|
BTW: Instawallet charges no fee. What's their business model? Somebody could explain?
|
|
|
|
Al TP-LINK TP-WR703N de Avalon ( alrededor de 30€ en ebay) le han metido 64MB de RAM para cgminer y le han tocado la alimentación. Se alimenta por USB y en la wiki pone que le han cambiado la resistencia 0R de J1 a R113 (lo que esto significa exactamente os lo dejo a los que sepáis de estas cosas  ) Dijo Zhang en un post que el hub usb es necesario por un tema de incompatibilidades al conectar el wr703n directamente a la placa. |
|
|
|
I'm hallucinating or there was a post right here warning newbs about Matt being a scammer? Was this post deleted by mods? Anyhow: please Matt be so kind to answer the questions I ask you in my previous post. Wwhy don't you publicly commit to use all the revenue generate by your Avalon to pay back what you owe?
Then, let me ask:
how do we know that this is not another prank, and you that will simply not honor your commitment as you did in the past?
what collateral are you offering to your investors as a guarantee?
I am deleting OT replies to the topic. OK, fair enough. And thanks for staying vigilant, appreciate the work you do. |
|
|
|
I will pay 3BTC for supervised 2 minute remote control session. I just want to see it hashing.
You would seriously pay $420 for a 2 minuteremote control session? I guess MXRider was just joking. We all know PrimeAsic is a scam and there are no working PrimeAsic devices. He could have offered 3,000BTC, he wouldn't have to spend those to see a PrimeAsic hashing at 80GHs because that device does not exist. |
|
|
|
I'm hallucinating or there was a post right here warning newbs about Matt being a scammer? Was this post deleted by mods? Anyhow: please Matt be so kind to answer the questions I ask you in my previous post. Wwhy don't you publicly commit to use all the revenue generate by your Avalon to pay back what you owe?
Then, let me ask:
how do we know that this is not another prank, and you that will simply not honor your commitment as you did in the past?
what collateral are you offering to your investors as a guarantee?
|
|
|
|
|
And Luke-JR: your "as of yesterday" in OP + some of your comments in this thread makes me think that you are colluding with BFL to try to manipulate the outcome of a stupid bet.
It's incredible to me that both BFL or you might be loosing your time on this senseless shit.
Luke, I had a deep respect for what you do, now I feel like I'm hallucinating.
|
|
|
|
|
I did not gamble on this.
But saying that OP is proof that BFL shipped their product is just a huge pile of BS.
What a shame.
|
|
|
|
Mira tio listo, la union europea solo es el metodo de convertir la antigua europa en
el nuevo orden mundial, comprar paises a precio de saldo e imitar sistema esclavistas
sin ningun tipo de remordimiento, asi que si, disfruto mucho con su destruccion...
Pero no me gusta gusta que el ciudadano comun y corriente sufra por ello.
El ciudadano "fuera de lo común" (élites financieras) está mejor que nunca, y es el ciudadano común el que está pagando la cuenta con su sudor y sangre. Y no, la destrucción de la "unión europea" no significa nada: ni bueno ni malo. Es sólo una herramienta más del Bundensbank y sus proxies para imponer la hegemonía financiera y así poder hacer y deshacer a sus anchas. Una vez cumplido el objetivo, será sustituida por otra. Y los ricos serán más ricos y los pobres más pobres, eso no va a cambiar sino que se va acentuar. Si es eso lo que te hace disfrutar y no el saldo de tu cuenta en btc, peor me lo pones. |
|
|
|
Al ritmo que va, puede ser que con la crisis en Eslovenia ahora... llegue rapidamente a los 150... o 200...
Otra crisis en Francia y se dispara a los 1.000 euros
( mi cara al ver hoy por la mañana el contador de intersango )  WOAJAJAJAJAJAJA!! Ojala, siga europa autodestruyendose a este ritmo  Ese comentario deja claro por qué se autodestruye. Una pena tener esa mentalidad. Es lamentable disfrutar del sufrimiento ajeno y de las miles de vidas destruidas por este salvaje latrocinio perpetrado por las élites financieras sólo porque a ti te hace más rico. |
|
|
|
|
Just read the "should you truste me" link in your signature.
Summing up: you got two scammer tags in the past. Last one related to a commitment you did not honor, and you are still owing a very big amount of money to dozens of members of this community. You try to justify that this commitment was just a "prank"... But still you have money to buy Avalons while not paying back your old debts.
Trying to make it right with the community? So why don't you publicly commit to use all the revenue generate by your Avalon to pay back what you owe?
Then, let me ask:
how do we know that this is not another prank, and you that will simply not honor your commitment as you did in the past?
what collateral are you offering to your investors as a guarantee?
|
|
|
|
I will pay 3BTC for supervised 2 minute remote control session. I just want to see it hashing.
It's a SCAMPlease do not feed the scammers. |
|
|
|
|
There are some projections you cannot escape from
1200 Avalons will add at least 84THs to the network at the same time you'll receive your unit (I considered an average of 70Ghs per unit, but it may be more because of 4 modules Avalons like yours)
yeah, that will increase the difficulty Aprox. X3 without even considering BFL or ASICs inertia - and you throw numbers based on today's difficulty?
That's deceiving, and IMHO trying to make a big buck from newbies taking advantage of gold rush and ignorance is not the best way to regain confidence of the community
|
|
|
|
My bid is withdrawn.
It is not possible to withdraw your bid, but it is also not necessary. 1 BTC per 1% of profit from an ASIC is highly undervalued. This is a batch #3 unit You paid 75 BTC for that machine, thus 0.75 BTC per 1% This is already a serious amount given the difficulty projections, but you dare to state that 1 BTC for 1% is highly undervalued. Trying to scam some newbies? Would you care to throw some math to back your bold statement? |
|
|
|
I'm just trying to understand the RPC thing. When you do a transaction in Bitcoin-QT, you need the password to unencrypt your wallet. If you connect to RPC and authenticate you do not need to unencrypt the wallet to do transactions?
I don't think so, otherwise every RPC-command should contain the encryption password as a parameter. I believe you unlock the wallet while starting the service. Or the RPC-authentication password is also the wallet encryption password (don't think so either because RPC is much older than wallet encryption). You may check https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/API_reference_(JSON-RPC) for better info. EDIT: Just checked and there are explicit RPC calls to lock and unlock the wallet. The wallet was then likely not encrypted, or encrypted with a weak password. That's correct. One has to first send the RPG command to unlock an encrypted wallet even when using the RPC commands. So the thief brute forced two passwords, correct? |
|
|
|
I was late to the game.
That's a very common misconception that has been around for years literally. People who invested in Bitcoin 1-month ago and enjoyed a 3-fold increase of their investment value are not complaining that they were late in the game. There is no such a thing as being late to the game, because the game is far from being over. Yes, it takes balls to sink thousands of dollars to invest in Bitcoin at that point, but the truth is that it took as much if not much more balls to invest in it one year and a half ago just after it crashed and it looked more than ever like the nay-sayers were right from the start and Bitcoin was over. Doing something when the whole world is laugthing at you and calling you stupid isn't something easy. People who say "I was late to the game" today and fail to grasp that we are still very early in the game will kick themselves one year from now. This. Buying a serious amount of BTC is quite difficult and slow for a newcomer. There is a full generation of people with small computer knowledge that is not even understanding bitcoin. This will change... But Oh boy, the game is far from being over. |
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy Yeah, that caught my eye too |
|
|
|
|
Guys, shipping those things all over the world is not so simple as some of you seems to think.
Problem acknowledged, they are workin on it: enough said
And remember this is a public forum before posting.
|
|
|
|
I think the problem is the closing date. If someone wants to spend more than 200btc he wants the machine now. Dont wait 15days more where the machine could mine for the buyer. Just my 2 fiatcents :p
Perhaps. I think the fact that I am insisting on a local transaction is narrowing the audience a lot as well. Would a 7 day auction be more reasonable? I accommodate that if that's what potential buyers want. How about bidding in BTC vs USD? I would like to get paid in USD at the end of the day, so it doesn't matter to me either way. A 24 hours auction would be much more reasonable. People feels the heat when the fire is close |
|
|
|
1) The fact that BFL seems to care more about winning a bet than delivering a solid product to customers speaks volumes.
2) The way they tried to win this bet speaks volumes about the dishonest way they conduct their business. It is borderline scammy.
I'm sorry, but as far as BFL customers are concerned this is a FAIL on two counts. Regardless if BFL wins this silly bet or not. Get a clue folks and set your priorities straight.
This. |
|
|
|
The block chain bidding is ideal. It makes the bids binding. In my auction for CH shares, I had a few bids that were not honored. Love the innovation profmac.
Too bad my auction took too long, I was gathering those coins to invest with you prof.
2 questions:
1) End date for the auction - there has to be one for me to bid.
2) Will there be refunds to original address for non-winning bids?
Thx TheJucie
Report immediately the users that did not honor their bids in your post and they may get a scammer tag. As you may have noticed posts cannot be edited in auction subforum, they are binding. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
