TECHSHARE seems to be saying that he does not need to explain his reasons to you. If we only talk about the trust with the Turkish users, he says that he may have added them for his own reasons. At one point, i think he has said that he wants the forum to have more diversity in DT1. That diversity also seems to be primarily targeted on having sufficient opposition to the "clown car" or whatever. LOL.
I wouldn't have stepped in if he hadn't said this: I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community, they added me, as a result I ended up back on the default trust list.
This is not what happened. With the exception of 1 member, (Blacknavy), he added all of them first, before he knew how they would respond to his "mediation" (or well before the entire thing took place). The real order of events is this: - TS gets included by Turkish members and ends up back on DT1 (with a positive score) - TS "mediates" dispute between Timelord on Turkish community - TS's reciprocal trust inclusion history is exposed- TS falls back off DT1 (with negative net inclusions) ...7 months later... - TS ends up " back on" the default trust list with +2 inclusions Now he'll probably try to switch the subject to anything other than why he made up a fake timeline in order to make it seem like he wasn't fishing for reciprocal trust inclusions. |
|
|
|
I am not side stepping anything, I am directly addressing your baseless accusation. Since you have chosen to attempt to make a lie truth through repetition, I am just going to start quoting some of the many responses I have already given to your argument which you refuse to actually address in lieu of repeating yourself like a parrot who desperately wants a cracker.
You completely sidestepped addressing the fact that I proved you were presenting events out of order. You were adding Turkish users to your trust list before Sept 7th, 2019, the day you involved yourself in their dispute with Timelord. There's no way I can make it any more clear to everybody than I already did. Now stop lying. |
|
|
|
I don’t expect you to keep up, so for those who can, here’s a little more proof... make sure you know how to read before responding about this letter: https://ibb.co/S3tNbzFIf they didn’t create it, then why is it a secret to answer a simple question... I understand some of you will be in constant denial. And that’s ok, one day you’ll know better. If they didn’t have any participation in its creation then it wouldn’t be a classified matter... how’s that for a theory. The message here is that they created it for a reason, and it’s not to do common people any favors. This is a form letter which the only thing that can be deduced from is that the NSA has denied your friend's FOIA request. The verbiage in this letter can be found in dozens of other examples across the web, several of which are used by conspiracy theorists in support of their theory. http://www.mountainvistasoft.com/personal/mia/mia-foia-page-1.gifhttp://www.mountainvistasoft.com/personal/mia/mia-foia-page-2.gifWhile nobody knows for sure if your theory about the NSA inventing bitcoin is true or not, we do know you are not the first person to propose it. |
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing this. I've only skimmed through it as most of it is pretty boring, but it did get me wondering, does anyone involved in this trial remember what it is actually about? Ira's lawyers seem to be concentrating on making the case that Craig is not Satoshi, and Jimmy Nguyen is defending his stance that he is. Of course, if Craig and Dave didn't mine bitcoins, then Craig wouldn't be on the hook for anything... I think this trial is now entirely about whether Craig (and Dave) is Satoshi or not, Ira's proceeds or settlement be damned. Jimmy on page 103: "And more importantly if you look at the Court order even though Craig disagrees with it, the Judge decided to find that Craig was in a partnership with Dave Kleiman. A lot of people, even if they are detractors of Craig will acknowledge that Dave was a good person who participated in Bitcoin's early days."
...
From what I hear I think what I was referencing there I rely on looking at the Bitcoin blockchain industry and there are people who believe Dave Kleiman participated in the -- in helping Craig with Bitcoin.
Erm, are there really? |
|
|
|
Just found this thread and didn't want to start a new one. I don't know why airtman would put hacker's telegram in his post as they reside in different countries, maybe they were just working together. But I did find that Yourhomeboy is an alt of airtman. Both use the same skype address, nnanna540: Am a Nigerian i tried reaching you on telegram but its a bit difficult because we are not mutual friends, please contact me on telegram @gifthoy or Skype: nnanna540
I have Hetzner and Linode Accounts for sell at $10 each. The account will be tested before you make any payments. Hit me up on telegram @homeboybct
Skype: nnanna540
Yourhomeboy was also using airtman's telegram address: Btc mining bot available
Price $50
Contact me
Generates 0.01btc in 45 minutes. Proofs available if you are serious to make money while you sleep.
Telegram: @Gifthoy
Hello, a group of brands representing other brands on facebook needs citizens of the Countries i listed on my topic. You must be a jr.member and 6+ months in this forum, Also a basic knowledge of photoshop is needed, you need the photoshop to Edit texts when needed.
Reach me on telegram: @gifthoy for more details. thanks
They also sent merits to each other. I'm tagging both accounts as they seem to be encouraging others to engage in dumb ways to try to make money (thread bumping services, "mining bots," etc). |
|
|
|
His inclusion bumped you up to +1. So what? So what? So I'm just explaining to you what I meant since you misinterpreted it the first time, that's what. None of the rest of what you said has anything to do with this issue. |
|
|
|
(angry rant sidestepping the main issue)
None of this changes the fact that you keep putting forward a fabricated timeline. If you keep lying about the order of events, I'm going to keep correcting it. - In the week preceding 9/7, you added Kalemder, helping him to reach DT1 1, and he added you.
False, again. 04-09-2019 The date I was DT1. After this date, I added TECSHARE ( 07-09-2019). So I was not dt1 thanks to him. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying he only added you because you had just been added to DT1. You were on DT1 with 0 net inclusions. His inclusion bumped you up to +1. |
|
|
|
This whole drama created by a few Turkish members seems to be affecting the Local board overwhelmingly. Most Turkish users are interacting in Local and there view about Global is being manipulated by those caught in scamming activities. They are sowing general discord amongst the community with stupid conspiracy theories. I have been trying to talk with the people over at Turkish local. Here is a step-wise evolution of the matter. 1. REMOVAL OF KALEMDER The whole thing started because Kalemder was removed from the ChipMixer campaign after he was found to have some "Mutual trust inclusion/ exclusion" affair with TECHSHARE. He says that he did it because he trusted TECHSHARE as he was speaking out against racism. Bullshit. There was never any shred of evidence to support that idea, and it was based completely on an assumption on Nutilduhh's part, as they later admitted publicly. Not at all. You have every much a right to include who you want as I do to assume you were fishing for reciprocal inclusions. I mediated a dispute between Timelord and some members of the Turkish community, they added me, as a result I ended up back on the default trust list. Being the angry little ass clowns they are, they mobilized to invent several stories across multiple threads simultaneously to try to slander myself and others who had decided to add each other. Not because of mutual inclusions, but because our interaction had cultivated trust. Liar. This is the 3rd time I have to correct your lies on this issue. Were you just hoping I wouldn't see this, or what was your plan exactly? That said, if you review the original thread Vod bases his accusation on, you will see I made an effort to mutually resolve a conflict between members of the Turkish community and Timelord. This lead to several interactions with several of the members of the Turkish community, of which I gained respect for because of how they handled the response. I must assume they felt the same way and this is why they added me. I didn't do anything I wasn't supposed to and these accusations are nothing but a tall tale designed to make sure I wasn't allowed to be put back on the default trust instigated by people with very long time, publicly documented animus against me. Your timeline is off. The trust trading was happening well before your involvement with Timelord's fake flag bonanza. The post you linked is dated September 7th, and you were playing trust games with Russian and Turkish local board posters from July through August. The only reason these users were on your radar was because they had recently been promoted to DT1, and like you, were either off or barely hanging on by 1-2 votes. Your other great rationale for adding local board posters is because somebody like Foxpup, suchmoon or myself distrust them, which according to you, "makes them interesting." Still a terrible reason to include someone in your trust list, and evidence you don't belong on DT. Your first interaction with the Turkish community was on Sept. 7th, 2019. - In the last week of July 2019, you added by rallier and PHI1618. - In the week preceding 8/10, you added bobita, helping him to reach DT1 0, and he added you. - In the week preceding 9/7, you added Kalemder, helping him to reach DT1 1, and he added you. All of these additions took place before your first comment on the matter. It was because you had added these members to your trust list that you decided to "mediate" their dispute with Timelord, NOT the other way around. As can be documented by your trust inclusion archive, you have a long history of adding people to your trust list as soon as they become DT1. It's obvious you are fishing for reciprocal inclusions. You're still doing it, BTW. 5/4/2020 10:16:29 PM DaveF is selected into DT1 5/6/2020 1:56:59 AM TECSHARE trusts DaveF |
|
|
|
According to my local crypto priest there will be only 21 of them, but the good news is he said that they will be all guaranteed females and they will be handsome too.. As modest as I am, I'd be fine with say 5-8 milfs. I mean I don't want to spend my afterlife listening to Kardashians gossip, makeup tutorials and obscure pimples treatment tips (72 times that is...). Thinking about it, just give me a handful copies of the missus, one for gardening, one for dishes etc., so I can spend all my time having fun with the the other two or three  +1 WOmerit... will send you the real stuff when I get my source merits in a bit. Went on a spree the other day and cleaned out my stash. |
|
|
|
|
Oh, I didn't look into it. Yeah that's utter bullshit.
Going to tag OP and his alt.
What a waste of a merit.
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch. You should probably move this to the Scam Accusations board.
Luckily the AlysDax thread is already in Investor-based Games and the OP has been tagged.
|
|
|
|
Not gonna happen at this point. Too much liquidity in the system already and everyone knows that if stocks do fall, the Fed will step in to print more money to prop them back up. Even if stocks did fall, BTC will fall along with them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just refusing to learn from what happened last time around. The best argument I've heard about BTC not being correlated with the stock market is "it's a short term correlation." This may be true, but its a correlation nonetheless, that occurs during a critical time period. But I do expect the impact of a stock sell down on the Bitcoin price to be less this time. They know how hard it can (will) rebound.
This could very well be the case. |
|
|
|
But which is the topic? I can't access the post. It looks like it was deleted. Can you link also the topic? I'm sure it is an interesting discussion there.
Thanks to LoyceV's amazing inventions, I found this (fun parts included only): Become a member of Ponziland and you will receive free bitcoins coming from new members!
(snipped boring Ponzi terms)
Oh, and I don't give refunds... Honest Ponzi indeed. |
|
|
|
Although the use of such thread bumping/spamming methods in promotion is not enough to confirm scam, it definitely gives another negative sign.
Especially when the projects they were previously hired by were also scams: But once again, I sincerely want you to take into account the history of the company and its development well before the current crisis.
If you are experienced and reputable company, why did you hire that "marketing agency" (as they like to call themselves) to fill your ANN thread with all those newbie sock puppet accounts, writing ridicoulous one-liners that won't fool anyone but will bring you attention, albeit not the kind you wanted. These kind of services are ready to promote just about anyone that pays, and same accounts that are "working" in your thread and promoting known ponzi schemes like Goldario, among others. I have no idea how they managed to sell you this, but it doesn't look good, and it's something that is frowned upon here. Rikafip already researched it and called them out, that guy is an animal. |
|
|
|
I didn't come here to change your mind. I just came here to prepare salt for your wounds.
Price of BSV on Feb 13th: $358 Price of BSV today: $193 Change: -46%Price of BTC on Feb 13th: $10,350 Price of BTC today: $9733 Change: -6%Ouch. |
|
|
|
What a disgrace to the bitcoin ecosystem is Coinbase.
Gullible CEO
Shilling shitcoin in a tweet where a famous person tells she’s buying bitcoin.
True... and in a rush he uttered perhaps some of the worst advice that could possibly be given: get into any of the many other cryptos out there  CMC currently lists 5,474 coins... Let's narrow it down to the top 1000. He's basically telling people to generate a random number between 1 and 1000 and choose that coin to invest in. I would almost think he was joking if he didn't say "open a Coinbase account." |
|
|
|
ouch  |
|
|
|
LOL. I notice the notLoomdart account is now suspended, but Brian Armstrong's tweet is still there. It's free real estate, that's why he won't delete it. Unfortunately Adam Back also replied to it. This is pretty cringe-worthy as well, sent to the actual JK Rowling:  |
|
|
|
Hahaha, ask Mindrust how listening to MasterLuc has worked out.  For real. After being so wrong so hard, he should stop making charts for a while. From what I noticed about "professional" TA people: they never look back unless they were right. It's always about selling people on their idea of what comes next. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
