Got it in previous post. Screenshot is there now. Sorry about that. I brain cramped. Same as web user and pass  So it appears like usb issue cables hubs or..? Board is missing please type lsusb and post output |
|
|
|
Same as web user and pass |
|
|
|
It does sync the time properly with the network time. Just noticed IPv4 broadcast is empty. I wonder if there was something there before? screen -r?
What does it say?
Tplink shall be able to sync network time
---------------------- Just noticed IPv4 broadcast is empty --------------------------- It does not matter .... once again screen -r via ssh will tell you what is wrong pls post the output here |
|
|
|
|
screen -r?
What does it say?
Tplink shall be able to sync network time
|
|
|
|
If you don't have free electricity it's only 1 choice. Buy Bitcoins instead miners. Even with electricity at 0,1$/kWh and difficuty jump at 5% S4 will no ROI.
Pretty much ^this  Second that advice. Unless you have millions of dollars to invest and free electricity. Yeah take bickLEDSKY ADVICE. EVEN THOUGH HE HAS FREE ELECTRICITY stealing it from somewhere His school probably HE IS NOT MINING. JUST SPREADING BULSHIT EVERYWHERE from the other hand if you do have millions pls make sure to hire LEDboy for your PR And it does not matter if you invest a bug or a millions. The free electricity always costs zero Right led boy There is no Equipment which will ROI in BTC and all we the community are the only ones to be blamed for it..... |
|
|
|
0% fees and PPLNS earnings. (The tx fee is not paid out to miners for maintaining cost and the bonus for our engineers.)
This is not possible on the existing p2pool share chain. Every p2pool node would have to upgrade(?) to bitmains version. It would be possible for the 'p2p' pool as described by Bitmain, for their share of the tx fees. Miners mining on this pool are not p2pool miners, and do not have to run bitcoind or p2pool itself. They connect to a pool just like any other, except that in this case the pool is a p2pool node. The pool is the node, and would recieve the coinbase payout. It would then pay the miners the portion of the 25BTC payout that Bitmain received, according to PPLNS, and keep the tk fees portion of the payout itself. And then the mentioned tx fees will not be enough to cover server electricity costs alone... I am wandering whre the rest of the money will come from to cover the pool expenses and what happened to so called decentralization propaganda ? Where will go merged mining profits also? And how the hell small miners will benefit from that Once again as I see things the goal of it is to collect between 5-10 % of all bitmain devices all over the world  Us folks be aware of that as long as you posses most of them. Nice strategy for a wise businessman though And as always bitmain will steal p2pol code and probably ckpool also like he did with other open source code and make money on top How noble he is. So guys please join whatever pool you like but not this one! At the end for the those joining antpol it will bring you nothing else but loss!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Thank you for your time jonnybravo0311!!!!! As i said whole thing is a complete bulshit a few pages ago. Bitmain propaganda roughly sounds like this: 1. My Miners SW sucks and it is closed code 2. I do not want/will fix them in near feature 3. But i will make a miracle with 0% fee "Decentralized" pool and loose a ton of $$$ (server rent staff salary, support) just because i want you to maximize your "profits" and mining speedHe can maximize your mining speed manipulating pool stats but I can not say same about your profit folks At the end what matters is not your pool stats but your payouts Meanwhile there are a couple of tricks which pool op can do to pay for pool expenses even with 0% fee - which will decrease your payouts even more THINK! |
|
|
|
How do you cover your costs having in mind it is 0% fee pool?
Transaction fees will cover some costs, but read the OP as to 'why' generally. Come on dogie, TX Fees The fees can not pay even electricity for the servers alone. This is just a simple math. I do not have free time to loose to do the math/ but please feel free to prove me wrong -------------------------- but read the OP as to 'why' generally. ----------------------- I do not need to. I will leave this task to other folks |
|
|
|
Don't forget that even if they end up being just one node in any p2pool network - be it the existing one or a new one, they will be far more than 51% of that network meaning it's as good as a centralised pool.
Like I said, they're paying homage to the idea of decentralisation because clients are demanding it so it makes for good marketing on their part. While them contributing to p2pool is most welcome, I see no sign of any of the alleged decentralisation.
Hi ckolivas, Yes p2p.antpool.com is only a node of p2pool network, but it brings more hashrate to the p2pool network. As mentioned in the announcement, we think we need to add hashrate to p2pool network first, to make the output more stable, then lots of p2pool nodes will show up. Finally, there will be a denctralized p2pool network. Can i ask how much are you paying for your dedicated servers all over the world? And how many qualified people are involved in this project? My rough estimate is that you are spending 3-5K USD monthly for your pool project. The big question is: How do you cover your costs having in mind it is 0% fee pool?Thank you PS: we all know that the Decentralization idea is very good but it brings you 0 USD in return! |
|
|
|
As to p2p mining, Antpool collects all subscribed miners to its servers, and then contributes to the already exist p2p network (p2pool.info).
Then why is p2pool currently only ~4.2PH? Nice one a million question Any way BITMAIN is ACTIVLEY refusing to publish and fix his software issues and now he begun to fix p2pool and bulshit people. I am telling it again 0% fee comes along with 0% brain......Small miner will stay small miner. end of story.. |
|
|
|
@ loshia: Let's not jump to conclusions shall we? When the software is uploaded to git, we can all see what is what then.
As far as merge mining is concerned, that's one of the best things about p2pool - why wouldn't anyone do it? I've been merge mining for 2 years now. Many nodes merge mine - it's normal.
Yes sure i do agree. But why then you do not get some portion of it joining antpool? Any way...i will stop spamming this thread. I just want to point out obvious things. If you can read them fine if not it is a shame. Wish you luck joining 0% fee pool Best to all of you There is no charity and Decentralization. All is about money, no matter how it is presented. Speaking of money i prefer to pay my fee, donation or whatever you call to other folks (pools) which i do respect. Simple as that. Joining antpool will not maximize your profits! If you do believe in Decentralization run your own p2pool nodes |
|
|
|
Thank you Bitmain - that sheds a bit more light on the subject. So you're keeping it python based then? (please say no) Please tell your R&D crew to ignore p2pool.info - it is useless & will only create confusion for noobs. Better if it was gone  A bit light? He is bulshiting you boys There is no way to do some of the things as described Any way i am damn sure that eventualy if when someday famous git will be published it will reval the whole truth. As i said there is no free lunch with %0 fee and dedi servers all over the world Unless BITMAIN is in the charity decentralisation business ---------------- Quote: -------------- There are two factors to address for the payout stability of smaller miners. 1st, the total hashrate of p2pool protocol is small and the payout of the whole network is not stable right now. We need to increase the p2pool protocol's total network hashrate. The above seems legit. No irony... ----------------------- BUT the below is just a plain big bullshit from Literature class 2nd, small miners' hashrate is low. We think we can help this by set up a good protocol mining agent.  Small miner is small and it will stay small unless new HW is purchased. There is no software magic to make small miner a big one The issue is getting worst especially with p2pool. Period! PatMan you can ask BITMAIN if he is merge mining that will be a good start And the answer is...? |
|
|
|
BITMAIN Customer Service Team
What? Who are you with zero posts registered 07 May 2013? @ Bitmain: Can you confirm this member & clarify the questions asked please? Thanks. Who cares dude... Do you know how ti find out if you are mining solo or not in a pool in every work provided by the pool? Do you know ho to find out if each and every work provided by the pool is legitimate? Do you know how to find out if pool op is mining merged without giving you a portion of it if not please do not expect a clear answer even from a legitimate and official BITMAIN Customer Service Representative Pathetic |
|
|
|
I'm willing to give Bitmain the benefit of doubt ATM, but I too would like to see some clarity on the situation, as others have asked previously. And please Bitmain, can we keep this thread free of dogie poop? Ta  Yes you can Ignore button and moderation right? It is clear that Bitmain wants a share from his sold miners speaking bulshit that is how i see things. And i do not need a crystal ball for this. Use your heads folks that is all |
|
|
|
Open source? and BITMAIN - this is a bad joke. Right? Any way we all know that most of you will go where you think the most profitable place is. But it will turn out that it might be your biggest mistake folks At the end the community is driven by pure greed with 0% understanding what is going on in technical terms. I am sorry to say that folks, but with such behavior it will maximize BITMAIN profits. And your loss also  |
|
|
|
Bam, and another one... Just told a couple other mining farms I know about this - Lets get it up to 2PH this week. Hate to say it, but I am starting to get the feeling that the other pools are not being completely honest... +1 Unfortunately math never lies. Pool is lucky. I wish it to stay like this but..... Enjoy your time here folks. The most important thing is that both Kano and con do know their Magic in details... |
|
|
|
I'm looking for an android wallet developer, but OP seems to have retired.
I am very selective about what coins I do apps for at this time. I have made something like 7 apps and they do require a lot of time and then later updates based on how the coin developers modifiy the coin to try to handle various attacks or shortcomings. Myriadcoin had three forks in the past two weeks. That took come time to translate and debug. The wallets that I updated recently include Darkcoin, digitalcoin and Myriad. While those are active, other coins such as Franko and Infinitecoin seem to have died. For instance the Franko app doesn't connect to any peers and is useless. Megacoin still works and Quark does too. I have a preference to work on established coins (they have been around for 6 months). If the price is right, then I may be willing to add another coin app to my list. 3 or more BTC is where the price is right. FRC / Freicoin is keen on a wallet. We will contact you soon. WE? May i ask who you are? Are you done with LED business already? thanks |
|
|
|
Wasp ? As long as know the biggest bickLEDsky technical inventory was "CLOSED SOURCED" blinking LEDs pcb board hashing happily with 0 Gh Comon Bick bring some light here like ex wasp spokesmen will you How are blinking LEDs doing lately |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
