcoin happens to be less shitty.

 


Some of the shit you come up with, sometimes.

Holy moley.

If others were to copy you, the place would be filled with fucking trolls and guys distracted by shitcoins, macro-events, worshipping the dollar and believing that price follows hashing power.  

We would be quasi-delusional, and trying to set the record straight in regards to some of your funzies should not be considered any kind of a joking matter.


And, I am not even really that mean about it....  When I call you names, you usually deserve most of it, even though once in a while I might go over board a bit.

And, think about it, you are the one who specifically brought up litecoin while proclaiming that you were trying to get a response out of me.. .. so under the whole scheme of things, I feel like I am being pretty tolerant to frequently go along with your various attempts at funzies, including that frequently you are likely seriously actually doing some of the dumb stuff that you describe yourself to be doing and/or believing... so in the whole scheme of things, I am pretty fun to tolerate your frequent and ongoing lack of focus.


That would mean that we are getting to the lower points of don't wake me up zone.. so yeah, I would likely start to pay attention if we start to get into those price areas.

Think about it.

Around  February 25th, we pretty much broke above from $53k  and we got into the $60ks, and there has hardly been any return to those sub $60k prices - except a quickie bounce below $60k on March 4th.

So, yeah, I would not be surprised to actually revisit some of those upper $50k prices, yet at the same time, there is no real need that BTC prices have to actually go back there... .......ever.....

So that is one thing about preparing for and/or hoping for some levels of down.  They may or may not happen, which helps to support the rationale of biasing any preparations that you do towards up.. which I think you still have some troubles with actually putting those kinds of UPpity preparations into actual practice..

Not financial advices (even though it is), and part of the reason that I cannot give financial advice to uie-pooie, is because largely you are a lost cause.. hahahahhaha  #nohomo.


What else is new?

One of the most inevitable things in bitcoin is that it is volatile, so you are not saying anything new by suggesting it to be volatile.. yet the ONLY thing that you seem to be implying is that bitcoin is going to be volatile in both directions, which surely is problematic since it seems way more likely that bitcoin is going to continue to be volatile to the upside, even though so many folks seem to currently be worried about corrections that surely are probably even less than 50% likely to happen... and even if they do, so what?  The main thing for most people (probably including uie pooie) is that they do not have enough bitcoin.. and at least you have some bitcoin as compared to the overwhelming number of no coiners that we have in the world... maybe what?  99% or so of the population are still no coiners.  That is under-preparation for UPpity if there were to be any way to reasonably outline the dynamics of the coiner status (or lack thereof) of the world's population.


I am still happy.

I mean that it seems that we are still "ahead of schedule" so why be concerned about where we happen to be, and since we are likely going to have another 12 to 18 months of UPpity, it likely does not hurt to take it slow (if and when possible), and also seems to cause more likelihood that the UPpity would be sustainable for longer stretches of time into the future...

I don't know, but you know sometimes when the price makes great leaps upwardly sometimes the buyers just cannot keep up.. and right now, I think it is becoming more and more difficult, and perhaps even dangerous for the fat cat bear whales to be fucking around trying to get the BTC price to go below $60k.. Yeah, sure we cannot really stop them from trying, but there may well end up being a bunch of them who end up getting reckt as fuck through their ongoing playing around to try to get the BTC price to go down and maybe they are largely running out of coins to accomplish their DOWNity preferences.

I am NOT going to deny that I also have a preference for UPpity.. so that more and more beartwats can get reckt.. but sometimes it just takes a bit of time for both the up and the down to play out, and surely it seems likely that a decent number of the beartwats are likely going to get reckt this cycle.. so yeah in the meantime, let them have their cake.

I don't mind paying it.  I think that we were close enough to agreeing.  Yeah, I was annoyed with several aspects of what I perceived to be your waffling, but at least when you set forth the bet terms in a more concrete way,' I mostly found them largely agreeable, even though I was not 100% sure of your commitment to it (since the payment amounts were quite lopsided.. 100 to 1).. which both commitment to the bet and lopsidedness of the bet were a couple of my main motives for suggesting the potential appropriateness of escrow.. .. and anyhow.. as far as paying 0.0001 BTC through lightning network or something like that.. I would not have any problem with such a thing since those are generally not very costly ways of carrying out BTC (or BTC adjacent) transactions - with relatively small amounts, and I actually don't mind practicing with those kinds of payment methods (including that I am still practicing and learning) to see how they work out.

You can do modified pushups, which makes it easier to do them.


Maybe if you tried doing 5 sets of 15?  That would be 75 for the day.  And you could do 20,15,20,15,20 - and that would be 90 for the day.  I am not going to say it is easy because it hurts, but I think that if you are able to spread them out and do them throughout the day, it gives your body a chance to recover, both in terms of joints but also in terms of overall tiredness that comes from adding extra exertion into your daily routine.  I feel tired from adding the lunges, so I have to spread them out and maybe some days I will do more and other days fewer, and hopefully continue to be able to build (while also attempting to maintain most of my energy focus on the pushups until maybe some times I am in the mood for the distraction of the other "substitute" exercise - like the lunges in my case.

Firstly, there is no need to quote the whole post, especially if the post is long and you might be asking some questions that are related to ONLY part of the contents of the post.

Second, if you are still figuring out how to get started with regularly investing into BTC, try not to get too caught up in regards to figuring out what the short-term BTC price is going to do, especially if you are considering buying for the long term, just start to buy regularly, and while you are perhaps starting to buy with small amounts of your discretionary income, then spend more time making sure that you have your budget in order rather than attempting to be overly strategic in regards to your bitcoin buys. You can adjust your BTC buys as you get more used to buying BTC regularly, so yeah, it might be better to first just do small weekly buys while you are figuring out your specific financial situation.

Sure specifically we do see that we are in the middle of a pretty decent dip, and without knowing more about your own particular circumstances, it is difficult to even know how much extra discretionary income you might have sitting around and ready to put into bitcoin or if you might start to engage in overly risky behaviors merely because you are still new to buying bitcoin and/or you are becoming overly greedy in terms of wanting to get short-term profits, which surely in this thread we are not focusing on short term profits rather than the creation and carrying out of plans that are going to give you options on a longer timeline, such as 4-10 years down the road or longer, and yeah, it can feel good to be able to buy on dips and maybe to have some additional assurance that your BTC holdings are in profits right from the beginning, yet whether or not your BTC are in profits from the beginning do not tend to be very good focus points, especially if you might well be serious about long term investment plans that will build your bitcoin over many years and give you more options one or two cycles down the road.

And, yeah, we cannot even tell from your description of your situation if you are absolutely brand new to bitcoin or if you had already been accumulating bitcoin for a while, which also can change the calculations that you would do on an individual level, and surely if you are actually quite brand new, then you may well realize that it can take more than 10 years to build a decently good size and strong investment portfolio, even with an investment that is so seemingly strong as bitcoin, and in spite of bitcoin's many strengths, it is also not guaranteed to return profits to you, so you should also consider those kinds of matters when you are establishing your investment strategies and carrying them out.

Maybe you want to discuss some of the matters that you are considering within the 9 factors that are important to consider for investing into bitcoin, and remember that BTC price performance is ONLY one of the 9 factors that you should be figuring out, yet you don't need to figure out all of the 9 factors in order to get started.


It is best to presume all other coins besides bitcoin are shitcoins, and you should approach them from that perspective... Don't give shitcoins any kind of benefit of the doubt, but instead consider them as affinity scams on bitcoin and full of overstatements that are merely playing off of bitcoin.

Sure there may well be exceptions to the rule, but it is hardly worth any time to be fucking around with them,. even though there might be some shitcoins that actually have some possible value... and you might even get yourself into worse shape if you try to value them based on their having high market caps, so then you get distracted into a bunch of nonsense and wasting your time, money and energies, when you should be spending that time, money and energies getting your shit together in regards to your bitcoin strategy.

Yeah, once you might get your shit together in regards to bitcoin, then perhaps at that point, you will have more liberty to "look into" various shitcoins, and perhaps by the time you actually look at bitcoin, you will actually come to realize that it is not worth your time to be fucking around with those various distracting bells and whistles that may or may not pump at the time you would like them to.

Anyhow, the punchline is to presume shitcoins really are shitcoins and don't waste your time on them, even if you like gambling, but if you cannot resist gambling then limit your gambling to 10%.. but yeah, degenerate gamblers are not able to limit themselves, so they just argue that all shitcoins are not shitty, so they are already approaching the matter from the wrong perspective which truly should be to presume that shitcoins are a waste of time, money and energies that could be better spent on focusing on bitcoin.


Fuck off with your pumping of shitcoins in this thread and trying to proclaim that some shitcoins are less shitty than others.. yeah, even if what you are saying might be true, it is not appropriate to be bringing such distracting nonsense into this thread.


You sound distracted or maybe just a lost puppy.

Like this one:

Browsing through recent posts of tyz, I cannot see a reason for the ban.. or at least for me, nothing stands out as a possible reason.

From that article and from a few others that I found through a google search, I could not determine the timeline in which El Salvador needs to pay back the outstanding IMF loans, and there was a Bloomberg article (behind a paywall) that seems to suggest that the $1.4 billion is not due until 2030 - yet that does not make any sense in terms of the seemingly ongoing negotiations.

I don't have any problem with IMF attempting to impose conditions for their loans, and so El Salvador can largely just stop borrowing from IMF, yet they still have to get through servicing the outstanding loans and potentially having to pay them off with questions regarding if they have enough money to pay off the loans without overly suffering.

Of course the IMF likely fears that if they extend more credit to El Salvador, then El Salvador will just continue to buy bitcoin with some of the loaned money, which may well merely just seem to be a speculative attack on the dollar, the IMF system and surely cause concern because buying decent amounts of bitcoin with extra funds is likely a very good ongoing play for El Salvador to both get out of debt and to improve conditions in their country (by employing sound monetary policies).


I would think that it would not be a good idea use bitcoin to pay off their IMF loans, especially if they were to be able to pay off the loan through other ways.. and yeah, the cheap  availability of debt can likely be very tempting, and it can be painful to be paying off debt when it is not able to be rolled over, yet if they are not able to secure various kinds of debt to roll over their existing outstanding loans, then it may well be a lot better to just continue to pay down the debt and to invest into bitcoin (even if from my perspective - as I posted several times earlier - the level of El Salvador's investment into bitcoin remains a decently small portion of their overall budget - seemingly less than a few percentage of their annual revenues, at most  $400 million over 2 years versus $7 billion-ish annual revenues).  

By the way, within your linked article, they had seemed to believe that El Salvador has ONLY around 2,000 BTC, when recently El Salvador disclosed that it has close to 6,000 BTC.. .and the author also does not grapple with any of the specifics regarding the servicing of the loan or when the loans are due... but yeah, sure speculation that if BTC prices reach $100k, El Salvador could pay off all of its loans with BTC seems to be a bit short-sighted, even though surely it would seem that the higher the BTC price goes the more options that El Salvador has with its bitcoin, but that still should not necessarily signify that it would be a good idea to sell much  if any of the BTC in order to service such loans.. especially if there may well be other options.

Yeah franky1 can be a bit of a jerk sometimes, but I did not see any personal attacks that go beyond mostly attempting to beat you up substantively, and yeah maybe franky1 is wrong or he goes overboard from time to time, but he had raised some decent arguments as well.. 

You (BTCdragosfera) did not even chime into the thread until after franky had already posted a couple of times, and fillippone posted the OP in the first place, so it is not even your thread... not that it matters very much when this had been established as a regular thread rather than a self-moderated thread.

If you want your own thread that is not open to debate (or at least you can delete anyone who you believe is perverting your message), then maybe this should have been authored by you as a self-moderated topic. 

Yeah, sure Fillippone could have created this as a self-moderated thread, and then as the owner of this thread, he could have deleted whatever responsive posts that he wants.. .. but he did not... .. and I suspect that fillipponne had made this as an open topic... so that members could chime in and express their opinions. 

Surely when it comes to markets, there is likely more going on than just pure math... so there is going to be a bit of a problem for anyone trying to model out bitcoin's price performance and/or adoption in pure mathematical ways.. even if you might be able to model out past performance to show how we get to the present, then what about the future? I doubt that bitcoin's price performance is going to fall into a pure mathematically predicted curve even if you think you got all the numbers correct, and even though sure your numbers and your curves might well work for a while, but it is going to need to be coordinated from time to time to real world data, too.


Bitcoin is a paradigm shifting technology that brings a lot of new innovations to the world, so it would be problematic to be attempting to overly-simplify bitcoin as if it were not adding additional value to the world. 

Sure, from time to time, bitcoin is going to appear as if it is nothing more than a speculative stock, yet you seem to be missing something if you are pigeonholing bitcoin in that kind of a way.

I could not exactly figure out what BIG beef there is with Plan B's model which has some similar dynamics as the Powerlaw theories, and yeah, I don't claim to know the math exactly, yet I still would say fuck the math to the extent to which there are attempts to try to be precise in regards to how fast various aspects of bitcoin's growth is taking place.  Yeah, sure, no problem some of that can be attempted to be modeled out and captured in math, but it also ONLY goes so far, even if we might be considering the [ur=https://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/the-seven-network-effects-of-bitcoin/l]seven network effects that Trace Mayer outlined in 2014/2015-ish[/url].

Hahahaha

Maybe dragonvslinux is going to be back soon in order to revive his betting terms?


You seem to be exaggerating UnDerDoG81.  The mere fact that BTC is your only investment does not likely mean that you are 100% bitcoin, even though I can see how it might be characterized that way...

It just sounds strange that you are proclaiming that you never sold any BTC since 2013, yet there have been so many times you had been in this thread whining about you were going to sell. .and then yeah, maybe you finally did?  

But still..

hard to take you seriously... .If you have a job and you have cash and bitcoin, then your cash is not in bitcoin.  If you have been living completely on bitcoin and converting all of your cash into bitcoin then maybe you would be 100% bitcoin, but you already claim that you had not sold any since 2013.. and it seems that you claimed that last cycle too.. after one of your sales and then your whining about it.  Or maybe I am remembering wrong.  You might have been whining, but never ended up selling.. who knows?  You sound a bit all over the place in terms of trying to follow what the fuck you are talking about and what might be some of your goals in regards to your supposedly holding bitcoin.


Can you sing this one at the next 2026 solar eclipse in Iceland while getting batslapped after every verse  and chorus (after every paragraph or after every line, perhaps?).

Barely 40th if that is what you are talking about.

Are you asking for some other kind of a prediction?

You may as well make your own.  I do like that we are still on the top 100 table, but I would not be surprised to fall off of it, since the lowest numbers on the table are still $58.5k-ish which is not even out of "don't wake me up" zone..  but yeah, I am kind of surprised (but not totally surprised) about how much time we are spending in no man's land - even while for sure, nothing is out of the realm of possibilities, since going straight through noman's land is ONLY like a slightly more probable scenario than it would be in other locations.. but it is not like the probabilities are even likely to break out of the 60% territory, that is if we might want to place some kind of a number on it.

I am pretty sure that DirtyKeyboard's script ONLY puts in the latest update, so it does not do you any good (except you want to show how you got to t to post two formats in a row, since his script is only going to include the latest of the dates (the second one in this case) in the next table.


DirtyKeyboard is not making a table for each date.  His script merely puts the latest report into the latest table, so whatever is the latest report at the time that he runs in the thread will be included into his next table... so in this case, I_Anime, only your 4/13 report will be included since the substantive results of your 4/12 report is contained within your 4/13 report... the punchline which is the total number of days and the total number of pushups until that latest report date.

I wasn't going to report mine for today, but what the hell, I am posting anyhow, so may as well throw in my latest report.

100k,JayJuanGee,69,12245,2024-04-13

You really consider the lower low to be below $60,700?   You are not even out of the don't wake me up zone.

I think that we have to go below $55k before I might start to wake up from this seemingly boring normality... that at most would be a BIG ANT dump.


But we are not talking about shitcoins here.

Who gives any shits about "crypto markets?" 

Does the tail wag the dog, or what?


That is fucked up.

-2 WO for uie-pooie... sirazimuth

If you had not noticed, nature does not have any sounds coming out of amplifiers.

Similar when going camping next to a bunch of loud folks who are not able to separate themselves from being loud as fuck, 24/7 and who seem to be unable to appreciate the actual sounds of nature.

You need a batslappening sirazimuth for fucking up nature and your brother saved you from being even worse..

Hey, what about you put on headphones so you can really get into it..?  Ever think about that?.  #nohomo

I thought that just the young whipper-snappers did those kinds of "ruinin dee moo" things, having inabilities to leave city life behind, fucking up nature and imposing their "unnatural" and usually way too loud sounds on others.

That strategy is meant for either someone who has a specific budget or someone who has already overaccumulated BTC.. so I am really not suggesting the strategy be used for trading and/or to sell BTC to buy back cheaper, especially for guys who had not already concluded that they have enough or more than enough BTC... which seems to be what a lot or smarter than everyone else newbies seem to want to do, and then they end up never reach a point of high enough BTC accumulation to actually justify using something like either the sustainable withdrawal tool or even a raking system, which also presumes overaccumulation of BTC.

You do not need to necessarily find out how the sustainable withdrawal tool will do, since you can back test it.. thank bitmover for that bonus feature...

Yes, I know that past performance is not indicative of future results, yet I think that the sustainable withdrawal tool show that you can engage in a pretty aggressive withdrawal strategy of 10% or more and still maintain and/or increase your BTC value in terms of dollar value.  So yeah, your BTC amount is going to go down by engaging in the withdrawal practices, and you likely should also to try to lighten up on your withdrawals during the periods that the BTC price is at or below the 200-WMA.. and the advance withdrawal is optionally a way to try to play the waves.. . yet at the same time there is an ongoing presumption of your using the tool based on your having already had accumulated enough or more than enough BTC by the time you start to employ such strategies. and personally, I recommend valuating your holdings and your goals based on the 200-WMA rather than BTC spot price... I also don't recommend selling in order to buy back later.. even though the advance withdrawal has a bit of that presumption of being able to buy back built into it (especially if you wait until the much higher levels when the BTC price  is 400% or more above the 200-WMA .. because there is a bit of a presumption that those higher rates are not sustainable, and if you end up cashing out too much BTC at those prices, you are likely still going to be o.k.. especially if you had already determined that you have accumulated too many BTC... a shitty part of it remains tax consequences.. hahahahahaha

For sure, if you know that your timeline is already pretty long.. maybe 10, 15 years or even longer, then you will be glad to be able to buy some cheaper corn, even though you cannot know if it is going to keep dipping for some time, but then your cashflow ONLY comes in so fast too.. so some guys might be buying every week and then maybe even trying to time their weekly buys for the dipping periods during the week, like the one we had today.... and maybe some guys might get mad because they already bought their weekly buys during the dip from $73k to $68k, so then when we get extra dip, then there might not be much if any spare money to buy more dip, unless the dip might last long enough for the next paycheck to come in and maybe the dip will last long enough, and maybe it won't... ..

For me, even though I sometimes get annoyed by newbies cheering for the dip, yet it still makes sense, and it makes more sense the earlier any of us is in our BTC accumulation to be getting excited about BTC price dips, without even necessarily cheering for them.  There is just happiness to be able to have the opportunity to build the BTC stack a little bit more (even though maybe it is ONLY 5-10% more.. or maybe if it keeps dipping then we get into 20% or more territories, and so far this dip from the top to the bottom is right around 16.5%, which is not a bad dip. 

For me, since I like to call my average costs per BTC as around $1k-ish, it does not make a whole hell of a lot of difference to have BTC in 61x profits versus 73x profits versus potentially 55x profits or maybe 85x profits.  Sure, the higher numbers are nice, but I am not as materially affected as guys who are relatively early in their BTC stacking journey and who might be trying to get as much bang for their buck in terms of ongoing accumulation and feeling some bonuses when being able to buy dips. 


Overall, I agree with your point avp2306.  For long term investors, they just keep buying BTC, and there might be some folks who are stimulated to get started in BTC because of the dip, but if they are a long term investor, whether there is a dip or not should not make very much difference, even though it can feel a little bit better to try to keep your average cost per BTC down - even though it is probably not going to make as much of a difference to be getting worked up about how much BTC is costing you, versus just ongoingly staying persistent in terms of stacking BTC, so that down the road.. whether it is 4-10 years or longer or some other timeline, there may well be decently good chances, that the amount of stacking is going to end up having some kind of a feeling of a reward - so long as they guy is able to keep his coins and not lose them.. which there might be some mistakes along the way too, but if the stack is mostly building and likely to continue to appreciate in value, there's likely going to be better feelings about the BTC having had provided additional options that would have otherwise not been available. 


Ultimately, people can do what they like, but there are a lot of things going on that are putting a lot of upwards pressures on the BTC price, so it seems crazy if anyone who is either a low coiner or a no coiner would be either shaken out of his coins or stop buying or even worse sell coins in these kind of times.... so yeah, who knows if the BTC price will correct some more and who knows if there are going to be some folks selling their coins, even those in ETFs, which seems that the ETF holders would be a lot more sticky, especially since they largely have just been entering BTC in recent times, so it would not be very likely that too many of them would be shaken very easily.. but who knows?  we have to see the data and anticipate that there still is a lot of ongoing new buying pressures, even though for some reason we are getting some short term selling that might be trying to shake out the weak hands or even scare the newbies from buying as consistently and aggressively as they should be.

It is not nice to troll  - talking about shitcoins and/or reiterating your own ongoing inabilities to focus on long term.

Sure, who fucking cares about how various shitcoins might (or might not) pump from time to time? It is largely noise.. and yeah, you admit to such childish and purposeful pumping of a shitcoin.


I think that one of the main purposes of escrow is to assure seriousness in any proposition and/or bet, and yeah in recent times there are more needs to be concerned about on chain transaction fees... and surely there could be charges (fees) with any person providing escrow as well... although there might be some forum members willing to provide escrow without charging, yet we would still have to make sure the fees are covered.

Yeah, I don't really know the solution, except each side would bear his own transaction fees and perhaps the splitting of escrow costs... and I was not completely inclined to insist upon escrow services in the event that seriousness could otherwise be confirmed, and perhaps your writing out the bet terms did contribute towards showing that your proposed terms were more serious than I had originally thought.. ...

So even if we did not exactly agree upon escrow, yet if we are able to establish that the bet was sufficiently serious, then it appears pretty likely that such bet is going to end today, since there are ONLY a little over 6 hours left in the day, and it appears that currently (as I type this post) there is around $338 of weight-traded BTC price (currently showing weight-traded price of $67,145) that has to be made up (or increase in price).. which seems very difficult to accomplish especially since the BTC price is currently moving lower rather than higher, unless there were a pick up in BTC trade volume and/or a decent enough pick up in the BTC price, which it seem the opposite is taking place right now...

So yeah, sure, prepare to give me a lightning address, whether it is your own address or some other lightning address... and yeah, right now I am not very comfortable with such low amounts being processed on chain.. at least right now and not without the consent of the recipient to receive such a low amount (which might be a little bit lesser of a deal if the amount were sent to an exchange address), but yeah if you are agreeable to using lightning as a substitute payment route then we could probably make that work.. .. yeah if it comes to the actual exchanging of payment information, we most likely could figure out the part of the actual confirmation of the address by PM.. and I am not necessarily going to delay, but I might not be able to pay right away, either.. we have to make sure to coordinate and make sure we are available .. depending on if the lightning network invoice expires or if it is one that does not expire.. .. all good practice, in the use of various bitcoin (or bitcoin-related) payment options, I suppose...

Merely because you were able to buy lower than you had sold does not mean that what you did was the better of practices.. but hey whatever, you do you.

Any kind of need to compare bitcoin to other coins does not even enter into my mind, except for sometimes having to weave through comments in which some forum members seem to be wanting to make those kinds of comparisons.

Yes, there are various other activities going on that can be looked at from time to time, but how much time are we going to be spending thinking about that crap and/or feeling some kind of need to make those kinds of comparisons? 

Hopefully not too much and if guys are lured into that crap, then if they can at least keep some kind of a limit on their being lured into it, they are likely going to be better off, but there are quite a few folks who dabble in the shitcoin space, and some of them don't really seem too dumb either.. .. but still seems like a waste, and sometimes there are needs to limit even listening to those guys.. even though I don't completely ignore all of the guys who dabble their energies in that space while attempting to take those kinds of guys with a decently large grain of salt.

What is so "beautiful" about that?  You seem to be saying down before up.


I am having trouble figuring out how our current place in bitcoin history and/or BTC price performance could be considered "boring."

For instance, today's BTC weight-traded prices are still in the top 20 of all time. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138109.msg63938265#msg63938265

How could that be "boring?" 

Yeah, maybe tomorrow is going to end up lower.. perhaps in the top 30?  Probably not in the top 100.. but even if the price were to end up dropping to be barely in the top 100 with $58.5k--ish, that is not even that bad of a trade-weighted price to be.

Being anywhere in the top 100 of weight-traded prices continues to seem interesting to me... but hey?  maybe there's something wrong with my thinking on the topic.  Perhaps? perhaps?


Don't let your hopes for low prices fog your vision, which probably should be to accumulate BTC at any price for the next 4-10 years, and you are likely going to be a head of a lot of people in regards to your BTC accumulation in accordance with your own financial situation.

Of course, there are no guarantees, yet if you are new to this forum and you are accumulating BTC, then you are ahead of the game.  Don't get distracted merely because others have lower costs per BTC or your perception that you are late, when the overwhelming number of the world's population is still not even getting started buying BTC.

Also, don't be fucking around with trying to trade BTC.  Focus on accumulating it for the next 4-10 years or longer through buying it.  The best way to be sure that you are accumulating bitcoin is by buying it. not by fucking around with selling it and thinking that you will buy back lower. which is retarded... the better thing to do is to accumulate until you reach a state of over accumulation, and then once you reach a state of overaccumulation (by ongoing buying of BTC - and perhaps BTC price appreciation), then you have more options to start to sell some of it.

In the end, you are responsible for whatever you decide to do, including if you decide to fuck around with BTC by trying to trade it before you have accumulated enough (or more than enough) of it.

I did a quick look at your post history.. so yeah, based on your earliest use of the forum as a way to bounty hunt, you might not be smart enough to understand what I am talking about.. so hey if you are capable of learning.. maybe you can figure out ways to accumulate bitcoin rather than fucking around with begging for freebies and/or being involved (wasting your time) with shitcoins.

This thread started and the BTC price was around $42k to $43k, so I see no reason to even consider $67k as problematic..

Maybe if we get back down into the $40ks we might need to worry.. otherwise.. I don't see any issue in regard  to whether we call it a correction (which seems a correction for ants, so far) or we call it resistance (or stickiness) in terms of the upwards journey.

Yeah, there are no guarantees that the BTC price is going to $100k and beyond, even though I am tentatively thinking of $100k as a bump in the road rather than any kind of a meaningful destination - even though surely there are going to be a lot of folks excited about $100k, since so many normies just love to focus on round numbers (and yeah, sure we are going along with such focus in the context of this thread, too).

Personally, I think that the more important point is that no one is going to be prepared for UP unless he buys bitcoin.  So it does not matter the price if you happen to be a low coiner or a no coiner, and if you want to prepare for up, you need to buy.  You don't prepare for up by waiting for down, since it is not guaranteed that down is going to happen, even if a bunch of weak hands are selling their coins, it does not mean that sellers are outpacing buyers.. so no coiners and low coiners are going to need to be careful if they are waiting before they buy BTC.

Another thing is dumb twats who are trading the best asset that exists, and so they think that they can sell and buy back cheaper, and so they are going to be out of luck if the BTC price ends up not correcting, merely because they speculate that it is going to drop.  We have witnessed a lot of regrets from folks who sold too many coins too soon, and generally speaking we have a world in which an overwhelming majority of folks do not have enough bitcoin and most of them don't realize that are underallocated to BTC by their failure/refusal to adequately/sufficiently buy some. (or enough).

brought that daily traded average down, but still nearly $1k above $67,483.

Today is looking a bit rougher.

The first 4 hours of the measuring day, and we are off to a tough start, so yeah, this could be a day that we end up not getting above the November 9, 2021 price.. but we still have another nearly 20 hours, at that time of this post...  Let's see what happens.

During the worst 30 minutes yesterday, there were just over 600 BTC dumped between $65,230 and $67,667.. so that surely ended up bringing down the daily weighted average - and so usually on the weekend there is lower volume, but you can really never know for sure, and also whether the BTC price might bounce back or continue to correct down, I am not going to claim to know.


You are delusional or you need better bi-focals.

You are not even comparing the right date. .

And you are comparing within the wrong group of thousands..


Snap out of it!!!!!!