Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 02:03:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 160 »
481  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 11:29:24 PM
This tread if full of geniuses

482  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ► ► ►HashFast Endorsement on: September 05, 2013, 11:25:25 PM
It's just simulated mumbo jumbo. Pre-order vendors have been issuing overly optimistic simulation results since forever. Until they have test chips in hand and some solid measured results everything will remain up in the air.
483  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 10:07:23 PM
The problem with pre-orders is that they can be abused to sucker money from people who don't know what they're doing.  That's what BFL did.  That's what I think HashFast is doing.  But I don't think KnC is doing it.

...don't forget Avalon and their outright theft using the pre-order model.

Even *IF* the vendor in question acts honorably then there's still huge risks of delays and the investor gets to eat all those losses as well. When one pre-orders gear for delivery far into the future they're forced to speculate on the profitability of that gear if & when it ever arrives. Obviously some of knc's early investors couldn't possibly have done this with any accuracy due to predictably unpredictable events(new vendors emerging...etc). I personally find it difficult to accurately predict the profitability of gear I can buy for delivery even a few weeks into the future and it's getting worse now with more vendors entering the field.
484  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 09:47:31 PM
as soon as you can buy asics from the shelf there wont be any profit anymore to gather

people are willing to pay to high prices for those asics regarding the future difficulty and that leads to overpriced asic hardware

if you are lucky you will make marginal profits like 5% a year

no preorder = no whining = no gain

edit: investomers is a good term cause its exactly what we are doing. we are basically funding a startup. usually you arent able to do so as a small investor cause its the job of big venture capital firms, but we are in a special situation as bitcoin far from being established and the usual partners like banks and venture capital stay away as soon as they hear "bitcoin". so THATS the reason we are allowed to gather good profits as investomers.

We'll get there anyway, the market will always seek equilibrium. Mining will eventually be only marginally profitable just as it has been in the past. The reason in hand gear commands a premium is because there's historically been a tightly restricted supply and lots of pent up demand due to non-performance by pre-order vendors. That is changing as more and more pre-order gear is introduced to the secondary market and more vendors emerge.
485  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 09:34:15 PM
Expecting management to do what management says they'll do is not unreasonable.

The question was "why does no one care about this."  I'm explaining why I don't care.   If they're honest, they won't sell shares.  If they're dishonest, we're fucked.

I suppose the price might go up a little if they proved they locked the shares, since it would provide evidence for their honesty. But right now I'm looking to get more cheap shares as soon as the ActM price goes up a little and a sell order I have gets filled.

I'm not worried about it, my view is that they're honest.  Or at least, the probability of their honesty is high enough to justify the current share price.

Understood, thanks for clarifying.

I'll leave the speculators to speculate. I frankly find posts by people cursing their day job because it prevented them from cleaning up by flipping crypto stocks rather disturbing.

I see Stuart is hot on the FUD wagon Smiley

God I love this shit.

When you quote him those of us that have him on ignore are tricked into reading his post anyway.
486  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 09:23:28 PM
The pre-order model flat out sucks for investors. At best it's a zero interest loan with the purchased gear as collateral. The gear that hasn't been built yet mind you. Yes knc is offering refunds and I wouldn't even have given them a second look otherwise, but we need to move beyond this ridiculous sales model. Just because you can get a refund doesn't mean you don't have losses. Those that are ordering are plainly interested in BTC and as such have numerous investment opportunities. When knc announced their plans to develop this hardware those that invested made their choice. Whether it was the right choice or not remains to be seen, but if they paid with BTC at that time then they're already way behind because they locked in an exchange rate that was most likely lower than it is now. If they paid with fiat then they likely could've purchased BTC directly and been better off. Again, nothing against knc as they've acted in good faith thus far, I'm just disappointed that they've not helped to move us beyond this pre-order model and it's lopsided share of the risks heaped upon investors.
487  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 08:50:08 PM
Expecting management to do what management says they'll do is not unreasonable.
488  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 08:45:36 PM
Don't even get me started on AMC, VMC, ACM, ACTM or whatever ks's ticker is now. I've never bought a share.

I greatly prefer LC, as I think the risk/reward profile at this point is far better, but LC is not doing themselves any favors. If management hasn't sold their shares then keeping their word and offering proof should be a no-brainer. Why has this not happened and why doesn't it seem to bother anyone else?
What was your opinion on BTCGarden?

I never bought a share as I saw no upside.

This seems pretty richly valued for an IPO after sucking up 32,000BTCs on btct.co in short order...then there's another 2,000,000 shares coming at higher prices? That's 6x the daily average on btct.co already poured into the garden in just over a day. I'm not seeing much room for further upside at this point, but good luck fellas.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264696.msg2859837#msg2859837
489  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 08:44:03 PM
I greatly prefer LC, as I think the risk/reward profile at this point is far better, but LC is not doing themselves any favors. If management hasn't sold their shares then keeping their word and offering proof should be a no-brainer. Why has this not happened and why doesn't it seem to bother anyone else?

creativex, none of this is new. I'd be interested to hear why you purchased shares of LC if this was such a major concern of yours.

You must know that, at this point in the game, communication across the board leaves a lot to be desired. Obviously this doesn't apply to you and Basic-Mining (but I think you'd agree the pursuits between Basic-Mining and Labcoin are totally different)

Communication hasn't gotten worse since you bought shares. In fact, a couple updates have come out since.

I bought a small number of shares for the same reason everyone did. If they're legit then the upside is tremendous, but their actions are not the least bit encouraging and simply saying "well, they've always sucked at communicating" isn't really persuasive. It says to me either they're incompetent or they're lying. Like I said, I ain't selling, but they're not helping me to reach a point where I'm comfortable buying more.
490  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] Virtual Community Exchange w/ Options, DRIP, 2FA, API, CSV, etc. on: September 05, 2013, 08:28:46 PM
There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding at work here. Simply having more shares does not entitle one to advanced knowledge of the inner workings of a company, save in the case of companies that have board members or an advisory board. Company officers that provide such information are indeed benefiting one group of virtual shareholders and putting another group at a disadvantage, but there's no way to police this. The transaction that you've referenced with my company occurred at a share price of .61 and every investor that held shares at that time benefited as they were afforded an opportunity to sell their shares at a higher price and their shares then received higher dividends. As this transaction was necessarily preceded by a public shareholder vote due to bASIC-Mining's unchanging contract everything was done transparently in the light of day.

Cheers.
491  Other / Archival / Re: btt on: September 05, 2013, 08:05:35 PM
It was plainly losing momentum, mostly I believe due to Mt Gox's inability to accomplish pretty much anything effectively...ever. BTC will be more stable when Gox rightly takes it's place amongst the dinosaurs and dodo birds of history. This space moves at warp speed. Adapt or die.
492  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 07:57:27 PM
Don't even get me started on AMC, VMC, ACM, ACTM or whatever ks's ticker is now. I've never bought a share.

I greatly prefer LC, as I think the risk/reward profile at this point is far better, but LC is not doing themselves any favors. If management hasn't sold their shares then keeping their word and offering proof should be a no-brainer. Why has this not happened and why doesn't it seem to bother anyone else?
493  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 07:48:18 PM
I don't believe they will fail to deliver first gen stuff(which is actually 2nd gen stuff for the ASIC BTC mining community), but they've offered pre-orders for the very same gear at lower prices for November delivery when they could easily have simply said "no more pre-orders", "no more zero interest loans", "no more offloading 100% of the risk to investors/customers" and instead offered hardware for immediate delivery at premium prices in November and beyond. I understand the appeal of the pre-order model when a vendor is green as they don't likely have the VC funding to cover NRE costs, but knc is essentially playing with house money now and has had a chance to differentiate themselves...they passed.

Unlike the past orders, you can wait for November 1st and order with KNC at the new prices which they will deliver on around November 15th.  I don't feel this is a pre-order situation since I don't believe they will run out of stock.  The reason they posted the prices now and the dates is to allow people to plan for the future if they wish to buy an ASIC.   If they didn't release this information, consumers may need to look at Cointerra, HashFast, BF, or another company.  

If you don't like pre-orders, just wait and buy one when they are available.  KNC didn't say you need to pay now or you may miss out on the units scheduled for November.

I don't like pre-orders, particularly pre-orders from companies that have yet to deliver products. I don't have a specific problem with knc, I'm actually considering them for future business, I have a problem with the pre-order model which has brutally punished investors in the past. Even those that paid knc in BTC months ago are very unlikely to recover their investment in BTC. It's a horrible model from the perspective of an investor and the market can and will do better, but apparently knc will not be among the companies leading the way in this regard.
494  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 07:32:23 PM
We don't. We need updates that say something specific. We need management to act in good faith.

The crypto investing landscape is littered with the financial corpses of those that have invested "on faith".

The failure to lock their shares or prove they've done so is a big deal even if cheerleaders in this thread want to sweep it under the rug.
495  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 07:27:05 PM
What's LCs motivation for staying silent and not telling investors any specifics about their progress? It's surely not to protect their their market share as they don't have one yet. It's surely not to protect their technology as their technology is currently well behind what others have. Too busy? That doesn't make sense as they posted something yesterday. Their actions don't make sense and are leading to this information vacuum which is predictably leading to speculation and anxiety.

LC's two posts yesterday were very important and many invested money based on those two fairly generic posts, yet nobody in charge at LC could be bothered to issue a statement on btct.co or even update the OP which hasn't been altered since July 27 31. Their handling of information and management of expectations is at best amateurish.

do you expect a personal phone call every day from the CEO or what?

No, but it would be nice. Wink

I expected them to do what they said(lock their shares), but they did not. Now I expect them to communicate effectively, but they are not.

PR guy should be fired yesterday. Whatever he's being paid it's too much. They can pick a guy from the crowd and get better results.
496  Economy / Securities / Re: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) on: September 05, 2013, 07:18:44 PM
What's LCs motivation for staying silent and not telling investors any specifics about their progress? It's surely not to protect their their market share as they don't have one yet. It's surely not to protect their technology as their technology is currently well behind what others have. Too busy? That doesn't make sense as they posted something yesterday. Their actions don't make sense and are leading to this information vacuum which is predictably leading to speculation and anxiety.

LC's two posts yesterday were very important and many invested money based on those two fairly generic posts, yet nobody in charge at LC could be bothered to issue a statement on btct.co or even update the OP which hasn't been altered since July 27 31. Their handling of information and management of expectations is at best amateurish.
497  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 07:05:03 PM
I agree that knc is most likely legit, but why do they need to perpetuate this insanely risky(for the buyer) pre-order model at this point? AM and the secondary market have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that in hand hardware for immediate delivery commands a significant premium over hardware paid for now and delivered in x months down the road. Knc plainly has the funding to become the second major player to only sell what they actually have, but they're passing on the opportunity to change the scenery and likely leaving money on the table doing so. Instead bitfury will likely wear this crown and it will erode knc's future sales.

Until they've failed to deliver the first-gen stuff, they aren't perpetuating any preorder model. What opportunity are they passing up? The first-gen stuff is limited number like the other manufacturers. Second-gen orders are being taken (like other manufacturers), so that the pipes stay fed for constant output.

Little lost on where you went with that.

I don't believe they will fail to deliver first gen stuff(which is actually 2nd gen stuff for the ASIC BTC mining community), but they've offered pre-orders for the very same gear at lower prices for November delivery when they could easily have simply said "no more pre-orders", "no more zero interest loans", "no more offloading 100% of the risk to investors/customers" and instead offered hardware for immediate delivery at premium prices in November and beyond. I understand the appeal of the pre-order model when a vendor is green as they don't likely have the VC funding to cover NRE costs, but knc is essentially playing with house money now and has had a chance to differentiate themselves...they passed.
498  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: September 05, 2013, 06:53:02 PM
I agree that knc is most likely legit, but why do they need to perpetuate this insanely risky(for the buyer) pre-order model at this point? AM and the secondary market have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that in hand hardware for immediate delivery commands a significant premium over hardware paid for now and delivered in x months down the road. Knc plainly has the funding to become the second major player to only sell what they actually have, but they're passing on the opportunity to change the scenery and likely leaving money on the table doing so. Instead bitfury will likely wear this crown and it will erode knc's future sales.
499  Economy / Securities / Re: [BTC-TC] Virtual Community Exchange w/ Options, DRIP, 2FA, API, CSV, etc. on: September 05, 2013, 06:18:17 PM
Real danger for minor investor is fuzzy number of outstanding shares. bASIC-MINER for example. Outstanding 51625 / 1000000 Issued.
Market cap is shares price multiplay by outstanding shares. If Issuer increase it as bASIC-MINER from 50000 to 51625 shares price decrease in inverse ratio.

Nobody in stock market did same things. Evrytime when Issuer want to make new outstanding he must offer by special price new outstanding to old shareholder in extraordinary order. Otherwise major shareholder can make fraud in the law. Please look example above https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=125629.msg3085484#msg3085484

Sorry again for my english, but I see here easy ligal way how to fraud vs minor shareholder. In real life it is posible with weak statute where not provided with special offer issue of shares.

P.S.: In BTC-TC present only 2 clear company who define minors: LABCOIN (Outstanding 10000000 / 10000000 Issued), COGNITIVE ( Outstanding 10420 / 10420 Issued). Other is fraud in law. burnside, please, change the law!

Hi ventolin. Burnside has never made any claims that he's going to police the exchange that I've seen. Doing so would be a full time job+ in and of itself and would open up a whole new can of worms. Instead he offers a minimal layer of protection by preventing issuers from altering their own contracts and ensuring that shareholder votes are conducted fairly. In addition he's made it very clear in every conceivable way that virtual investors are responsible for their own actions. Exchange moderators are responsible for rating assets and ensuring that issuers follow their contracts. Those that do not do so tend to draw the ire of exchange moderators who vote those virtual assets down over time.

I understand your concerns about shareholder dilution and I share them, but the only additional shares that have ever been issued by bASIC-Mining were issued for a special equipment purchase that was authorized by majority shareholder vote. All shareholders, regardless of the size of their holdings, have benefited from said purchase in the form of increased dividends and opportunities to sell holdings at higher prices. If there's a more fair way to conduct these procedures then I'm sure we'd all like to move in that direction.

There's any number of ways in which large shareholders of any asset can attempt to manipulate share prices and all virtual investors must remain vigilant and protect their own interests regardless of the size of their investment.

Cheers.
500  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs 30 day countdown to the end of September on: September 05, 2013, 05:30:00 PM
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 Shipping Update
by BFL_Jody  , 09-04-2013 at 11:06 PM
Jalapenos 4.5 and 5 gh/s: Feb 12-14, 2013 no Jallys shipped today

Little Singles 30 and 25 gh/s: Nov. 6, 2012 one day of orders

Singles 60 and 50 gh/s: July 31, 2012 pay date four days of orders

MiniRigs: All June orders (2nd 500gh/s unit), all July orders 1st 500 gh/s   none shipped
August 1st for 1st 500 g/s units


25 days to go
You should edit the minirigs to "none APPEARED to have shipped" Since you have no proof for your statement.

How about "Status same as yesterday"

(like it matters)

Of course they're shipping MRs. They're just shipping them to themselves just like they did the infamous Luke Jr. unit on April fools. BFL is not run by idiots, it's run by criminals.

It'll all be over soon. With all these new vendors coming out of the woodwork BFL is toast. Sonny the con's parole ends soon and the jailbird will fly to the next scam.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 ... 160 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!