|
I can step up as the interim CEO, but would Avalon re-route the order? It's under Ian Bakewell's name, and this is a unincorporated company.
I don't hold any shares in BAKEWELL, but he does owe me around 100 BTC (not counting interest), and has borrowed a lot of coins and shares from other people.
|
|
|
|
|
Which is why loaning to you most likely won't result in a payback.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone want to order me a pizza for 10,000 satoshi?
|
|
|
|
|
Try double spending the coins with a higher transaction fee.
I was going to say happy to lend it to you if you could resend the inputs to my address, but then I realized why not just send it again to btcjam?
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid coinbr manual deposits...
|
|
|
|
|
There's a silk road forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Pay 15.5 BTC to znort987.
(Or maybe ask him to forgive it / work out something else)
|
|
|
|
I'd think so. Afterall isn't blockchained associated with SatoshiDice? Just use their inbuilt ability to gamble with SatoshiDice lol
They might have stopped their partnership though? Havn't checked.
Blockchain.info My Wallet works with every single bitcoin service, because it is not a shared wallet. "Blockchain.info is not affiliated with satoshidice.com." |
|
|
|
|
You *could* just redeem the 5 BTC if you want.
|
|
|
|
|
PM me if you'd like to buy.
|
|
|
|
'cause I can like myself a strongly pseudonymous, online wallet that is sufficiently feature-rich...So come on, AMAZE ME.
I guess you didn't want a secure online wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Unless I'm the only person that has my private keys, and all signing is done on my computer, you are a fucking dumbass if you use this wallet because you will lose "your" coins.
You just admitted that nothing is 100% safe. Besides, do some reading.. the chrome extension for Blockchain.info is quite secure. Not bulletproof of course, but a hundred orders of magnitudes better than your current setup with is "send me coins".
Here is what WILL happen (guaranteed):
1. Operator goes AWOL, with no renewals server goes down
2. Operator disappears along with the coins in the wallet. Possibly a "hack" explanation.
3. Site actually gets hacked by someone else, you lose some or all of your coins
Don't store private keys on server.
If you don't have the private key, you don't own the bitcoins. Period.
Sorry if I'm a bit harsh, but this will end up with people losing their bitcoins to a hacker, to you, or to /dev/null.
Especially considering how the operator was registered a couple of days ago, he most likely saw how instawallet could have stole 10 million USD and wanted to scam others.
|
|
|
|
This whole 51% attack fear seems way overblown to me though. In order for one to succeed would you not need to convince someone to accept a zero-confirmations transaction, seconds after the attack was made? And then, run out of there like a bat out of hell?
No. A majority attack allows the attacker to recover his coins that were sent out and confirmed by multiple blocks. But it needs also luck. 51% of hashrate is not enough to succesfully create longer blockchain. Over a long enough period of time it will. It's like playing in a casino game with positive EV. Sure, with variance sometimes you might lose, but over time you will win more. |
|
|
|
|
Auction ends April 10, 2013, 23:59 UTC.
I bid 31.7 BTC for roll 1.
|
|
|
|
Well, the downside of p2pool mining is that your payouts come frequent and small, so you're trying to send a transaction with a lot of dusty inputs to make up that amount.
That makes your transaction take up more space, and pushes your fee up.
-- Smoov
Hmmm that makes sense. But as far as I know, LTC transactions aren't even close to the blocksize limit, so sending it without fee should get it confirmed as well, even if it takes slightly longer. Hell, I'm a miner myself, so naturally I should be able to just include my transaction in a block, even tough there's no fee attached to it. Is there any way to do just that? Maybe via a raw tx? I never used that function before though, not even sure if that's possible with LTC, but I've heard of people using it with BTC. Look into transaction fees. Yes, you can send a TX without fees. Has to be high priority enough. Sending a TX without fees is not a good idea on bitcoin now, even if the client accepts it, btw. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
