Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 03:48:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
521  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: CoinAd - Free Coins every hour on: March 06, 2013, 10:35:49 AM
This dedicated server is so fast!
522  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Free Bitcoin Sites *and* Free Newbie Lotto on: March 05, 2013, 09:08:52 PM
Free litecoins, sweet.

Winner of today's draw: #57 sanderth

Unfortunately he didn't read this part, below, of the lotto description/rules, and so didn't get much from these sites:

"Make sure to submit an address that you will not be using in your own daily check of these sites or else it may be rejected by
many of these sites."


What is this trolling about?     Undecided


Yeah, I'm also getting a lot of these posts.
523  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What happened to coinad.com yesterday? on: March 05, 2013, 02:52:16 PM
Coinad was a good clone of dailybitcoins and the pay per chat idea really put them over the top - it was great.

Unfortunately, it looks like it may be gone for good: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=66851.msg1582395#msg1582395
That was only a minor rage quit caused by a huge load of work.
524  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: CoinAd - Free Coins every hour on: March 05, 2013, 02:46:40 PM
Is this forum full of bots or something?

They are old accounts making their posts to get out of newbie land to go get their 35,000 ripples.  If you check the post above yours you'll see the account was created back in 2011.  So not really bots, but not serious posters.  Sorry about Coinad, was really enjoying it.
CoinAd will return bigger and better.
525  Other / Archival / Re: Web Developer needed. on: March 05, 2013, 02:44:34 PM
Am I too low? When I work I always go cheap.

I could do it for under 2 BTC. PM Me what you need


Hi,

at the moment its easiest to keep the request simple and discuss over PM etc. i am looking for someone well versed in PHP/SQL/JS and with prior experience of using bitcoind to code a simple game/user account system and chat along with other small features.

This quote is not even slightly realistic, viewers please ignore this it will not be accepted.
<?phps
   echos 'tupid;
php?>
526  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Kim Dotcom wants to create a Bitcoin credit card, would you want a Megacard? on: March 05, 2013, 09:25:27 AM
Bitcoin going mainstream.
527  Economy / Speculation / Re: JESUS are we going to hit $50 today? on: March 05, 2013, 09:24:28 AM
JESUS says yes.
528  Economy / Services / Re: [CoinURL] All ways to monetize your content! [LOW BIDS! Advertise CHEAP!!] on: March 04, 2013, 09:32:22 AM
Now getting over 800,000 impressions per day on banners alone!
And I represent over 10% of that  Grin
529  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Most Expensive Thing You Bought With Bitcoin? on: March 03, 2013, 04:38:46 PM
Nexus 4 -> 16.4 BTC (~$500)
530  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Where do I get free Bitcoins? on: March 01, 2013, 10:52:26 AM
50% chance of getting 0.01 mBTC when chatting here: https://coinad.com/?m=chat *

* subject to change or removal
531  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Free Bitcoin Sites *and* Free Newbie Lotto on: March 01, 2013, 10:52:10 AM
50% chance of getting 0.01 mBTC when chatting here: https://coinad.com/?m=chat *

* subject to change or removal
532  Economy / Services / Re: [CoinURL] All ways to monetize your content! [LOW BIDS! Advertise CHEAP!!] on: March 01, 2013, 09:34:51 AM
Why don't you remove the link shortening thing?
It's only used for crap, earnings are extremely low and it completely kills the server.

Remove that, save a lot of money in a cheaper server, hire some designer, remove the 25% fee... Profit for everyone!
533  Economy / Gambling / Re: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts on: March 01, 2013, 09:12:47 AM
What happened with my account? "CoinAd"
Where are my referrals?


EDIT: Visual glitch.
534  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer Trade Fortress on: February 28, 2013, 05:03:15 PM
I really don't see why people are saying MoneyPakTrader is the scammer and not TF.
I saw the code, half it's functions were not working, the structure looks like it was made by a 14 year old with 2 months experience.

IMHO, the job that MoneyPakTrader paid for was not delivered in time nor completed, so he deserves at-least a partial refund.

Did he or you agree on pay to fix the supposed mess that was made? If so, did you quote a cheaper price? Without actually seeing it we can't honestly know if it's good or bad. TF claims it was working when sent and now doesn't work. Did you or anyone change it in any way?
I'm the programmer that's working to "fix" (pretty much a complete rewrite) the code.
I asked for 16 BTC, when I started I didn't knew who was the first programmer (TF), only when I saw it on my "Show unread posts since last visit." list.

When the script was delivered to me, some of the features weren't working, I didn't change the code before the tests.

He has terrible programming techniques.

"Terrible Programming Techniques" still doesn't always mean it won't work as intended. Just because you are more efficient doesn't invalidate someone's work. I learned that long ago when I first started HTTP.
Thanks for the reply.
This applies: "When the script was delivered to me, some of the features weren't working"
535  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer Trade Fortress on: February 28, 2013, 04:49:37 PM
I really don't see why people are saying MoneyPakTrader is the scammer and not TF.
I saw the code, half it's functions were not working, the structure looks like it was made by a 14 year old with 2 months experience.

IMHO, the job that MoneyPakTrader paid for was not delivered in time nor completed, so he deserves at-least a partial refund.

Did he or you agree on pay to fix the supposed mess that was made? If so, did you quote a cheaper price? Without actually seeing it we can't honestly know if it's good or bad. TF claims it was working when sent and now doesn't work. Did you or anyone change it in any way?
I'm the programmer that's working to "fix" (pretty much a complete rewrite) the code.
I asked for 16 BTC, when I started I didn't knew who was the first programmer (TF), only when I saw it on my "Show unread posts since last visit." list.

When the script was delivered to me, some of the features weren't working, I didn't change the code before the tests.

He has terrible programming techniques.
536  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Google Nexus 4 (UK/EU) on: February 28, 2013, 03:14:21 PM
Purchased a 8GB phone from him and used John (Johnthedong)'s escrow service.
I'll come back here when it arrives to my door Wink
537  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: February 28, 2013, 10:10:45 AM
rE9hpRfFFqWGxpGYA8bC6GkroRCr4mLLcq


Thank you  Wink
538  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mt. Gox hits all-time Bitcoin high on: February 28, 2013, 10:07:59 AM
Awesome!  Grin
539  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Blockchain.info - Bitcoin Block explorer & Currency Statistics on: February 28, 2013, 09:09:33 AM
I'm having problems using sendmany -> https://blockchain.info/api/json_rpc_api.

Nvm, I had insufficient funds.
540  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scammer Trade Fortress on: February 28, 2013, 08:49:18 AM
I really don't see why people are saying MoneyPakTrader is the scammer and not TF.
I saw the code, half it's functions were not working, the structure looks like it was made by a 14 year old with 2 months experience.

IMHO, the job that MoneyPakTrader paid for was not delivered in time nor completed, so he deserves at-least a partial refund.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!