I dont see yet what you project is about. You have a advertising network. But instead you being the middle man between advertiser and publisher, they can connect directly? And you get a fee for making the contact?

You mention personalized ads as free as a the internet. Isnt that risky when someone creates such a personalized ad that installs keylogger or something? Is there no control?

And at the end i dont understand what you need $50k for. You mentioned you bought a domain for $35k, the website is ready 90% but i dont see what its needed for. Besides i dont see the worth of such a high priced domain while a longer, brandable name could do the same too.

On top... you claim the userbase is already huge... why not simply reinvest the profit from there? Im not sure yet why you need additional funds now.

You didnt mention the url as long as i didnt miss it.

Did you test already if your prediction algorhythm will work? I only think the following:

Each and every bettings site needs to calculate how certain win for a match and player is. Depending on that they will set the payout levels. At the end they do exactly what you try to do. So if someone wants to know, which player most likely will win, he only needs to check betting sites and the odds will show him the outcome that will come most likely. If that wouldnt work then betting sites would go bankrupt pretty fast.

So why do you think that you can create a system that is better than the predictions of those betting sites, that probably tweak their algo since decades already?

I see i was already mentioned in the the thread so i will post now the details about my involvement as escrow.

My service as escrow can only give security for the time beneath paying your bitcoins into the escrow address and receiving the ICO Coins. I created a single bitcoin address where interested users can pay their bitcoins in. PLEASE make sure that you only send coins from an address you control and you are able to create a signed message with. You will need that to prove you payment later with CounterStrike.

The escrow address is:
The workflow so far will be:

* Sending coins to the bitcoin escrow address. ONLY from an address you control and you can sign a message with.
* Once CounterStrike solved all points needed to start you will need to verify your payment as yours.
* I need to be implemented in the personal messages. So that i get the signed message and can connect the BCT-Username to the sending bitcoin address.
* In order to know that the user received the ICO coins i need a confirmation that the buyer got the ICO coins so that i can release his btc to CounterStrike. Alternatively, if it will work that way, the buyer gives me (and CounterStrike) the info about to which address send the ICO-Coins to. So that i could check if the coins reached the ICO-Coin-Address. Though this second way is only an alternative in case it will work that way.
* Once i got the confirmation that the ICO-Coins reached, i will forward the Bitcoins and my service ends for the single user.
* I will ask CounterStrike for his ID, i didnt ask yet so i dont have it yet. I will update this post once i received the ID or once he denied to give me his ID.

If youre fine with the security level this will give you then you can start sending Bitcoins to the escrow address.

You are in Bitcoins for 3 years already? Didnt you notice that the amount of scammers are huge?

In case you didnt notice yet. You most probably didnt login into your normal blockchain.info wallet but you logged into a fake wallet. So you gave the scammer your wallet login details and he used it to steal your coins.

Even if you contact blockchain.info support it most probably wont work since the scammer will have send the coins to an address only he controls, not blockchain.info.

So im sorry but you fall for a phishing attack and i dont see a way to get the coins back. Unfortunately everyone in here has lost coins to either scams, inept businessmans or or or. Be super cautious, ask others and investigate before you do anything like investing and so on.

And you should enable additional security settings for wallets. 2FA for example. (But dont forget to note down the creationcode for the 2FA. So in case you lose your phone you can setup the same 2FA on another phone again.)

Adding to my last post. If the donation depends on if a BCT-User convinced them then it could be failsafe i guess.

In that case NPOs are eligible for a donation if:

* The NPO asks in here BEFORE they implement BTC
* A BTC-User convinces them to accept BTC. Doesnt matter then if he asks here before or claims he convinced them after that.

But not when:

* A NPO has the BTC-Donation Ability implemented and says they did it because of BTC100.

This only would work if the BTC-User has to be on here since some time already. Or do i miss a point?

I think it would be helpful to clarify things a bit more and publish clear rules so that NPOs that wouldnt be eligible dont need to ask.

I know. And youre right. I only think its a not perfect condition. If someone only recently sat up the donation button he could come and claim he created it to take part in B100. And followed the rules. We couldnt prove it happened differently.

Personally i would think a X Weeks ago would make more sense though like you say, the rules are set already. Probably the rules only could be changed by checking the current balance and contacting the last donators until current balance is met. So that the current balance donators are asked.

But i see its for spreading Bitcoins not for rewarding for accepting bitcoins in the first place.

As far as i see it your website is legit and so is the project. I dont see a reason why you should not be eligible. Though the last word has Rassah.

Anonymous email services always should have a single point of attack. So the provider for example. Maybe take a look at bitmessage. There is an email service bitmessage.ch that implements bitmessage. Maybe you can find some good ideas from there. But i dont see how you can solve the centralisation.

Wow. Didnt think they reaches 62.5 Million USD in donations already. Im not sure bitcoins would make a difference though bitcoins might get mentioned in this.

Regarding the project itself. I think its a project that can be supported.

YOU allow your own account being hacked. Then you send an email to the support so that they can help you. And only because they dont answer as fast, as you want them to answer, you believe you have the right to call them thieves? Really?

Im not sure if you handle problems always that way but if localbitcoins would be a realworld store and you speak that way to the staff, then for sure i would give you a house ban.

NotLambchop... I guess ill answer you one time before i forget about you.

I didnt lose all my coins in weex. Its not wise to put everything in one basket like you should know. Regardless of what you believe about weex and ukyo. I took my time to investigate the weex case carefully and it doesnt matter trying to convince you about the current status. It simply is the best choice to stop speaking about it for now. If you would take your time you would get it at some point. Though when i read you foul language then i doubt somehow that you are able to manage being that level headed.

Anyway. What i do, think and find out isnt depending an what the forum troll thinks about me or what names he throw around. Im done with this now.

I will now use the ignore link on Satan666 and NotLambchop. If they would bring up legit points but the naming and pure hate only annoys me.

I bought a couple of shares, checked if the ebay account owner is aware of this offer before, and i can be in contact with the issuer all the time. On top i can prove things, that he claims, are correct.

As a small shareholder i consider myself as a partner and yes, his decision is fine by me. He has employees that can run everything. Though i hope he gets a nice foreman that can run the shop business in case AB isnt available, so that everything runs fine in the meanwhile, but its not so much important to get my coins daily.

Im fine with condensed weekly updates or updates twice a month. Though i would like to read some words on development in the shop too sometimes. For example new employees and things that happen around there. Just interested whats going on.

They seem to be a legit non profit organization and are mentioned in a big magazine. The workers there work for free though there is a monthly fee for it. The magazine writes its still way cheaper than a kindergarten or a childminder. I think its true that they dont earn money and the fee most probably is only for covering costs like rent of the flat, internet and so on.

I think it might be useful to trim that list. Im pretty sure there are many users in the list that arent active anymore. For example i checked the first 10 linked profiles. 4 of them werent in the forum since months, 2 of them werent for around a week and so on.

I think the list in the current form isnt as helpful as it once was.

@squall1066 if you dont have time to check those profiles i could help you providing a least with the last logindates of the listed escrows. Let me know if i can help.

Great news. I already contacted the person in charge and he wrote he will send you an email to thank you.


Sounds fine to me. That was the NPO that looked like they deserve a donation most to me. So when the religious thing is out of the way then donation can flow.


Sounds strict. Its possible that they took some time to deal with something. 2 months shouldnt kill that chance, though thats only my personal thought.

And i wonder how many NPOs that received a donation only created the bitcoin acception possibility because of bitcoin100. It sounds like most sites were found and not convinced by bitcoin100 shortly before, though i might have gotten a wrong impression from the introduction posts of the NPOs.

On top, i believe most NPOs will add the donation possibility silently and see how it goes before they make a press release or something like that. So i wouldnt wonder when many sites accept bitcoins since some time but only later they make it known more publicly.

---

I dont find their bitcoin donation button. Manually by mail?

Looks like an old site and looks legit judging from the newssites that mention them. They simply want to legalize weed.


They are mentioned a lot of times on websites so i think they are legit. Too hard to fake.


They look legit to me.


Me too. Its a bit strange speaking of NPO and then presenting such prices. I checked google results and it seems this organisation is nowhere seen as a normal business. Only as a charity. So think the info he gave are correct and that the fees are only additional services that help to fund the other activities.


Wow. Prominent Bitcoin Button. They have their own wikipeadia article so i think they are a NPO and they specialize in educating Jury members about their rights. I wonder why one would need money for that since the website could do it on its own but they seem to do some sort of public service.


Looks legit to me and they are mentioned through so many ways that i cant imagine faking it with a useful amount of work. I didnt find something suspicious.

Greenwich time should be the default for such forums i think. When i register an account i mostly dont bother to set up anything, only want to post. Maybe i add things later or change the timezone when it disturbs me for some reason. Only saying.

Escrow mostly means involving a third person that hold the coins from the buyer until the goods were received correctly. Having a person as escrow helps in case of problems coming up so he can ask for information, try to find the truth and negotiate a solution.

It can take a bit because not all persons in the trade are in the forum all the time.

I would like to not "fight" in two threads so maybe read my answer here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=348468.msg8090750#msg8090750


Right... sueing him would make him talk. And i already went so far to send ukyo and graet a letter demanding information. I didnt sue him because he claims the coins are gone and without weex they cant be retrieved. And that sounds logically to me. Ill copy simply from the other post i made now: Weex dont have the coins. If sued and demanding the coins then weex has to go bankrupt otherwise ukyo would take legal risks personally. And if weex is gone then there is no one that could demand the coins back. Simple as that. So the decision is simply to believe ukyo for now or try if he lied and take the risk to kill the chance to get the coins back.

I simply would want to wait until its clear if the original coins can be retrieved. Of course that cant take forever. Im not sure that you can sue him to explain where the coins are without forcing him to set weex bankrupt. As CEO he would need to do this.


I dont believe in a NDA too. But i wouldnt be against a lawsuit when the silence couldnt be explained. For example, lets say the coins are gone, ukyo sees he has a problem. The first person would be his lawyer that would say to him "dont say anything" until things are cleared. Next thing might be an investigation and the investigator would say "Dont say anything until we cleared things in order to not hinder the investigation".

Anyway... im tired of all this. I take the shitstorm for ukyo. Maybe i should give up and dont care anymore. My life would be a bit more peaceful.

Guys... im getting tired of this shitstorm. Believe what you want but i think its stupid to not try to inform you first hand and judge without trying to inform.

By the way... tell me that im delusional or whatever but dont say im dishonest. I maybe had more coins in escrow than most other escrows on the board, at one point over 3k Bitcoins at a time and i didnt run with them. So if you want to say something negative about me then that i might be wrong on my judgment with ukyo but not that im dishonest.


No proof available. Only his word. Though it makes sense that the coins cant be retrieved anymore when weexchange has to go bankrupt. Its commons sense that doesnt need ukyo. Weex dont have the coins. If sued and demanding the coins then weex has to go bankrupt otherwise ukyo would take legal risks personally. And if weex is gone then there is no one that could demand the coins back. Simple as that. So the decision is simply to believe ukyo for now or try if he lied and take the risk to kill the chance to get the coins back. I made my decision for the moment but it seems a couple of people think they are way wiser than me. They dont bother to contact ukyo but think they know what happened and will happen anyway. Good luck then i only can say.


Sadly it involves some truth. Though its hard having invested in the past and NOT losing. The projects that did earn money at the end are only very few. Mostly it would have been wiser not to invest at all. But i think you dont need to speak down on me. As far as i remember you werent wiser than me in the past and you lost your part too.


*sigh* Again, you seem to not being able to a bit imagination. You never heard of lawyers that says you should not say anything until things are cleared? Never heard of investigations where you shouldnt say anything to not risk the investigations?

Fine by me. Its proof for you so do what you want. Maybe youre right. But maybe you only kill my chance to get the original coins back. And thats why im against a lawsuit for the moment.


No. In fact i hate the position im pushed in at the moment. I take the shitstorm that ukyo should take. And only because i believe him for the moment, judging from the chats i did with him and project he showed me. Because i think thats the only chance to get the original coins back. I explained above in this post why i think so.

Anyway... i dont know whats the truth at the end. I only see the options. And sueing doesnt have a chance for succeed in my eyes anyway. At least not when sueing with the intend of getting the coins back. But who knows. I might be wrong.

Because coins that are taken away and might be retrievable are different than coins that are spent to various companies for creating an ASIC? And you think im delusional? I wonder where you see coins can be retrieved from ActiveMining. Did you take the amount of worth into account the IPO-Coins should be worth now? And what about the damage done by trading shares for those that dont own shares now anymore?

Anyway. Delight me with where you think the coins can come from. I sold long ago when i realized that ken is driving this to the wall. I would like to sue him just for not allowing me to trade my shares so that i had to stay and look how they drop in value. But i dont await to see something back from the coins i lost trading since im pretty sure they are spent somewhere unretrieveable. Business went wrong... sorry. And you wont be able to prove any scam happening besides unregistered shares. The actual business doesnt look like its some labcoin copy. But let me know if you know more. I would be happy to get my lost coins back.

Your trustrating took a hefty hit it seems?