~
...
As I already told, i am not from their team...
... all the team members could be easily found in telegram chat...
... just personal support, because i have account here...
...
You are answering on behalf of the team. None of the team members have this project listed on their profile. We dont need to look for them on telegram, you love them so much, you can always send them a message. You created your account here to support and promote them. We will continue to post on the thread that you created for them. Your account was created: Date Registered: October 03, 2018, 07:01:27 AM and your first post was about them: I know this platform, have some their tokens - I think the the price must be growing after some small investors will sell all their BITS and the cost will stop to fall. As there is always a lot of buyers who sell all the coins in first minutes and do not wait for the price grow at all (as for me, it is a good time to buy their coins sooooo cheap  ) - so they provoke the small cost, what is actually a good time for other investors to buy $$$$$$BITS$$$$ |
|
|
|
Website is new. They don't have a team listed on the website, not even a whitepaper (just a light paper for now) and they are asking investors to help them raise 100BTC.  https://domainbigdata.com/ichiba.io |
|
|
|
on MY website? I am not from their team, I am a supporter of both projects...
When i saw such reaction on my supporting post, I asked SOZ team for a comment of this "plagiarizm case" which is hard to call so (on my opinion) if the material is made by the same team, no?
...
In this case " their website". How do we know that their whitepaper was made by the same team? we dont have a crystal ball. And again: THERE IS NOTHING about Bitcoinus on their website and whitepaper. ~ ... (when i joined bounty and checked their telegram, i saw their client support admin is working on Bitcoinus team, so a connection was obvious for me) ~ .... I just made supporting post as my way to start discussion about new project i support (this platform is for free crypto discussions, right?) and do not represent here any team/members, only myself, so if you need any additional information you should ask their team, i know only what i see and what i get on my questions  As you stated - you are a supporter and joined their bounty - supporters and bounty participants want to see the project grow, but sometimes they develop some type of tunnel vision. Did they offer you tokens/coins to open that ANN for them? How much? Where is their official thread in this forum? They don't have one? Why not? Yes this forum is for crypto discussions, and you opened a thread for them to discuss their crypto. We posted our comments in there with our findings, which you come here and post your comment (below) acting as team member. So yeah, their whitepaper is definitely fail, but before telling about scam don't you think you should check much longer than 1 minute on website?  It appears that you didn't spend 30 seconds on their website. Where is the team there? links to a team profile? Links to their other project Bitcoinus? ~
...
But as project just started, as we can see - so they must learn the mistakes and do their best...
Sometimes the best way to cure a disease is at earlier stage. |
|
|
|
|
Hello
Where can we read information about the team behind this project? Please provide links.
When are you releasing a full whitepaper?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Question to a person creating topic: you checked their whitepaper, but haven't checked the socials to see that they have the some members working in both platforms? Great work, dude As Secrets of Zurich told in their telegram "Secrets of Zurich is the side development project of Bitcoinus team with another development orientation on individuals" - what is also obvious if to check LinkedIn and see that one of Bitcoinus developers officially wrote that he is working in Secrets of Zurich project. So yeah, their whitepaper is definitely fail, but before telling about scam don't you think you should check much longer than 1 minute on website? Are you saying that plagiarizing they whitepaper is not enough evidence to be convinced that the team are not legit, what else will be on the social as you said that can serve as an alternative to a plagiarized whitepaper. To me the project is not legit and members of the community need to be warned about that. I am saying that it is not plagiarism because, if i am not mistaken, to copy yourself is not plagiarism. I pretty believe Bitcoinus team, that's why i don't see why i shouldn't trust the project made by their developers. COPY and PASTE yourself is ok. BUT you are copying another project - different name - doesnt matter if the team is the same (which you didnt provided evidence). is Bitcoinus an ICO Factory where they can copy and paste and reproduce hundreds of ICO per day? NO they are not and such a thing are not acceptable. Each project is individual and should have their own whitepaper and free of plagiarism. Also, there is no disclaimer on whitepaper or website about their association. |
|
|
|
Question to a person creating topic: you checked their whitepaper, but haven't checked the socials to see that they have the some members working in both platforms? Great work, dude As Secrets of Zurich told in their telegram "Secrets of Zurich is the side development project of Bitcoinus team with another development orientation on individuals" - what is also obvious if to check LinkedIn and see that one of Bitcoinus developers officially wrote that he is working in Secrets of Zurich project. So yeah, their whitepaper is definitely fail, but before telling about scam don't you think you should check much longer than 1 minute on website? First - Where is the team on https://www.soz.fund ? There is NO team listed on your website. How long do you think it took us checking your whitepaper? We can guarantee you that was more than 1 minute. Maybe you should spend at least 30 seconds looking for a link to the "team members"   If you want transparency, show it/make it, don't expect investors to go to social media asking questions about a team that doesn't exist on the website. ANd there is nothing about Bitcoinus on SOZ.fund website either. You only have a plagiarized whitepaper there, and that is more than enough to make investors walk away. Now you will live with the consequences. |
|
|
|
You should check information before writing You spend time to find the problems with whitepaper (what they must do better, not just copy from one project to another), but you haven't check their socials to see the same team working on both projects? seriously? You just copied and paste and create another project? doesnt work this way. |
|
|
|
~
...
ok. understood.
we already change unders construction the web. thanks
we will do
best regards
Your page still visible to everyone, and now there is a new set of a team. 
You should remove your website from public viewers until it is completed. edited - They did! Updated: 13/03/2019 Under construction  |
|
|
|
What happened: FAKE TEAM/EXPERTS - Using stock images
Scam accusation was made on March 11, 2019, 11:27:28 PM and you update your thread on March 11, 2019, 12:27:59 PM. Almost after 1 hour of thread creation. Is this coincidence? I don't think so. Dear Community. we bought our domain for Litenode Site: http:/litenode.eu
We are developing it. thanks for belive in us. Go UP miners!!! After posting the accusation of a fake team, we saw that there is a disclaimer on their thread about being under construction - which was at 12:27:59(noon). We don't want to accuse a project of a scam or give a red trust, except if they are really a scam/scammer. We noticed the FAKE TEAM - which were obvious but (1 hour later) we realized they website has " Lorem Ipsum" all over the place - which can be a sign of undeveloped/incomplete. And we edited and posted that message on top of the tread (*** THIS IS NOT A SCAM ACCUSATION YET***). And we left this thread open for their explanation. Today those stock images are gone, but there are other images that doesn't look like a stock image, and people can easily mistake them by real developers. (or are they their developers?) Usually " under construction" stay under construction and not public to viewers.   |
|
|
|
More evidence:
|
|
|
|
I like that you mark this: *** THIS IS NOT A SCAM ACCUSATION YET***
please take note that we will update the website and you could review in some time.
thanks
If the website is under construction - put it under construction - means: No public have access. Once you updated your website with your images of your real team let us know. If anyone gives you a red trust, ask them to consider. |
|
|
|
Our SITE is under development but Our site profiles are updated http://litenode.eu/about/Check us and contact if needed to be than we are really us. Do you realize that you got busted for using a fake team? How can you just update it and think that now everything is fine? Party over on this one. New account for a new scam needed... We are updating our site, in my case before make a scam accusation i like look for info about: project, see discord, lookfor team...you dont make nothing about this..only shoot and disconect your actitude seems not very profesional. it is not a scam accusation as you can check the thread. It is a fake team accusation - as you have stock images on your website. If you your website is under construction, put it under construction - means no public has access until completed. If you got any red trust, ask the person that gave a red trust to you to consider. Once you update your team and website let us know. |
|
|
|
After you reminded him of his old project, he went back and made a post.
~
I will rebuild the website and reconnect with you all.
Very unprofessional and suspicious at the same time. |
|
|
|
So, you abandoned this project and created a new one. And someone had to remind you....That's no good. Hello, Do you have a whitepaper? We saw there is only 1 person on your team ( https://github.com/kiyototomioka) and this person appears to be new at this. You are asking for investors, so please provide a link to your whitepaper. Thanks. ANd you haven't answered our questions. |
|
|
|
Hello
Do you a team and a whitepaper? Can you provide links? Thanks.
Hello ICOEthics, We have not got a whitepaper as we do not see the need for one. Litecoin never had a whitepaper for the same reason we don’t. if we are required for any reason to produce one we will produce one. That is old days, past, history, where investors used to trust on projects without a team and whitepaper. Nowadays investors want to see a team and the idea/purpose of the project written on a paper. Without that, the only thing most investors will see it as a possible scam. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
