I have to overclock the memory as much as I can in order to max out my hash rate.

Yes, it was Bithumb.  I feel sorry for anyone that bought at $400 or $450.

Why would that spike Zcash price and not Eth's?

Up 63% at the moment and mining profit is spiking.

My cards run perfectly stable dual mining on only the 8 pin connector but I don't OC them to the extreme.

I always see it mentioned that you don't need to use both the 8 pin and the 6 pin power connector when mining.  But why not?  We are pushing these cards to their limit, why would that not help?  Is it because we are not overclocking the core, just the memory?  Or maybe because we're not actually driving monitors with the cards.

Has anyone tried using both power connectors to see if it does increase the hash rate?

Is there a hard cap on the number of MUSIC coins?

MUSIC is top of the mining list right now, along with Zcash.  It's fun to mine a coin that actually increases in whole numbers rapidly instead of 0.00001 fractions

Some incredible mining profit spikes on Zcash since last night but they only last a few minutes.  My rig makes about $8-9 per day the last week mining ETH/DCR or Zcash and last night Zcash spiked to $11.50 for a few minutes.

I'm even mining it with my AMD cards.  I did not realize how little power 570s and 580s use to mine Zcash compared to ETH and ETH/dual mining.  My 4 AMD cards are using almost 300W less when mining ZCash vs ETH/DCR!  That works out to about 75 cents per day saved on power and everything runs much cooler.  So now I am factoring that into my decisions about what to mine.

More accurate profit calculation and switching seems like the next big thing to be tackled in mining.  There is a lot of opportunity for improvement.  I don't want to depend on profit switching decisions from pools like Mining Pool Hub, that's too limiting.  Ideally the algorithm should take into account past history of your actual mining hardware, performance of the pools used, and everything.

I'd also like to see just an easier to use mining front end.  Awesome Miner is a very good application but configuring all the pools, miners, and templates gets a bit tedious because of all the different screens and mouse clicking involved.  I'd also like to see A.M. more easily handle mixed mining rigs where you want AMD cards to mine one thing and Nvidia cards another thing.  That's doable in A.M. but it could be a lot easier.

Define "performance is a little more".  How exactly?

It absolutely blows my mind that so many people think $250,000 BTC is possible.  That would give it a market cap of over $5 trillion.  To put that into perspective there is only $1.5 trillion in cash U.S. dollars in the entire world.

Get a grip people.

How do you get that to display in EWBF?  I was able to get it displayed in the web browser though using localhost:4028.

I can't get either the 1060 or the 1070 above 2.9 efficiency stable no matter what settings I tweak.

Wattman just displays a white window (or sometimes translucent) in both of those remote viewing apps.  So I literally have no way to use Wattman remotely, I have to plug in a monitor and keyboard/mouse to the rig.  Very irritating.

Why don't I just use Afterburner?  Afterburner doesn't work with my AMD cards, never has.  That's a whole nother problem.

Yes I have 4 AMD cards mining ETH/DCR and 2 Nvidia mining ZEC.  All six devices are mapped to system monitoring.

Both miners show the total number of accepted shares correctly, it's just that the GPU list below shows zeroes for the AMDs.   I figured if the total is known the per-GPU value should be known as well.  Not a big deal, I can always look at the Claymore window if I need to know those values.

Just a suggestion but if some values are not available then I would prefer to see them shown as N/A or blanked out rather than see a zero.  Zero is not the real value.

On the GPUs tab in Awesome Miner my AMD cards are showing 0 for the Accepted progress even though I have plenty of accepted shares that show in the Miners list above it.  My Nvidia cards show the Accepted values ok.

Bug?

I am using Awesome Miner.  I used the Diagnostics feature to view the command line and intensity is set to 64.  This is the command line (user name omitted for privacy reasons):

miner.exe  -di 45 --intensity 64 64 --server us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com --port 20570 --user xxxx --pass x --api 0.0.0.0:4028

I did reach 620 H/s for the 1070 and 1060 but that's still low I think and most of the time it's between 584 and 603.  I hope I can improve this as mining Zcash is pretty profitable at the moment.  I'm going to tweak Afterburner settings next but my current settings work very well for Ethereum mining so I would expect them to work well for Zcash as well.

EDIT:  I was underclocking the core clocks by 100 MHz or so and by changing that to zero it got me up to 656 H/s and by overclocking I'm getting even more.  I have to see what that does to my power load though.  Quite the difference from AMD cards where reducing the core clock doesn't affect hash rate.  

EDIT2:  I have hit 438 H/s on the 1070 by overclocking core by 114 Mhz.  That's better!  But I have to go look at the power meter to see if it's worth it.

Suprnova links to a miner on github.cm on their ZEC page.  github.CM?  Google reports it as a phishing site.

Lame.

I'm only getting 602 H/s from a 8GB 1070 and 4GB 1060.  I was expecting more like 670ish.  WhatToMine says 700 but that's with an 8GB 1060.

The 1070 is doing 339 H/s and the 1060 261 H/s.

26.5 isn't terrible but you could probably get another 1 or 2 with some tweaking.  Many cards just can't reach 29 or 30.