|
Whats the total circulation of this (i.e. total coins ever mined)? Anyway to check in client? I think one of the other alts (yacoin?) had a field for this in getinfo.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any trade going on anywhere? Need to get some pricing reference for mining profitability ..
|
|
|
|
|
Accepting offer for 10 μONC lot. I you wanna buy PM me.
|
|
|
|
How do i get it?
You send me 1 BTC, i send you 1 μONC (0.000001 ONC) |
|
|
|
Did I just read that correctly? Did you say 1BTC?  yes |
|
|
|
|
1 μONC per BTC. More where it came from.
Get yours today before difficulty increase makes price much higher.
|
|
|
|
|
WTS 0.0000001 ONC (100 nONC ) for 1 BTC
|
|
|
|
first coin where I get only rejects, not even orphans  You're doing something wrong. Are you using cpuminer included with wallet? yeah reject means ur not hashing correctly. orphan means ur hashing correctly... but someone got it before you. |
|
|
|
|
almost 1000
RELEASE THE ORPHANS
|
|
|
|
w00t mined my first block. but amount 0.00 due to the fairness BS  |
|
|
|
seed nodes? im stuck at "no block source available"
Once i get upto speed i can open my port for others to seed off...
None, the network is seeded by IRC channel (a working one), just wait for someone else to join. ah yeah i got some. |
|
|
|
how about releasing the sources then? so we who can do our own builds can start and then get on with our lives?
That's a good point, I've pushed the sources to Github. Checkout tag v0.1.0 seed nodes? im stuck at "no block source available" Once i get upto speed i can open my port for others to seed off... |
|
|
|
Sorry for delay, got some minor problems. I hope I'll upload the QT client in 15 minutes.
At least give it a hour more. I have to go to lunch..don't want to miss this :9 Just release it when you feel its ok...but 13:00 UTC would be fine G You won't miss anything, since there will be no reward for first 1000 blocks for everyone interested to catch up. He can't do that, he probably already mined the genesis block (unless that's what's causing the problems). Delaying public release from that moment onwards will only enhance premine rumors.
Nope, the problem arised when I changed client version to 0.1.0, it turned out that the client version is used internally to check database version and capabilities. I'm building the fixed client at this moment. how about releasing the sources then? so we who can do our own builds can start and then get on with our lives? |
|
|
|
|
64 chips @ 0.09 BTC = 5.76 BTC
|
|
|
|
I can't remember how many W each K16 uses. How many K16s would 100W limit you to?
32W per K16 estimated 3x32W=96W 4x32W=128W not too much eh.. 4 kva for 42U $2500 / month 125 x K16 = 4 kva 125 x K16 = ~3 K16 per 1U (most likely there are some unusable slots, use for switches, spacing, etc) https://www.stackpop.com/configure/colocation/united_states/virginia/ashburn/1723724 kva 59U for $1000 per month (or $2000 unsure if power is included or extra) 750 x k16 = 24kva 750 x k16 = 12.7 k16 per 1U or ~51 per 4U (most likely there are some unusable slots, use for switches, spacing, etc) But these can only be used once stability of these devices is proven, to not need much babysitting by hand. Cramming higher density into 1U is only viable if you are hosting the rack on your own premises and can arrange adequate cooling.. But then why would one use 1U and not bigger cases where u can have better airflow using more efficient bigger fans. |
|
|
|
Well, I guess that's true, if you simply define cloud computing as distributed computing. What first comes to mind for me, however, is virtual machines such as Amazon Web Services, which would do quite poorly at mining.  Cloud is a meaningless marketing buzzword. Mentally, whenever you see "cloud" replace it with "internet". And if more specific, replace "public cloud" with internet and "private cloud" with intranet. It will save you from a lot of confusion. Experience: Works in "cloud" business. Edit: https://github.com/panicsteve/cloud-to-butt <-- i use this extension to make boring buzzword spam more entertaining to read. |
|
|
|
Right, i use "--failover-only", and then "switchpool" command to set which pool i want to mine at. The logs and display show that its only mining the pool i want it to. and if this pool is down, it failsover to something else. Works like i want it to, I dont "feel" there is any issue in terms of payouts or smthn... I believe failover-only still communicates with the failover pools. You can verify this with netstat. Switches depend on OS and what you know about the output / want to see. More importantly, if it wasn't communicating with them, then it wouldn't know the difficulty, defeating what you are trying to do to begin with. IOW, for what you are trying to do to possibly work, all but the "currently active" pool would need to be disabled, and you would need to poll the difficulty from the wallets, all of which would need to be accessible from your polling application (either locally or over the network). Hmm makes sense http://pastie.org/private/c2qa7mv7dsncpnyxkcryoa is from a pool thats not "currently active". 'Status': u'Alive',
'Stratum Active': False, When i switch to this pool it uses stratum only. But here its showing it as Alive, and stratum to be inactive. Will need to tcpdump to see if difficulty info is being passed along for inactive pools or not. I have been using wallet to get difficulty information, but would like to remove wallet dependency. I use raspberry pi to mine which is incapable of running wallets. Currently i run the wallet on my desktop, but I want to shut down the desktop for few weeks. The difficulty from block explorer sites (basically getdifficulty method) shows the difficulty of the last block mined, not the current network difficulty. |
|
|
|
I am using cgminer with multiple pools for different coins.
Taken straight from the first paragraph of the README: Do not use on multiple block chains at the same time!
But he's only got one active pool at a time via the API, (at least I asusme it's just one pool), so does this warning still stand? Right, i use "--failover-only", and then "switchpool" command to set which pool i want to mine at. The logs and display show that its only mining the pool i want it to. and if this pool is down, it failsover to something else. Works like i want it to, I dont "feel" there is any issue in terms of payouts or smthn... |
|
|
|
You are making an assumption that Bitcoin's value won't change in that time. There is a lot going on in the financial world right now, I think we're on the verge of a new push. Let's say Bitcoin is worth $500 or more each in 6 months, even making a shaving of a Bitcoin can still be worth serious money.
Hes making the assumption that 1 Bitcoin today is worth 1 Bitcoin over time. I think thats a probably sane assumption... |
|
|
|
I am using cgminer with multiple pools for different coins.
Taken straight from the first paragraph of the README: Do not use on multiple block chains at the same time!
Hmm.. i thought adding "--failover-only" makes any pool mixup go away? havent noticed any issues doing it this way... and restarting cgminer takes minutes (~4 seconds per fpga each configured serially). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
