I did find an archived version of the white paper. It was shamelessly copy/pasted by hoards of bounty hunters on other mediums across the web. So much about hard working bounty hunters  . But seriously, I am sorry for those who are making video reviews as I saw that some of them actually put decent effort into it, while this article bounty work from what I saw is just a copy/paste or text spinned content. After their website, twitter and Telegram went down, some guy on their bounty thread is still hoping for the best. As long as bounty hunters keep being so naive, they will be exploited by scammers.. Any sourse of this claim? Where you got the news that it's a scam project? Although the bounty manager taking some time to give us the updated spreadsheet in this thread. It doesn't mean the project is scam. Let's wait some time more ,Give them some more time to update us before claiming scam without any strong proof. I hope you got my point. 
@bakasabo I know that won't really change anything, but if you raise the flag against @BucksCake I will gladly support it. |
|
|
|
@freewallet
because covid-19 I really need this money. I hope that my account can be unlocked. My problem has not been resolved until now, and I am very angry. If my problem is not solved, I will keep posting on bitcointalk to tell everyone that freewallet is a scam.
Sorry to hear that after four months your case still hasn't been resolved, and based by the Freewalet's practice up until now, I don't think that you have much options othee than going through KYC in order to get your funds back, unfortunately. One thing I don't get though is why you decided to use Freewallet as you are as you said " privacy-conscious person and don't want to perform kyc procedures." as in their TOS its stated that they can ask for that in certain situation. I fully understand that their request for KYC is most likely a bullshit way to get people out of their funds, but you should have been more careful before you decided to use them. In case Freewallet detects suspicious activity on Freewallet account, Freewallet conducts AML/KYC procedure for the user. To be sure that nobody has unauthorized access to the users account, We ask to provide all necessary information for verification, including without limitation an ID, photo, screenshots showing the source of all your incoming transactions etc. The User is obliged to pass through AML/KYC procedures, which may be applied to the User from time to time, and provide accurate and truthful information about himself as well as maintain and promptly update his Freewallet Account information in case of any changes. If my problem is not solved, I will keep posting on bitcointalk to tell everyone that freewallet is a scam. I don't think that they will change their mind just because of that as their account has been tagged & flagged already, and here on bitcointalk they are pretty much considered to be a scammy wallet that should be avoided. |
|
|
|
OK guys.. congratulations for all those who made the bet in favor of Anthony Hopkins. It was a completely unexpected, but 100% deserving win by the great actor. And I don't think that too many people made a bet on Chadwick Boseman, because the odds were really low. Nomadland won the award for the best picture (which was expected, but I thought that Minari was better). Anyway, not much to complain about the awards this time.  Yeah, one of those years where Academy didn't make any completely illogical decisions. We are going to wait for that to happen again for some time I think The jurors did the right thing IMO. The award should be given for the best performance, and not based on emotions. IMO, Anthony Hopkins deserved that award more than anyone else. Chadwick Boseman is a good actor, but his performance was not as good as the one from Hopkins in The Father. Overall, this time the awards were fair. IMO, there is not much of a chance for complaining by anyone. The jurors did an exceptional job in selecting the best nominations for awards.
Exactly this. Chadwick Boseman did a fine job, and he definitely deserved nomination he got, but Anthony Hopkins was simply brilliant in this movie, his best role since The Silence of the Lambs without any doubt. Who knows, maybe Academy voters saw those huge odds for Hopkins given by the bookies so they decided to bet and get some extra money . Just jk lole, I don't think that something like that is easy to organize as Aacdemy has more than 7,000 voters.
I just watched whole ceremony as I couldn't watch it live, and this was probably the worst one ever. Hopefully the next one will be in normal conditions. |
|
|
|
Tbh I don't even know what btcpop is until I read this topic. What makes this unpopular exchange so special for you that makes you want to deposit your fund there?
My guess is that OP bought/sold some shitcoins there that were only available at that exchange and nowhere else, as that's the most common reason why people end up using those dodgy less known exchanges.
@OP Yeah explanation that they have you is a pure bs, and they obviously don't intend to give you back your ETH so they came up with something ridiculous, hoping that you will give up. Good luck with your lawsuit! |
|
|
|
Is there someone here successfully unfrozen there airdrop kKIK token? I've got tons of this token that I get during 2017-2018 airdrop and the current price is very tempting to redeem. I already read the mechanics of unfreeze for the token but I'm worried whether they will really giveaway there free token or not.
I seriously doubt that you will find anyone who managed to unlock KICK tokens, as based on my little napkin math few posts above you would have to pay ~$1340 of fees in order to unlock 888,888 KICK. While doing so, you will probably loose few couple of thousands more, unless you are an experienced trader.. My advice for you is to simply forget about those airdropped tokens and move on. It's simply not worth the money and effort. |
|
|
|
^^^ Hmm... I was wrong about Schindler's List. I guess I was too much biased towards In the Name of the Father. In the Name of the Father is a fine film, no questions about that, but for me Schindler's List is a masterpiece, and that's what separates those two. I was jist surprised when you said that is undeserving as that's the first time I heard that, while Crash gets mentioned all the time in that context. BTW, there is a surprise. The Oscar for Best Actor this year is won by Sir Anthony Hopkins!!! That was completely unexpected, but I am glad for him. No one deserved the award better than him. He was simply outstanding in The Father. The best actress award was won by Frances McDormand (Nomadland). And as expected, Nomadland is chosen as the best picture. In most cases, I have to say that this year's awards were won by deserving people. Yep, great thing about Hopkins winning an Oscar, academy did the right thing for a change and awarded truly the best performance this year. LOL.. did you put any money on him?
Unfortunately not, I was so busy last few days that I completely forgot to bet on this. But still, I don't mind as I am glad to see that the right person won. And as I mentioned in the beginning of this thread, Boseman turned out to be a bad bet, with only 1.08 odds. I hope that people didn't put much on that one. Why betting on Chadwik Boseman for the best actor award would be a "bad bet"? I wouldn't bet on Chadwick Boseman winning the Oscar not because I don't think that he will win it (on the contrary, seems like he is obviously the the favorite) but because odds given are way too low. With odds ranging from 1.05-1.08 you would have to bet a lot to get any decent return, and I think that risk/reward ratio in this case ain't good at all, therefore making it a bad bet. If odds were let's say 1.3-1.4, then I would certainly think about taking that bet, but with 1.08? No chance! I generally avoid such a low odds, no matter what I am betting on. Too many times lost while taking sub 1.1 odds not to learn the lesson.
2021 Oscar winners https://www.indiewire.com/2021/04/2021-oscars-winners-list-academy-awards-1234631270/ |
|
|
|
I filed a recovery claim with a cyber security representative because the attorneys did not handle it well as it is an internet situation after i lost $40,000 to this investment scam platform.... with referral from a colleague I was fortunate enough to get back all of my $ 40,000 invested through a group of cyber agents called Hackloop You can also share your story how much have you lost to hackloop via email . Email: hackloop606@gmail.comLOL, you have have got to be kidding me, cyber agents lol. What, they are capable of hacking the blockchain and getting your money back? What a weak scam attempt, pathetic really. There you go, you got another tag now.
I will never take any exchange seriously if their way to present themselves is by stealing another famous exchange's theme.
Unfortunately, those that are their target audience won't even realize small details like that, similarity to Binance, as anyone with some trading experience will see through this. Lucky for scammers, there is constant influx of brand new people coming to crypto that are completely unaware of all the dangers that lie ahead. |
|
|
|
I wonder if any of the Turkish members here used Thodex, I hope they have not lost funds. Turkish authorities are coming down hard on crypto exchanges. They already forced the closure of Vebitcoin last week and this could have played a part in Faruk Fatih Ozer to steal the funds and leave the country.
Out of curiosity I checked "Thodex" in bitcointalk search and Turkish members indeed used that scammy exchange, unfortunately, as there are bunch of threads made in months before this exit scam. Hopefully people didn't loose a lot, but what a shitshow.. |
|
|
|
I am happy to report that after two days of complaining with friendly admins, who cared enough to push the support team, and after a couple of publications such as this thread, Gate.io has adjusted the withdrawal settings. I have been succesful in withdrawing my RBTC!
The minimum is now 0.10005 RBTC (still a lot and actually too much) with a fee of 5.0E-5 RBTC.
Thanks to all responders for the support. It made me feel less alone in this matter.
I am glad to hear that they decided to lower that minimum amount and that you managed to get our your money out of there! I still don't understand why the hell they enabled depositing RBTC if they don't plan to let people trade in the near future. I mean its one thing to enable deposits few days ahead of trading, but this is something completely different and doesn't make absolutely no sense to me. |
|
|
|
AFAIK, RBTC is not tradeable on the exchange nor officially listed there. Gate.io has some bug on adding token on there exchange even though its not tradeable there.
Yep, that's the big mistake that OP did as according to both CMC and Coingecko, RBTC is not tradable on Gate at all. That still doesn't explain why minimum withdrawal and withdrawal fees are so high. It doesn't make any sense to me, other than to entrap those who don't pay attention and don't check properly before depositing. What exchange you are using to determine the rate of 1RBTC=1BTC?
Both Kucoin and Bitfinex have very similar RBTC/BTC ratio. On Kucoin its 0.99 and on Bitfonex 0.98, so almost 1:1 |
|
|
|
|
Few of my friends are regularly using Gate to buy some shitcoins and I don't remember them having any kind of issues so far, but what they did is very sneaky and shady. I mean, to enable deposit of the currency that you can't trade for anything and then set ridiculously high minimum withdrawal is basically an entrapment. And then when you add 8!! RBTC fee...It's something that not even shitty exchanges like Yobit and HitBTC would do I think.
One can argue that it's your own fault for not checking for what you can use RBTC for before depositing, but still, I wouldn't expect this from any exchange that cares about their reputation.
@Arrrvin I am curious now, what are the RBTC withdrawal fees for RBTC on Bitfinex/Kucoin?
|
|
|
|
Injection of political propaganda (beyond a certain limit) is not going to do any good. Even previously there was a lot of controversy surrounding the prizes awarded to films such as Schindler's List and Crash.
While I agree that Crash win was controversial as there were few clearly better movies nominated that year (Brokeback Mountain, Capote, Good night and good luck) I don't remember anything of that sorts surrounding Schindler's List. As a mater of act, I think that this is the first time I hear someone saying that about Schindler's List. When you look at the competition that year (The Fugitive, In the Name of the Father, The Piano and The Remains of the Day), only maybe In the Name of the Father comes relatively close. All other films can't simply match Steven Spielberg's masterpiece. Tehnical part of the movie was superb, and on top of that both Lian Neeson and especially Ralph Fiennes (he should have an an Oscar for his brilliant portray of Amon Goeth) probably had career roles. I was blown away by The Father; at first, it seemed that the various scenarios will slow down the entire film and that too much time will be wasted in distinguishing the real from the imaginary, but it soon becomes clear that it doesn't matter at all. Anthony Hopkins' brilliance anchors the entire film.
Yep, it is a shame that Hopkins won't probably win an Oscar for this. Despite the odds I think I will bet some money on him, just in case he wins by some miracle. |
|
|
|
These are only due to the failure of the bounty managers. Bounty participants also need to update themselves over time. Because if you participate in the under-bounty of a manager who has no power to bring the payments to the hunters on time. And that's exactly why Bounty Hunters should work under reputed managers, because they keep Bounty Hunters safe and pay on time.
Problem here is that (for bounty hunters that is) if bounty hunters only join the bounty campaigns led by reputable managers, they probably wouldn't join more than a few bounty campaigns per year. I don't think that I know about any bounty manager that is consistently bringing new altcoin campaigns and in the same time asking for escrow in BTC/ETH or any of the other top currencies , as that's the only way that they can somewhat ensure that bounty campaign will be paid off. The same way I can't believe that bounty hunters keep joining dozens of campaigns in hope that one or two will bring them something, I have issues understanding why any project would opt for bounty campaign when reach of an average bounty hunter is almost 0. Content they make is usually subpar, and on social media they follow each other anyway. This might have worked some time in the past (I guess) when all top altcoins had their ANN thread here on bitcointalk. But now? No chance. All you have to know about this is when you look at the ease that projects like Dego decide to screw bounty hunters. Their bounty pool of 100,000 DEGO is currently worth ~1 million USD, and at one point is was even 2.5 million, so no wonder that they decided to screw bounty hunters knowing that nothing can really happen to them. They will get some heat on bitcointalk, ban some users on Telegram and continue with their business as usual. |
|
|
|
Gambling section (and others) needs to see some major changes and bunch of topics should to be moved to off-topic. Or even better made a child board where people can talk about sports in general, rather than sending them to offtopic where we know that there won't be much interest due at least one reason: majority of signature campaigns, posts there are not counted towards weekly quota, therefore people will be less inclined to post there. That's how it is, whether we like it or not. People tend to post where their posts are counted for. Did anyone bet or talked about betting on ESL?
Yeah I guess that's the probably the main reason why that thread has been moved, but I am sure that there are many other threads where people are talking about sport in general and not about betting on specific events, odds etc and are still there. Maybe it's time for some spring cleaning on that board. |
|
|
|
To be completely fair, the idea of the Super League isn't dead. The project hasn't vanished, it has just been put on hold for now because no one appreciated what the Top clubs tried to do. Perez said a few days ago that no club has officially asked to have their contract with the league terminated. Some more recent news suggests that the league is now working on changing the model that doesn't guarantee that the participants can't be relegated. Yeah I agree with that, that idea is not dead yet, unfortunately. But we do now that Perez is a liar and I don't believe a single thing he says. Like when he said that Bayern, BVB and PSG were not invited at all, which was later revealed to be nothing but a lie. Nevertheless, I still see it more fitting in the Gambling boards than off-topic which is like a secondary garbage bin.
That's for sure. If you remove Super League thread because no one is talking about betting, then you gonna have to remove bunch of other topics from that board too. |
|
|
|
I believe it was turned off-topic because you discussed it incorrectly. If it is in the gambling discussion section, you have to discuss matches, win rates, odds, how to bet, which team to bet on. In short, everything has to do with betting, but your topic is quite simple, it only discusses sports. You know, this is not a sports forum, I have no objections when the subject is moved. Sometimes a topic gets a lot of attention, but it's still off-topic. That explanation would make sense if there is no other Super League themed threads in the Gambling Dicussion board, namely European Super League? made back in October 2020 and it's still there. From what I could see, it's not any different than the thread started by @igehhh. My guess is that it's simply moved from there as by the looks of it, it won't be possible to bet on anything related to SuperLeague in the foreseeable future, but still it kinda fits more to Gambling Discussion thread where all other sports discussions are than in off-topic where threads go to die. |
|
|
|
If you means media outlets like coindesk et al -- they are NOT 'credible'. They are pay-to-play sites with near zero oversight of what folks pay them to present as 'news'. When you come across crap like that miner the best thing you can do is post a complaint comment about it as well as send a post to whatever they have that they call editors.
Exactly this. All those media outlets can be bought, some for few hundreds of dollars, some for morw but end result is the same - they can't be trusted. Regarding this bitwats miners, if you use mining calculator it turns out that ROI for their miners is approximately one month, maybe a bit more. If those miners were really that good, no one in their right mind would sell them just yet, with them being so efficient. Rule of thumb:if something sounds too good to be true=scam. |
|
|
|
The blue dots are the monthly data used to calibrate the model. The red ones are the ones realised after the original model has been published.
They follow the model white line like a clockwork!
First time I read your topic about PlanB and stock-to-flow, I really though it's way too optimistic (I am usually a bit cautious about BTC predictions, some would say even too much) but looking it at the current situation where market follows it, gets me really excited. Even I started thinking that $1 million by 2025 is possible. Anyway, just saw a PlanB tweet where he is even relieved by this last correction. Looks like BTC pumping the eay it did so far was too much even for him  https://twitter.com/100trillionUSD/status/1385496730200907776 |
|
|
|
Hah, what a coincidence, just yesterday I watched Bitcoin vs Gold debate between Michael Saylor and Frank Giustra. It was actually pretty good and I suggest to watch it! To answer your question, I don't think that Bitcoin Vs Gold is even needed. Both can coexist as a store of value and even though I am not willing to exchange my BTC for gold, I certainly understand the people that prefer gold. |
|
|
|
What happens is that while people like you and me that have been in the market for a long time what we are seeing is nothing special, for the people that have been part of this market since the pandemic started this is completely new, they have been spoiled by bitcoin as it seemed it will always go up and now they are worried because it is becoming obvious to them this is not always the case, anyway let people complain as that is the only way in which they can actually learn.
True, they way we look a corrections like this is just a matter of experience, and it can indeed be frightening for someone who thinks hat he lost 20-30% of his portfolio after months of constant growth where it looked like you can't make a wrong move. If I remember correctly there 5 similar corrections during 2017 bull run, and so far this year I think that we experienced two or three. So a least few more ahead, if we are basing it on previous bull run, which may be completely different as market is more mature imho. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
