I s dev active?
Not anymore Really is he gone? Just read a few page back, he wrote about this |
|
|
|
I s dev active?
Not anymore |
|
|
|
|
This coin has no dev anymore, so it will probably sleep there until its delisted from bittrex or taken by another dev i guess... Ill check back in a few months i guess
|
|
|
|
For how long it was listed on Poloniex?
Not sure exactly but for years |
|
|
|
If instead of all the hyping and talking, BDC would have actually done some development Polo might have not delisted it.
(I am explicitly not referring to Clintar here)
Personally I think the decision to bail on the project now, shows perfectly that BDC talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk. Not even one step.
BDC, you suck. (No, Clintar, not you, you're allright by me.)
Well no more development anyway, he needed polo to have liquidity to buy alot of it!  (Lol yeah right) |
|
|
|
I bought 5 each of Gigabyte Gaming 580 8gb, Gigabyte Aorus 580 8gb, and Msi 580 Armor 8gb. The Armor cards are absolute junk and I'm sending them back. Modded one of each card and got both Giga versions up to 29mh/s stable, Msi would never go over 26mh/s but mostly stays at 24mh/s and the mod and/or changing core/clocks only makes things worse. TBH I'm thinking about sending all the cards back and waiting on Vega. If these cards had done ~30mh/s they would have almost paid for themselves by the time Vega releases. MSI Armors are going back for sure! Total garbage. Cheap construction, no backplates, just nothing good to say about them.
That's funny, I bought some of the MSI Armor RX580 8 GB as well and I am getting 30.5 Mh/s on each of them mining ETH while drawing about 105 watts/card measured from the wall, GPU-z shows 75-80W. May I ask how you modded them? I simply copied the 1:1750 strap to the 1:2000 and I am running 1125/2275 clocks with 0.900 core voltage. They work just as good as the RX480's, not any better but not really any worse either. I had modded the 2:1750 strap to the 2:2000. Reflashed orig vbios and redid the whole thing using 1:1750 to 1:2000, set -cvddc 900 in me .bat and the card is hashing dual at 30-31mh/s and 900+ dcr steady for about an hour now. What tool did you use to modify the straps, when i open the room with polaris editor 1.4 the strips have bad numbering (odd number), if i open it with SRBPolaris 2.5 it open and i can see the timings are 1:1750 (correct numbers) but my model is UNKNOWN and it gives me a warning, not sure if i should flash it if its unknown, even if i think its only that its a model that is not recognized. My card is a MSI 570 ARMOR OC 4GB Thanks |
|
|
|
Looking for cheap DCT? I'm selling some signature bounty stakes @ .0003btc/dct. You won't see it this cheap ever. PM me if interested.
This isn't an IOU, you're buying a bitcointalk.org forum account. You will claim the bounty stakes when they're distributed with said forum account.
Yeah thats a bargain! The ICO was 1BTC for 7500, so this means 0.00013 and thats when BTC was around 600$, so you're selling around x5... And those didn't cost you a single penny since they were given for putting down a signature |
|
|
|
Lokks like some controversy is afoot  I just don't understand, 98% of the coins out there aren't listed on polo, i even know coins that were in development for years and were on shitty exchange with mostly no volume at all. And they were still working on it. At some point i can understand that he needs to dump coins on the market to pay for his expanse somehow. But telling us that he can't continue to work on the coin since he can't buy alot of it anymore to take us for stupids... So are you talking about buying or dumping? you seem to be using those terms interchangeably but they are different things Ok well, im tired of your word play, this is getting nowhere... |
|
|
|
Lokks like some controversy is afoot I just don't understand, 98% of the coins out there aren't listed on polo, i even know coins that were in development for years and were on shitty exchange with mostly no volume at all. And they were still working on it. At some point i can understand that he needs to dump coins on the market to pay for his expanse somehow. But telling us that he can't continue to work on the coin since he can't buy alot of it anymore to take us for stupids... |
|
|
|
I'm glad you tried but in the end you need designers and coders that can actually do something. Talking and dreaming is fun but then it's back to reality in the end.
If there had of been some coding and real development that was evident to polo then perhaps it would not have been delisted. At the end of the day, I welcome these posts because they expose who people truly are. In this case, we learned that this person was not legitimate; a legitimate project must prove itself before it should be listed on a major exchange. This individual shows reverse thinking and possibly due to trading on the side. One point I mentioned in our post: As for Boolberry, we’ll see what happens – I remain highly skeptical of anything with it, even though Boolberry is sound from an economic and technical view (it lacks a visionary leader – which is unfortunate). But many people realize that if the project “dies” again, they could do what I just described. Also, they’re realizing they could do this with other cryptosphere projects too. And ultimately, this may lead to less crypto-spam, which benefits all of us. We all learned that blockologist wasn't the real deal - we can now ignore people associated with him and his future efforts. That's been a worthy lesson. As for XBB or BBR (whatever it is now), it's probably dead even with solid technical and economic fundamentals. Only a visionary leader who will see this through can resurrect this, but I highly doubt that will happen. the only thing that would prevent delisting at this point was the database improvement. the volume and growth was already apparent, a product of my involvement. I did some development, inspired some other contributors and paid some developers. I usually stayed silent so as not to influence the market and stuck with the bi-weekly updates for any material news, which occurred on a known frequency. I think that negates most of what you're saying. A more accurate description is saying Boolberry got delisted from Blockchain Development Company just like it got delisted from Poloniex: because it doesn't make business sense anymore. For Poloniex, the line in the sand was the RAM requirements, for my company its the lack of liquid market. Take the baton and run with it, because thats what I did. Some things worked and some things didn't. Business and revenues are up from this public project, its a pretty good story, from a perspective you're not considering. There is plenty of opportunity to make your boolberry holdings way more valuable than they are. So basicaly you're saying that you were dumping coins on the exchange to be able to do business with it... I still think that its the first time i see this in a coin. No, you're grasping at straws with that comment Then can you elaborate why you need a liquid exchange to operates? The majority of the donations came in the form of bitcoin and monero. So those weren't dumped on the Boolberry market to do business. Does that answer the question or was there another connotation I missed? Any Boolberry positions I controlled weren't used to cover costs, so they wouldn't be dumped to help my business operate Then why do you need a BBR/XBB market at all in order to develop the coin? I added more ^ And not being able to buy ALOT prevents you from developping the coin? I still don't follow you, can you elaborate more of how not being able to buy more coins prevent you from developing it? |
|
|
|
I'm glad you tried but in the end you need designers and coders that can actually do something. Talking and dreaming is fun but then it's back to reality in the end.
If there had of been some coding and real development that was evident to polo then perhaps it would not have been delisted. At the end of the day, I welcome these posts because they expose who people truly are. In this case, we learned that this person was not legitimate; a legitimate project must prove itself before it should be listed on a major exchange. This individual shows reverse thinking and possibly due to trading on the side. One point I mentioned in our post: As for Boolberry, we’ll see what happens – I remain highly skeptical of anything with it, even though Boolberry is sound from an economic and technical view (it lacks a visionary leader – which is unfortunate). But many people realize that if the project “dies” again, they could do what I just described. Also, they’re realizing they could do this with other cryptosphere projects too. And ultimately, this may lead to less crypto-spam, which benefits all of us. We all learned that blockologist wasn't the real deal - we can now ignore people associated with him and his future efforts. That's been a worthy lesson. As for XBB or BBR (whatever it is now), it's probably dead even with solid technical and economic fundamentals. Only a visionary leader who will see this through can resurrect this, but I highly doubt that will happen. the only thing that would prevent delisting at this point was the database improvement. the volume and growth was already apparent, a product of my involvement. I did some development, inspired some other contributors and paid some developers. I usually stayed silent so as not to influence the market and stuck with the bi-weekly updates for any material news, which occurred on a known frequency. I think that negates most of what you're saying. A more accurate description is saying Boolberry got delisted from Blockchain Development Company just like it got delisted from Poloniex: because it doesn't make business sense anymore. For Poloniex, the line in the sand was the RAM requirements, for my company its the lack of liquid market. Take the baton and run with it, because thats what I did. Some things worked and some things didn't. Business and revenues are up from this public project, its a pretty good story, from a perspective you're not considering. There is plenty of opportunity to make your boolberry holdings way more valuable than they are. So basicaly you're saying that you were dumping coins on the exchange to be able to do business with it... I still think that its the first time i see this in a coin. No, you're grasping at straws with that comment Then can you elaborate why you need a liquid exchange to operates? The majority of the donations came in the form of bitcoin and monero. So those weren't dumped on the Boolberry market to do business. Does that answer the question or was there another connotation I missed? Any Boolberry positions I controlled weren't used to cover costs, so they wouldn't be dumped to help my business operate Then why do you need a BBR/XBB market at all in order to develop the coin? |
|
|
|
I'm glad you tried but in the end you need designers and coders that can actually do something. Talking and dreaming is fun but then it's back to reality in the end.
If there had of been some coding and real development that was evident to polo then perhaps it would not have been delisted. At the end of the day, I welcome these posts because they expose who people truly are. In this case, we learned that this person was not legitimate; a legitimate project must prove itself before it should be listed on a major exchange. This individual shows reverse thinking and possibly due to trading on the side. One point I mentioned in our post: As for Boolberry, we’ll see what happens – I remain highly skeptical of anything with it, even though Boolberry is sound from an economic and technical view (it lacks a visionary leader – which is unfortunate). But many people realize that if the project “dies” again, they could do what I just described. Also, they’re realizing they could do this with other cryptosphere projects too. And ultimately, this may lead to less crypto-spam, which benefits all of us. We all learned that blockologist wasn't the real deal - we can now ignore people associated with him and his future efforts. That's been a worthy lesson. As for XBB or BBR (whatever it is now), it's probably dead even with solid technical and economic fundamentals. Only a visionary leader who will see this through can resurrect this, but I highly doubt that will happen. the only thing that would prevent delisting at this point was the database improvement. the volume and growth was already apparent, a product of my involvement. I did some development, inspired some other contributors and paid some developers. I usually stayed silent so as not to influence the market and stuck with the bi-weekly updates for any material news, which occurred on a known frequency. I think that negates most of what you're saying. A more accurate description is saying Boolberry got delisted from Blockchain Development Company just like it got delisted from Poloniex: because it doesn't make business sense anymore. For Poloniex, the line in the sand was the RAM requirements, for my company its the lack of liquid market. Take the baton and run with it, because thats what I did. Some things worked and some things didn't. Business and revenues are up from this public project, its a pretty good story, from a perspective you're not considering. There is plenty of opportunity to make your boolberry holdings way more valuable than they are. So basicaly you're saying that you were dumping coins on the exchange to be able to do business with it... I still think that its the first time i see this in a coin. No, you're grasping at straws with that comment Then can you elaborate why you need a liquid exchange to operates? |
|
|
|
I'm glad you tried but in the end you need designers and coders that can actually do something. Talking and dreaming is fun but then it's back to reality in the end.
If there had of been some coding and real development that was evident to polo then perhaps it would not have been delisted. At the end of the day, I welcome these posts because they expose who people truly are. In this case, we learned that this person was not legitimate; a legitimate project must prove itself before it should be listed on a major exchange. This individual shows reverse thinking and possibly due to trading on the side. One point I mentioned in our post: As for Boolberry, we’ll see what happens – I remain highly skeptical of anything with it, even though Boolberry is sound from an economic and technical view (it lacks a visionary leader – which is unfortunate). But many people realize that if the project “dies” again, they could do what I just described. Also, they’re realizing they could do this with other cryptosphere projects too. And ultimately, this may lead to less crypto-spam, which benefits all of us. We all learned that blockologist wasn't the real deal - we can now ignore people associated with him and his future efforts. That's been a worthy lesson. As for XBB or BBR (whatever it is now), it's probably dead even with solid technical and economic fundamentals. Only a visionary leader who will see this through can resurrect this, but I highly doubt that will happen. the only thing that would prevent delisting at this point was the database improvement. the volume and growth was already apparent, a product of my involvement. I did some development, inspired some other contributors and paid some developers. I usually stayed silent so as not to influence the market and stuck with the bi-weekly updates for any material news, which occurred on a known frequency. I think that negates most of what you're saying. A more accurate description is saying Boolberry got delisted from Blockchain Development Company just like it got delisted from Poloniex: because it doesn't make business sense anymore. For Poloniex, the line in the sand was the RAM requirements, for my company its the lack of liquid market. Take the baton and run with it, because thats what I did. Some things worked and some things didn't. Business and revenues are up from this public project, its a pretty good story, from a perspective you're not considering. There is plenty of opportunity to make your boolberry holdings way more valuable than they are. So basicaly you're saying that you were dumping coins on the exchange to be able to do business with it... I still think that its the first time i see this in a coin. |
|
|
|
Did you publicly burn the 15million coins? The answer to this will determine the success of this project
35M were burnt of the 50M. he still have 15M i think, well i haven't found them in the explorer, but until proof he still have them... |
|
|
|
Ever bother looking at the market? You drama queens with your new accounts can move on now!
Once this two sided shitstorm clears maybe some devs will stepup and do this coin justice.
In the meanwhile I will sit on my stash and continue to mine.
I rarely post in discussion forums but your all so fake and conceded this has been an interesting read, Stephen King has now officially lost his spot as my favorite science fiction writer!
You know its more profitable to mine ETH or mostly anything else and to buy BBR right? |
|
|
|
Is it dead?  Yup dev quit, will probably be delisted from bittrex too, volume is too low and no dev If it's dead, why would someone set ~7 BTC buy order at trex? or 9 BTC at polo? Well for midterm its mostly dead, unless CZ or clintar release something but this is mostly based on hope. And i never said that this couldn't be traded. It will simply fade over time and maybe later another dev will pick this up... |
|
|
|
Is it dead? Yup dev quit, will probably be delisted from bittrex too, volume is too low and no dev |
|
|
|
|
Any of you guys, can a 4k PSU (30x6pins) take 21 gpus? (3 rigs of 7 GPUs)?
7x6pins for the GPUs, risers have a 6 pins splitters so they need 3.5 (4x6pins) and the PICO adapter 1x6pins, this makes 12 6pins for a rig, so 36 for the whole setup, 6x6pins over...
Am i right?
|
|
|
|
Was out of town for a few days. Replying to PM's and sending out tracking #'s for outstanding orders as quickly as I can. Thank you everyone for your patience.
Packages are currently on hold as I mentioned, I am waiting for more splitter cables.
You'll need a website and a partner soon, your business is taking off! Glad you're back! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
