0% fees (well that depends) but price would change so such bot could lose a lot or get a lot. Besides as it was mentioned before , fiatleak doesn't show whole bitcoin flow.

Value of coin is not related to supply, not in the way money or normal products are.

Biggest problem is meta currencies are something different. Compartment to Visa and MasterCard make no sense. It is like comparing cola to liquid gold.

FedR is organised this way since there wasn't enough money that government owns to really create high enough Reserves. Even though it is organised this way there is still supervision of governors democratically elected. Not to mention rules of law and judicature. It looks weird but in the end system works same as in other, more normal countries.

Well everything consumer a lot of power. Creating decentralized international monetary system is worth it. There are also more cheaper sources of energy.

Every gambling related event is ponzi that people are aware in some way. It is like lottery. You buy tickets, one person wins all other people money.

It is hard for me to believe you have good alt coin idea with no idea about programming. After all every alt coin is created in this way. Having an idea to created super efficiency, easily accessible coin that is also ultra remote is not really an idea. But yeah, some people might code it for you if you pay them.

Great idea. Not to mention it can be easily customized to gain power for other purposes too.

"But then the QuitCoin company comes along, with its algorithm, offering to sell you QuitCoin for $400. Will you ever accept such an offer? " no, I probably wont. This dude has no point at his theory.

http://blog.magicaltux.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/MtGox2014Leak.zip this link where are all of those "evidences" are doesn't work. Show me something more then just random screenshots. I don't mind screenshots as evidence at all but I can't see all of withdrawal there were out there, only some of them. That is not enough. Not to mention if it were actually evidences, clients of mt.gox should use it in court.

This proposition would put more pressure on bitcoin, while we should try to keep it as free and liberal as possible. Besides only government would be able to use such enforcement on people and I want to keep government as far away as possible from any kind of government.


You can always try to not to watch tv. Bitcoin is heavily related to internet, not tv, it is even more international then you think, especialy since biggest bitcoin buyers recently are russians and china and they don't care about american tv or government. Fun fact, I don't watch any of this channel. People should watch whatever they want, it is they problem. You can be jewish or any color and still be part of anglo-american culture if you decide to. Hell, it is not even relevant.

You can start your own foundation at any point you like. Unless you want others to do dirty job.

It is not first coin based attempt to make more money based on mt.gox clients misery. It doesn't even make much sense to be honest. Not to mention I can't see who would be potential users. People who would solidarity with mt.goxers or maybe you want to drain even more money from them.

Isn't it a bit old topic to call it scammer, even if it is

Euro as always, even if it fall, there is many banks that want it high and nice, much more then USD.

CHF is down for very long time now.

Krone is interesting. I never even took a look on it, but for sure it should stay stable.

Yuan is yuan, too heavily controlled by state. Even citizens of issuing state don't want to use it.

maybe because mt.gox is down...

You should show some screenshots

Interest value is not easy to determine. It usually depends on various issues related rather high fluctuation of supply and demend on different moments of times. It is easy visible especially when we look on recent weeks.

You saw recent prices on gold and prices on prices on bitcoin ? Gold is heavily advertised "idea" of wealth, that is as virtual as bitcoin.

But at some shops profit margin hits around 10-20%. It could hurt shop owners , even if it would temporally lift price a bit. After awhile shops would be falling down, unless we assume growth of price for over 25% at this point. Thats some kind of risk and obviously it is liberal decision of any one interested. It can carry some kind of risk with it, but also kinda nice gain.

Are any of those actually facts ?

All of those tin hat theories are getting boring. People should find some kind of more interesting topic.