The global "bubble" of IoT will only continue to inflate, it is still just an instrument to increase the limits of its strength. But if on this background understandable finances provided by non-virtual commodity and intellectual assets will begin to form, we will also see that the world and history will eventually choose.
I hope u are not the person who thinks that btc is also a bubble.. |
|
|
|
|
The level of excitement around the "Internet of Things" (IoT), all these "network heaters", causes some confusion. It seemed, would be, so what? Why such rates and budgets? Let me remind you that only IBM, not the first player in this sector, is ready to invest only $ 3 billion in its IoT-platform (software only) why?
|
|
|
|
|
I can not imagine that IoT really worked on a large scale without Exxor or the equivalent because of the security requirements and the absolute need for interaction
|
|
|
|
By the way, do you have something of IoT in your house?
If wifi lighting and Amazon Echo can stay in this list, my answer is yes |
|
|
|
So transaction security is actually reliant on the subsequent transaction volume for the overall network?
I imagine if the attacker simply chooses to mount his attack during a period of negligible transaction volume (thus low weight build-up on the legitimate tangle).
Yes, we assume that there is a constant flow of transactions. If it's not the case then merchants should rise confirmation threshold during such hours. Like, if you send your Nexus to wrong address, it will not be received until the receiver signature is verified and will return back to your account. It is said on media that mentions about exxor on their website |
|
|
|
|
It has amazing tech and can actually be used in the real world because it can handle the numbers among other things. I will not be surprised if we see this being implemented in future game releases as companies, and especially companies that develop games, love those micro transactions. Now you have something which is free, fast and secure.
|
|
|
|
IBM and young novice.. Looks like Bill Gates in 1980  Good luck devs in your product! I think that romantic story will never repeat. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, who are online. The project looks like IOTA. And I was interested in IOTA ICO. So I have something to say. I heard that IOTA is, in fact, centralised and the transactions are not protected.
Haven't heard anything about this. Could you tell us more? Oh, I can't remember in fact details of this analyse. There was a lot of scary tech words.. Let me find the article.. Here it is. MIT (MIT Digital Currency Initiative) has published an IOTA code audit, providing one of the largest reports on bugs in the history of Crypto-Currency. This report demonstrated the vulnerability in the core of the cryptographic library IOTA, which allowed to destroy coins of any user of the system or to access them. The largest bug that appears in the audit was found in the IOTA kernel hash partition. Hold your horses dude, the bugs were fixed after they were found. That's also what developing is about, constantly looking for weak spots and fix them. Furthermore IOTA had a sort of protection mechanism in their source code, so people could not copy their system without license. That's perfectly fine. Ether devs are fudding because they couldn't see the huge market capital IOTA was about to gain. IOTA is here and will stay guys. If you like it or not. Taking cheap shots by some devs by posting about this even after IOTA fixed the bugs and admitted that they have a protection mechanism in their source code. Is low life shit. Oh, that's my fault. Thank for that info, bros. It's hard to be informed in that huge industry.. I actually sold IOTA (MIOTA) coins about 2 weeks ago |
|
|
|
Hey guys, who are online. The project looks like IOTA. And I was interested in IOTA ICO. So I have something to say. I heard that IOTA is, in fact, centralised and the transactions are not protected.
Haven't heard anything about this. Could you tell us more? Oh, I can't remember in fact details of this analyse. There was a lot of scary tech words.. Let me find the article.. Here it is. MIT (MIT Digital Currency Initiative) has published an IOTA code audit, providing one of the largest reports on bugs in the history of Crypto-Currency. This report demonstrated the vulnerability in the core of the cryptographic library IOTA, which allowed to destroy coins of any user of the system or to access them. The largest bug that appears in the audit was found in the IOTA kernel hash partition. |
|
|
|
Hey guys, who are online. The project looks like IOTA. And I was interested in IOTA ICO. So I have something to say. I heard that IOTA is, in fact, centralised and the transactions are not protected.
Haven't heard anything about this. Could you tell us more? Oh, I can't remember in fact details of this analyse. There was a lot of scary tech words.. Let me find the article.. |
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, who are online. The project looks like IOTA. And I was interested in IOTA ICO. So I have something to say. I heard that IOTA is, in fact, centralised and the transactions are not protected.
|
|
|
|
But what about information security? How exactly do the developers intend to provide security within their ecosystem?
What exactly do you mean? I mean technical details. The platform includes many different elements. Payment system, trading terminal. system of analytics, etc. How the safety of the various elements of this large system will be implemented. I do not think that information of this kind should be disclosed. Why not? I want to be sure that I'm investing in a reliable, secure project. If such information will be, then I think a little later. Closer to the project implementation stage. And when will the stage of project development begin? Maybe it will be possible to participate in the beta test of software products? The alpha and beta version of the product will be introduced in the spring of 2018 (if you look at a road map). In regards to beta testing, you can directly contact the developers in the chat telegram. |
|
|
|
But what about information security? How exactly do the developers intend to provide security within their ecosystem?
What exactly do you mean? I mean technical details. The platform includes many different elements. Payment system, trading terminal. system of analytics, etc. How the safety of the various elements of this large system will be implemented. I do not think that information of this kind should be disclosed. Why not? I want to be sure that I'm investing in a reliable, secure project. If such information will be, then I think a little later. Closer to the project implementation stage. |
|
|
|
But what about information security? How exactly do the developers intend to provide security within their ecosystem?
What exactly do you mean? I mean technical details. The platform includes many different elements. Payment system, trading terminal. system of analytics, etc. How the safety of the various elements of this large system will be implemented. I do not think that information of this kind should be disclosed. |
|
|
|
But what about information security? How exactly do the developers intend to provide security within their ecosystem?
What exactly do you mean? |
|
|
|
Do developers have experience in developing such projects? If they have any similar projects that they would be doing?
Yes, they have one successful project behind them. which they were engaged in. What is this project? Where can I read it? The Token Fund this is one of their successful projects, you can google it and look at it. If they already have one project that is an investment currency fund, why would they need a second project in this area? Are not these projects the same? Tokenbox and that project are completely different! The Token Fund this is an investment fund, and the tokenbox is an entire ecosystem for similar funds and investors. Tokenbox unites at once 2 categories: funds with traders and investors, this is its uniqueness!  Hmm.. That is it turns out. The Token Fund could exist on the Tokenbox platform? Exactly! |
|
|
|
Do developers have experience in developing such projects? If they have any similar projects that they would be doing?
Yes, they have one successful project behind them. which they were engaged in. What is this project? Where can I read it? The Token Fund this is one of their successful projects, you can google it and look at it. If they already have one project that is an investment currency fund, why would they need a second project in this area? Are not these projects the same? Tokenbox and that project are completely different! The Token Fund this is an investment fund, and the tokenbox is an entire ecosystem for similar funds and investors. Tokenbox unites at once 2 categories: funds with traders and investors, this is its uniqueness! |
|
|
|
Do developers have experience in developing such projects? If they have any similar projects that they would be doing?
Yes, they have one successful project behind them. which they were engaged in. What is this project? Where can I read it? The Token Fund this is one of their successful projects, you can google it and look at it. |
|
|
|
Do developers have experience in developing such projects? If they have any similar projects that they would be doing?
Yes, they have one successful project behind them. which they were engaged in. |
|
|
|
Their bounty campaign has already started?
Yes, for a couple of days already (if I'm not mistaken) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
