Negative trust feedback left by Quickseller: Canadianbitcoins agreed to purchase an item from me for .34 and he requested to use escrow, which I agreed to. Once an escrow address was provided by the escrow service Canadianbitcoins delayed sending bitcoin to escrow and eventually disappeared, leading me to believe that he was hoping to entice me to send what was being sold to him first without escrow. I would trade with extreme caution with this person and only deal with escrow when dealing with him
See the underlined part. He is warning others who want to trade with you to use escrow. You do understand why he put it. Proof of this?
I hope you aren't spamming for that sig. You can see it easily by checking his trust : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=447475. -MZ |
|
|
|
Trust never gets removed
Wrong! Some of them will be removed by theymos if some conditions are met but never for a scammer or a likely-scammer. Some of the ponzi operators made several names that resembled each other so maybe you were looking at a name that you didn't mark but thought you did
There is a chance for this to happen and is already mentioned by redsn0w.  =snip= Maybe you have thought that you have left a negative trust but you haven't pressed the submit button.
-MZ |
|
|
|
Loan Amount : 0.06
Reason : I'm going to use this money to cover the costs of buying a domain for a new site in development.
BTC Address : 1NPuHtNJ81FPDrbwiUNKEJPQQYzdwgeZj6
Term Length : 6 Days
Today is 22 February. I am the real owner of Tlee88 (UID: 371076) and I am giving this account as collateral for the loan provided by Muhammed Zakir (UID: 320943)
TX : 53d839df59a272861074289908e3c34c260d48afd4b0f902941ac169fc8135ae -MZ |
|
|
|
Are you sure this is not a joke. If it is not then this is a new scam method Ive seen on the market.
This has been here for some months now. Earlier, a person ask for loan and just after he got BTC, he told my account was hacked but the hacker didn't change the password.  -MZ |
|
|
|
I think that there shouldn't be a "spoiler" button, as the quotes aren't really spoilers. Instead, I think shrinking large quotes would be a better option, with the option to expand them to full size.
I understood what you meant but the general meaning of SPOILER is "Something you would've prefered to find out yourself". So I think that's not a problem. See hilariousandco's post above yours, that is perfect for this. -MZ |
|
|
|
Everyone has a "bad day/night" and last night was one such for me (this is what happens when you stay up until 4am 7 days per week for months working on projects).
6-7 hours are fine for sleeping, atleast sleep for 6-7 hours. I apologise for "going a bit crazy" and have sent @gmaxwell a PM requesting that the topic be unlocked and moved to Project Development (as another mod suggested that might be an appropriate section).
No problem for me, I do understand! Although you have done publicly, if I were you, I would PM shorena(& anyone else) about my attitude at that time. @theymos "Automated Transactions are a Turing complete smart contract implementation designed to work on any blockchain" (when I have enough spare time I'll add that to my website along with some more simple descriptions of various use cases).
Good luck! Mind locking this thread and the other? -MZ |
|
|
|
PM me your email address, no charge.  -MZ |
|
|
|
Clearly I wasn't the only person confused. Thanks for everyone's input. Is there an "official" answer from the mods?
Are you looking for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.0 ? Discussion of activity workings in thread OP started about trust seems to me....a bit off-topic.   -MZ |
|
|
|
Though even if people from non-trusted list give feedback , that can change
AFAIK the 3 rd number will change but you need atleast 1 positive trust feedback! If I am wrong, can you give an example - a profile link or link to the source? Thanks! -MZ |
|
|
|
I don't use Electrum but blockchain.info
I do understand signing a message , adding address and public key now (thank you)
But i can't find anything about verifying on blockchain.info
Could you direct me please
~Appreciated
Go to 'Receiving' tab and then click 'Advanced Options' near 'New Address' and then click 'Verify Message'. I don't remember correct words but you got an idea. You can find a German post by shorena here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=920631.msg10425511#post_bcifeb2015. You can easily understand as there are pictures in it. -MZ |
|
|
|
Technically, this is possible.
In some cases the data needed for signing is huge, up to megabytes. It would then be close to impossible to transfer via QR, and that user might be in serious trouble then. Like with many many inputs from mining, for example. Even with non-extreme but large transactions it would not be very practical.
There are several ideas how to do "airgapping" securely. How I understand it, we are waiting for addon-ability for Armory first, then these optional and sometimes controversial options would be possible.
Ente
You are right but in most cases, this wouldn't be a problem. The Qr-code's size will increase, so you might need a an Android phone with a good camera. I would like to see this. -MZ |
|
|
|
Quoting: Collateral = BTC-e account. -MZ |
|
|
|
No, only if I'm too late. I have a fixed payout.
Minedblock: Yes that is coming but currently I can show no blocks. It's cloudmining namely.
Proof of payout and which cloud mining? -MZ |
|
|
|
It's not a ponzi. If I am late with paying. The percentage will be higher and you receive more back.
That means you don't have a fixed time for repaying? A bad idea IMHO. -MZ |
|
|
|
So after perusing and getting the basic overview, its a neat idea. I'd like to take it out of the Alt Coin section, but I can't think of an appropriate place to put it. I fully, and completely understand why it was moved to the Alt coin section, as I mentioned before, Mastercoin was ruled to belong in the alt coin section, and this has very similar traits. So I can pretty much guarentee you, that the mod that moved it didn't do it to spite you, its a really tough topic to place. Historical events lead it to belong in the Alt coin section, however burrying it there seems like a waste. Its not really a projects and development thread, as its just the idea and not a working model, and its not really Bitcoin technical and development since its coin agnostic.
I think I'd like to move it to projects and development, with this being the reasoning. "Organization of Bitcoin and related projects, bounty campaigns, advertising etc. " I suppose the theory is close enough to the beginning steps of a workable project. Since the thread is self moderated regardless, I'd say take caution to not cater to alt coin implementation discussion in the thread, at the risk that it will be moved again. If someone wants to implement it in their alt coin, I'd advise having them pm you.
Thats my proposal anyway, Ill wait for other mods to weigh in on it, since I dont want to be moving the thread back and forth.
As a side note, Psy and I once unknowingly moved the same thread back and forth to differing sections. It was at the point where we were both annoyed, and were going to send angry PMs to the OP for moving the thread back, until we checked the modlog and had a quick discussion over where the thread actually belongs. My point being, it happens.
Good to know! There hasn't been any real interest or discussion in it in technical-development-- This isn't meant as an affront on your efforts: You don't see similar noise about related (and I think better and more relevant) projects being worked on by multiple people on the Bitcoin Core team (moxiebox), simply because they're also not mature, and not yet interesting to a wider audience.
The last updates I saw on it were repeated duplicate threads announcing a really large bounty for creating an altcoin based on it.
With the lack of interest and constant bumping, I was considering moving it between project development and altcoin subforum; the huge create-an-altcoin bounty made me think the latter were more suitable (or at least, would get you the attention you want).
-MZ |
|
|
|
There hasn't been any real interest or discussion in it in technical-development-- This isn't meant as an affront on your efforts: You don't see similar noise about related (and I think better and more relevant) projects being worked on by multiple people on the Bitcoin Core team (moxiebox), simply because they're also not mature, and not yet interesting to a wider audience.
The last updates I saw on it were repeated duplicate threads announcing a really large bounty for creating an altcoin based on it.
With the lack of interest and constant bumping, I was considering moving it between project development and altcoin subforum; the huge create-an-altcoin bounty made me think the latter were more suitable (or at least, would get you the attention you want).
CIYAM's problem solved. gmaxwell has given good points for moving it, if it is undone, please consider not following what you did earlier. -MZ |
|
|
|
but project development is still to do with bitcoin projects right? this is way above my head though
His project is Bitcoin related but it may not fit in Development & Technical Discussion and that's why, I suggested Project Development. Edit: Solved. There hasn't been any real interest or discussion in it in technical-development-- This isn't meant as an affront on your efforts: You don't see similar noise about related (and I think better and more relevant) projects being worked on by multiple people on the Bitcoin Core team (moxiebox), simply because they're also not mature, and not yet interesting to a wider audience.
The last updates I saw on it were repeated duplicate threads announcing a really large bounty for creating an altcoin based on it.
With the lack of interest and constant bumping, I was considering moving it between project development and altcoin subforum; the huge create-an-altcoin bounty made me think the latter were more suitable (or at least, would get you the attention you want).
-MZ |
|
|
|
No it's just mining
So another cloud mining ponzi. If not, post a block you solved or post a TXID of a payout from a legit cloud mining or atleast a photo of your mining farm(won't trust you with a photo though). -MZ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
