with an bios mode and undervolt i expect the 480 to do closer to 27mhs for 80 watts so it will be alot better than one 1070 well that is yet to be seen, i think he can tweak it to have less wattage used at 37MH, still i prefer the 1070 for density, i need to buy less rig, which is always saving money in the end |
|
|
|
Is that considered good for its price?
I've seen confirmation of £160 ish and a release date of 29th June in the UK.
depends on your power its 24mhs stock at 100 watts if you have cheap power youre better off with your 380s 390s and 280x cards with an overclock the 480 can probably do 28 mhs with 150 watts oc which is a bit better power wise than a 390 but not worth the upgrade then the 1070 is vastly better because it can do 37MH at peak with less than 150w, and 32MH stable no other gpu can even dream to come close to this perf per watt, the only downside is that you need linux for this... If the 480 can only do 24 MH/s at 100W, It is difficult to do 36 at 150W. Then 1070 wins if that can do 37 MH/s at 150W. yes it can do that but on linux only, waiting for new windows drivers fix to have better hash there |
|
|
|
wait for rx 480 like I am doing..  From what I read if power consumption isn't an issue then the 380's /90's would be better? I'm only repeating this from what I've recently read tho.... 1070 is better than both, check the forum for etheruem a guy is pushing it to 37MH, which is crazy, for only 140w or around that and before the random guy go out saying shit like "$600 is trash"...no you can find it at $429 on newegg... |
|
|
|
I replaced just my 970 with a 1080 and the temp in my room has been night and day difference.
The only thing I hate is the price but oh well.
As Epsylon3 said above maybe down the road the cards can be taking advantage of for mining.
The price/performance may not be ideal yet but there should be much more potential for SW optimizations. And the power savings alone is worth it unless Maxwell prices drop significantly. I also wonder about the possible 32 GB barrier. I'm not aware of anyone getting more than 5 980ti's working. With the 8 GB on the 1080 & 1070 this could be limited to 4. Hopefully this is just a simple driver fix and not something more fundamental. there is already one guy on the ethereum forum running 3 x rig with six 1070 each, without problem, so apparently this is not a real issue, or maybe only with windows? he is using linux |
|
|
|
Is that considered good for its price?
I've seen confirmation of £160 ish and a release date of 29th June in the UK.
depends on your power its 24mhs stock at 100 watts if you have cheap power youre better off with your 380s 390s and 280x cards with an overclock the 480 can probably do 28 mhs with 150 watts oc which is a bit better power wise than a 390 but not worth the upgrade then the 1070 is vastly better because it can do 37MH at peak with less than 150w, and 32MH stable no other gpu can even dream to come close to this perf per watt, the only downside is that you need linux for this... |
|
|
|
|
there is also a power advantage besides the 70% more hash, because a 970 at 700khs mining neoscrypt, will consume like 170w against 145w of a 1070 with 1150khs
|
|
|
|
From my first tests with cuda 8 rc, sm61 doesnt improve anything... over 5.2, maybe this rc is not yet optimized for the GTX, but only for the Tesla 6.0
To resume, the 10xx are more like overclocked maxwells with a lower power usage :p Remains the 1080 special memory which seems a crap for now on mem algos
Yup, but seemingly NeoScrypt is performing like shit on the 1070, regardless of it having faster GDDR5 then the 9xx series. Ethminer wont even run on the 1070 in w8.1 Both the 970 and the 1070 have a 256bit bus. neoscrypt is performing very well on a 1070, around 11150 on LINUX, with the correct oc, this is 70% more than a 970 1150 ? not more my 970 gives 710kh/s peaked with Neoscrypt you think a 70% increase is low? are you joking, also it appear that it can be overcloked even more, this was done with only +200 on the core(1750), these card can reach crazy value when overcloked, like 1800-1900 to me it's more than enough, in the end it's the 2x perf/watt that everyone was expecting since the beginning.... A lower price to performance ratio would also have been nice. The lower power usage is the only advantage over Maxwell ATM.
uh what? it's freacking 70% faster on both etheruem and neoscrypt, how this is only "power advantage" |
|
|
|
|
buy a 1070 for $430 on newegg it can get 37MH under ubuntu at 145w, for me it's worth the money at that rate
the 480 will most likely be the same in term of watt per performance, inital cost will also be around the same on the performance ratio
|
|
|
|
|
by how the thing are going, bitcoin right now is not even so good about tx fee, they are becomign more and more expensive, if you don't want to be delayed indefinitely
i'm with core but somethign need to be done about this, no matter what, 1 mb limit is not acceptable, and it's not optional to do the next move
|
|
|
|
|
so, someone got the payment from the last reset? was due the 20 of this month
|
|
|
|
if 27MHs is correct you should have something like 0.25 etheruem per day
I don't know where you got that. I'd rather say something like 0,2 ETH. I got 60 MH/s of hashpower, and I don't get 0,5 ETH/day ! i'm getting like 1.05 for 120MH using the stratum for dwarf, so with 27MH you should do 0.23 at the very least |
|
|
|
From my first tests with cuda 8 rc, sm61 doesnt improve anything... over 5.2, maybe this rc is not yet optimized for the GTX, but only for the Tesla 6.0
To resume, the 10xx are more like overclocked maxwells with a lower power usage :p Remains the 1080 special memory which seems a crap for now on mem algos
Yup, but seemingly NeoScrypt is performing like shit on the 1070, regardless of it having faster GDDR5 then the 9xx series. Ethminer wont even run on the 1070 in w8.1 Both the 970 and the 1070 have a 256bit bus. neoscrypt is performing very well on a 1070, around 1150 on LINUX, with the correct oc, this is 70% more than a 970 |
|
|
|
Unfortunately the price has dropped significantly to $674 at the moment. I think many people who bought at $250-$400 made a good profit selling their coins and that's a good thing. Now if most of them sold most of their coins already the price will start rising again.
Yes, that's sad. We had a 100$ drop in one day. Now I have to wait in order to sell my coins, since I wanted to do it at 700$+. 100 drop after a 350 rise, is still a great achievement, and in the end what i see is a 250 rise |
|
|
|
how well amd card perform on lyra2v2 and neoscypt? i want to know if the upcoming 480 are really worth to get for other top algo other than ethereum
We included an optimized sgminer in the v1.5.0.0 NiceHash Miner release ( https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMiner/releases) ... AMD is still quite strong on all algos with this optimized version. Best regards, NiceHash team. yes i know, but i do not have amd right now, i just want to know about their hashrate on those two algo? i need info to decide to go with amd or nvidia with the new upcoming gpu |
|
|
|
Gtx 1070
Ubuntu 16.04, cuda 8.0.26, driver 367.27
[Reference + EVGA hybrid kit @150W limit]
Ethash with genoil: 26mh/s
Neoscrypt with nicehash-sp: 1050 kh/s
Lyra2v2 with nicehash-nanashi: 35mh/s
[OC core+200, memory+1200 @150W limit]
Ethash with genoil: 30.5mh/s
Neoscrypt with nicehash-sp: 1150 kh/s
Lyra2v2 with nicehash-nanashi: 37.5mh/s
I could set the power limit to 170W using nvidia-smi but it still runs at below 150W.
really nice vlaue you have there especially for neoscrypt which is 60% more than a 970 and also etheruem can you tell me about the exact consumption, with those hashrate? i hope these hashrate can be "portrayed" in some way to windows did anyone checked this, apparently one 1070 can do 37MH https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners |
|
|
|
what kind of vmod? software mod via bios or hardware by soldering potentiometer ?
bios vmod, check the thread about the nano mod, it can really lower the wattege to a great extent, if a nano which is 28nm can be lowered to 80 watt which is like more thna 50% from the original tdp i can't see why you can not do the same with a 470.... |
|
|
|
|
16 gpu? are you joking, talking about instability there would be underestimating it
there is no way you can do it with 16 gpu for one rig, buy more rig, instead, they are not that expensive, you cna do one for less than $400 if component are used
|
|
|
|
|
if 27MHs is correct you should have something like 0.25 etheruem per day
|
|
|
|
|
it seems that without -L single 0 it does not work for me, it keep crashing on first gpu, there are other command that were added, maybe i'm not aware of?... i didn't follow all the recent release might help....
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
