Bitcoin Forum
July 12, 2024, 06:08:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 391 »
4741  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 16, 2015, 01:33:25 AM
Fyi, I just responded over at Reddit and it also addresses Johnny Mnemonic's post (see also my posts in the Ion thread, just click my profile to see my latest posts):

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3oi16k/ring_ct_for_monero_a_work_in_progress_comments/cvzval5

I may have one more post about my health, because something rather crucial became more clear to me as I was researching to make sure the NAC I am taking is not an excitotoxin.
4742  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 15, 2015, 01:13:15 AM
uhoh time to buy some moneros

I said I believe their attempt is broken and I don't think they know how to solve it the way I did.

Amazing how people misinterpret what I write. You think just because they made a (what I allege is a broken) attempt that means they can invent what I did. Rather I see that they apparently didn't even realize their mistake, so they aren't even close to figuring out how to invent what I did.

I might be wrong, so I await more replies from them over at Reddit.
4743  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 15, 2015, 01:08:37 AM
b) He said, if all conditions meets (i.e. stay below 17,735, then the market moves lower to have room for the slingshot, then the slingshot move up), then the collapse following the slingshot would be in Q1 2016.

There won't be any collapse of the slingshot as it will be the new bull market heading to 32,000. The collapse is the significant decline before the slingshot that will trap the current longs into going short at the bottom (the greater fools, the majority always has to be wrong) before the slingshot when the smart money covers their shorts which they opened at much higher levels where the current longs were long.
4744  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ion discussion on: October 14, 2015, 10:20:21 PM
they all know who I am. they know how to send me a private message if they are interested. Instead I am certain they will go try to invent it themselves. Monero apparently doesn't have significant funds to pay developers because they didn't sell any coins. Everything was mined. Any way, I was always willing to work for those who would pay me well. I've never received an offer to be well paid for my efforts in cryptoland.
4745  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 14, 2015, 10:09:05 PM
If the market stays below 17,735 then it will test the lows. Now this is fucking useless btw as he doesn't say in which period...

It is not useless and he means what he said precisely. If the market EVER (well Armstrong said by 1 quarter at latest) moves above 17,735 before having the false move to downside to create the slingshot effect, then there won't be a slingshot. But he also said that the absence of a slingshot won't rule out the phase transition to a 32 - 40K level by 2017.

The slingshot is the potential for a very significant false move to the downside (where shorts pile on before covering) and then a fast lurch back up moving to new highs very quickly.

The longs are trapped by the significant false move down and they go short right at the bottom.

It appears the potential for the slingshot might have been averted (or delayed?) when the Fed delayed raising rates or guidance thereof.

P.S. I am leaving the forum, but I do want you all to get better at reading Armstrong. I hope one of you can do this sort of introspection for me going forward.

suda, damn it, Armstrong spent $1 billion (inflation adjusted dollars) collecting archives of data. His model is accurate before no one else had ever spent that much on collecting vast data. The Pi correlation was discovered from the data, not chosen arbitrarily.
4746  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ion discussion on: October 14, 2015, 10:01:11 PM
I had to come back to post something very important. Seems Monero is attempting to duplicate my invention. I will be posting this on the Ion thread as well.

The brand new Ring Confidential Transactions for Monero appears to me to be broken:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3oi16k/ring_ct_for_monero_a_work_in_progress_comments/cvzval5

There's only one thing that proves your excellence: To be imitated/copied. I'd be very glad if I were you. I might even join their efforts like a valuable advisor... Smiley

Edit: This is a serious advice. Your ideas may transform XMR to what you're trying to accomplish by your own.

If they offer enough money, they can receive my white paper. No one has contacted me.
4747  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ion discussion on: October 14, 2015, 09:25:06 PM
I had to come back to post something very important. Seems Monero is attempting to duplicate my invention. I will be posting this on the Ion thread as well.

The brand new Ring Confidential Transactions for Monero appears to me to be broken:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3oi16k/ring_ct_for_monero_a_work_in_progress_comments/cvzval5
4748  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 14, 2015, 09:18:30 PM
I had to come back to post something very important. Seems Monero is attempting to duplicate my invention. I will be posting this on the Ion thread as well.

The brand new Ring Confidential Transactions for Monero appears to me to be broken:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/3oi16k/ring_ct_for_monero_a_work_in_progress_comments/cvzval5



P.S. my health is not going well. I am pretty much giving on trying any therapies (because nothing works and I've tried "everything") until and if ever I can afford the best research specialists doing diagnostics on me. So don't expect too much from me. But I am still trying. I did run 9 kilometers in the past 2 days but today was a total Chronic Fatigue day bed ridden.

Oh I am still retired from this forum. The above required my posting.





i can tell you know little about visual art (as is evidenced by your cherry picking pieces of the airport murals to coalesce and fit a preconceived idea about NWOs)

There aren't any other $5.2 billion projects with that style of art. That isn't cherry picking. It is probabilistic analysis of who is capable of what.
4749  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 13, 2015, 05:09:49 AM
I was only going off of what you wrote, much like your mother was probably going off of what you said. I have little to no interest in the 9/11 dialogue. I love art and literature and am knowledgeable based on the time I spend nurturing that love, so don't expect me to research beyond what you provide, and what you provided didn't provide enough info to jump to the conclusion you insisted was logical--again, your mom is a wise woman.

All that detail was all provided in the videos I linked to, but which you did not bother to watch.

You want everything in a sound bite, because you believe what you want to believe. I have no problem with you're desire to be ignorant of the details, but next time when I tell you have have 7+ years of research then don't abuse me with the slander about me being a kook (I wasn't pulling some random inkblot, rather I was illuminating your ingrained blindblot spot).

Indeed my mother isn't an engineer, isn't thorough and thus isn't aware of what is going on. She knows there is probably horrific shit that she doesn't want to know. And I respect her choice not to delve into it, for as long as she respects my choice to do so and as long as she doesn't criticize me behind my back without having the facts to criticize me with.

You do not know which issues I am expert and not expert. You have no basis to know. We barely know each other. You have not sat with me all these years behind my desk.

I don't claim to be anything great. I was here to share my research with those who wanted to review the details.

And now I desire to retire from this forum because I've said it all. What is the point of talking more.

Instead I pray to be able (and it is far from certain as to whether I can given an chronic illness that supposedly has no cure) to spend my days doing those activities which I love to do which are so much more satiating for my soul:

  • Training hard every day. Exploring the limits of my athleticism, mental toughness, and endurance at age 50. Various sports.
  • Programming new software. Creating new technologies.
  • Riding motorcycles, music, joking, interacting, socializing, and exploring.

I am so hungry for the first two especially. Several years of drought. If my prayers can be answered, I will so busy doing my life I won't have time for this forum.

Bye again and good luck to every one. I hope you all can learn to be more discerning of reality. Remember reality is elusive because it is colored by our preconceptions, our interests, our insecurities (and contrived delusions to satisfy them erroneously), and our laziness to research and distinguish facts from conjecture.

I hope something great comes out of all the effort we all put here. And many of you have put a lot of effort here, but I doubt many of you have put more effort than I have here. Perhaps smooth excepted but damn smooth as much as I respect your efforts and logic, Armstrong was railroaded by the organized criminals and wasn't given a public hearing and you pushed the stance that is some form of official result ... sorry I can't respect that as objective of basic humanity. Clarity of discernment is so important when driving decisions. Again literalness is not reality. Discernment determines our reality. You want navigate in the center with counter-balancing logic. Fine I respect your choice. I would rather stand for something and that which I believe to be best of my ability is the truth.

Today we  choose who and what we will be. We can repeat the same habits or we can dig down inside ourselves if we really want a change. There is no better time to start than now.


OROBTC, Tor and I2P are not going to be anonymous against national security agencies. Period. Detailed explanations of these issues written in language that laymen can understand will come at a different time and in a different venue. There is no sense in me writing such details here in a forum as it will soon be buried and no one will find it ever again any way.
4750  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 13, 2015, 04:40:32 AM
Regarding my upthread post mentioning Persia (Iran) rising and prediction that Israel will cease to exist by 2022:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-12/meet-ghostly-iranian-spymaster-running-every-mid-east-proxy-war-he-everywhere-nowher

Regarding the start of WW3, the proxy war is opened in Eastern Europe, Middle East, and SE Asia (here we go...):

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-12/obama-wont-back-down-after-chinese-threat-sends-warships-china-islands-matter-days

Many Europeans do not understand that shrinking government is the right response to many of their troubles.

Why is that so many people can't recognize reality as it really is. Distorting the facts in your mind doesn't help you be objective. (what is that BS I read up thread from r0ach et al about gold futures market manipulation delusion and nonsense which Armstrong has entirely refuted yet these fools will continue repeating their delusion until they are bankrupted by it!)

My gosh OROBTC you disavow (mischaracterize) reality because we don't have shrinking government, we have (end game socialism on steriods devolution) increasing government and debt manifesting as totalitarianism:

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/37992

Quote from: Armstrong
The problem with austerity carried out in this fashion is that they are turning off the spigot and it is ending in Marxism/socialism. To continue to service the debt, governments hunt the rich and raise taxes then agree to exchange all info. In the process, they cause capital to hoard and not invest. So you are not really ending socialism, rather you are moving more toward totalitarianism.
4751  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 12, 2015, 02:24:13 AM
Lets not forget the lucky Larry Silverstein, his family and associates who all miraculously avoided death on that day, such a lucky guy..

The fortunate circumstances that kept the high-level individuals out of danger the morning of 9/11 were quite extraordinary. Larry Silverstein survived the attacks supposedly because his wife forced him to go to a doctor's appointment instead of a meeting at the WTC; Silverstein's son and daughter survived because, independently of each other, they were running late; his top aide survived because he cut short a meeting he was in at the top of the North Tower; his publicist agreed to join a meeting at the WTC at 9:00 a.m. instead of 8:00 a.m.; and others associated with Silverstein Properties may have avoided danger due to the cancellation of a meeting on the 88th floor of the North Tower.



See, that's more provocative evidence than buying an insurance policy 10 years prior to a payday.

Is your thinking and research always this sloppy. Or is your desire to shoot the messenger greater than your desire to be objective. You appear to have allowed your emotions (again all that self-imposed, blindspot angst in you when any person delves into religion) to rule your pre-frontal cortex.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/owners.html

Quote
Ownership Change

Author Don Paul investigated this and related issues for his 2002 book, which contains the following passage detailing financial aspects and ownership changes of the complex preceding the attack.

Quote
On April 26 of 2001 the Board of Commissioners for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey awarded Silverstein Properties and mall-owner Westfield America a 99-year-lease on the following assets: The Twin Towers, World Trade Center Buildings 4 and 5, two 9-story office buildings, and 400,000 square feet of retail space.

The partners' winning bid was $3.2 billion for holdings estimated to be worth more than $8 billion. JP Morgan Chase, a prestigious investment-bank that's the flagship firm of its kind for Rockefeller family interests, advised the Port Authority, another body long influenced by banker and builder David Rockefeller, his age then 85, in the negotiations.

The lead partner and spokesperson for the winning bidders, Larry Silverstein, age 70, already controlled more than 8 million square feet of New York City real estate. WTC 7 and the nearby Equitable Building were prime among these prior holdings. Larry Silverstein also owned Runway 69, a nightclub in Queens that was alleged 9 years ago to be laundering money made through sales of Laotian heroin.

In December 2003, the Port Authority agreed to return all of the $125 million in equity that the consortium headed by Silverstein originally invested to buy the lease on the World Trade Center. The Port Authority rejected a request by the Wall Street Journal to review the transaction. 5   A press report from November 2003 about the same transaction noted that it would allow Silverstein to retain development rights. 6  

The lease deal didn't close until July 24th, just 6 weeks before the attack.
4752  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 02:57:52 PM
Probably my final post on this forum.


I found that on Armstrong's blog before opening this forum tonight, which links to the copy on Infowars.

If I could urge readers to listen to another video, please listen to that full interview between Alex Jones and Matt Drudge. He pleads that Americans "are sick" and we have only a short period of time to still speak out. I urge readers to really listen to what he is saying. Please listen to that video and understand how close we are to losing all our freedoms.


And so the murals at the Denver airport are just random art.  Roll Eyes Unfortunately generalthis is "sick" and not knowing it is one of the symptoms.

Again the videos I linked to unequivocally show that 9/11 was a pre-planned demolition and explain with sufficiently specificity how it was done. Again Prescott Bush was financing Hitler which is what created the State of Israel. Again elder Bush was head of the CIA before becoming POTUS. Again the CIA was running drugs and in general all these actors are leaders of the organized crime in the world. It is the same actors. Organized cime and Israel's Mussod is part of this inner circle.

Readers you either cure your sickness and recognize the reality in the world today or you will become much more sick over the coming decade.


I am signing off from this forum. It is has been a "hell of a run".



Quote from: myself in a prvt msg
Distinguish the natural evolution of Jews returning to their "homeland" and establishing residence in Palestine with the level of organization required to force a military outcome.

The "true zionists" (Edit: whoever they are or if they exist) have sold out to those who had the power to foist that on the world.

And that power is organized crime.

Organized crime committed 9/11.

It is that simple.

The complexities of the issues between Jews and Islam and Christians go centuries, but now the issue has been leveraged/hijacked/infiltrated by organized crime.

Well maybe it was always like that. Maybe religion has always been a tool to manipulate the people.

Quote from: myself in a prvt msg
I am not against you as a person nor as a Jew. I am not against you having a place to live in freedom.

I am against the mass political manipulation which is what zionism has been.

I personally would try to get out of that asap, if I were you. But I wasn't born there and invested in that system. I realize that could be a huge personal burden. Hey but I haven't had my severe burdens (e.g. this illness). I did move my entire life from the USA where I was born to the Philippines. Thus I know it can be done.

Good luck. I will be leaving this forum.
4753  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 02:48:45 AM
this is so silly. we are wasting time. enough

this ends now. Bye.
4754  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 02:20:49 AM
You can't wear goggles when someone is punching you in the face--good chance of them breaking or getting smashed into your eye.

Plexiglass can very strong. And goggles could be very big even covering most of the face. The problem is I think it either offers too much protection making the fight unfair, or it could break a bone on the face due to concentrating the pressure of punch where the goggles are resting on the face. We both agree it doesn't work, which is why I have never thought seriously about a comeback into sports at an old age as a boxer. I seem to have a talent for rapid fire combinations. My quickness is similar Manny Pacquaio but alas it is not meant to be for me to actually compete in the sport. Too late. Probably for the best.


MMA is my choice--it's mixed so it's Brazilian jujitsu, kick boxing and wrestling, plus a few other things like sambo, judo, and various forms of karate.

I am familiar with the techniques used inside the MMA ring. Boxing doesn't seem to be effective because the wrestlers just go for the legs and take you to the ground.

You are challenging me to a technically skilled sport where I have absolutely no training, so it wouldn't even be a contest. You might as well just ask me if I can give you a knife to stab me with. I am basically asking to have my arm or leg broken or dislocated. That would be insane. Of course I would simply have to fight dirty and break the rules in order to compete, so in a real life situation I would poke your eyes out, ram your nose up into your brain, etc, but then this wouldn't be friendly sport any more but rather survival.

So of course I will decline.

I was looking for a friendly afternoon on the field where I could teach you to have some respect for a 50 year old man. Bruise each other up a bit, but unlikely any serious injuries (although broken bones aren't totally impossible, the likelihood is much less than dislocation of an elbow in grappling). But since you imply you have no experience at grass field sports, then I guess we can't do it.

The decathlon would require far too much training on my part. Unless I was set on getting back into that shape any way, it would be a distraction. Football shape is something I would like to reattain any way, because it is a cross-training type of conditioning with explosiveness.

I suppose our only comparable sport would be boxing since I have no training and you have some capability to do that in an MMA. Or we could allow kicking also such as the Thai version of boxing. But again I would risk my eye and thus the rest of my productive life. Hardly seems worth it. If I could find some sort of head gear with a clear plexiglass over eye, and you want to fight for points (can't really hurt each other with headgear on), then that would be an interesting competition.
4755  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 01:50:23 AM
Also, i prefer track or MMA. How about a decathlon followed by a three round fight? I'll even let you take a nap.

But I don't get to have physical contact decathlon (meaning I can't slam into you full speed and get you to respect). I've never trained for a declathon and it would take much more time to get back into shape for that. The only reference points I have for the events of that are I ran 4:15 for the 1500 meters in high school (in the middle of the season before peaking so I could probably have gone faster but I tore my hamstring while sprinting a 330 in my senior year due to losing our coach and being overtrained on running up steep hills). I don't know what my 100 meter time is but I did 4.5 seconds for 40 yards in my early 20s. 400 meters I've run in the low-50s, but I never trained for that event so I could probably have gone faster (every time I ran it was really falling apart the last 100 meters). High jump I will suck as I am only 5'8" in shoes (69" wingspan only). I had a 36 - 40" vertical leap in my 20s but I have not had that lately due to being ill (26" just recently while very ill).

I don't have any experience at grappling, so MMA is not something I can reasonably compete in. I don't want to end up on the ground grappling because that isn't something that know how to do. It is a skill that takes time to master. Whereas, running full speed and slamming into you is something I love to do. If boxing, then maybe (no true experience but I seem to have some natural talent) but I have to risk that I only have one eye and I don't think it is worth it. I would wear goggles if we do a contact sport.

In any case, I offered football because it is a contact sport and I assume you are larger than me in height and weight and I wanted to give you an advantage because if we do MMA or boxing then we can't do it, because it is not reasonable if you are in a different weight class than me. In American football, all sized players have to play together.

Boxing if I can wear goggles, but I don't know if that even works. Never tried it. And if you are not more than 180 lbs. If you have any experience in boxing, I have none. But what the heck, I seem to like the sport. The main problem is the eye and the weight difference.
4756  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 01:13:30 AM
What does 911 have to do with what I posted above?

Precisely.

And why do you think you are Barry Sanders?

Meet me on the field and you will find out.

(you got me thinking. I bought a new pair of turf shoes a few years ago but never got to use them because of my illness. Would be wonderful to use them they are still new in the box. I think I'll be ready soon)
4757  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 01:09:55 AM
generalizethis,

You myopia is best explained with an analogy to my mother's reaction when I started to mention that Silverstein the owner of the lease on the World Trade Center had renegotiated his insurance in 2001 to include TOTAL destruction of the buildings by terrorists. Her reaction was, "that doesn't prove he was complicit, because everyone was worried about terrorists blowing up buildings". Even on those merits alone, she was totally off reality. Factor in that the pre-planned demolition is already proven, then there is no way you get the materials into the building without the owner of the lease likely being complicit.

This is about your level of intellect on the murals at the Denver airport. You are totally unaware of reality. You seem incapable of weighing the circumstances and all the surrounding facts. I am not going to rehash it again with you. It is a waste of both of our time. The fact that you are still holding a grudge about it, it is childish. Move on. If you really want to test egos, meet me on the football field. We can have a friendly game of physical contact (well I doubt you'll ever be able to touch me though).
4758  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 11, 2015, 12:22:49 AM
Fact: 9/11 was a pre-planned demolition job. Wrap your mind around the implications my man.

If instead you persist in going back to age 5, let me put it that age level mentality for you. I will point out that I could literally do the following at age 5 and I will welcome you to try to tackle me now because I can still do these moves:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKjfoQVssBo

Seriously. Want to try? Again I ask you where you were born and where would I find you in the USA if I come back for visit we can have a friendly test out on the grass field.
4759  Economy / Economics / Re: Economic Totalitarianism on: October 10, 2015, 11:11:25 PM
Not sure what the other things have to do with you thinking you are the first one to figure Revelations out

Where did I claim that  Huh

, but go on deluding yourself; you won't be the first or the last. Hump that leg.  Grin

I thought I asked if we could graduate from being 5 year olds? Did you miss that post?

You are always fighting the last war when others have moved on?

You realize the last 3 posts from you in this thread (and the 2 that yours forced me to post thus 5 posts in total) have been useless noise. This is not helping the reader.
4760  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: October 10, 2015, 10:40:08 PM
trollercoaster, I think if you take your last post and the last paragraph I added to my prior post together, we can posit that the elite are trying to amplify and promote the multicultural conflicts in order fester the need for a world government.

Also it is the concept of divide and conquer. Divided peoples can't pay attention to who is fucking them over, because they are too busy squabbling over for example feminism, gay marriage, zionism, etc..

Also they want to bastardize or balkanize existing cultures, e.g. promoting Israel for all who could fraudulently claim they are Jews to come steal some land. It was another theft paradigm, analogous to socialism. Getting people to steal from each other, encouraging lawlessness, and thus wrecking havok on civilization, thus making civilization weak.
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 391 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!