Bitcoin Forum
July 12, 2024, 01:58:33 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 296 »
4741  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Buying btc with PP on: February 16, 2016, 05:57:01 PM
I will send first if trusted or you can sign btc address with btc in it.
PayPal is reversible up to 365 days, even if you send first, there's still a chance of you reversing the payment later.
Btc are not reversible. Once the other party sends their coins and the transaction gets confirmed, there's no chance they can get their coins back, given the situation you were to reverse your part of the exchange.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14632.0

Money sent through PayPal and any other money transfer service that accepts credit cards can be easily reversed by the sender, even after several weeks. Therefore, you should only accept PayPal in trades with people you trust very highly.

This is why newbies are not likely to sell their PayPal USD for bitcoins successfully.

4742  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Overview of Bitcointalk Campaign managers [Last update: 14-Feb-2016] on: February 16, 2016, 10:52:00 AM
Lutpin ([ANN]) (Profile) (Send him message)
Rank: Senior Member
Payment methods: BTC
Payment period: weekly / monthly
Maximum: 150-200 members, depending on the campaign terms
Fee: Depending on the campaign, always up to negotiation
Escrow: Yes
Past experience? Yes, several (e.g. Crypto-Games.net signature campaign).
Max budget(monthly) you have had experienced with? 3BTC
4743  Economy / Lending / Re: Need a small loan on: February 16, 2016, 09:46:28 AM
Thanks Lutpin. I can see how it's hard to trust someone new after I read that. I'll probably just buy a $20 gift card and trade it on paxful.
You can lock the topic on the lower left in that case (since you wouldn't have to ask for a loan now).
4744  Economy / Services / Re: [OneHash.com] Frontier Signature Campaign | Senior Members | fixed/weekly [Full] on: February 16, 2016, 09:32:59 AM
I'm interested to join, let me know
You missed the last part of the title
"[OneHash.com] Frontier Signature Campaign | Senior Members | fixed/weekly [Full]"
Sorry, but I'm currently not enrolling.
4745  Economy / Lending / Re: Need a small loan on: February 16, 2016, 09:31:59 AM
Reading the sticky threads in this section before posting your loan request would have saved you the trouble of askin what is accepted as collateral.

What is considered collateral?

Collateral is something that can easily be resold to cover the loan value plus interest should the loaner default on the loan.

- The best collateral is another crypto-currency, such as Litecoin (also written as LTC).  Coins must be moderately traded on multiple exchanges.
- Some digital wares such as domain names can be considered as long as the user cannot recover it.
- Small valuable items that can be shipped though the mail - i.e. gold, silver, iphones, etc.
- Large items, such as a motorcycle or guitar can be used if you live close to the person giving you the loan.  Try localbitcoins.com

What is not considered collateral?

- Items they want to sell.  They don't want it back, so they will default.  It's scammy unethical behavior and will lead to negative trust.  Check their recent posts!
- Items not in hand.  Don't trust a user that promises to give you something *when* they default!  Tracking numbers only show something has been mailed - it could be an empty box.
- Future income.  You can prove you'll make xx coins in the next few days, but nothing forces you to send those coins to pay your debt.
- Identification.  So what if they can prove who they are.  Are you going to spend more money and time taking them to court on untested legal grounds?  You'll probably just walk away, like everyone does.  ID is useless.
- Games codes or similar.  To verify the collateral you need to use the code, which destroys the collateral.  Consider this a purchase, not a loan.  (Post in Digital Goods instead)
- Most new alt-coins or alt-coins that trade for satoshis are not good collateral as they can become worthless overnight.
- Paypal should never be used - they are anti-bitcoin and will rule against you 100% of the time.  Escrow can't even help, as paypal charge backs can come over 6 months later!
- Most valuable online accounts can easily be recovered by social engineering (the user contacting support to say they were hacked, and regain control of the account)  Examples:  Steam
4746  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust Abuse by User Luptin & Mexxer-2 on: February 16, 2016, 08:46:40 AM
oh boy, next time please write me a PM when you open a meta thread about me.
Wouldn't want to miss the drama.



Mexxer is pretty cool. He's remove any trust he left me for asking for a no collateral loan when I was a Newbie. Lutpin, eh.. I'm not so sure about.
I'm that kid that always got beaten up on the school yards. Now I let it out on random strangers on the internet.
(That was sarcasm guys, in case anyone would take that for serious).



@Gildarts: If it was up to me, you would never set a foot into this forum again.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13894939#msg13894939
You got some banned alts, don't you? Roll Eyes
4747  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known alts of anyone: User generated on: February 16, 2016, 05:17:10 AM
chilipowder also has some positive trust from someone in default trust and it seems he left some fake feedback on his hamaz171 account (hamaz171's trust page)



Maybe QS can tell us more about hamaz171s Senior Member, that was used as collatereal in the loan. Misunderstood that part of QS' feedback.



Yep & CoolRunnings21, I'd guess.
No collateral but I do get my sig payment from Luckyb.it tomorrow.
For loaning me .07 you will recieve my sig payment of .075.
1KUjksSc2GE6gvNW7AdM4J8TGTLTzyhuP2 if someone can do this.
1KUjksSc2GE6gvNW7AdM4J8TGTLTzyhuP2 and 1JETKx6xBjaBaBVEqLWuMA32jA76dp8Usq are connected via 76a01205afbe312b49156a61959da11b73ad17961e5e076fe189d63a6d134d09
1JETKx6xBjaBaBVEqLWuMA32jA76dp8Usq and 1AfknpFaMJW6bu3tTszUgvHF5ne5Uhy6MT are connected via 57c08c6a88553c0f03fc28fcb82e85615185816d97b728e77f4584ffa95ab7ba
1AfknpFaMJW6bu3tTszUgvHF5ne5Uhy6MT and 1xqUhaJxWLc2mKXVykfVHqaDmtzFdd6F8 are connected via 2e2a5d2228d44bc4b41891a6b6fb98f47f8edc63a76578fea6fd81c3074556d6
(you're welcome shorena)

Hey look, that guy got trust from chilipowder also.

4748  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 04:48:04 AM
No, I didn't mean it that way.
But it certainly sounded like you did. Sorry, but that might easily be misunderstood in a thread that starts with the sentence
I would like to charge Lutpin with ruining people's trust scores with malicious, erroneous negative trust feedbacks.
You can see where I get that idea from.



What I wrote was just a straight observation and I'm wondering if others see it the same.  I guess it was the SebastianJu thing where he seemed to be getting attacked from all sides in a tone that I don't often see used with trusted members like him. And there were other threads too. But as I said, I could be totally wrong.
Well, I don't agree. That's only my observation though.
4749  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 04:32:05 AM
Is it just me or has the mood around bitcointalk darkened since these adjustments to the DT list happened?
Is it mexxer or me you don't like being on DT?

I think OP realizes his mistake of giving out a rep loan and hopefully he won't do this again. The question is at what point can these things be forgiven?
I'm fairly certain he won't do that again. As for the part of "forgiving":
shorena had left him a negative, and revised it to a neutral. I have done the same, after some discussion.
We both decided to give the guy a second chance (and yes, I know I took longer with that, but that's because the rep loan wasn't the only issue I had).
That's it at the end of the day.
4750  Other / Meta / Re: My account SebastianJu banned for 14 days now? on: February 16, 2016, 04:06:49 AM
One of the most trust worthy escrows in the forum gets banned for signature spam, classy. :p
And the guy who recently had some troubles with him comes up to twist the knife in the wound, surprising.
4751  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known alts of anyone: User generated on: February 16, 2016, 03:01:08 AM
Well, I came here to self admit an alt but I see that I was already spotted, not that I was trying to hide it anyways.
Here is the proof for those who want it
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Comment: Signed by Bitcoin Armory v0.93.3

Today is 2/15/2016. I, Knightdk, am admitting that achow101 is my alt.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----


HGyp8lC+/Chdksltz8I/ZjNN5yL+EpeMLsd8vzUXEfYq6eRmIkOMeaZWXTyJN+CT
NjyKfu+6f4cknJwyDyP03c8=
=3WVL
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Will include that in my next version of the OP (or first reply, since we've been breaking the limit).

Also, what's up with this (bad copy-paste on the last three lines?):
|
Accounts involved
|
Trust status
|
Proof
|
Submitted by
|
Other information
|
|JameRD, mobiletalk|Red Trust|here and here|zazarb|Email address: peterwaight42@gmail.com and BTC Address |
|Chinatsu, kydranel|Red Trust.|here|Joel_jantsen|Address|
|Rago,mokadev|Red Trust.|here|Joel_jantsen|Address|
|knightdk,mokadev|Neutral|here|Shorena|PGP public key|
|knightdk,mokadev|Neutral|here|Shorena|PGP public key|
That's only mexxer not being abled to run bbcode/the table.
4752  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 02:28:45 AM
I will remove one of them then.
I will remove the feedback from your account.
Thus meeting my 2 conditions stated earlier:

I was ready to remove the negatives I gave you (or better said, to change them to a neutral) under 2 conditions:
1) You remove either of the trust points you left MonetaCoin
2) You remove your negative on my account


As shorena already did, I have now changed my ratings on your two accounts to neutral.
4753  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 01:55:21 AM
You did not mention the trust points on Moneta.
You were at fault, as you weren't involved, and I wasn't 100% wrong, where as you were.
And if you removed them both, I would have removed mine.
There's that thing again.
Feedback can't be wrong. Yours can not, neither can be mine.
You can dislike someones opinion, but you can't tell them their opinion is wrong.
4754  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 01:46:33 AM
How is leaving positive trust for an escrow service any way the same as giving a rep loan?
How is leaving trust from 2 accounts something you can easily approve of.

You acted before, and still act like 400k sat is a load of money. I was trying to help the guy.
You don't get it, do you? It's almost nothing. You were ready to sell out your trust for dust.

How do I still seem ready to do that? I understood, apologized, and seized responsibility for my actions.
How am I still "ready to do it"?
You had problems with the trust system back then, you still seem to have problems with it right now.

Also, literally we were talking in PM, you said "you aren't the one commanding it all" while I was trying to have a mutual agreement, you tried to make me remove both of them first, when you were the one in fault.
I was ready to remove the negatives I gave you (or better said, to change them to a neutral) under 2 conditions:
1) You remove either of the trust points you left MonetaCoin
2) You remove your negative on my account
But for you, that was no option, because I had to act first, since
you were the one in fault.

I was pissed when I got to cryptogames, because you literally act so superior in everything that you do, then you ignore the person once I tried to talk to you in PM.
Everything was said. Since you only were coming back again and again appealing me to remove the negative rating, there was no point in exchanging PMs with you.

Honestly, it's people like you that make me want to leave this forum. So many good things, and ideas, marred by people like you and Timelord, who only show the one side that you put together, and charge with negative feedback.
Yeah, I'm the cancer that kills bitcoin, I got it.
4755  Economy / Reputation / Re: Reputation System and The Corresponding Abuse on: February 16, 2016, 12:57:03 AM
I would like to charge Lutpin with ruining people's trust scores with malicious, erroneous negative trust feedbacks.
This isn't a court, you don't "charge" someone.



4 months ago, a few days I believe before Thanksgiving, US, I was relatively new to the forums, and I did not understand some concepts about scamming and reputation loans and all of that.
I made the mistake of helping a guy with a reputation loan. Proof : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1254441.msg13009211#msg13009211
Quotes from the thread:

Take it from someone who knows.. Lock this thread and keep your nose clean.
Trust is earned, not bought and it can't be forced.
Farming trust and reputation will only end badly, and your best bet is to re-evaluate.
Rep loans are frowned upon here, as ou can see you have been given negative trust
you need collateral and a reason to take a loan

And a few posts later, from you:

I have received payment for my loan.
5mBTC. Trust has been posted.

Yeah, you "didn't see that". I know. You should have known from yourself that what you were doing is wrong.



I saw the guy around the forums, and wanted to help the guy out with his career.
Or, what I think is, you wanted to make quick money (0.004BTC in that case), and sold your credibility out for it.
Something I can't approve of, and something you still seem to be ready to do.



I have returned, and I started this off, apologizing for my actions, for I wasn't aware of the general use of the reputation loans, to buy trust, and later scam, because of the already-present trust on the account.
Proof:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1359022.0
You know what the guy you were willing to trust so easily did later? He tried to run a ponzi.

I, instead of being listened to, for apologizing for my actions prior, got slammed with more hate, and one person even went to say that I was "trying to pity" older members.
That was sho, who was willing to remove his negative on you, nice bringing him into this that way.



I, then had a long chat with people on a thread, where my alt (xavTrot6) and the x_Molotov account were marked as being under one owner ( me )
proof : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg13869366#msg13869366 and south.
We find alts, if those are alts of red trusted members, we mark them accordingly. You were in that moment a red trusted member, hence your alt was marked.

On the x_Molotov account, it says
Lutpin 6: -0 / +4   2016-02-14   0.00000000   Reference   
Knowingly gave out a reputation loan and left positive trust after being repaid. Also fails to see his mistake and insists on having done nothing wrong.
Let's see what I wrote in the other thread about that:

I have done nothing seriously wrong.
neither of my accounts have done anything wrong
nothing has been done that has been wrong/immoral.


I can see multiple other feedbacks on @lutpin's account, all saying that he gives malicious feedbacks for the sake of ruining people's reputation and boosting other peoples'.
Which you can find on many other users that leave alot of feedback also. Most of those are retaliation feedbacks, given for revenge after a feedback I had left.
Like the one you left me:

"Maliciously hands out feedback, even when he is not involved."

I do not know those people, so I cannot judge if those are correct statements, or if those are scammers, merely mad at the fact that he gave them negative feedback.
Most of them glow in red of -4 and deeper, they are sure nice guys to have a coffee with.



I however, know that the feedback on my account is wrong, the Molotov feedback to be taken off, and the mention of xavTrot6 being my alt, reduced to a neutral or removed.
He wouldn't listen to me via PM, and when I confronted him on a chat on a betting site, he had me blocked, then he blocked me on PM.
I don't think so, and I after all am in the right to leave feedback as I think its correct.
I told you how we could sort this situation out via PM, you said you don't want to, then I blocked you and you followed me to crypto-games.net
What you pulled off there is on the lowest level. Let me quote the chatlog to you:
Quote
[23:04] <xCacheMoney> Lutpin.
[23:04] <xCacheMoney> Don't be a pussy.
[23:04] <xCacheMoney> Unblock my PM.
[23:04] <xCacheMoney> Learn how to talk, how to negotiate.
[23:04] <xCacheMoney> You can't be a dick, then ignore comments when people confront you about them.
[23:05] <[MOD]Lutpin> could you please stop harassing me? I blocked your PM for a reason
[23:05] <[MOD]Lutpin> Joter (our admin) already warned you that this is not the right place to talk about it
[23:05] <xCacheMoney> I will "harass you" until you remove the erroneous comments on my accounts.
[23:06] <xCacheMoney> Or I will push and charge you with BS negative reviews in Meta.
[23:06] <[MOD]Lutpin> but not here, drop it, that's my last warning
[23:06] <[MOD]Lutpin> go to meta, make a thread
[23:06] <xCacheMoney> Not here, not PM.
[23:06] <[MOD]Lutpin> I don't really care about it
[23:06] <[MOD]Lutpin> but this here stops right NOW
[23:07] <xCacheMoney> It does not. Until you remove the wrong comments.
You also tried to insult or insulted me on several other occasions.

[...] with sheeple who aren't even involved, following suit, spamming me with negatives.
And the fact that a few people can control the sheeple into spamming negative trusts, [...] when they aren't bloody involved in it.
[...]
However, all the sheeple placing negative trusts on both of my accounts, where they are not involved at all, should not be happening.
[...]
However, the hate just piles up from the sheeple, trying to get in with the higher members, for a pat on the head.
[...]
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!

[...]
My information is 100% correct, as you did land malicious  feedbacks, both on me and some other innocents, while running a 'hategroup', that rounds up people, and spams them with negative feedbacks.
[...]



Oh, and shorenas take on the situation:

Alright, I did a little check on you.

#1 gratz on no longer still being a filthy casual.
#2 grow a spine, you just vanished after the negative rating
#3 there are no shortcuts to trust.

-snip-
I know this may not be easy to answer, but what is a good way to get my reputation up?
I heard rep loans are scammy, and wouldn't do it anyway.
-snip-
a good way to get your rep up, is being honest and doing the right thing.
#4 I will change the rating to neutral, dont make me regret it. This does not mean that others will follow. Dont bother them.
#5 If you want to do trades, do them with the rating you have. Yes, you will get trolled, but those have no interest in trading with you anyway. Those willing to trade with you can use escrow, allow it.




To be honest, I was ready to give you a second chance, as shorena already did. I was even willing to overlook the things that had happened and move on.
But that you left trust from both your alts to the account MonetaCoin shows me, that you did in fact learn nothing and have not changed one bit.

"Acted as escrow for my BET investment program. Professional, fast, and a pleasure to work with."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366279

4756  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for Investor-based website developer on: February 16, 2016, 12:19:49 AM
No
So wanna tell us more about that HYIP idea of yours that is no ponzi?
4757  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Windows & Microsoft Keys CHEAP PRICE |AUTOBUY|BTC| on: February 16, 2016, 12:16:28 AM
Clean your thread and delete your old bumps please.
Also remind to keep the bumping at once every 24 hours (you violated that rule in the past).
4758  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Method to buy bitcoins with paypal with only 2% fee on: February 16, 2016, 12:02:33 AM
I'd like to get a vouch copy.
No offence, but I was talking about someone who would be abled to do a decent review and who would be trusted enough, not someone coming to every sales thread asking for a vouch.



I'd like to get a vouch copy.
I'd like to get a vouch copy.
I'd like to get a vouch copy.
I'd like to get a vouch copy to verify everything is ok.
4759  Economy / Reputation / Re: Removal of escrow.ms? Update: Recommend users for DT 2, as escrow.ms is removed on: February 16, 2016, 12:00:58 AM
I really like it how every topic becomes about qs... not...
Was about to say something to Timelord over at the known alts thread, was about to say something to him here,
can't you just sort out your problems with QS in private?!
4760  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] Method to buy bitcoins with paypal with only 2% fee on: February 15, 2016, 11:50:25 PM
<3 my comment was oboviously sarcastic hence the ":^)" but I'm pretty sure there are people who look to exchange their paypal to btc
So you'd be willing to give out a vouch of your Method to someone, so that those "people who look to exchange" know what they are buying?
Pages: « 1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 [238] 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 296 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!