Not much to add really, you can find such topics in the services board at the moment. Just be aware that it's fraud and if you decide to try it you're the one taking the risk. It must be one of the first times that someone advertises that here. If it's allowed now, it will be allowed in the future. What's next? Drug trafficking? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) In this case I agree with you, we should "make" something to stop these BS.
|
|
|
So no one here is greek and can tell his personal opinion (as citizen of Greece)? I think we are at the end, the system is going to fail.
most people in this forum think that politics is choosing between democrats and republicans. They also think that if they have heard something from CNN or DW it must be the truth! So there is no point in discussions really... But here have a hint. The problem is systemic. Even if everything doesnt collapse with just Greece it will eventually collapse. Rather soon i might say. Oh thanks for your opinion, you are right about the mass-media and this is why I have created this thread.
|
|
|
davout ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20071018154810%2Fnonciclopedia%2Fimages%2F1%2F13%2FAsd.gif&t=663&c=f-SHq2D2QecBAA) , Can I ask you what is your opinion about this "hard-fork" ? Thanks for the attention. Not needed right now. While I'm not against - in principle - to the limit being bumped by sane people when, and if ever, *actually necessary*, I vigorously oppose Gavin's proposal of exponential block-size growth. It's either pure madness, or a straight attempt at sterilizing bitcoin by indirectly putting it into reach of governments through increased centralization. Interesting opinion, thanks davout.
I've find this old video about the blocksize/decentralization : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZp7UGgBR0I Maybe someone is interested to see it and tell his opinion.
|
|
|
I agree with the banning. Isn't it proven to be a scam?
It's indeed getting ridiculous. One even had ponzi in his name, and still got people scammed!
Yes, but the staff members don't ban the scammers (it is not against the rules).
|
|
|
Instead of making a ponzi section , there should be some kind of report as ponzi or whatever , and mods could just delete the thread i dont see why a ponzi section would be neccesary.
The problem is : the various ponzi schemes are not against the forum rules, why do you think the staff members should delete them ?
|
|
|
Yawn.. How boring. Direct copy of weekly ponzi. Isn't anyone original anymore?
The script is on gitHub (open source) with some changes: https://github.com/Crypton33/CryptoPonzi A lot of ponzi sites are using it because it is "free" and easy to use. well this really explains why there are alot of ponzis that keep spamming day by day, free script for all so that everyone can start their own ponzi like this is giving this boards a bad images Yes, it is easy. They have only to buy a small vps and a domain name and start to promote their ponzi schemes. The only way to stop these bullshit is "don't invest".
|
|
|
So at the end it is not a simple "choice", okay now I'm very confused.
That's just because you don't recognize word salad when you see some. davout ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg1.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20071018154810%2Fnonciclopedia%2Fimages%2F1%2F13%2FAsd.gif&t=663&c=f-SHq2D2QecBAA) , Can I ask you what is your opinion about this "hard-fork" ? Thanks for the attention.
|
|
|
Bitcoin has a BIG potential but we limit it, a max 20MB block size is not a drama. Come on guys, the actual block size (1 Mb) is not for ever. As "technology" the "changes" are obligated.
Swapping one arbitrary number for another is how software is developed. Protocol development is another thing entirely. It is not enough to change it. Protocols demand to know: "Why?", "Under what conditions will it next change?", "What triggers a change?". "How will we measure for that?", "What risks are there for measuring it in that way?", "How are those risks managed?", etc... If for our parameters, we are picking subjectively selected arbitrary numbers (guesses) based on even the best available predictions of the future, we know that we will be wrong eventually. What then? (That's how we got here today) People that design software, say: "So what? The installer will just download the latest patch and we go on." People that design protocols, say: "We have work to do." The alternative is that a central committee appoints itself as the arbiter of block size limits and everyone salutes it. This is not a likely result for Bitcoin, which is possibly one of its biggest distinguishing features from all the other choices. So at the end it is not a simple "choice", okay now I'm very confused.
|
|
|
Possible hacked/bought account (it seems he is not the real owner/creator of it). I will remove the feeedback when you will sign a message with one of your old bitcoin address (posted here in the forum).
|
|
|
For every $1 you invest you will earn triple that within 3 months.You have my guarantee worse case scenario is you break even, which is extremely unlikely. I run botting programs to automate tasks in online video games. I invest in the most efficient hardware. Minimum investment $1,000Maximum investment $5,000* $3,000 returned for a $1,000 investment within 90 days of being sent.
* $6,000 returned for a $2,000 investment within 90 days of being sent.
* $9,000 returned for a $3,000 investment within 90 days of being sent.
* $12,000 returned for a $4,000 investment within 90 days of being sent.
* $15,000 returned for a $5,000 investment within 90 days of being sent.In the event something were to go wrong, the newly bought hardware can be returned/resold for easy recouping of damages. Trust in me. 01010100 01110010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101101 01100101 00101110 00100000 00111011 00101001 Quoted for reference. Can you prove that you are the real owner ?
|
|
|
Yawn.. How boring. Direct copy of weekly ponzi. Isn't anyone original anymore?
The script is on gitHub (open source) with some changes: https://github.com/Crypton33/CryptoPonzi A lot of ponzi sites are using it because it is "free" and easy to use.
|
|
|
se la pacchia è finita perché si parla ancora di cointellect?
Si sta parlando della carta cointellect, ma non credo che nessuno di noi ne richiederà una. Chiacchiere da bar quindi ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Mica tanto da Bar, si ta parlando di questa carta Svizzera che Cointellect ci vuole taroccare manco fossimo gli ultimi imbecilli della terra, anzi colgo l'occasione per spalancarvi ancora la mente in commenti al riguardo. A prescindere dal fornitore cui fa capo la carta del cliente, i clienti che hanno una carta di credito svizzera devono affrontare costi enormi per il prelievo al bancomat. Prelevando contanti con una carta Visa, Mastercard o American Express si deve affrontare fino al 3,75% di costi per le commissioni. Con la maggior parte delle carte di credito vengono addebitati almeno 10 franchi a prelievo. E questo avviene sia in Svizzera sia all'estero. Alcuni fornitori, ad esempio Credit Suisse, addebitano almeno 5 franchi se il contante viene prelevato ad un bancomat in Svizzera. Ad esempio: chi ha una carta di credito Cornercard e preleva 400 euro al bancomat, da adesso deve pagare 15 franchi di commissioni. Con altre carte di credito svizzere, ad esempio di UBS, Credit Suisse, banche cantonali, banche Raiffaisen o Postfinance, i clienti devono considerare tasse tra 17.50 e 18.75 franchi. Nessuno di noi è obbligato a richiedere quella carta, se non la vuoi "chiudi" definitivamente con cointellect e inizia a cercare qualcosa di alternativo.
|
|
|
se la pacchia è finita perché si parla ancora di cointellect?
Si sta parlando della carta cointellect, ma non credo che nessuno di noi ne richiederà una.
|
|
|
Bitcoin has a BIG potential but we limit it, a max 20MB block size is not a drama. Come on guys, the actual block size (1 Mb) is not for ever. As "technology" the "changes" are obligated.
-1 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Ftumblr_ls3s3cJWyl1qe27tzo1_500.gif&t=663&c=yk4eKxdb3zne9A) ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) thanks for your comment, so is not bitcoin a technology and doesn't it need "changes" ? Ok, it seems something is wrong in internet.
|
|
|
ma alla fine se non viene firmato nessun documento, mi dite che cosa vi fanno pagare?
se la carta arriva veramente e coin ci butta li i nostri dindini e noi li ritiriamo, loro come fanno a importi di pagare il canone mensile? alla fine non c'è nessun contratto firmato
Magari li ritirano dalla somma che ti devono inviare, non so ma può essere uno dei tanti modi. Ormai se vuoi restare su cointellect devi per forza investire, è un 100% ponzi d'ora in poi.
|
|
|
Another ponzi scheme, OMG ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) .
|
|
|
Bitcoin has a BIG potential but we limit it, a max 20MB block size is not a drama. Come on guys, the actual block size (1 Mb) is not for ever. As "technology" the "changes" are obligated.
|
|
|
Thanks, this is very helpful. You are welcome, I hope to see again the possibility to upload ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) or better use an avatar in the new forum software.
|
|
|
|