We are back: Bitstamp | Total bids: 108622791 USD. Total asks: 2212 BTC. Ratio: 49100.87570 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0306 seconds
|
|
|
|
this is on topic because there is a question is a "~lauda" should be added to the OP's trust list.
The title is additions. That would be a exclusion, and is therefore off-topic. QED. It was rated negatively in 2013 by those accounts. Doesn't mean that people had the same opinions back in those days. In fact, when I sold the accounts I do remember there being quite a few escrows willing to do the job.
There were a few members that Quickseller used an alt to complain about (in one of those "Lauda something something" threads), i.e. was whining that they didn't receive negative ratings for account sales from the past as I was tagging people left and right. Now I can't, nor want to look for this post but there were names such as Yahoo and KWH (IIRC; if I am mistaken, I apologize) and others. Anyone objectively assessing the situation can easily conclude why nobody has tagged them, you or other similar examples. Don't get me started on this obvious lame "fear" of getting tagged for no reason. Such silly psychological games might work on kids though.
You should be getting a bonus for busting down trolls. Didn't you use to wear a signature from Bitsler or something? We all believe a true Vod should be in DT1.
So say we all...
I think that everyone agrees with you.  |
|
|
|
Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash!
Incoming negative rating in 3, 2 /s.. Oh wait. You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?
There are a few threads every week or two. Seems about right.  I highly doubt that he actually believes that nonsense. |
|
|
|
But I'm scared that Lauda will neg trust me for it like he does to anyone else that speaks out against him.
That is an outright lie. People do not get neg. rated for that. Stop using shills and doing shady stuff, and you won't get neg. rated. Lauda neg trusts people just for offering to buy or sell an account, which seems totally disproportionate, given that he has engaged in these practices himself. (“How much for 10 accounts?”)I have not, and this is a very pathetic attempt at freeing all the tagged accounts. It is futile as it has no valid arguments behind it. However, I shall not forget it. All you need to do is express opinions Lauda disagrees with to get default negative trust now.
That is also a lie. There are personal vendettas at play, and provably so.
Another lie, and then you wonder why you get tagged 
Any rating on Bcash shills that claim Bcash is Bitcoin is valid as per theymoses statement (not that it was necessary as that one was obvious). Anything else mr. shill? |
|
|
|
You tried to buy a dozen accounts on two occasions (that's what was dug up at a glance)
Nope. ..and a year later you are talking about how you "can easily live from" posting with 4-5 accounts in sig campaigns.
If I talk how easy it would be to rob someone in a certain way, does that mean that I've also done it? Non Sequitur. It's nice to see that you squirm just like everyone else.  I do not. You tag people with negative trust for both actions. So, it's okay for you, but untrustworthy for others?? Is that how things work??
So that's who you are. So you admit to both placing the bids to buy that account and that xanis is your alt?
Xanis was banned on my request, but I obviously don't remember every post.
It's nice to see how you like breaking the rules, yet attempt to call out others on certain actions. Can we get back to the actual topic, @OP? Conclusions recap: The Pharmacist - Yes. zazarb - Definitely no. Anyone else?  |
|
|
|
From the looks of it, you took the time to delete at least 3,000 posts, which in itself is an indication you were trying to hide something.
Or, unlike the account farmer and account trader such as yourself, I wanted to clean up shitposting which I did. here is an example of xanis placing multiple bids on an account. Placing bids != actually buying something. Furthermore, even placing bids != intent to buy something. Non Sequitur Why exactly are you saying this is nothing? Are you saying that xanis is not you? Or are you saying that xanis was not buying accounts? Or both?
The equivalent of that is finding a very early shitpost of mine, and accusing me of spamming now because of said shitpost. To my knowledge, Xanis was not buying accounts but was rather just shitposting.
Not that said case is on-topic. Zazarb is barely tagging anyone who deserves it, and he left way too many positive ratings before for minuscule deals. |
|
|
|
The way the rating comes across to me as Hilariousandco being vindictive because he was overruled on the decision to unban that guy.
If hilariousandco removes his, and I add a new rating, would that fix it? Oh right. I disagree with the rating, and think it shows poor judgment, and I am posting that opinion.
You think wrong, and are likely not going to find anyone who agrees with your bullshit. I think you should do the right thing and address both the lauda and loan shark issues.
The "lauda issue" has been already addressed by not listening to your biased complaints that have almost nothing to do with reality, and so has the "loan shark issue" with the negative rating.
I wonder how you related to mr. Loan Shark and what your ulterior motive here is (other than the title of this thread). |
|
|
|
Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?
No. You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???
No. Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?
Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar. Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!
Given that you aren't smart enough to verify yourself, yes. Time to make the measures even stricter. |
|
|
|
I am also curious to know why you are making this a reason to veto zazarb's position on your trust list, yet you leave Lauda on your trust list when he had dealt in accounts in the past.
I have not. Keep wasting your time with shills and making up lies snowflake. Very strong evidence has been posted that suggests otherwise. If your evidence is a shitpost from the past, then you are very much bamboozled. You don't even realize how pathetic and butthurt gobsmacker must have been to dig up graves, and then read 2-3k posts in order to find nothing.
Case in point: zazarb is not a fit candidate. |
|
|
|
Some of the other collectible traders on the forum I would trust with my BTC are already on DT, but how about Zepher, Minerjones, Hhampuz? Or are you guys mainly looking for scam/spam/etc busters?
Zepher and minerjones are already on DT. I am also curious to know why you are making this a reason to veto zazarb's position on your trust list, yet you leave Lauda on your trust list when he had dealt in accounts in the past.
I have not. Keep wasting your time with shills and making up lies snowflake. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: STT
Rank: Legendary
Current post count: 2336
BTC Address: 1Hdm4dMqQed4BY3WWYhidnAdU21fjP8Hyw
I see the campaign is CFNP but I always miss brief openings, so I post my details in case it becomes possible to join at some level and I will check back when I next login
There are at least 2 members in queue for a spot in that tier, thus it is very unlikely for you to get a spot anytime soon (if ever). Hi Lauda, if is possible i would like to change the btc address for the payment, here the new: New address: 1DTA43zjUp6eSQxTvmc3TjWnsvwXBM8YBf Signature with the old address: H6x/6Yj9VSPli28+28/UzH9tcz8c/hqqB0tN5nlbMDazZNLmnrXaADk2WHZADm/RsHVjxCP7ja0+r5TMwA/EslY= Old address: 1FEwnT4WDcxdXVe2nzw7FSfadYapBaeaY3 Done. Hi Lauda,
If there comes a spot free for Sr. Member, could you enroll me?
I already participate on your campaign but just got promoted from Full member to Sr. Member.
I've marked you as such, but can't enroll you obviously until there is an opening.
Payments have been released: ed97e46effee4cea74762d0cc18cc0d584af3a29bd34e30c9cdfa5e7985a52b7. |
|
|
|
I have no idea whether someone uses it or not. AFAIK achow's website uses the 2nd post of this thread. I'm also going to partially deprecate the use of the list this way. It will have more convenient way for a select few managers. a newbie account cant accuse anyone Just ignore the shill accounts that got #REKT in recent take downs via ratings. Whenever they attack me I try my best to even push forward stricter measures wherever appropriate.  |
|
|
|
Given the current situations in the forum,I'd gladly recommend myself [Why wouldn't I ? ] That usually doesn't work and is frowned upon even though rationally it can make sense to suggest oneself. I think I did this one. Being on a DT is a long time responsibility.
It's quite the burden if you're active. Last time I recommended Lutpin and Mexxer who were an idea choice for the DT [fortunately they did get selected].
One of which scammer the other. Ain't it weird how these things work? Can't really think of anyone who deserves to be there..
I could think of a name or two (other than the Pharmacist), but they are more people that I'd *personally* place there if I could. |
|
|
|
It's you...
If you say that it is me, does that make it me? Why would you deny that?
If I don't remember it being me, was it still me? Can you prove I'm the same me as the claimed user from 2013? Can you prove that I was not replaced with a reptile? Can you prove I was not cloned by an agency and replaced by such clone? I have a lot more questions that need to be answered before you can reasonably conclude that it is me.
Anyway Doc, I need to ban more account. Bye for now. |
|
|
|
I suppose this one won't be added to the OP It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon. |
|
|
|
Ah, the irony.
Ah, the butthurt. LaudaM, probably the single worst spammer in this forum's history (and banned several times for it), running an anti-spam blacklist.
Who is that That's cute. Let me guess: Recently been tagged? |
|
|
|
The XT version is availbale from Gunther for 0.05 BTC, but I still have to pay 0.9 BTC if I use a reseller.
So, by now I would opt for Gunthar, because there is no discount if I buy from a reseller. Or am I missing something?
That's 0.05 BTC without an exchange licence (i.e. you can't really do anything with it). Therefore, if you buy XT + 1 exchange licence, the pricing is 0.1. In other words, 0.05 BTC base price + 0.05 BTC per exchange. |
|
|
|
That works better for budget oriented people. I've suggested OP to take a look at others (i.e. not myself) due to the fee. I'll do it for no fee. Minus the network fees off course.
You should not be holding anyone's money regardless of whether it would be for free or not. Sounds like either an attempt scam or attempted trust farming. |
|
|
|
Not this time. Nice to see a desirable item after so much garbage has been released by others though. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
