Change my rank to JR.member Thanks

Since you keep posting your shitty arguments and ''proofs'' :

Answers from religious doctrine are rarely adequate for nonbelievers. In fact, many fervent believers in God reject the argument about God’s timelessness because even timeless beings need explanations for their existence. But if God is the creator of all things, and yet also requires cause, we face an infinite regress of causes. The only way to avoid this infinite regress problem is to state — as Christian theology has always done — that God is the first cause and is entirely self existent, meaning the reason for God’s existence is contained within the very definition of God.
While this viewpoint certainly may be attractive, it still fails to convince skeptics who are more likely to favor the idea that the universe contains within itself the reason for its own existence. If that could be true of God, why couldn’t it be true of the universe? There is certainly reason to be skeptical about the common sense intuition that everything must have a cause or that everything must have a reason to be as it is. This perennial assumption has been challenged by the physics of the 20th century that uncovered a mysterious quantum world where things often do not appear to have reason to be the way they are.
The common sense assumption that everything must have a cause or a reason to be as it is also suffers from what is called the fallacy of composition. This fallacy comes about when we assume that properties of the parts apply to the whole. For example, just because every member of the human race has a mother, we cannot infer that the human race itself has a mother. Similarly, a collection of spherical things would not itself have to be spherical. In discussions about the origins of the universe, we would say that just because every individual part of the universe has a cause, that does not mean that the entire universe has a cause.
The realization that our universe had some sort of beginning has opened up exciting new conversations about origins. In some ways, a universe with a beginning seems to beg for a cause. But if the universe came into being from nothing , it becomes deeply problematic to speak of anything having caused the universe to exist. Some cosmologists would argue that our universe is the result of an uncaused quantum fluctuation. Such fluctuations do not have causes in the traditional sense, so they argue this does away with our universe needing a cause. But there is a significant problem that  the vacuum that fluctuates is not nothing. Quantum vacuums — which are what you get when you remove from space all the particles and energy — are real. They have activity, laws and rules. Our universe may have fluctuated into existence from such a vacuum, but the vacuum remains unexplained.
Cosmologist Lee Smolin suggests in Life of the Cosmos, that black holes can give birth to new universes. He proposes that our present universe emerged out of a black hole in some other “meta-universe.” And perhaps our universe is presently birthing new universes. Such a process, while clearly speculative, provides a caution against extrapolating from common sense notions of causality to philosophical conclusions about the nature of all of reality.

Why would it be off-topic? Because you dont want to talk about it because obviously you cant refute shit

How do you prove that fetuses know about the existance of God?

You are OP, i know it, why are you making new accounts all the time to bump the thread? No one is going to invest anything in your scam site

Didnt you read? He was not lucky he was cheating.

I dont know what you mean, it takes 2 million bets using martingale at 1 sat base bet to get 0.01 PROFIT not to reach 0.01 as a bet

I was OBVIOUSLY kidding, you are a bit too mad you dont even see the jokes now, you gotta calm down man

Obviously its a conspiration made by the atheists, they are all liers, always come here with their logical reasoning, their overwhelming evidences and proofs and we have to believe that instead of The Holy Bible?? PFF atheists = bad

The faucet pays really low compared to min bet, i couldnt even bet more than 5 times before loosing, you should increase faucet rewards or make the min bet lower because like this there is no way for new players to try the site at all

Dinosaurs? PFFF THATS A MYTH THEY DONT EXIST, Fossils?? PFF THEY WERE MADE BY ATHEISTS TO DECIEVE US FROM BELIEVING IN GOD

Funny thing is that people was saying that it was a promotion thing made by you or someone from primedice and turns out it was a cheater

Well some btc casinos dont have a limit, are you sure about that tho? Any links to that scientist report?

No evidence of god there, what if instead of God being timeless actually the real God is THE GIANT SPAGUETTI MONSTER, HE IS THE TRUE GOD HE IS TIMELESS AND HE CREATED THE UNIVERSE AND HERE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 YOU CAN CHECK MY PROOFS FOR IT, ALL HAIL THE SPAGUETTI MONSTER

It is, they obviously have the multiplier to lose less money afterall its a faucet and its giving you free money but if you want to gamble dont do it there

How is evolution unscientific if evolution is only based in science? Do you even know what evolution means or are you on of those morons that believe we came from monkeys?

What the fuck is the level thing? 10.000 usd to buy levels?? Who is gonna do that

Dooglus said the user knew the seed. It was not luck

Oh. In that case you were right 100 wins in a row is something almost impossible (something like 0.00000000000000000000000000007889 %) if my math is correct lel

Well with bitcoins might actually be better to gamble because some bitcoin casinos dont have a min bet or a max bet but casinos with money do have a max bet on red/black type of bets so its harder to use, for example, martingale. But with bitcoins if you have a lot you could make some money even using martingale, of course you would have to quit at some point.