Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 08:39:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 »
4761  Other / Meta / Re: Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too! on: July 30, 2017, 10:13:57 AM
It's alright suggesting these things but numerous rules/restrictions and ideas have been proposed to combat spam but theymos never responds to them so not much that can be done. Things like being harsher on poorly run campaigns can easily be implemented but then there's proposals like making users pay a fee to get a bigger signature which are more difficult/controversial but would stop people signing up purely to earn here without at least investing in bitcoin/their account.

Asking users to pay a fee for using signatures would indeed be controversial. Especially if they get banned for spamming after that, the users would cry themselves hoarse about how the forum is scamming them.

True,  but we wouldn't need to ban anyone if campaign managers did their job properly and they didn't pay poor posters or accept them in the first place. I think we should just move towards banning poorly run campaigns instead because it's unmanageable and unfair for staff to essential run campaigns for them and once they start having their accounts banned and ico threads trashed they should start to get the idea.
4762  Other / Meta / Re: Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too! on: July 29, 2017, 09:16:03 AM
Ban all the campaigns paying less than 0.0007 per post,  disable signature for members posting not 10 but 5 consecutive shit posts, problem solved.
You either want a high quality and high standard community or you don't, which is it?
If you want to advertise your cheap ass project, company, service then find some cheap forum to do it.
If some body has to earn even $2 in a day otherwise dies from hunger, they'd be willing to join a signature paying 0.0001 per post to make a living and we have millions of such people, only the matter of time before they find this forum 1000 people at a day. lol

It's alright suggesting these things but numerous rules/restrictions and ideas have been proposed to combat spam but theymos never responds to them so not much that can be done. Things like being harsher on poorly run campaigns can easily be implemented but then there's proposals like making users pay a fee to get a bigger signature which are more difficult/controversial but would stop people signing up purely to earn here without at least investing in bitcoin/their account.

Ban all the campaigns paying less than 0.0007 per post,  disable signature for members posting not 10 but 5 consecutive shit posts, problem solved.

To be honest, a dollar per post is still relatively high in terms of paying someone. US minimum wage is $7.25 so you need to maintain one post approximately every 8 minutes. (Which is why we have a maximum). And if the signature campaigns under that $1.94 threshold are banned then you'll see a flood of accounts going to the higher paying campaigns. Do you really want spammers to be paid more? Because regardless of the price I am sure that services will start up campaigns and allow spammers a place of refuge. They're just offering low rates right now because they can get away with it and flood their ads everywhere.

I don't think a minimum price would be a good idea and campaigns that pay 0.0007 are rare and hard to get on when they appear. If campaigns were better managed in the first place pay wouldn't really be an issue.
4763  Other / Meta / Re: [WTF] MY ACCOUNT GOT BANNED AFTER JOINING WAVES CAMPAIGN on: July 29, 2017, 09:01:08 AM
WTF, I don't know why admin doesn't allow moderators to signature ban any body with 10 consecutive total shit post? think about it, if you post 10 shit posts then you are a shit poster and if you are unable to join any signature campaign then no body would be joining all the low rate campaigns and they will be forced to increase their pay rates resulting in people with good post quality joining those camps. slowly people work on their quality and we'll see no more spam. WTF, am I right or not?

Poor posters do usually get a 7 day ban as a warning.
4764  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Alternative to btc-e on: July 29, 2017, 08:58:34 AM
I'm also looking for the next best thing.  I don't mind verifying my ID but am looking for an exchange that you can buy/trade LTC,  ETH and XRP with BTC.

The options aren't so great. There's Bittrex. I left Polo months ago because of the massive amount of complaints about missing deposits/withdrawals. But that's partly what left me with so much on BTC-E when it went down....... Cry

Did you personally have missing deposits or just what you've heard from others? What would you say is the most reliable of them? Also,  I think I'd prefer it if it was fully regulated as well and European based to avoid issues.

Has it actually been seized? It just doesn't load for me. They normally put a notice up or announce it has been taken. Doubt they would have left it this long if they had.

Yes, it has been seized. It has not fully propagated, but by tomorrow or so, everyone should see the same thing. From the whois, the name server is now pointing at Shadowserver, which is a proxy for law enforcement.

Dang. My friend actually has about $30k in various coins and cash on there. I was gonna deposit a bitcoin or two as well to give trading a go but I'm glad I didn't now. Don't want this to happen on any other exchange though.
4765  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Withdrawing from Coinbase to UK bank account? on: July 29, 2017, 08:50:02 AM
Still no contact from support and it's been a week now. Is this normal for them or do they not actually handle some support tickets at all? Does anyone know if they have an official thread or account here as that might be easier.

The last time I sent them a support ticket, it took them 6 days to respond. Then the support rep completely ignored my issues and sent me some boilerplate responses. This was about a month ago. Granted, there is still likely a large influx of new users right now, but this level of support is really quite disappointing given that they are highly regulated and generally held in such high regard.

Hmm. Thanks for the response. I don't understand why sites like this don't just hire more support operatives instead of giving themselves a bad name. I think I might just start selling my coins for cash because there's always problems with exchanges and rip off fees etc.
4766  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Alternative to btc-e on: July 29, 2017, 08:46:46 AM
I'm also looking for the next best thing.  I don't mind verifying my ID but am looking for an exchange that you can buy/trade LTC,  ETH and XRP with BTC.

I was optimism but It's over. After domain Seizing, It seems there isn't any hope for returning back even in 10 days away.

Has it actually been seized? It just doesn't load for me. They normally put a notice up or announce it has been taken. Doubt they would have left it this long if they had.
4767  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Withdrawing from Coinbase to UK bank account? on: July 29, 2017, 08:38:14 AM
Still no contact from support and it's been a week now. Is this normal for them or do they not actually handle some support tickets at all? Does anyone know if they have an official thread or account here as that might be easier.
4768  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for trustfully known Escrow-Service! on: July 29, 2017, 03:50:28 AM
Before choosing an escrow I would recommend you to take a look at this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2043356.0. This is what happens when you choose a bad escrow. The escrow ran away since he could easily just buy a new account and continue scamming.

Take a look here and here is a list of all the big escrows that you can trust: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.0.

Some popular escrows include https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133846 (Moonbux) and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18321 (Ognasty)

Good luck!

He's said numerous times that he's looking for reputable escrow companies and not freelancers.
4769  Other / Meta / Re: Can we get activity points on posting in the Off-Topic Thread? on: July 29, 2017, 03:41:57 AM
Yes,  you will get activity but read the sticky in off topic. If you think you can just post rubbish in there to quickly rank up your account you'll soon be banned.

Hi, I'm a Newbie too but I read the rules and they say not to post anything on the Off-Topic's thread. A friend of mine also told me to try not to post anything there, so don't do it  (or try not to) Wink

No,  that's not to make off topic posts not relevant to the thread. Posting entirely in off topic is a quick way to get your account banned though.
4770  Other / Meta / Re: Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too! on: July 29, 2017, 03:35:04 AM
I'm pretty sure their campaign isn't managed too well, which doesn't help.

I don't think it's run at all. It took me several messages to get them to do something about the spam coming from their campaign and the user who had about 10 accounts on there shitposting in the sports threads one after the other. Pretty sure there's at least one guy still on that campaign with multiple alts doing the same.

Yeah, restricting the minimum post limit is probably unreasonable really (as long as it's not a ridiculous amount) and fixed campaigns that require a minimum amount of posts usually make much less spam than those who are on unlimited one. However, I think we should prohibit campaigns from forcing users to post in certain sections (as with threads) because that's when people really start to churn stuff out that they have absolutely no interest in. The entire Gambling Discussion sub was essentially solely created because of FortuneJack shitposters talking crap about every possible sports league in the world because they needed to make most of their posts in the Gambling sub and there's only so much shit you can talk about Gambling and they'd exhausted every possible permutation to discuss how bad or good gambling is a long time ago.

We had 15-20 accounts copy-pasting in the football discussion thread. I would suspect such behaviour is forced by signature campaign posting requirements too.

There have probably been hundreds caught doing this. I'm sure there's plenty more still doing it in those and all the other sports threads but I'm not going to waste my time looking for them.
4771  Other / Meta / Re: Bounty Campaign Rules on: July 28, 2017, 05:56:59 PM
The signature campaign guidelines thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684035.0

But you cannot incentivize people to post in your thread or do any sorts of on forum giveaways if they pay out in alts coins/tokens.
4772  Other / Meta / Re: Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too! on: July 28, 2017, 05:32:22 PM
As we've discussed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2045928.msg20448891#msg20448891
Banning or not allowing campign manager to make a minimum post every week will help lessening signature spammers.

Thoughts?

Signature campaigns wouldn't want people signing up, not making any posts and then claiming their payment.
Minimum posts are essential (whether on a weekly or monthly basis). Otherwise, campaigns will pay per post and that creates bigger problems.

Yeah, restricting the minimum post limit is probably unreasonable really (as long as it's not a ridiculous amount) and fixed campaigns that require a minimum amount of posts usually make much less spam than those who are on unlimited one. However, I think we should prohibit campaigns from forcing users to post in certain sections (as with threads) because that's when people really start to churn stuff out that they have absolutely no interest in. The entire Gambling Discussion sub was essentially solely created because of FortuneJack shitposters talking crap about every possible sports league in the world because they needed to make most of their posts in the Gambling sub and there's only so much shit you can talk about Gambling and they'd exhausted every possible permutation to discuss how bad or good gambling is a long time ago.
4773  Other / Meta / Re: Forum ranks/positions/badges (What do those shiny coins under my name mean?) on: July 28, 2017, 05:14:30 PM
Hi,

Today for first time i have seen message like this in signature space of one Bitcointalk user:
"Banned from displaying signatures until August 25, 2017, 01:51:16 AM"
But not under his posts. This information was only in his profile informations (in the signature window)

How/why someone can get ban like this?

It's because of this:

That is very much not allowed. The threads are trashed, the poster is banned for 60 days, everyone who participated is banned for 3 days, and everyone who participated cannot display a signature for 30 days.

4774  Other / Meta / Re: An error occured when im posting? on: July 28, 2017, 12:47:11 PM
You have time restrictions on posting as a new member. They decrease with the more activity you get. Just make sure you wait six minutes before trying to post or after logging in.
4775  Other / Meta / Re: What is the trick in this on: July 27, 2017, 01:37:42 PM
Did you buy the account? If not your account may have been hacked or someone tried to claim the bounty with your account name for some reason.
4776  Other / Meta / Re: Delete my account on: July 27, 2017, 12:24:14 PM
It's not possible. Just log out of your account and abandon it. Why do you want it deleted any way?
4777  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Forum moderation policy on: July 27, 2017, 07:18:01 AM
In something anywhere and anytime (navigation link, very sticky or other) that explains the moderation guidelines and spammers?

There are signature guidelines here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1684035.0

And forum rules here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0
4778  Other / Meta / Re: Do altcoin services (including bounty threads) need a new board? on: July 27, 2017, 05:22:26 AM
Yeah,  it's called the trashcan. They should be in their own board but some sort of restrictions or punishments need to be made on them because they shouldn't be allowed to operate here as they are. Not sure why alt coin giveaways aren't allowed but we allow signature campaigns with most accepting hundreds or even an unlimited amount of users with absolutely no quality checks at any stage of the campaign which is far more damaging to the forum as the spam is spread everywhere. I think we should consider not even allowing them if they don't pay in bitcoin because that will stop the vast majority of these lazy, cheap get rich quick scams. 

The signature guidelines thread should also be changed into strict rules and any campaign not following them or running a poorly managed campaign should have their entire threads trashed and their accounts banned. Maybe then people will start looking after their campaigns but if we continue to let them get away with doing absolutely nothing then they will.
4779  Other / Meta / Re: [WTF] MY ACCOUNT GOT BANNED AFTER JOINING WAVES CAMPAIGN on: July 26, 2017, 05:30:02 PM
No,  not permanent. The ban will likely be extended if you're caught evading.
4780  Other / Meta / Re: Countries that banned bitcointalk.org on: July 26, 2017, 05:23:23 PM
China actually restricts access to a lot of sites including Facebook apparently:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Websites_blocked_in_mainland_China

Article on China blocking this forum specifically: https://cointelegraph.com/news/the-strange-case-of-bitcointalks-chinese-ban
Pages: « 1 ... 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 [239] 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!