Quoting suchmoon post as it is and the message was successfully verified using http://brainwalletx.github.io/#verify?vrAddr=1A8DePhATaFEyNBJpuybCA8oYUUZEgUraP&vrMsg=This%20is%20suchmoon%202018-06-17.%20I%20control%20bitcointalk%20accounts%20"suchmoon"%20and%20(temporarily)%20"Gleb%20Gamow".&vrSig=HM71xTAaD8xyx7ciTaPTmKLBp7Y7Rzm9uQ5MIdhUJh6ZVUPtz2mAEsiyI%2F4BS5ZQVDnsSnHSWWBw4ur5UjzgxAU%3D

Suchmoon has at least one old address 1A8DePhATaFEyNBJpuybCA8oYUUZEgUraP (https://web.archive.org/web/20140403105622/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771), if you still have access to it you can sign a message with it...although I don't consider this mandatory.

By signing a message, you prove that the staked Bitcoin address is yours.
So, for example, in case your account get hacked, you can create a new one then sign a new message with that Bitcoin address so the admin can restore the hacked account to you.

This is a too bad start for Argentina and for him especially. I consider Islande as the one winning the game and I passed the extra 5 minutes asking the referee (in the front of the TV ofc) to end the game, poor Maradona, Messi failed him
Let's see the performance of Croatie and Nigeria first in this word cup before giving more speculation about this group.

Hope it will not be a one side match (boring one), Argentina could end it with +2 goals difference and someone has to show his skills and try to beat the actual record of CR.

Posting this mainly to keep following the topic
+
Can't theymos or Cyrus check the ip addresses? all the previous pms? Find a link between the reported accounts? It is better than speculating whether the account changed hands or not after being already tagged.
(and btw why is Phinnaeus Gage asleep from a +year?)

1- Yes if you tag an account with a negative trust then you will add to it a negative score.
For example i have 0: -0 / +0, if you add a negative trust to me, you will see -2: -1 / +0 and when you enter to the trust page, you will find your comment on the "Trusted feedback", that's because in "your" setting "you" are part of the default trust. Now for me or for any other member who didn't add you in "our" default trust, nothing will change, we will keep seeing invoking having 0: -0 / +0 but if we look closely to the "Untrusted feedback" and we press "Show ratings" we will find your feedback.

2- If you add someone who isn't part of depth 1 or depth 2 to your default trust, you will see that some Bitcointalkers that had previously 0 trust with -2 and the opposite things for the others which depends from the type of the feedback he left : Negative or positive.
Now if you exclude (~ then name) someone from depth 1 or 2 from your trust settings, his feedbacks will not appear for you anymore in the Trusted feedback but instead in the Untrusted feedback and thus means you will see his feedbacks deducted from the trust rating of users.

3- theymos for example is depth1, think about it like a grandfather, he trusts his children and add them to his circle so they become a depth2 default trust members. Then those children trusted respectively their children also so they become depth3 and so on, so the next generation become depth4.
Press the "Hierarchical view" at the end of the page to have an idea about this.
You can trust only depth1 (theymos, HostFat, dooglus, Maged, dserrano5, OgNasty, Tomatocage,
SaltySpitoon, philipma1957, Cyrus, Blazed, hilariousandco, OldScammerTag) or depth1+2 or 1+2+3 or the four.
Now you can edit your trust settings as you wish and you can personalise it by adding or excluding any member you like but keep in mind that the others will always see depth2 as the default trust (apart from some members who edited it of course).

I hope I was clear in my explanation 

Awesome game, this match should be the final one it would be the best and yeah CR did a good job.
Hope we will see better games in the next days 

Winning with an own-goal at last minutes isn't something promising, and chances of Morocco decreased significantly now. We will see the game between the boys in the iberian peninsula before giving conclusions about who will pass to the next round.

There is a neutral trust also.
What you are seeing now is the default trust system, some users who edited their trust settings see other ratings.. So -32 for you, is 0 for another one, it depends from the guys you trust or not.
And for the point of banning them, the forum indicated that it will not moderate the trust.

Prefer to not underestimate the Russian but yeah with Salah it is possible. For the Saudi 10-0 is possible but hell who cares about soccer when they (crown prince obviously) cut the rice importation from you...a little bit serious : politics will have an influence in this match and i doubt the Egyptians will beat the Saudi with more than 2-3 goals

Funny pic, i like the odds of Japan, Australia, Korea and KSA especially.
I could fix this by :
- changing the title to chances of kicking the whole staff
- new odds = 1/actual_odds

Ok i prefer to lock the topic since it appears that we will see more off-topic replies than the ones i was looking to see.
Thanks anyway.

Don't worry the record will be beaten by Brazil (not again ) Panama (VS England or Belgium) or Australia (VS France). Those game have a great potential of many goals.

For sure cryptocurrencies changed our lives somehow but i am talking mainly about bitcointalk as a forum and the way it affected our daily lives

A high score of 5-0 prove in fact that there is 0 home advantage and there is 0% of luck.
The Saudi team is weak and the Russian played well, besides Putin was there so no jokes (just kidding) and the big idiot Saudi crown prince was also there so in his face  

I thought about seeing your response to this question since I experienced a weird thing today.
Dreams are something that we experienced all and it has a variety of themes. Today, my dream was consisted in being banned from bitcointalk, i don't remember many details but I remember reporting shitposts then posting something controversial tho? then a mod (dunno but theymos or h&co say to me something now) banning me then I woke up or at least that's what I remember at the moment.

Bitcointalk is being a part from my life now
So did you experience something similar?
This topic isn't intended for shit-posting and I will remove only low-quality posts...

Can't you people just make a quick search in the last 2 pages at least to find out whether your topic is a duplicated one or not? I am tired from reporting for real... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4452291.0
Lock your topic please.

Edit : pretty sure no one of the user who posted after me read my post. You guys are just bunch of spammers...

Is it really hard to figure it out alone?
Look at the end of mprep post...
If you could help with another one then welcome

I believe this is an auto-bot, we will figure this out soon... Edit : 100% an auto-bot was detected!

The exchanges could just force the European citizens (+ Japanese) where the KYC is imposed afaik to reveal their identities, without forcing it for others from countries that didn't have any regulations yet, no? Or should the exchanges impose these rules to everyone in this planet or else it will be prohibited?

An image taken from the cited study