Burst value is now at 100 Satoshi.
Time to change the PR from "pointing fingers" to "promoting" Bursts.
Burst has AT, with all it's projects, Escrow, ...
Pool attacks seems also to be on the rise, that gives me HEADACHE to think of the future of BURST, if it has a future at all.
I don't think that "pool attacks" and "pointing fingers" is the right "PR", does it?
Please don't reply, just promote BURST the right way would be the BEST reply!
How would you propose marketing Burst? Glad you ask (just some thoughts): 1. Stop attacking others. 2. Make more documents, like: 2.a POSITIVE experiences with Burst (all the features it has) 2.b collections of swipe files for social networks 2.c update the documents we have already and put it on a few places, but with a link to the original site, so just in case you do not have the latest version 3. Coordinated promotions, like focus on ONE feature at a time. Lets make a day of the week for promoting Escrow, and feature it, encourage to use it. Other day for a Lucky Draw, other day for mining. 4. Make more Blog entries for "non-techies" 5. Encourage signature files at each social network/emails you use 6. Add links what to do with Bursts (I disagree with the current thinking of keeping it like a painting! I would like to see rather places where I can buy / sell things, short USE it) IronTiga did some pages of that. I lost the link. 7. Encourage to work with Assets, create your own assets, trade with them, ... promote them individually 8. Create slogans, create abbreviations for BURST --- something you can remember If you can make a song, like we have for Bitcoins 9. Make movies: Burst in action, friends are talking about Burst, .... ... |
|
|
|
|
Burst value is now at 100 Satoshi.
Time to change the PR from "pointing fingers" to "promoting" Bursts.
Burst has AT, with all it's projects, Escrow, ...
Pool attacks seems also to be on the rise, that gives me HEADACHE to think of the future of BURST, if it has a future at all.
I don't think that "pool attacks" and "pointing fingers" is the right "PR", does it?
Please don't reply, just promote BURST the right way would be the BEST reply!
|
|
|
|
If i buy some hdd now, my ROI may never happen For example 3 x 4TB drives mining solo 24/7 FOR 60 MONTHs from now on (cost and electricity only for drives) Calculated for Burst price = 0,00000105 and BTC = 230$ |Month|Block |Per Day|Per Month| $ Per|ROI for |ROI with 0,6$ per month
| |Reward| | | Month|11TB(450$)|HDD Electricity Only(12 watt)
1 6634 2073 63044 15,23 -434,77 -435,37
2 6318 1974 60042 14,50 -420,27 -421,47
3 6017 1880 57183 13,81 -406,47 -408,27
4 5731 1791 54460 13,15 -393,31 -395,71
5 5458 1706 51866 12,53 -380,79 -383,79
6 5198 1624 49396 11,93 -368,86 -372,46
7 4950 1547 47044 11,36 -357,50 -361,70
8 4715 1473 44804 10,82 -346,68 -351,48
9 4490 1403 42670 10,30 -336,37 -341,77
10 4276 1336 40639 9,81 -326,56 -332,56
11 4073 1273 38703 9,35 -317,21 -323,81
12 3879 1212 36860 8,90 -308,31 -315,51
13 3694 1154 35105 8,48 -299,83 -307,63
14 3518 1099 33433 8,07 -291,76 -300,16
15 3351 1047 31841 7,69 -284,07 -293,07
16 3191 997 30325 7,32 -276,74 -286,34
17 3039 950 28881 6,97 -269,77 -279,97
18 2894 904 27506 6,64 -263,13 -273,93
19 2757 861 26196 6,33 -256,80 -268,20
20 2625 820 24949 6,03 -250,78 -262,78
21 2500 781 23761 5,74 -245,04 -257,64
22 2381 744 22629 5,46 -239,57 -252,77
23 2268 709 21551 5,20 -234,37 -248,17
24 2160 675 20525 4,96 -229,41 -243,81
25 2057 643 19548 4,72 -224,69 -239,69
26 1959 612 18617 4,50 -220,19 -235,79
27 1866 583 17730 4,28 -215,91 -232,11
28 1777 555 16886 4,08 -211,83 -228,63
29 1692 529 16082 3,88 -207,95 -225,35
30 1612 504 15316 3,70 -204,25 -222,25
31 1535 480 14587 3,52 -200,73 -219,33
32 1462 457 13892 3,35 -197,37 -216,57
33 1392 435 13231 3,20 -194,18 -213,98
34 1326 414 12601 3,04 -191,14 -211,54
35 1263 395 12001 2,90 -188,24 -209,24
36 1203 376 11429 2,76 -185,48 -207,08
37 1145 358 10885 2,63 -182,85 -205,05
38 1091 341 10367 2,50 -180,34 -203,14
39 1039 325 9873 2,38 -177,96 -201,36
40 989 309 9403 2,27 -175,69 -199,69
41 942 294 8955 2,16 -173,53 -198,13
42 897 280 8529 2,06 -171,47 -196,67
43 855 267 8123 1,96 -169,51 -195,31
44 814 254 7736 1,87 -167,64 -194,04
45 775 242 7367 1,78 -165,86 -192,86
46 738 231 7017 1,69 -164,16 -191,76
47 703 220 6682 1,61 -162,55 -190,75
48 670 209 6364 1,54 -161,01 -189,81
49 638 199 6061 1,46 -159,55 -188,95
50 607 190 5773 1,39 -158,16 -188,16
51 579 181 5498 1,33 -156,83 -187,43
52 551 172 5236 1,26 -155,56 -186,76
53 525 164 4987 1,20 -154,36 -186,16
54 500 156 4749 1,15 -153,21 -185,61
55 476 149 4523 1,09 -152,12 -185,12
56 453 142 4308 1,04 -151,08 -184,68
57 432 135 4102 0,99 -150,09 -184,29
58 411 128 3907 0,94 -149,14 -183,94
59 392 122 3721 0,90 -148,25 -183,65
60 373 117 3544 0,86 -147,39 -183,39
You didn't take the resale value (which is even more significant if you buy the hard drives used) and the added value of using the hard drives for storage into account. I would think that most people who mine BURST are using spare hard drives that aren't being used for storage. At least, that's what I intend to do anyway. For less than 10 drives too much time wasted for reading forum/plotting/replotting and installing windows 8(under win7 is total mess with memory). Anyway on working machine may be lags. If you talking about > 50 HDDs, that would be another story. And after 4 years these hdds will be obsolete. I cannot see how the RoI changes with more than 50 HDDs. If the price does not go up, then this coin is also history. It is a pity, because it has AT. |
|
|
|
Oh Elmit - beside your pool charging 33%, you're now 8 blocks off of reality - you may want to kick your wallet so you can continue to steal from your miners and bots.
Why people keep mine in Elmit pool if he scam them? Maybe they dont know they are cheated? Simple solution send to every one msg how he did for invite ppl  That's because Headach does not know how a pool works. Therefore he imagines the missing parts. I am happy with my pool and not a single BURST has been stolen. If you can read the blockchain you CAN verify it, but if you cannot then you are just telling stories. And it does not matter how many accounts you open to attack me here, ... it is still the same, Headache cannot read the blockchain! |
|
|
|
H.
I get the feeling you do not like me, by attacking only me and somehow you are saying contradicting things, like:
You claim that ALL Uray based pools have an error and do not pay out. Now you say, only my pool does not pay out.
You say others do have a link, but I can confirm, that none has a working link. I removed mine too, to be equal.
I really try hard to verify what you are saying, but fail. I might be to stupid, or to tired of carrying 4 tons of books during my moving.
It is therefore always good to have some debuggers, like you, who find things out, I never thought of, like that somebody uses multiple miners on the same IP. That was brilliant! Could it be that this is a public IP (Firewall)? and somebody is running a private network behind? Like an ISP? Or maybe it is an Internet cafe, that would explain the small amounts of mining.
And no, there is no restriction to reply, ... you can reply as often you want, I just will not reply to all.
We don't like you, but that's beside the point. All uray code does have the bug, (inherently) however most other pools using it have fixed it. See, that's the beauty of open source code. We have been telling YOU to fix it, but you haven't even TRIED. We all know you removed the links becuase that is all you could figure out how to do. The thing is, when our stuff goes down, we tell people, and fix it. I'm very aware of the blockex being down. Tiga handles it, and he's busy. But he will fix it, and if he doesn't in a reasonable amount of time, I can. But I prefer to let my people have full control over their projects unless I NEED to step in. I have already setup a completely new VM on my dacentec VMWare host that will be used for the blockex, as it's apparent the current VM isn't powerful or stable enough. You know exactly what you're doing, Elmit (well, as far as the miners and money "issues" on the pool. Basically anything else, no way.) and it would be nice if you would just tell people, and quit being this way. Your stuff would be a lot better if you would just allow people to help you instead of being... well, you. Haitch, I think we should just let this go now, it is clear that this fool will never change. So all we can do is let the community know and move on. No point in continuing this. Everyone can clearly see who is on top in this argument, and I'm certain that people are aware by now of his pool and asset issues. We've done what we can do, maybe now is the time to let it be? I'm not telling you what to do, merely suggesting we just let this idiot be. He's gonna continue doing the same bullshit and we know it. edit: scratch that, screw this guy. I could never spot ANY help, but complains from you and your team. Even the first settings I was asking and got wrong answers. So it seems that your team is just trying to let no other pool beside yours. If you DO know what is wrong, why not tell? I am not the only one using this code. Why not post it as an issue to git hub? No pool has a working link to the transactions(, but I did!) And exactly THAT link was complaint on. So it is a simple fix, as you did: Remove the link! If I know something I help, not so your team! Any question I had was answered as: You are an idiot, you run a pool and you do not know that? THAT kind of attitude makes it impossible to fix things. The asset script IronTiga was completely wrong. Did not fit for that kind of asset. Even the offset of the time was wrong by 21 days or so. All I do for BURST, pool has been criticized by your team. I can live with that. I prepared some surprises though. IronTiga might be busy now, cleaning up after the earthquake, depending where he lives. I suggest to use your VM for now anyway. So, again, read my initial question and try to give your opinion to it. By not answering, by not telling what is wrong with Urays code, you do not make it better. To fix something, the fact must be first seen. I could not yet "catch" such a situation. I was not at the time there, so all can be true, but I believe, based on the attitude towards me, it is more likely not true. When I look at the pool all seems normal. So I started questioning, what if it is true, what could be a reason of not paying out. The first thing I found is, that Uray did not count the transaction fee. If you have a few miners as I had, nothing can happen, because the preset minPayout is set to 250. That means, as long you do not have amount of miners (assuming each transaction fee is 1 Burst) plus the pool fee is less than the 250, nothing will be missed. Further, it should not happen, because the next round pay out keeps a part for the next round. Therefore Never should be all paid out! Next was to look at other pools balance. Again, assuming that Urays code is trying to pay and could not I thought it might be that the balance is too less. So I came to the question. Why some pools have balance close to zero, some have excess above the daily mining. Both values seems for me not right. My conclusion is: If more quality miners are mining, always new rewards flow in and you will not come close to zero. I am not putting my head in the sand. I am listening, but could not find any solid evidence others than hear say. And get back in time and think when it started! Why, out of the blue, IronTiga slammed PetaByte? What do you expect to do? Just let this happen, or just look at other assets? Honestly, I do not care if you like me or not! Lol! However, I gave up to tell you when I see something wrong on your pool, because it is just taken the wrong way. |
|
|
|
|
H.,
I do not understand what you try to say:
1. Is it not allowed to mine on one IP with multiple users?
2. Is it not allowed to mine within a private network with multiple users?
3. Is it not allowed to mine on one hard disk with multiple users?
4. Is it not allowed to mine from UE or Kiev?
5. If you have no idea - as you stated, then why do you answer to my question? Worse, far far away from the question?
I also don't understand your question, why I maintain a zero balance. It is anyway not true, but less than 23.76% of the last day's pay out.
Is it not allowed to have a low balance? Could it be, that the pool paid out all, while other pools keep EXCESSIVE MINER's BURST in the POOL's wallet?
Why are you asking only ME about zero balance and not all other pools?
I don't think that we will shutdown so quickly! Why should we? We have a solid miner base, who are not just registered as miner, but also DO mine. The pool is working fine and your noise does not really bother, ... in fact I find it very amusing. As more you and co talk, as more miners I get.
Glad that a new pool comes up with a .ga at the end, ... I hope he makes a lots of advertisement, .... for me, because .ga are not resolved here. I just need to add: "... or mine at MiningHere", ...
I am already excited to see the new design of your pool. We also consider to do something, but without the tv testing screen. More like dev pool, simple, but working. Or just the HowTo page, .... Stay tuned, ...
|
|
|
|
So four of your miners happen to be carrying around their burst mining rigs and all somehow coincidently managed to end up at the same Ukranian internet cafe? You have to be fucking kidding me - right ?
The IP shows it belongs to wnet.ua To my knowledge, they have not moved UA to Ukraine ;-) |
|
|
|
H.
I get the feeling you do not like me, by attacking only me and somehow you are saying contradicting things, like:
No, I do not like you - as I said I consider you a cancer on the BurstCoin community. However, nothing I've said is contradictory, and I'll go after any other cancers like you. You claim that ALL Uray based pools have an error and do not pay out. Now you say, only my pool does not pay out.
Uray says the payout code is broken. I say only your pool fails to display claimed payouts. You say others do have a link, but I can confirm, that none has a working link. I removed mine too, to be equal.
Hmmmm - cryptomining.farm does. I didn't check any others, but seeing as one does - you're wrong/lying. Well, if I go to the smallest pool on your list
I really try hard to verify what you are saying, but fail. I might be to stupid, or to tired of carrying 4 tons of books during my moving.
It is therefore always good to have some debuggers, like you, who find things out, I never thought of, like that somebody uses multiple miners on the same IP. That was brilliant! Could it be that this is a public IP (Firewall)? and somebody is running a private network behind? Like an ISP? Or maybe it is an Internet cafe, that would explain the small amounts of mining.
So four of your miners happen to be carrying around their burst mining rigs and all somehow coincidently managed to end up at the same Ukranian internet cafe? You have to be fucking kidding me - right ? I'm so glad you appreciate people like me checking up on your pool. Now if only you would address all the problems found by people like me. Elmit - your pool is either accidently or deliberately stealing from your miners. Your "asset" is not paying out, or replying to investors. You're being sued for fraud. BTW Who do I contact to make sure this thread is included in your trial ? And no, there is no restriction to reply, ... you can reply as often you want, I just will not reply to all.
No help on who is the proper authority to report you to ? I tried from cryptomining.farm, just the first link: http://burst.cryptoport.io/tx/17338833804961871513 and ... Why do you not answer the question. Lets word it again for you, ... I typed it slow, maybe that helps: What does it mean, when the pool has a high balance? Why do Dev pool and cryptomining.farm have a high balance? Isn't that the earnings of the miners? Why they don't give it to them? What is Your opinion to this? Please stay once in a while focused to the question! |
|
|
|
I am sorry, I cannot help you with that. Did you check your blood pressure? lol |
|
|
|
|
H.
I get the feeling you do not like me, by attacking only me and somehow you are saying contradicting things, like:
You claim that ALL Uray based pools have an error and do not pay out. Now you say, only my pool does not pay out.
You say others do have a link, but I can confirm, that none has a working link. I removed mine too, to be equal.
I really try hard to verify what you are saying, but fail. I might be to stupid, or to tired of carrying 4 tons of books during my moving.
It is therefore always good to have some debuggers, like you, who find things out, I never thought of, like that somebody uses multiple miners on the same IP. That was brilliant! Could it be that this is a public IP (Firewall)? and somebody is running a private network behind? Like an ISP? Or maybe it is an Internet cafe, that would explain the small amounts of mining.
And no, there is no restriction to reply, ... you can reply as often you want, I just will not reply to all.
|
|
|
|
I got some questions regarding the numbers at http://burstcoin.eu/poolsPool Total Payouts Balance DevPool v2 303,427.70 Burst 490,668 Burst cryptoport.io US 6,258.00 Burst 25,952 Burst burst.ninja 282,005.05 Burst 22,057 Burst cryptomining.farm 188,800.73 Burst 254,103 Burst burstcoin.it 12,551.68 Burst 694 Burst tompool.org 19,634.51 Burst 0 Burst PooLTo.Be 19,413.62 Burst 0 Burst MiningHere.com 18,030.75 Burst 1 Burst Blago Pool 66,169.51 Burst 2 Burst .... If the pool gets close to zero, then my feeling says, that this could cause a possible missing payout. The pool might have missed to calculate the transaction fee and the pool fee. That could cause the pool having no Bursts to pay out. .... What is your opinion on that? My opinion: 1) I wonder if you're tring to justify your pool ripping off your miners. 2) I wonder how the pool with the second highest number of miners has the second lowest payout. If you have more miners than burst.ninja, but ninja is paying out 290K+ Burst/day, and you're paying out 18K/Day, with more miners - where is the rest of the Burst going? Your personal account ? You have 1000% the miners of burstcoin.it, but pay 150% Something is very wrong with your pool. But then, we've been telling you this for months and either 1) you're incompetent and you do nothing but continue to rip off your miners unintentionally, or 2) You're actively ripping off your miners and enriching yourself at their expense. 3) Nice move on disabling showing how much you paid out to your miners, it was a good attempt at hiding your thefts. Unfortunately, you didn't take into consideration that we can still look at the timestamps of payments to miners, and figure out who got paid, and who didn't. We can also look at how much you're paying out per payment cycle, and see that you're still only paying your miners (at worst) 2.5% of pool earnings to (at best) 66% of pool earnings, and keeping the rest. Those were my opinions and thoughts. H. I could not spot an answer to my question. Maybe you don't have one! 1. (You really should use a speeeel chega, lol) I am listening what you say and try to figure it out if there could be some problem. You can only fix, if you know about it, not if somebody claims about it. 2. Could it be that the miners with SMALL hard disks are coming to MinginHere and the ones with Large hard disks are going to the other pools? You are clever, I am sure you thought about this possibility, didn't you? I can only pay out what comes in, right? AND THAT is documented in the blockchain. What I am thinking about you, I do not reflect here. ;-) 3. I removed the link as promised, since other pools don't have it either! Don't bother to reply, leave other people a chance to. |
|
|
|
I got some questions regarding the numbers at http://burstcoin.eu/poolsPool Total Payouts Balance DevPool v2 303,427.70 Burst 490,668 Burst cryptoport.io US 6,258.00 Burst 25,952 Burst burst.ninja 282,005.05 Burst 22,057 Burst cryptomining.farm 188,800.73 Burst 254,103 Burst burstcoin.it 12,551.68 Burst 694 Burst tompool.org 19,634.51 Burst 0 Burst PooLTo.Be 19,413.62 Burst 0 Burst MiningHere.com 18,030.75 Burst 1 Burst Blago Pool 66,169.51 Burst 2 Burst As you can see, it mentions the total payout of that day, and the remaining balance. Whereby the total payout is static to that day and the Balance is updated. Pools payout a portion and keep a portion for the coming rounds, which results in the balance. For my feelings, the balance should never exceed the total payouts, assuming that you have always payouts. If the pool pays out 50% at the time a block was rewarded and 50% later, then the balance could be max 50% of the total payouts. If it is not paid out in the following rounds, then the miner might have been gone and would not get the other half. If the pool gets close to zero, then my feeling says, that this could cause a possible missing payout. The pool might have missed to calculate the transaction fee and the pool fee. That could cause the pool having no Bursts to pay out. As said, the balance is updated, that could change a little bit, but if the balance is constantly higher than the payout, then the pool is not paying their miners all they deserve. What is your opinion on that? |
|
|
|
PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.
Elmit, how about COMMUNICATING this ? Before it happens. I see, the 2.7 Petabyte assets bought for ~416k Burst (~165 USD on March 17th, ~124 USD today) are not that much, I'll get over it. But with all the fuss _you_ were making about that ByteEnterprise Asset this doesn't look proper. The stats pages you announced on https://burstforum.com/index.php?threads/petabyte.236/page-3 : http://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAccountTransactions.phphttp://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetAccounts.phphttp://home.elmit.biz/BURST/getAssetTransfers.phpdon't work. There is no transparency, I cannot check anything about your asset's performance. And if you spend time on this site to post a pool comparison and engage in, aehem, whatever that was, you could at least read and answer your Burst message inbox. I can not even communicate with you, you ignore me. Should I see myself as an investor, "business partner", client of yours ? Then I'm disappointed, up to the point where I want my 416k Burst back - sale offer is up, don't talk, act. I am sorry to disappoint you, but not only I had to move, I lost also my private home page, where this statistics have been on due a hard disk failure. I have also to re-program the entire accounting again. Fortunately I backed up my keys, so nothing got lost. I could also not login to many sites, including here. I do my best to get it up again soon. Regarding pool comparison, I am checking my - and other - pools all the time and and had really a good time to see that all is working fine. And I really learned a lot of the other assets, which I will most likely not follow. I learned about statistics, how to see it and how it is advertised, ... short a lots I learned. I see an investor also a business partner, but sure not as a client. You can sell your asset anytime to anybody you like. That is what the asset exchange page is for. There is no buy-back option, since also the shop does not give me this for the hard disks. |
|
|
|
SO, It seems that MiningHere is the ONLY pool right now offering a link to verify the latest transactions. Maybe it is time to remove it, to avoid attacks from you! ;-) lol
Elmit, one of the numerous things you've totally avoided explaining - why is it that on the best of your pools payouts, is it a maximum of 66% of the block reward? Is your pool fee set to 33% of earnings? Have a nice day! No reply to you and co as long the link is not working on other pools! |
|
|
|
Looking at his pools payouts vs burst.ninja who he loves to disparage/slander.....
Burst.Ninja Time up: 7 months. Payouts: 26.9M burst
Mininghere Time Up: 6 months. Payouts: 1.67M burst
Well, we mined on ninja and all the names it had before, but I got tired of hearing "it is down", so I setup MiningHere by myself. I mined with some friends (6) only for myself there for several months. I had no missing transaction, so I gave it a shot to let others mine as well. At the moment 262 people are actively mining there. Other pool say to that number "Miners responded". To get a new "inactive miner" is easy, just use the reward assignment to a new wallet, and you got more miners. Now, haitach and co attacks me of not paying out, but look at the blockchain, we do! We do have a link to transaction, a WORKING link. No other pool does!!! Maybe I miss that link to find there. I recommend to proof first with other pools that they pay out, before attacking me again. Otherwise I might also disable the link to be "equal". Elmit, hey - if you're going to slam me, please at least speel (sic) my nick right  H. A. I. T.C. H. I am just loving it!!! LOL, you make my day! And this was the last message I sent to you over on BurstForum, where 100% of the claimed latest payments were missing from the block chain, 20 hours after the claimed payments. You too can use your working link to the block explorer to verify - it's how I found you weren't paying out properly. And now we're at 100% of payments are missing - either massive incompetence, or flagrant theft. Which is it ? Recent Payments (None of which are on the blockchain) S3FP-PN5T-94Q7-DPGG4 14.24 06/04 20:21:07 MXY2-YN9Q-K5W9-8RXN6 19.94 06/04 20:20:58 (to shorten the post, nonsense deleted) I guess that explains how Elmit covers the cost of micro-transactions, just get one of your miners to pay them for you ....... As for "We do have a link to transaction, a WORKING link. No other pool does!!! Maybe I miss that link to find there. I recommend to proof first with other pools that they pay out, before attacking me again. Otherwise I might also disable the link to be "equal". Yes, the burst.ninja link is broken currently - it's being fixed, but the "cryptomining.farm" user links work fine. So, no, you're not the only pool with working links. The other curious thing is when you look at cryptomining's links you see payouts of hundreds of Burst per miner, that are on the blockchain; when you look at mininghere's you see payouts of of a few Burst (mostly) to a few hundred Burst (occasionally), that more often than not aren't on the blockchain. Elmit - fix your pool or shut it down. Let's do this: As long NINJA doesn't have the link up, it is better not to attack me! Maybe you recommend there also to shut down. - just a joke, we need a good tv testing screen! To your list, where did you get it? Any proof or do you randomly make up numbers? To your name, ... I must have thinking on headache when I wrote it. To cryptomining.farm, the link is not working, I just tried it: http://burst.cryptoport.io/tx/12210796179606387098SO, It seems that MiningHere is the ONLY pool right now offering a link to verify the latest transactions. Maybe it is time to remove it, to avoid attacks from you! ;-) lol |
|
|
|
PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.
Your pool payouts got lost, as you've been told over and over and refuse to address ..... riping off your miners is more profitable than fixing the problem I guess. Please give me the link of the payout of your pool you are using. thanks! I could not find hat link on ninja! |
|
|
|
PetaByte will payout in May, because I had to move, ...
Nothing get lost, just delayed.
Your pool payouts got lost, as you've been told over and over and refuse to address ..... riping off your miners is more profitable than fixing the problem I guess. Please give me the link of the payout of your pool you are using. thanks! |
|
|
|
Looking at his pools payouts vs burst.ninja who he loves to disparage/slander.....
Burst.Ninja Time up: 7 months. Payouts: 26.9M burst
Mininghere Time Up: 6 months. Payouts: 1.67M burst
Well, we mined on ninja and all the names it had before, but I got tired of hearing "it is down", so I setup MiningHere by myself. I mined with some friends (6) only for myself there for several months. I had no missing transaction, so I gave it a shot to let others mine as well. At the moment 262 people are actively mining there. Other pool say to that number "Miners responded". To get a new "inactive miner" is easy, just use the reward assignment to a new wallet, and you got more miners. Now, haitach and co attacks me of not paying out, but look at the blockchain, we do! We do have a link to transaction, a WORKING link. No other pool does!!! Maybe I miss that link to find there. I recommend to proof first with other pools that they pay out, before attacking me again. Otherwise I might also disable the link to be "equal". |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
