Damn, the forum is really taking this quarantine thing seriously. Really, its dumb to temp ban the participants of a giveaway thread in Games & Rounds, or anywhere for that matter. The mod should just delete the thread and temp ban the thread creator. It seems like a very strange move on your sig campaign's part to ask members to do something like this. Was it a polite request or was there some implied pressure? I'd refuse to do it simply because I don't want my unread replies bit polluted.
Knowing jeremypwr it was probably just a polite notification that there was a contest was going on. |
|
|
|
All the big cities are deserted, reality surpasses fiction again, only the Martians remain to appear and we will have the complete apocalyptic pack.
 |
|
|
|
@sunce33 I hate to break it to you, but this doesn't look good. What were you thinking - that nobody will notice?
We tried to warn you a few months back, didn't we? When you posted the same translation under Serbian and Croatian subforums (and on some other forums). Isn't that cheating? And your defense is that you are not a fraud?!
Does this thread say what I think it says? ..
Jovane, brate, prijatelju... Cemu ovaj post? Jel to tvoj prevod i imas li dozvolu korisnika @sunce33 da to copy/paste ovde? Koliko li oni placaju ovakve profile ovde... Kako im nije dosadilo vise da ih masa reportuje... Nemam pojma, ali ovo se smatra kao plagiarizam i za to se banuje nalog na prvu. Al eto, potencijalnih 20 dolara je ipak bitnije. Basically jovan85 is being accused of plagiarizing the work of sunce33 by posting the same translation from the Croatian board... That's probably why he deleted the post which is a word-for-word copy/paste of the Croatian translation. He registered in that bounty with both accounts. And the fact that jovan85 accidentally used the sunce33 twitter handle makes it a sealed deal. They are definitely the same person. jovan85 should have been banned for plagiarism but he deleted the post before it was reported, thus there is no longer anything to ban (though he may have done this in past bounties). |
|
|
|
Namecoin should dump all that .bit shyte and concentrate on being just a currency like the bitcorn
 -1 Merit |
|
|
|
P.S I especially want to ask members who have given me negative trust : LeGaulois, nutildah, Coolcryptovator,
In what way did I damage you, what did I take or do to you that you took offense to me?
I do not even participate in the discussions, I have never accused anyone of anything.
I am old woman I just working on bounty and anything else. Even many of these bounties are failures and many bounty manager is scam.
I'm only guilty because having a friend here and working with him.
This is my explanation. You think what you want,. and I know what is truth.
There's a lot of instances where you both work in the same bounty, and then one address sends their tokens to the other, and then the tokens get deposited into Etherdelta. I am hesitant to unfairly red tag people, but this is a practice commonly used by alt accounts cheating bounties. Unfortunately the excuses you've provided are pretty common among those used by an account after it gets caught having alt accounts. Even if I were to change the contents of my tag on your account, it would still be red for merit swapping. I tend to go by the guidelines established in this post when leaving negative trusts, as they are a collection of things discussed and agreed upon by much of the DT community: Unacceptable behavior that will result in a red tag:
Attempted or successful fraud or theft.
Business activity that resulted in the loss of funds by others.
Account sales
Merit sales / swapping
Harassing a DT
Offering escrow without a track record
Asking for a no collateral loan
Shilling / advertising MLM or ponzi
Escrowing for themselves
Late loan repayments / loan defaults.
You were clearly engaged in merit swapping as the posts receiving merit are simply bounty authentication posts and not informative or useful whatsoever. But I never said a merit font was giving their alt any merits - they were busted for handing out 50 merits in one go - that's what the topic of this thread is about - nutildah is trying to rewrite history.
You're talking about TMAN and he wasnt "busted" for anything. He sent 50 merits to a post he thought was useful, to a member he thought (at the time) was deserving of them -- NOT to a proof of authentication post. He certainly didn't get 25 merits in return for it (he got 3 from The-Devil, I just looked it up), and it wasn't from a suspected alt account. YOU are the one trying to rewrite history. |
|
|
|
I think this type of promotion is unreliable.
I agree. Talking to yourself with alt accounts in order to advertise a project makes that project look like a scam. |
|
|
|
|
I occasionally wander into the altcoin discussion board looking for posts to merit and am almost always met with scammers and spammers. Its pretty disappointing, to be honest.
This is a very stupid scam you are promoting. At least you are not pointing to a website or telling people to buy the token from you.
|
|
|
|
I'll remove it when he will remove ABitNut from the trust list because ABitNut is not a trustable person since he gave me a negative feedback for no reason and that i don't deserve a negative feedback. That is the TECshare fault if ABitNut is in this list.
You had a chance to help yourself out earlier when you PM'd ABitNut, but you blew it: I've not been active on this forum for long. But I got a notification that I had a private message so I checked it out: Few years ago you gave me a wrong feedback "untrust" saying that i'm an altcoin which is false. Now i gave you one negative feedback too saying that you are a scammer.
Delete your sh*t.
I checked the feedback I left. Yes, I called you out for being an alt account years ago. And that's exactly what my feedback means. I (as an individual) was convinced that the person that controlled your account had multiple accounts. Now I'd be open to reasonable arguments but: 1) Your message to me is rude 2) You're abusing the trust system by leaving false feedback 3) You're accusing me of being a scammer So I'm disinclined to oblige your request. Have a nice weekend. You can't talk to people that way if you want them to do something nice for you. He's the one that referenced his rating to try and get an action from me. I blocked him PMs and moved on.
You did not "move on." You left him a negative trust and called him a scammer. So much for anybody attempting to be the bigger man. |
|
|
|
Hi Loyce I have a question about this item: - It's okay to include your alt-account on your own Trust list. This means you trust the feedback you left from that account. Example:
- Don't include your main account from your alt account(s). This could influence DT1-voting, and although that's not part of this guide, it's bad.
What's the rationale behind saying it is OK for someone to include their alt account in their trust list? If the person adding their alt account is on DT1, that automatically makes their alt DT2, which is arguably more significant of an outcome than an alt including their main account. Just want to know what the thinking behind this is. |
|
|
|
In less than two months, Bitcoin will be halved.
What do you think will be the same trend as with other currencies before and after halving?
For example LTC. Before halving, the price will rise and after it will immediately collapse.
How likely is this scenario?
This is the wrong thread to be meriting your alt accounts in, sonny. Tards coming out of the woodwork today. Must be something in the air. |
|
|
|
I vaguely recall one of the merit fonts getting busted for doing pretty much the same thing not that long ago and the response was they are a merit source and can divvy up the merits as they wish.
A merit source was sending merits to their alt account? Which one? That's even worse than a DT including their alt account in their trust list. I doubt blue Snow is such the newbie they are making themselves out to be - there's plenty of self scratching and back scratching between the DT1's of this forum.
Well, he appears to be Indonesian, so that narrows down the pool quite a bit. Happy sleuthing, Watson. |
|
|
|
I bought 0.35 Bitcoin recently when the price hits $3,850Best decision I ever made, what a profit.  And YES, Bitcoin was already dead long time ago. I take it crypto hasn’t made you much money then during your time involved in it. All that profit on a whole 0.35 BTC, you absolute minnow   I think he was primarily fishing for merits. |
|
|
|
|
Wonder how Lambie feels about the coronavirus.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would anybody use an exchange that has to use such a cheeseball thread bumping service to attract attention to itself? This type of promotion is used mainly by scammers who have no intention of ever developing an organic community.
Stick with one of the trusted options if you are looking to do leveraged trading. Both BitMex and FTX are far, far better and more trustworthy exchanges than this no-name exchange.
I am waiting for reports of Amanpuri with-holding customer funds and preventing withdrawals to start happening any week now. This exchange looks like a scam. It was promoted in the same fashion that scams present themselves. I do not trust it at all.
|
|
|
|
I bought 0.35 Bitcoin recently when the price hits $3,850 Best decision I ever made, what a profit. And YES, Bitcoin was already dead long time ago. O'Rlly? BTC was at that level for all of about 2 minutes, and only on some exchanges... You're a seller of Fakebook groups and advertiser of ICO services? I have doubts of your magnificent claims... |
|
|
|
Looks like merit trading, as that account immediately sent 25 merits to the account that merited him, for this post. Did a bit of research and it appears they both belong to the same person. One account he uses for Croatian translations, the other for Serbian translations. They frequently enroll in the same bounties. sunce33 uses the twitter handle of the same name: Twitter:Week: 7 (09/03/2020)-(13/03/2020) BitcoinTalk Name: sunce33 Your Twitter Account Name: @sunce33 Your Twitter Profile Link: https://twitter.com/sunce33 jovan85 usually uses a different twitter handle but accidentally used it to enroll in one particular bounty (thread is locked): They've been entering the same bounties since 2017. I write on that mail :ask@athenacoin.io but I not get any answer.
I got mail:
Michal Bezvoda, Athena team
23 Nov (9 days ago)
Hello,
could you please check your eth wallet and confirm that you receive all athenas?
Thank you.
Michal
Athena team
I answer but nothing, how long need wait or any answer. In future I hope this project become very successful,because have good concept
Yes I got same message but not receive any reward?Why dev?I understand project not collect money from ICo, but you ask to check if I receive and answer. Any info?Thanks I'm sure connections can be found between their ETH addresses: sunce33 - 0x95D7dadBA22245f4fc8608c60236CbC888BAA032 jovan85 - 0x48755CA1E80b62a724C4F388c498522E7c9f1C86 Yep, sure enough, 18,441 SGC tokens moved from sunce33 to jovan85 on Nov 18, 2017. I would say there's a 95% chance these accounts belong to the same person. I am newbie still learning and reading all post by higher rank here
Sent you 2 merits so now you can rank up -- this was a good find and I will tag both accounts. |
|
|
|
 OK, the last few hours have been totally decoupled, this move especially. |
|
|
|
While I agree it was likely a bio-weapon, and that study seems to make some very strangely worded conclusions for a scientific paper giving me the distinct impression it serves more political purposes than scientific ones. Even if the article is totally accurate, this is only something that excludes genetic engineering, not an accelerated forced mutation process done by raising many generations of the virus in a targeted environment. This would essentially be mostly indistinguishable from natural evolution.
Sorry to burst your bubble but you don't know more about this issue than the authors of this article, who work for the largest non-profit biomedical research organization in the United States. An "accelerated forced mutation process"? Because you have no idea how little you understand about the issue, you will have no way of understanding why you are so incredibly wrong. "This would essentially be mostly indistinguishable from natural evolution."  First of all, there's an entire section of the article called " Evidence for natural evolution". "These two features of the virus, the mutations in the RBD portion of the spike protein and its distinct backbone, rules out laboratory manipulation as a potential origin for SARS-CoV-2" "They conclude that the virus is the product of natural evolution," "Accelerated forced mutation" is NOT the same thing as "natural evolution." They're not saying "similar to natural evolution," they're saying it is natural evolution. But because you are so very very smart you know better than the people whose jobs it is to study the topic day and night, right? They studied the issue. You did not. That is why I support their conclusion: In one scenario, the virus evolved to its current pathogenic state through natural selection in a non-human host and then jumped to humans. This is how previous coronavirus outbreaks have emerged, with humans contracting the virus after direct exposure to civets (SARS) and camels (MERS)...
In the other proposed scenario, a non-pathogenic version of the virus jumped from an animal host into humans and then evolved to its current pathogenic state within the human population. For instance, some coronaviruses from pangolins, armadillo-like mammals found in Asia and Africa, have an RBD structure very similar to that of SARS-CoV-2... over yours: likely a bio-weapon 1,000x, every day of the week. Oh, but let me guess, they are just political pawns used to facilitate a cover-up. And meanwhile you're completely unbiased and just presenting facts as you see them. Right. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
