That's a privacy infraction. Why should they have to do that?
I.D. can be faked. One photo of a burned house is no different to any other photo and does not prove a residential address. A randomly generated series of twenty letters, numbers and characters prevents any fake prepared videos crafted days, weeks or months in advance. OP talks about insurance so it would ensure there is no insurance fraud A lender is entitled to know who the borrower is and the truthfulness of their "genuine reason" for a loan given the potential borrower didn't just say it was for "personal" reasons. If the potential borrower can't truthfully prove the circumstances of the claims in their loan application, then that would mean they are not being truthful. |
|
|
|
|
I think the NRL has another three weeks then top eight for a couple of rounds then semis top four then the grand final. I'll be home tomorrow and check for certain.
In any event, tomorrow evening , the Sea Eagles should tar and feather the Roosters. Friday, the Warriors and Panthers should knock over the Titans and Storm (the later should be worth watching) Saturday, the Broncos and Rabbitohs (and I'm going down with the Dolphins sinking aspirations) then Sunday, the Eels over the Dragons before the Canberra Raiders under tens take on the West's Tigers with a fifty point head start.
Just kidding... The Women's West's Tigers are top of the NELW ladder after two weeks while the Men are bottom of the ladder.
Now a Canberra Mens Vs Tiger's Women's match might be interesting...
|
|
|
|
Please post a video of yourself in front of your burnt down house writing |
|
|
|
You Open line of credit with 3% intrest rate monthly You misspell interest ... but in any event ... Yes that's correct that's how it works.
You borrow 100$ you pay back with % you can get to borrow 200$ you pay that back with % you get to borrow 400$ ...
Loan request: $100 USDT TRC-20
Repayment amount: $103
Loan Duration: 28 days from funding.
Purpose: recharge lightning wallet. Wallet address: TEvt9NpRM6FoytKLQnpSumsL5cmssnTCo9 Please post your USDT TRC-20 wallet address for repayment here, please. *Edit* 2023-08-05 22:00 GMT+10Loan request now recinded due to OP being unresponsive. |
|
|
|
|
NRLM 2023
Newcastle have taken an early leed against the Raiders 14 - 0 after 24 minutes. The Raiders are five points and five positions ahead of the Knights on the ladder so on paper at least they should win (but they are on the back foot as half time approaches)
Later, I'm expecting Manly Sea Eagles to win over Saint George on the back of Manly's win last round. The Panthers should evade the Sharks who might be top four material, but won't win the Premiership.
Tomorrow, the Dolphins should overcome the Bulldogs snapping at their heals fins while the Townsville Cowboys should overcome the Gold Coast Titans.
In the NRLW the Raiders beat the Roosters 24 - 14 (my money would have been on the Hens) In the game underway
After 30 minutes, the Dragonets are leading the Eels 8 - 4 (Money would have been on the Dragonets)
In the Rugby Championship tonight, New Zealand will probably trounce Australia while tomorrow Argentina are the underdogs against South Africa.
If they win it'll be almost as big a boilover as the impending Ireland Vs Nigeria Women's FIFA Soccer match. Depending on the score Australia will move into the semis if Ireland wins by two points.
The BBC World Service have been gushing over the Moroccan team, so I've put a small wager on them against South Korea,.
New Zealand against Switzerland, Argentina over Sweden. Morocco over Columbia.
|
|
|
|
|
As expected, the Broncos beat the Roosters 32 - 10 last night. Tonight, the Rabbitohs should humble the Tigers once again then the Storm and Eels should be the clash of the day with the Storm probably beating the Eels in a close match.
In the NRLW - The Titans@ beat the BroncosW 17 - 16 in what looks to have been a very close match, so I would have been two from two if I'd bet on the Women's game. The TitansW move to first on the ladder while the BroncosW drops to 9th (second from the bottom of the Women's Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
Even now the OP still hasn't posted any kind of trust feedback.
|
|
|
|
... Your interactions with me, Timelord2067, HedgeFx, and the creation of this thread has exposed the petulance for which you (elmanchez) have become infamous. ...
Just like when elmanchez started one of those numerous navel gazing threads yahoo62278 referenced in his now locked thread (there goes my "right of reply") where the DT echo chamber sung in unison then fell silent choosing to deny they were in the wrong when elmanchez went on to scam. It would explain a lot of the hysteria being whipped up recently. |
|
|
|
I have a question. What constitutes plagiarism?In this post: a user is responding to questions concerning their lending service they have repeatedly attempted to start: (the post is unedited) Cash secured loans are used to prevent large losses and help businesses or individuals avoid bankruptcy. Not that anyone will go bankrupt on a 100 USD loan but that's why they exist, I am experimenting here and will keep this going for as long as I have enough data for one of the products we plan on offering to our private clients.
Reasons why cash secured loans are a thing:
1. Build credit
2. Better loans in the future
3. Keeps collateral intact as it can be slowly paid back.
It's easier when the collateral is used to slowly pay the loan in case of a failure where the original investment is lost. Collateral can also be topped up or stay intact while loan is slowly paid over a specified period of time. Hope this was clear.
I don't know where you've seen this before but they probably had the same idea in mind. I've highlighted two lines, it's not much, but a Plagiarism checker website determined the two highlighted lines are from the website https://www.thebalancemoney.com/cash-secured-loans-315598 In the same thread the poster of the above text then twice cites that website when they are further taken to task about the terms of trade. Quote #1 (30 minutes later) Quote #2 (4 hours after quote #1) (note: the quoted link takes you to https://www.thebalancemoney.com/cash-secured-loans-315598 - Archive [ 1a 1b] [ 2] )
so my QUESTION is "given the user cites the website in a follow-up post, and has used seven words that an external website considers to be plagiarism, has the user plagiarized the work, or, was it an unconscious use of the text and therefore not plagiarism?" Thanks for reviewing. |
|
|
|
why would i lie about getting a loan? makes NO
Hey that's great news that some one was able to provide you with a loan - you can lock this thread now: i got some good news regarding my loan !  someone has been willing to loan me 500 € user from this forum but he told me to not publicly name him so i will respect his wish offcourse i'm more then glad that after a few years this loan is finally filled thanks for this (you know who you are)
Flag supported: https://bpip.org/flag.aspx?id=3102 |
|
|
|
Anyone considering the above loan application should do due diligence - the OP has started shopping around for loans: Loan request: $70 of TRX
Repayment amount: $140 in TRX, BTC, ETH, MON or other Cryptocurrency
Loan Duration: 48 hours from receiving the loan
Purpose: Converting the $70 of TRX to buy the equivalent amount in Bitcoin, which I will then use as stated in previous post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5460870.0) to repay the loan in full + a $70 gratitude/thank you 'tip' as well.
Wallet address: TNiovrdnmzmeaH1g3YEUZxBZeXMar42gC2 (Guardia Wallet which accepts TRX, TRX-10 and TRX-20) Don't get caught out facilitating a second or third loan by not researching your client first. If you haven't read this already, read this:Lending Board Rules of Engagement - Attention Newbies |
|
|
|
|
Hey thanks for answering my question and pointing that out.
|
|
|
|
HedgeFx has engaged in some sleight of hand with a ban evading thread asking for another loan - take a good look at the wallet address that the lender has quoted and claims to have paid the borrower $500 into https://tronscan.io/#/address/TFqN1GmbXtQNZu1BsuhrExzpKLszXBfQ4UTwo days ago there were two dust transactions TO that wallet address, then $500 went FROM that address to another wallet address. (see below)
This is a post as reference for new loan of 500 usdt loan discussed with Hopenotlate: Loan Amount: 500 usdt Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 550 usdt Loan Repay Date: On or before August 5 Type of Collateral: None TRC20 - USDT address: TFqN1GmbXtQNZu1BsuhrExzpKLszXBfQ4U **Address Staked Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5403092.msg60700546#msg60700@hopenotlate: please confirm after sent @DT member: please Tag this loan om My trust as usual. Thank you Sent right now. Providing repayment addy in PM.
Eleven minutes later, HedgeFx claims to have received the payment - how? The funds went FROM the wallet address he was asking they be sent TO. The outbound occurred hours *after* HedgeFx claims to have received $500 (but didn't). https://ninjastic.space/search?title=HedfeFX <-- Misspell their own profile name  https://ninjastic.space/post/62582475 - (The actual post was deleted by mods due to ban evasion).  Are lender and borrower one and the same ?? @Theymos @LoyceV @DireWolfM14 @1miau @yahoo62278
|
|
|
|
|
@SmartGold01 I will again remind you that your "proof" is inconclusive given either user can turn around and say they copied the other user's post and changed the post later and then when they weren't accepted in the campaign deleted their post.
Have a look at @Xal0lex post from two weeks ago where they said relying on ninja as sole proof is not good enough (paraphrasing)
|
|
|
|
|
Loan request: $100 USDT Trc-20
Repayment amount: $110
Loan Duration: 28 days from funding.
Purpose: recharge lightning wallet.
Wallet address:
*edit*
Update 2023-08-01
Loan request taken off of the table after one week.
|
|
|
|
2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)
Please fix up your post to reflect what is required from investigators. I think all details about account connection can be found here You don't cite actual posts in the Forum where this is supposed to have occurred yet you expect us to go looking for the proof elsewhere. And also account 2 probably connected to Ayyan786 Probably? Why not IS connected - if you can prove it. You've used the first line of the submission form so you know where it is located. Please go back and fix up your post using the submission form and clarify your post. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Thanks for asking about my health but i'm not sure you're genuine so I will decline to answer you. Have a good day buddy.
I may have been accused of not having all the information, but not one person has said I have acted with malice.
PM me when you are ready to talk. |
|
|
|
My picks for the NRL Women's seem to be in line with the money already on these teams:
Titans Vs Cowgirls - I'm going with the Titans.
Maidens Vs Dragons - The Maidens will slay the dragons
Fillies Vs Hens - Nothing to crow about 'cause I'm going with the Hens.
Eels Vs Tigresses - The Eels will prove too slipery
Sharks Vs Amazons - The Sharks will maul the southern raiders.
Hopfully I get home in time to register on Rollbit and get some bets placed on these teams.
As always, screen grabs courtesy nrl.com | tab.com.au | nitrobetting.eu (and soon to be rollbit)
The men's game finished 36 - 18 to the Roosters while the Maidens slaughtered the Dragonets 32 - 16
Three minutes! THREE MINUTES!!! That's all it took for the Storm to smash the Knights!  |
|
|
|
I really don't like users using the trust system for this type of stuff. Speculation tags are just not cool IMO. I def don't think ps34 could write a topic like this 1 is written. Hopefully you guys can work out your differences and get the tag removed, but if not there is that ignore button.
Glass Houses, @yahoo62278| | Fishy001 | | 2022-11-13 | | | | IMO a hypocritical spammer who makes topics for attention and insults any user who calls him out on it. |
| | Royse777 | | 2022-07-18 | | Reference | | Co partner of Bitlucy casino that ended up scamming participants. User is also very hotheaded and childish |
| | Nexchange.co.uk | | 2017-09-18 | | Reference | | User has provided me with a signed message(verified) as well as paid out 2 previously opened sig campaigns. Still has an open scam accusation against them that needs deal with.
If they pay out the final campaign they have open I will remove feedback completely. If any problems occur will adjust my rating |
You have more than double the number of negative trust feedbacks placed against other users compared to the number I have (and a similar proportion of positives) - Perhaps instead of giving armchair opinions you go back and review your own trust feedbacks left for others? (Including your negatives) (Feel free to review mine to compare to your own)
I haven't seen your health issue thread for a while. I hope you are still on the mend. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
