http://ffpool.net was paying 1.5 BTC / GHASH for lyra2re, but not anymore. What happened to this pool?
|
|
|
|
48MH on lyra for 1080 is equal to around 32MH(30% slower) on a 1070, and a 32MH is almost 50% higher versus 22MH on a 970
The gtx 970 does 25MHASH with my private bins and stable OC. 25->32 is 28% faster. But then again, I guess the 1070 can be overclocked as well  . I just checked the local prices, and I can get two brand new gtx 970's for one 1070. |
|
|
|
you can not compare like this, you optimized like no tomorrow your 980ti, but you didn't the same with the 1080, with optimization a 1080 can probably do 30% more hash than a 980ti, this is basing on the benchmark
not talking about intensity, here talking about rewrite the code for the new architecture that is pascal, which has yet to be unveiled
True. But I will not do the job. |
|
|
|
assuming you increased some algo to 10-20%, the same will happen for the 1080, so add 20% more on top of that hashrate...
This is not the case. I have a few that has tested the "public" private bins, and they are sometimes slower than the opensource. My buyable private Spreadcoin #9 is up 0.6MHASH on the 1070 and 1MHASH on the 1080 compared to the opensource. 1070: 6000 -> 6600 1080: 7500 -> 8500 you still need to tweak it for the pascal, you can squeeze some more hash from it I think playing with the -x parameter can give a boost. |
|
|
|
the 980ti uses 250 if not overclocked, it will use 300 or more to reach 41 MH/s.
don't compare apples and oranges.
I need to double check, but I think the lyra2v2 is using less power than the other algos. The 1080 is using 176 Watt in lyra2v2 vs 180 Watt in decred so you're probobly right. The 980ti is closer to 300 watt@41mhash |
|
|
|
|
On 970 rigs yes. On 960 rigs no.
|
|
|
|
|
The gtx 960 can go from 11 to 14MHASH with small modifications to the code. I run with --farm-recheck 150
|
|
|
|
THIS IS NOT MY CARD MSI gtx 1080 Gaming X on lyra2v2 NiceHashMiner.v1.5.1.0
43.6MHASH is good, but I can do 41 MHASH stable on my 980ti. So the 1080 is only 6.34% faster than a pimped 980ti. (private kernal (sp-mod #7) with overclocking) You can pick up a used 980ti for half the price of the 1080 on ebay... The 1080 use around 180Watt and the 980ti use 250Watt. |
|
|
|
|
The point is that Etherum is worth $ 1,590,652,810, and million of dollars are given out the miners every day. (estimated $500 000 000 worth of GPU's mining)
Monacoin (lyra2v2 ) is worth $ 2,122,648
Vertcoin (lyra2v2) is worth $ 873,020
and
LyraBar
Verge
Unitus
MobileCash
Zoom
are worth pennies. So even if the 1080 is the fastest card to mine lyra2v2( shitcoins) , it is slow in etherum (This is where the money is right now).
|
|
|
|
assuming you increased some algo to 10-20%, the same will happen for the 1080, so add 20% more on top of that hashrate...
This is not the case. I have a few that has tested the "public" private bins, and they are sometimes slower than the opensource. My buyable private Spreadcoin #9 is up 0.6MHASH on the 1070 and 1MHASH on the 1080 compared to the opensource. 1070: 6000 -> 6600 1080: 7500 -> 8500 |
|
|
|
And they compare with low clocked reference 970/980ti cards running on opensource kernals. Phew.. My private kernals are still faster on the pimped 980ti:) Quark:  decred:  |
|
|
|
1080 tests with power consumption here: http://cryptomining-blog.comEtherum,neoscrypt,lyra2re is slow, the rest is fast. Some algos consume 180w( default tdp of the card)   |
|
|
|
|
100watt mining etherum @ 23mhash. The gtx 970 can do 22mhash.
But for quark@25 mhash it uses more.
I was told Lyra2v2 does around 32.5-34mhash on the 1070 and around 25mhash for quark.
|
|
|
|
|
A reference gtx 970 had a tdp of 145watt
The reference 1070 has a tdp of 150watt
A reference 1080 has a tdp of 185w
A reference 980ti has a tdp of 250w
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I will do the pascal sp-mod. I think I will move to AMD and 512bit bus. 1070/1080 is not attractive when it comes to price/vs hashrate.
|
|
|
|
|
The sp-mod private #7 (all nicehash algos optimized) is a windows executable. But you can run it in wine if you know how to set up wine..
It will run in full speed on windows, and full speed on linux if run through wine..
On linux you simply type
wine ccminer.exe -a x17 --benchmark
Sp-Mod #5 ( All nicehash algos optimized) default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock) faster than ccminer 1.7.5 cuda 7.5 32 build
nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 37.10
x11: 12.85 (+18%)
x13: 10.27 (+19.97)
x15: 8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)
|
|
|
|
Dont work on GTX 1070 ? .
Should work. The gtx 1070 is unreleased in my country, so how should I know? My mod is optimized for the maxwell cards. SP-mod #7 is made for the 750ti. I have a compute 5.2 mod ready, but will not release it until I get the pascal cards to test. in 1 month. Quark is peaking @ 32MHASH on the 980ti with this mod. |
|
|
|
i have mate - and nothing in there ...
I just sendt you an email without an attachment.. (let's continue the conversation on PM) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
