Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 02:41:04 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone  (Read 146352 times)
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510


Spear the bees


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 08:44:55 AM
 #1281

-snip-
Linkage is true. Implication is not that important.
Buying accounts in 2013 ≠ Buying accounts in 2017. I think we all know the difference. Most people used to freely engage in account sales before the influx of spam. Even when I had a lending service, I sold accounts. Then I stopped. Because it leads to shit. People are allowed to stop, you know. We're not all part of the cesspool.
There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.
There's a non-zero chance that everyone in DT has used the status to do X. Why point out obvious facts?
I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways.
Find it. Presumptions lead to nothing.

Lauda (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 09:34:13 AM
Last edit: November 14, 2017, 09:46:14 AM by Lauda
 #1282

Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.
I nuked an account of a rank that can't be nuked? Sounds about right. Roll Eyes

As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account.
You keep on lying.

The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest.
That is a lie. I have never, to my knowledge, bought nor sold an account.

-snip-
Linkage is true. Implication is not that important.
Buying accounts in 2013 ≠ Buying accounts in 2017. I think we all know the difference. Most people used to freely engage in account sales before the influx of spam. Even when I had a lending service, I sold accounts. Then I stopped. Because it leads to shit. People are allowed to stop, you know. We're not all part of the cesspool.
That post is obviously just bullshit in an attempt to discredit me. I was banned twice for SPAM (maybe even three times; I don't remember anymore) before becoming a moderator (here's a hint: The same person who banned me later promoted me). Is he really trying to say that a very old, secondary account, is worse than that? If so, he's a bigger baboon than I thought. The account has not been nuked, it has been permanently banned on my request a very long time ago (after I wiped its posts). My hate for spam partially stems from my past. This should have been obvious to anyone, no?

Unlike most shitposters, including the owner of that alt account, I've learned from those mistakes after extensive discussions with those who banned me. If you wish to waste your time on nothing, then be my guest.


"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Wendigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 1036



View Profile
November 14, 2017, 10:47:55 AM
 #1283

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar  Grin Anyone going to whip out the red paint now? Oh wait double standards and everyone giving blowjobs to each other. At least spit some out before you swallow next time. DT is rotten to the core. Hahahaha.


Lauda (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 10:50:15 AM
 #1284

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar  Grin
I was not caught with anything. The fact that you jump on this pathetic bandwagon just shows how butthurt you are.

Anyone going to whip out the red paint now?
No, as I have not done anything wrong. Unless of course, they plan on abusing their position like a certain someone. Roll Eyes

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
passionwagon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 11:11:19 AM
Last edit: November 14, 2017, 12:00:36 PM by passionwagon
 #1285

We have got a big fish here
Arsen56

Accounts connected:
Lhinglhung
Trevon
gamblebuilder
ahmedshawezi
rampalija
dirts
Hypes
Omnivion
MindGrenade
wetroof
Maqa71
Kotos123
mekler22
montyfd
dudupang
wakeupcall
agoenkjrz
aricleather
ndan13
Crystyan
liberatorium
Heisenberg74
Loq
Capitanike


Proof: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yd7bd94LuppHsBzoICGYJj3cEuf-eA8AoJPyhmvo45s/edit#gid=1764646260
Arsen56 ETH address - https://etherscan.io/address/0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8#tokentxns

All these multiaccounts are sending the bounties from their accounts to Arsen56 address. You can check the spreadsheet. This person is abusing signature campaigns, blog campaigns and others.

https://i.imgur.com/mo1zx3W.png

You can see how he is burstposting in order to get ranks for his next signature campaigns:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=340183;sa=showPosts

I am sure these accounts were hacked, some of them have their last posts made in 2015 in English, Indonesian or any other language, but now they are writing articles in Russian.


Addresses:
0x3b041627814ba14f6d5eaa29249d28df1d463fc8
0xd47538f95737de4ab5e303a8ac0993b820cbb7ea
0xe7f97f8b7c2fa3550b76f976d5edb3535b3e11b2
0x21dfe64c86e7ad907eb03d848e763c4f48c382b5
0x0267626a8b7812826740e1e61f06f9e26e08afcf
0x395f63c7a9d9d5fd623f297c3fe3dced1d0197bd
0xf8a3b60272641e216a393e8cfbbdb590cfc69f7c
0x62a87c726c7a080e3817bf011ffd636a8ece0411
0x9d8c45d15c216b16c450be5a596c54d124569b44
0x7b8b522133769c834328aa292831a3a28906805c
0xb5648a334d26edabebb2894b275bc668cd739762
0x224657681f6ed007b1fb79602926fba1c714484d
0xd6fda454ee37acfcb2b582c327b8fbf4df194803
and others.


Here he is seen selling member accounts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2311295.msg23448020
He says he has loads of them.

Here he says that they are needed for bounties, and he is selling them because he does not have much time for signature campaigns:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2311295.msg23460845#msg23460845
Doc Martin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 09:14:18 PM
 #1286

Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis

Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)

cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)

3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)

As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.

Miscellaneous notes:

Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg

But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg

"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!

There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.

The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.

I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.

Quoted for reference

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP Roll Eyes
Lauda (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 14, 2017, 09:15:38 PM
 #1287

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP Roll Eyes
It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  Roll Eyes

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Doc Martin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 09:29:35 PM
Last edit: November 14, 2017, 09:43:10 PM by Doc Martin
 #1288

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP Roll Eyes
It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  Roll Eyes

Most of the connections are "worthless" then. Many are self-admitted, neutral trust, no scamming. Why are they listed at all? Why do the rules not apply to you?? Smiley

You tried to buy dozens of accounts over multiple occasions. Since those posts were recovered from deleted posts, there's probably more. That seems relevant in a thread called "[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone." Also, you say one of your alt accounts is perma-banned. An opportunity to add pretty colors!!!

Why no add?? Smiley

Edit: And immediately, Lauda DT neg trusts my account just for mentioning the accusation against him/her. Such fair rules, much even application! Cheesy
gobsmacker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 14, 2017, 11:12:51 PM
 #1289

I suppose this one won't be added to the OP Roll Eyes
It will not as it is a worthless connection. You'd realize this if you were smarter than a baboon.  Roll Eyes

In this thread I will list known alt accounts of users.

Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?

You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???

Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar  Grin Anyone going to whip out the red paint now? Oh wait double standards and everyone giving blowjobs to each other. At least spit some out before you swallow next time. DT is rotten to the core. Hahahaha.

As expected. Lauda has tagged people for just mentioning buying/selling accounts. No proof required, we are all supposed to take Lauda's word for everything!!

I'm sure there will be no reciprocation here. But it's good to point out the hypocrisy from time to time. Wink

Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!
Lauda (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2017, 06:10:28 AM
 #1290

Are you listing "known alt accounts of users," or arent you?
No.

You only list accounts that aren't your own alts???
No.

Theres plenty of users on that list who don't have red paint. Why are your alts exempt from the discussion?
Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar.

Don't verify! Just trust Lauda!
Given that you aren't smart enough to verify yourself, yes. Smiley Time to make the measures even stricter.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Doc Martin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 15, 2017, 06:56:28 AM
 #1291

Dead accounts are not alts. Dead accounts should not be listed unless they have other implications such as more alts, ban evasion, and similar.

By your own standards, your alt engaged in untrustworthy behavior. That reflects on you. Nobody cares about the dead account lol.

So you are trustworthy because the account buying happened on your alt account instead of your main account? That's the logic here??! Roll Eyes

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why people are so scared to speak against you......all I did was fucking point out the allegations that are well-sourced and proven.
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510


Spear the bees


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2017, 10:16:02 AM
 #1292

people are so scared to speak against you
Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why
Did not happen in one day.

Lauda (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2017, 10:19:38 AM
 #1293

Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash!
Incoming negative rating in 3, 2/s.. Oh wait.

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?
There are a few threads every week or two. Seems about right. Roll Eyes I highly doubt that he actually believes that nonsense.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
Doc Martin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 12:48:47 AM
 #1294

people are so scared to speak against you
Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?

I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."

Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda?? Smiley

BTW the multiple trust ratings you gave me today show why
Did not happen in one day.

Happened in less than 24 hours for the same alleged "lies."

And if it happened over two days instead of one, what difference does it make?? Smiley

Lauda just lives in Bizarro World, where everyone who disagrees with her = Quickseller and every disagreement = "a lie" that justifies ruining their account forever.....
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 01:32:45 AM
 #1295

people are so scared to speak against you
Lauda is hitler! All hail Bitcoin Cash! /s

You don't really believe that people can't voice their disagreement towards Lauda, do you?
You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?

★ ★ ██████████████████████████████[█████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
★ ★ 
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510


Spear the bees


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2017, 04:12:08 AM
 #1296

You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?
Second sentence was not referring to the first. People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

Indescribable
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 05:12:54 AM
 #1297

Grabbed Popcorn  Shocked


Wait, Why does other DT was silence about this accusation. Even great timelord is silent about this one. Afraid of having another red trust score? hmmm.

edited:

The format of the posting of the accuser is same with timelord. Just giving a hint Grin
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 05:17:21 AM
 #1298

You do realize that sarcastically saying is not the same as seriously saying something, right?
Second sentence was not referring to the first. People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.
When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 

★ ★ ██████████████████████████████[█████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
★ ★ 
minifrij
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268


In Memory of Zepher


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2017, 07:00:44 AM
 #1299

When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 
It looks to me like he is leaving negative trust to liars and trolls.

It's also rather entertaining that you don't go after people doing the exact same thing, especially when you're personally invested in projects that they run. What a coincidink.
Doc Martin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 16, 2017, 07:51:58 AM
 #1300

People have voiced their disapproval of Lauda's actions. The problem is in the demographic of most of them being a bunch of kakapos.

I got negative trust for bringing Lauda' activity up at all. I never lied once. Everything I said was proven, clearly as day. But Lauda neg trusted me for "lying."

Now my account is ruined. And you wonder why people are scared to speak against Lauda?? Smiley

You think any Hero or Legendary member will risk having their account permanently ruined by saying anything against Lauda?? Cheesy

Of course I used my fucking alt account. And look what happened, just for speaking about it! Roll Eyes

Even great timelord is silent about this one.

Indeed, how interesting! Smiley

When Lauda is giving out negative ratings for being a "liar" and a "troll" who are speaking against him, it sure looks like he is leaving negative ratings in retaliation to speaking out against him. 

Especially when the references show they aren't lies........

Lauda admits Xanis is his alt (although clearly trying to dance around the subject) but denies that anything Xanis did can be associated with him. Haha!

Why don't we all have this privilege?? The first several posts of this thread are examples of hundreds of people who don't get that privilege. Why is it reserved only for Lauda?? Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!