Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 03:34:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
501  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [NEWS] Infinitecoin trading sites info, IFC on: March 09, 2014, 06:11:19 PM
Who is forcing it on to exchanges? BTW learn how economics works, more exchanges holding and trading coins means more coins being held for longer. If you want to blame anyone blame Cryptsy, they have been holding IFC holders hostage for well over a month. Also you complain about there not being enough services but I don't see you helping to build any, just sitting there on a fat load of coins complaining its not making you more money for doing nothing.

not for long.  don't worry though.  Its going to take some time.  Plus since it is on so many exchanges and if the exchanges maintain a low delta I should be able to sell it faster than when it was just on Cryptsy with minimal impact to the price.

Trust me I'm not going to dump it all at once.  That isn't profitable for me.  I will probably only account for a 10 to 20% increase in trading volume.

As for not supporting the coin?  I traded it in the beginning and kept the network humming along for the first couple months.  I made the network strong by increasing the total hashrate.  I did my part.

So your saying "I don't support the coin" but your holding onto a whole bunch of them all the same. You contradict yourself! You say it'll now be easier to sell as there are more exchanges, but then previously complain about to many exchanges, I'm confused with your logic!

You talk of the management of IFC but I doubt you know many of the current management team, I'd say 10% at best. The whole structure had a complete over hall a little over a month ago. The type of development now ongoing does take time and resources. We are not going to spout off publicly about what we are doing, that's a poor business practice.

Your entitled to your opinion but please base that opinion on the facts not your misguided perceptions! Ty.

I was saying that I did support the coin  (in the past).  Now that it has been spread to so many exchanges but has not had the same growth in utility (who uses it and at what websites), it has an unhealthy balance so I'm not supporting it any more.  IFC was a good experiment in what happens to coins when they have fast halving of rewards.  Not that it is past the halving stage I don't see any new useful features being implemented to make it worth mining.  The mining network is weak.

As to how easy it is to sell.  Again I stated that it will be faster to sell if the exchanges maintain a low delta.  When a security is hosted on several exchanges a sale on one may impact the speculative prices on others.  If sales are timed accordingly you can eliminate the arbitrage opportunities and prevent anyone else from trying to game your trades.  So yes sales will be faster.  However a problem exists in that having many exchanges diffuses the quantity that you can sell at any given point.  If we only had IFC/LTC on cryptsy then all eyes would be on that market and that along  If I put up 1mil IFC for sales people would react quickly and adjust their bids/asks.  It's harder to mask large sales in the order book.  But now that it is on several exchanges I can sell a large order and mask it without damaging the charts too much.  But it all depends on liquidity.  IFC isn't trading much on some of the other exchanges so I just ignore them.

Yes management did change.  I noticed the change because I was PM'd by a couple of you asking me to give you my IFC to support it.  I tried to be polite when I said I didn't want to and then everyone got rude about it.  So that was the first black mark for the new management.  Then the push to get it on many exchanges, more bounties and more giveaways, but I didn't see any new commerce channels in the same time or improvements in the network.  I gave IFC about 9 months and I think that is a good amount of time for a coin to prove itself.

I'll keep IFC on the radar and if I see improvements I like then I'll probably return by buying back in or mining it again.  If I see some significant changes over the next 2-3 months (probably how long it will take to sell the 3.75bill) I'll hold off selling the rest.

Also it is all my opinion, that it true.  It is my perception of what is going on around IFC.  But perception is created not just by me but by the outward events that transpire.  Maybe it's not just my outlook on IFC but how you went about marketing it that caused me to decide on selling it.
502  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Mazacoin : Why little interest? on: March 09, 2014, 04:33:51 AM
I am really surprised.
Why AUR became popular so fast? and Mazacoin with no risk of banning or anything not so popular??

AUR just went up to 0.046 while MZC dropped to 0.00003 ?
the thing is that Iceland government will most likely go against the currency while MZC have no such risk.

MZC attracted media coverage just like AUR.


Is it bcoz, investors got into AUR first and had nothing left to invest in MZC?
Or they are planning to invest in MZC after the airdrop?
Or bcoz of exaggerated marketcap due to premined coins

Would it have been successful if it came before Auroracoin?


Edit: found another thread with similar topic

Usual Disclosure: I own a little MZC, no AUR, and BTC and various altcoins
MZC is just a tiny fraction of my altcoins. The reason I bought is the same as above. I am not asking you to put your money into it or anything.

I just want to know whether I missed out anything




Also why is 42coin trading at 95 BTC a coin? Not even 2 coins exist!
Should i sell or hold? Plz advice

The first scam is the easiest.  It's all about the low hanging fruit.  Once peopel get wise to teh scam its harder to pull it off the second time.
503  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Best long shot for the lottery win? on: March 09, 2014, 03:19:57 AM
504  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why Auroracoin may be the most exciting altcoin of 2014 on: March 09, 2014, 03:08:21 AM
A lol of stories are still told about the dead.  This coin is dead but stories will still be told about it.
505  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ECU: new virtual coin, not cryto but regulated, alternative to Bitcoin et al. on: March 09, 2014, 03:04:51 AM
As soon as you create centralized control you open the risk of easy corruption because any company, or governement can come in a seize it.  This is a useless currency.
506  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Yo I'll tell you what I want what I reallyreally want... on: March 09, 2014, 03:01:55 AM
better taste in music?
507  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: AUR about to go up again: Most mined coin in the world on: March 09, 2014, 03:01:26 AM
Wonder who's going to buy all those freshly mined coins?

People doubling down when they bought at 300.
508  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: BT'er - "about us" changes on: March 09, 2014, 01:46:35 AM
not sure if anyone cares or if in proper forum.
just something ive noticed on BTer over the last few days...

the about changed, and apparently the ownership, or owners name at least.


 
Quote
About US
Bter.com is maintained and operated by "MYIP Team" who have successfully maintained

a number of websites, over the past few years. Bter is secured by
> SSL safe connection
> Web Application Firewall (WAF)
> Manually confirmed withdrawal
> Google TOTP Two-factor Authentication
We are doing everything we can to provide our users the safest, most efficient and

user friendly exchange platform possible.

--------------changed recently to:


Bter.com is maintained and operated by MaxCloud Inc. which was registered in British

Virgin Islands in 2011. Bter is secured by
> SSL safe connection
> Web Application Firewall (WAF)
> Cold wallet technologies
> Google TOTP Two-factor Authentication
We are doing everything we can to provide our users the safest, most efficient and

user friendly exchange platform possible.

From the rubble of mtGox comes a new step toward transparency.
509  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [NEWS] Infinitecoin trading sites info, IFC on: March 07, 2014, 08:10:42 PM
Who is forcing it on to exchanges? BTW learn how economics works, more exchanges holding and trading coins means more coins being held for longer. If you want to blame anyone blame Cryptsy, they have been holding IFC holders hostage for well over a month. Also you complain about there not being enough services but I don't see you helping to build any, just sitting there on a fat load of coins complaining its not making you more money for doing nothing.

not for long.  don't worry though.  Its going to take some time.  Plus since it is on so many exchanges and if the exchanges maintain a low delta I should be able to sell it faster than when it was just on Cryptsy with minimal impact to the price.

Trust me I'm not going to dump it all at once.  That isn't profitable for me.  I will probably only account for a 10 to 20% increase in trading volume.

As for not supporting the coin?  I traded it in the beginning and kept the network humming along for the first couple months.  I made the network strong by increasing the total hashrate.  I did my part.
510  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 05:23:59 AM
That's exactly what has and should be done. Screw around with them, test them. That's how you establish confidence.


Hashtags? I've never used a hashtag...You're pretty 'trendy' for an antiquity  Smiley

511  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 05:13:22 AM
How about you address the real concern I presented
I do have an issue with moralists  intentionally causing other people financial harm, whether it is undertaken as a strategy to shape behavior or because they have failed at technical persuasion and have no other means at their disposal to get what they want.

Hey about moralists that intentionally cause people financial harm.  Does that include subpar developers that produce exploits because of bad software design, or the inability to correct said flaws before the hole is exploited.

If a upright citizen reports to a bank manager that the back door does not have a lock of it, does the bank manager call the police to arrest the citizen, or does he go out and buy a goddamned lock?
512  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 05:04:39 AM


Also, how have I never seen the Mr. Rogers giving the finger .gif? That was mildly shocking.


I know, right?  I've been waiting all night to use it.  Just gave up and posted it.  Devinate keeper.
513  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 05:01:31 AM

Look man i'm getting low on popcorn here...

It's a fools bet.  He's already prepped to exploit AUR coin.  The game is rigged.  Besides that wasn't what I was looking for.  I want to see him hammer MAZACOIN.  But he can't do it.  He's already backed Aururacoin and isn't going to drop that exploit to try to feed a troll.  Too bad, so sad



At least your straight up honest.

I give you that.


~BCX~

It's a Thursday night and I'm down a half bottle of scotch.  I'm lookin for entertainment.  I may be ripped but I still have enough sense that to place a stupid bet.  I'm not some altcoin dev.
514  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:58:12 AM
Bitcoins, bullies and taunts. Judges, juries and executioners. Where did all the flowers go, long time a passing ...

515  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:55:21 AM


That is irrelevant. You made your intent clear in your original statement.


Glad you can still read after the sun goes down. My ol' man I guess is probably about your age (50's -ish) and he has a hard reading after dark. Intent hasn't changed. I see in another thread users are advocating for KGW to be deployed sooner than 5400, I'm all for it.


~BCX~

Well make sure you publish a snail mail address where legal service can be delivered if you have the balls.

516  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:53:12 AM

Look man i'm getting low on popcorn here...

It's a fools bet.  He's already prepped to exploit AUR coin.  The game is rigged.  Besides that wasn't what I was looking for.  I want to see him hammer MAZACOIN.  But he can't do it.  He's already backed Aururacoin and isn't going to drop that exploit to try to feed a troll.  Too bad, so sad

517  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:40:27 AM

Son, I was writing unix device drivers while you were still pissing your pants.


My dad said the same thing back in '98 when I tried to get him to get DSL and ditch AOL dial up after I told him he didn't understand modern computers. You must be an antique which explains why you have this overwhelming misunderstanding of what constitutes a crime and what doesn't.

~BCX~

hey look, i don't have to prove anything to anybody. Why don't you tone down the rhetoric. What you are planning to do is essentially to cause financial harm to unknown people by exploiting a vulnerability in AUR. That's the bottom line here. In my mind, that's criminal activity.



518  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:33:41 AM

Son, I was writing unix device drivers while you were still pissing your pants.

Why don't you tell him you were whittling abacuses too.  That stodgy I'm an old timie programmer nonsense is worthless these days.
519  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Undervalued coins on: March 07, 2014, 04:27:44 AM
LTC is overvalued. There are tons of alts better than LTC. It only gained in popularity due to it being at the right place at the right time. People who missed BTC train wanted to board another one.

Not really  it all boils down to utility.  All the other alts are only accepted at a fraction of the places LTC is.  So as you stated people who missed the BTc AND LTC trains want to board another one.  LOL
520  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 07, 2014, 04:26:15 AM
There is no crime here, little kid.

The only 'crime' that has been committed stemmed directly from the developer and everyone who simply jumped in and immediately attempted  to pull others into their con.


You people are disgusting, you aren't even capable of asking basic questions about the difficulty adjustment algorithm. Just grab grab grab, con con con.




Don't call me 'kid' bubba. You're just a whiner. What gives you the right to judge other people's actions and advocate for vigilante action against their chosen way ? Your crime is one of arrogance and hate for altcoins. Through your ill considered act of judgement you are willing to cause financial harm to others in pursuit of your ideological beliefs.



Yeah clearly is is not a 'kid'.  He still has to get to toddler before you can even call him a kid.  jeez
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!